19/12/2025
Kenyan Singapore dream, a sneak preview.
As Kenya pursues the “Singapore dream” articulated by the President, an honest assessment of global development experiences is necessary to determine whether this ambition is achievable and, more importantly, what it will take to realise it. Countries such as Japan, Singapore, and Malaysia did not become developed economies by chance; their transformation was the result of deliberate policy choices, disciplined leadership, institutional strength, and sustained investment in people and productive sectors over decades. Comparing their paths with Kenya’s current development trajectory reveals both encouraging parallels and critical gaps that must be addressed.
Japan’s rise to a first-world economy, particularly after the devastation of World War II, was anchored in strategic industrial policy, export-led growth, and relentless focus on productivity. The Japanese government worked closely with the private sector to identify priority industries, protect and nurture them in their early stages, and gradually expose them to global competition. Heavy investment in education, technical skills, and infrastructure ensured a highly productive workforce capable of producing high-value manufactured goods for international markets. Most importantly, Japan maintained policy consistency and institutional discipline, allowing long-term plans to mature without disruption from political cycles.
Singapore’s transformation offers perhaps the most cited model for developing nations. With no natural resources and a small domestic market, Singapore focused on good governance, rule of law, and openness to global trade and investment. Its leadership prioritized meritocracy, efficiency, and zero tolerance for corruption, creating a predictable environment that attracted multinational corporations. The state invested heavily in human capital, urban planning, public housing, and infrastructure while maintaining fiscal discipline. Development was not left to chance; it was meticulously planned and executed with long-term national interest overriding short-term political considerations.
Malaysia’s journey, though less dramatic, provides equally relevant lessons for Kenya. Through deliberate industrialisation policies, diversification away from agriculture, and attraction of foreign direct investment, Malaysia built a strong manufacturing base, particularly in electronics and energy. Policies such as the “Look East” initiative sought to instil productivity, discipline, and industrial skills by learning from Japan and South Korea. While Malaysia faced its own governance and inequality challenges, policy continuity and investment in infrastructure and education enabled steady economic upgrading.
Kenya’s development blueprint, Vision 2030, shares many similarities with these success stories. It envisions a globally competitive, industrialising, middle-income country supported by strong economic, social, and political pillars. The country has made notable progress in infrastructure development, financial inclusion, digital innovation, and regional trade integration. However, the gap between vision and ex*****on remains significant. Manufacturing still contributes a relatively small share to GDP, exports remain dominated by low-value primary products, and policy inconsistency continues to undermine investor confidence.
Unlike Japan, Singapore, and Malaysia, Kenya struggles with weak institutional enforcement, pervasive corruption, and frequent policy shifts driven by political transitions. Long-term development plans are often diluted or abandoned before yielding results. While education access has expanded, skills mismatch and low productivity persist, limiting the country’s ability to compete in high-value industries. Furthermore, public resources are often diverted from productive investment toward consumption and politically motivated projects, undermining fiscal sustainability.
For Kenya to achieve its version of the “Singapore dream,” it must internalise—not imitate—the principles that drove these countries’ success. Strong governance, accountability, and rule of law must cease being slogans and become lived realities. Industrialisation should move from rhetoric to action, with clear sector prioritisation, export orientation, and support for value addition. Human capital development must focus not just on access to education, but on relevance, skills, innovation, and productivity. Above all, Kenya must commit to policy stability and institutional continuity that transcends electoral cycles.
The “Singapore dream” is not unattainable, but it cannot be realised through declarations alone. Development is a long, disciplined process requiring sacrifice, coherence, and collective commitment. Kenya’s opportunity lies not in copying Singapore or Japan wholesale, but in applying their core lessons within its own context. If governance improves, institutions are strengthened, and development planning is executed with integrity and consistency, Kenya can chart a sustainable path toward prosperity—one defined not by aspiration alone, but by measurable and lasting outcomes.
Where smart connections power progress. A business entailed with linking up individuals, machines and technology with one another.
