http://en.freshnewsasia.com/, https://freshnews.com.kh/

Fresh News English, #9d, Street 598. Sangkat Chrang Chomres 2, Phnom Penh (2026)

15/09/2026

ទូរទស្សន៍ Fresh News ផ្សាយបន្តផ្ទាល់៖ កិច្ចប្រជុំលើកដំបូងរបស់គណៈកម្មការផ្សះផ្សាក្រោមអនុសញ្ញាអង្គការសហប្រជាជាតិស្តីពីនីតិសមុទ្រ (UNCLOS) រវាងកម្ពុជា និងថៃ ប្រព្រឹត្តទៅពីថ្ងៃទី១៤-១៦ ខែកញ្ញា ឆ្នាំ២០២៦ នៅប្រទេសសិង្ហបុរី

14/09/2026

The Closed-Door meeting of the Conciliation Commission under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) between Cambodia and Thailand, chaired by Katrina Cooper, Chairperson of the Conciliation Commission, concluded this afternoon, 14 September 2026, in Singapore.

Cambodian Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn, in his capacity as Agent, led the Cambodian delegation. The Thai delegation was led by Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow, in his capacity as Agent for Thailand.

The Opening Statements will be delivered on Tuesday, 15 September 2026, at 8:00 a.m. Cambodia Time (9:00 a.m. Singapore Time) which will be open to the public and webcast live in Khmer, English, and Thai, as well as on TVK.

Link to webcast
Khmer: https://vimeo.com/event/6170789?fl=so&fe=fs

English: https://vimeo.com/event/6170783?fl=so&fe=fs

Thai: https://vimeo.com/event/6170812?fl=so&fe=fs

14/09/2026

KB PRASAC Bank and Cambodia Tourism Board Sign MoU to Support “Dare to Stay” and Promote a Modern Cambodia to the World

(Phnom Penh): KB PRASAC Bank and the Cambodia Tourism Board (CTB) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen cooperation and support the “Dare to Stay” strategic micro drama project, an innovative initiative designed to showcase Cambodia as a modern, safe, connected, vibrant, and scenic destination to audiences in Cambodia and around the world.

Under the cooperation, KB PRASAC Bank will participate as a Pride Partner of “Dare to Stay,” a 50-episode micro drama developed by CTB and OMG Studios (Oceanus Media Global). The project uses an engaging Korean-Khmer love story to introduce audiences to Cambodia's contemporary lifestyle, digital connectivity, modern infrastructure, hospitality, and diverse destinations.

The signing ceremony marks KB PRASAC Bank's commitment to supporting initiatives that contribute to Cambodia's tourism development and strengthen the country's image among domestic and international audiences.

Speaking at the ceremony, Ry Vanna, President & CEO of KB PRASAC Bank said, “KB PRASAC Bank is proud to be a Pride Partner of ‘Dare to Stay.’ This is more than a micro drama; it is a creative way to tell the story of a modern, vibrant, connected, and confident Cambodia to the world. As a leading commercial bank, we believe we have a role to play in supporting Cambodia's economic development and the businesses and communities that contribute to our country's growth.”

He added, “Through this partnership, we look forward to working closely with the Cambodia Tourism Board and its ecosystem of tourism-related partners. We are also pleased to have opportunities to promote KB PRASAC Bank and our banking services through CTB's communication channels, while creating meaningful connections with businesses across the tourism ecosystem.”

Kim Minea, CEO of the Cambodia Tourism Board said, “We would like to express our sincere thanks to KB PRASAC Bank for joining us in showcasing Cambodia to the world. At CTB, we have a big ambition: to tell Cambodia’s story more clearly and confidently to the world. We cannot do this alone. We need strong private-sector partners who understand that tourism is a powerful driver of Cambodia’s economy, supporting businesses, creating jobs and bringing greater opportunities to our people.”

“Cambodia has a lot of amazing stories to tell. We have our rich culture and heritage, beautiful nature, coastlines and islands, as well as Phnom Penh and other cities that reflect a young, energetic and increasingly modern Cambodia. We are also becoming more digital, with more convenient banking systems and greater connectivity making it easier for visitors to experience the country. This creative micro-drama format is a powerful tool that goes beyond traditional storytelling. It can draw people into a story, help them connect with the characters, spark curiosity about the places they see, and inspire them to discover those destinations for themselves.”

The partnership will also enable KB PRASAC Bank to engage with businesses and partners within the Cambodia Tourism ecosystem, creating opportunities to explore collaboration and provide relevant financial and digital banking solutions to tourism-related businesses.

“Dare to Stay” is designed to reach audiences through popular short-form digital platforms, including TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts, with the initial launch focused on Cambodia before expanding its reach to South Korea, Southeast Asia, Indonesia, and other international audiences.

For KB PRASAC Bank, the project also provides an opportunity to naturally showcase the role of digital banking, cashless payments and financial technology in modern Cambodian life, reflecting the Bank's commitment to supporting Cambodia's digital economy.

The MoU represents another step in KB PRASAC Bank's commitment to contributing to Cambodia's economic and social development through partnerships that connect businesses, communities and opportunities.

Through this collaboration, KB PRASAC Bank and the Cambodia Tourism Board look forward to supporting the success of “Dare to Stay” and collectively sharing a positive and contemporary story of Cambodia with audiences at home and abroad.
=FRESH NEWS

14/09/2026

Fresh Exclusive / Analysis: Trump Dismisses AI Fears: Should America Slow Down or Keep Racing China?

(Phnom Penh): Two competing views are emerging over the future of artificial intelligence. One side fears that AI is advancing so rapidly that it could eventually become increasingly difficult for humans to control. The other worries that slowing AI development could cost the United States its technological lead over China.

So which poses the greater risk: AI advancing faster than humans can safely control it, or the United States slowing down and allowing China to win the AI race?

That question is exposing a fundamental divide between some AI researchers and U.S. President Donald Trump.

While some experts warn that the rapid development of increasingly capable AI systems could eventually pose serious risks to humanity, Trump argues that some fears surrounding the technology have been exaggerated and that slowing development could threaten America's lead.

On September 13, Trump said the United States was ahead of China in AI and that he wanted to preserve that advantage. In his view, whoever wins the AI race will gain an enormous advantage across many other fields as well. He also dismissed some of the more alarming scenarios surrounding AI as events he does not believe will happen.

This creates a difficult dilemma.

If the United States slows AI development in the name of safety, it risks losing ground to China. But if it focuses primarily on winning the race, could AI capabilities advance faster than humanity's ability to make those systems safe?

There are, in effect, two races taking place at the same time: the race between the United States and China for AI leadership, and the race between the speed of AI capability development and the speed of AI safety.

Why Do Some Researchers Want AI Development to Slow Down?

The warnings do not mean that today's AI systems have already escaped human control.

The International AI Safety Report 2026 concluded that current AI systems do not yet possess the capabilities necessary to cause what researchers describe as “loss of control” — a situation in which AI systems could operate beyond effective human oversight and become extremely difficult to bring back under control.

What concerns researchers, however, is that some capabilities relevant to such risks are improving.

For example, some AI systems have shown an increasing ability to recognize whether they are being evaluated or operating in a real-world setting. Researchers refer to this as situational awareness.

In some experiments, AI systems have also found loopholes in evaluation procedures. When researchers instructed certain models to achieve a goal with few or poorly specified constraints, some systems interfered with simulated oversight mechanisms and, in some cases, produced misleading accounts of what they had done.

These findings do not mean that AI has malicious intentions or is attempting to rebel against humanity. They emerged in controlled experimental settings specifically designed to test how advanced systems might behave under unusual or adversarial conditions.

But they raise an important question:

If future AI systems become more capable, more autonomous and better at carrying out complex, long-term plans, will human oversight be able to keep pace?

Experts remain divided.

Some warn that a genuine future loss of control over highly capable AI systems could have catastrophic consequences, potentially even threatening human survival. Others consider such extreme scenarios highly uncertain or implausible.

The key point, therefore, is not that AI has already become uncontrollable. The concern is that AI capabilities may advance rapidly enough that safety and control mechanisms struggle to keep up.

Put simply: the danger is not that today's AI is already beyond human control. The challenge is to ensure that AI does not become more powerful faster than humanity becomes capable of controlling it safely.

Why Doesn't Trump Want America to Slow Down?

The central answer is China.
For Trump, AI is not merely another emerging technology. It is a strategic asset that could help determine which countries hold greater economic, technological and geopolitical power in the future.

AI could boost economic productivity, accelerate scientific research, strengthen cybersecurity and enhance military technology.

Trump has therefore emphasized that the United States currently leads China in AI and that he wants to preserve that advantage. From his perspective, winning in AI could translate into advantages across many other areas of national power.

The logic is straightforward: if the United States applies the “brakes” while China keeps its foot on the “accelerator,” Washington could undermine its own competitive position.

Rules intended to make American AI safer could, in this view, give a strategic competitor time to catch up — or eventually move ahead.

The issue is viewed very differently in China.

On September 14, China's state-backed Global Times criticized calls by Anthropic to slow the development of advanced AI, portraying them as resembling a “Cold War” strategy that could help preserve U.S. technological dominance and constrain China's rise.

This illustrates why AI is no longer solely a technological or safety issue. It has also become a geopolitical one.

What one side describes as an “AI safety measure,” the other may interpret as a mechanism for restraining a competitor. And if both major powers fear falling behind, neither has a strong incentive to slow down first.

For Trump, therefore, the risk is not only that AI could advance too quickly. Allowing China to advance faster than the United States is also a strategic risk.

What Happens If Neither the United States Nor China Dares to Slow Down?

This may be the most difficult part of the AI race: both sides could recognize that moving too quickly carries risks, yet neither may be willing to slow down first for fear of giving the other an advantage.

Imagine two cars racing side by side. Both drivers know that the faster they travel, the greater the danger of a crash. But if one driver takes his foot off the accelerator while the other continues at full speed, the driver who slows down loses the race.

This is one way of understanding the AI arms-race problem.

The danger does not necessarily arise because either side wants an unsafe outcome. Rather, fear of losing to the other side can push both competitors to move faster, even when both recognize that greater speed may increase risk.

Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon has argued for U.S. cooperation with other countries to avoid a dangerous AI race with China. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has likewise proposed a framework aimed at managing the pace of advanced AI development and the risks that accompany it.

The problem is that unilateral restraint may be difficult to sustain.

If Washington imposes strict limits on AI development while Beijing does not, U.S. policymakers may believe they are handing China a strategic advantage. China could reach the same conclusion if it were the first to slow down.

The answer, therefore, may lie neither in “stopping AI” nor in allowing AI development to proceed without meaningful safeguards.

One possible path is the development of stronger guardrails: rigorous testing of highly capable models before deployment, monitoring for potentially dangerous capabilities, maintaining meaningful human authority over critical decisions, and pursuing cooperation among major powers on basic safety standards.

The objective would not be to end competition between the United States and China. It would be to prevent fear of losing the AI race from pushing both sides to increase AI capabilities faster than they improve AI safety.

Put simply: the central question is not only who wins the AI race, but whether that race can be run safely.

Conclusion: Safety or Supremacy?

Trump has a point: AI has become a strategic technology, and countries that lead in it could gain major economic, technological and geopolitical advantages.

Those warning about AI risks also have a point: AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, while humanity's ability to guarantee the safety and controllability of increasingly powerful systems must keep pace.

The International AI Safety Report says today's systems do not yet have the capabilities required to produce a genuine loss-of-control scenario. But some capabilities relevant to such risks are showing signs of progress.

The real choice, therefore, may not be simply between “safety” and “supremacy.”

The more important question is: Can the United States continue competing with China without allowing the speed of AI development to outpace the development of AI safety?

If the United States slows down alone, it could risk losing its technological lead. But if major powers focus solely on winning and no one is willing to apply meaningful safety brakes, the risks could grow for everyone.

The race the world needs to watch, therefore, is not only “the United States versus China.” It is also “the speed of AI capability versus the speed of AI safety.” Both races are moving forward — but safety cannot be allowed to fall behind.

14/09/2026

Cambodia's Natural Heritage Must Not Be Destroyed by a Few Opportunists

(Phnom Penh): In her open letter to the public, Angela, a foreign visitor and friend of Cambodia, expressed deep concern over reported illegal mining activities in a protected area in Ratanakiri Province, calling for stronger protection of Cambodia's natural heritage and urging competent authorities to thoroughly investigate the incidents and take legal action against anyone found responsible.

Read full letter below:

Dear People of Cambodia,

As a foreigner who has had the privilege of visiting Cambodia, I have been deeply impressed by the country’s extraordinary natural beauty. Beyond its magnificent culture and warm people, what touched me most was Cambodia’s vast forests, mountains, rivers, wildlife and remarkably unspoiled natural environment.

Cambodia still possesses something increasingly rare in our world: rich natural resources and landscapes that have not been excessively exploited. I have travelled through and enjoyed some of these beautiful places, and I believe they are treasures not only for Cambodia but for humanity as a whole.

That is why I was deeply concerned to read recent reports about illegal mining activities in a protected area in Ratanakiri Province, allegedly organised by a small number of individuals. Even more disturbing were reports that, when environmental rangers intervened to stop the illegal activities, a ranger office was burnt.

If confirmed by the competent authorities, these are serious acts that should concern everyone who cares about Cambodia.

Cambodia’s environmental laws prohibit unauthorised exploitation of natural resources in protected areas. Likewise, the destruction or burning of public property is a serious matter under the law. Disagreement with law enforcement can never justify violence, intimidation, destruction of public property, or obstruction of government officials who are carrying out their lawful duties.

Illegal mining is not simply about taking minerals from the ground. It can destroy forests, contaminate water, damage wildlife habitats, degrade ecosystems and permanently change landscapes that took nature thousands of years to create.

When environmental destruction is accompanied by violence, intimidation or attacks on public property, the problem becomes even more serious. Such actions can provoke social unrest, weaken respect for the rule of law and undermine the dedicated work of government officials and rangers who are protecting resources that belong to the entire nation.

I therefore strongly condemn illegal mining in protected areas, the destruction of public property and any attempt to intimidate or obstruct environmental rangers and other officials performing their lawful duties.

At the same time, justice must follow evidence and due process. I respectfully encourage the competent authorities to investigate these incidents thoroughly and transparently and, where evidence establishes responsibility, bring to justice those who organised, led, financed or committed these illegal acts.

The interests of a few individuals should never be allowed to outweigh the interests of an entire country.

Cambodia has received significant international recognition for its natural environment, sustainable management of land and natural resources, and its attractiveness as an ecotourism destination. These achievements should make every Cambodian proud, but they also carry an important responsibility: what the world admires today must be protected for tomorrow.

Cambodia’s forests, mountains, rivers, wildlife and other natural resources are a national inheritance. Properly protected, they can provide clean air, clean water, livelihoods, tourism opportunities and economic benefits for generations. Once destroyed for short-term profit, however, many of these treasures may never return.

It would be deeply unfortunate to see Cambodia’s precious and still largely unspoiled natural environment damaged by a few opportunists who may see only the immediate financial value of extracting resources, rather than the much greater and lasting value of preserving nature.

I therefore wish to express my appreciation to the Royal Government of Cambodia, environmental rangers, local authorities, communities and all those who work tirelessly to protect Cambodia’s environment and natural resources.

Their work benefits not only Cambodia but also contributes to the protection of our shared global environment.

The recent incident should also be treated as a warning. When serious illegal activities are allowed to continue without an appropriate legal response, they can encourage further violations and potentially develop into wider disorder.

The law should therefore be applied fairly, firmly and without discrimination, while respecting due process and the rights of everyone concerned.

As a foreign visitor, I do not claim Cambodia’s natural heritage as my own. But having experienced its beauty, I have come to appreciate how precious it is.

My sincere hope is that Cambodians will continue to stand together to protect this extraordinary inheritance, not only for themselves, but for their children, their grandchildren and generations yet unborn.

Natural resources may create short-term profit when they are exploited, but when they are wisely protected, they can create value for generations.

Please do not allow the interests of a few to destroy what belongs to millions.

Protect Cambodia’s nature. Preserve its beauty. Pass it on to the next generation.
=FRESH NEWS

14/09/2026

At the invitation of Admiral D**g Jun, Minister of National Defence of the People's Republic of China, General Tea Seiha, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Defence of the Kingdom of Cambodia, will lead a high-level military delegation to attend the 13th Beijing Xiangshan Forum, which will be held from 15 to 17 September 2026 in Beijing, People's Republic of China.

During his participation in the Forum, General Tea Seiha will deliver a speech at the Second Plenary Session, under the theme "Localized Conflicts: Predicaments and Pathways to Resolution,” according to a press release seen by Fresh News on Monday (Sep. 14).

On the sidelines of the Forum, General Tea Seiha will pay a courtesy call on and hold bilateral discussions with Admiral D**g Jun, with a view to further strengthening the ironclad friendship, comprehensive strategic partnership, and defence and security cooperation between Cambodia and China.

In addition, the Cambodian Defence minister will hold bilateral meetings with his counterparts from the Lao People's Democratic Republic, the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, and the Republic of Singapore, as well as with representatives of other participating countries and dialogue partners.

These engagements will provide an opportunity to exchange views on regional and international security developments and to further broaden and deepen defence and security cooperation, enhance mutual understanding, and advance practical cooperation for peace, stability, and prosperity in the region and beyond.

14/09/2026

Text on photo:

Chinese defence forum set to open amid roiling regional tensions

Caption for Facebook:

China's military leadership is expected to outline its aims for global security when it hosts its annual defence forum this week amid churning tensions in its own neighbourhood over Taiwan, ‌the South China Sea and doubts about U.S. commitments to Asia.

Defence Minister D**g Jun is expected to open the three-day Xiangshan Forum in Beijing on Tuesday with a fresh pitch for closer international cooperation within a multi-polar world but is likely to also include coded attacks on the U.S. and its allies, diplomats and analysts say.

Hundreds of military officers, diplomats and scholars from dozens of countries are expected to attend the three-day event, a tightly scripted Chinese rival to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, widely seen as a more freewheeling affair.

Some Asian envoys and analysts say that any overt Chinese criticism of the U.S. and ⁠its Western allies could be tempered because of President Xi Jinping's planned visit to Washington later this month to meet President Donald Trump.

Japan, however, could be an easier target given current tensions between Beijing and Tokyo.

Taiwan, whose military last month conducted military and civil defence drills to practice fighting a Chinese invasion, does not attend the forum or most major international events. Neither government recognises the other and China views the democratically governed island as its own territory.

D**g's speech on Tuesday will follow recent statements from Xi calling for greater representation for Global South countries in international affairs.

At the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Kyrgyzstan earlier this month, Xi said: "The domination of international affairs by a few is an injustice left over from history, and global governance dictated by one, a few or a bloc of countries is not true multilateralism."

Western nations generally send ‌relatively low-level ⁠delegations to the forum while some regional countries will send ministers as they try to juggle relations with China, a modern military power, and the U.S., the long-dominant East Asian defence ally.

The U.S. delegation is expected to be headed by the Pentagon's principal director for China, Taiwan and Mongolia, Cynthia Carras, a U.S. official said.

Vietnam, China's neighbour and rival in the disputed South China Sea, is sending Defence Minister Phan Van Giang while Malaysia will be represented by Vice Defence Minister Adly Zahari.

Source: Reuters

14/09/2026

Press briefing: "Developments at the Cambodia–Thailand border" on the morning of September 14, 2026.

14/09/2026

Oil prices jumped more than 2% on Monday, after new Houthi strikes on Saudi Arabia and Iranian attacks on ships in the Gulf compounded supply concerns following the closure of a key Saudi oil pipeline.

Brent crude futures rose $2.90, or 2.77%, to $107.51 per barrel as of 2313 GMT. WTI futures rose $2.27, or 2.27%, to $102.32 per barrel. Prices had initially risen more than 3% at market open.

Saudi Arabian state media on Sunday released video footage of damage to homes ⁠and a mosque from what it said was a Houthi attack on the country's southern Jazan province. The Houthis said they had also struck a Saudi military base in a neighbouring province.

A vessel in the Strait of Hormuz was struck by a projectile, causing a fire and forcing the crew to be evacuated, the British maritime security agency UKMTO said on Sunday.

Source: Reuters

14/09/2026

Editorial: Soil Is a Living Foundation

(Phnom Penh): Soil is often called dirt when it appears where we do not want it. In a healthy landscape, soil is a complex mixture of mineral particles, organic matter, water, air, roots, and living organisms.

“Beneath every green beginning lies a world working in the dark.”

Different soils contain different proportions of sand, silt, clay, and organic material.

Their structure influences how water enters, drains, and remains available to plants. Soil acidity, nutrients, organisms, and depth also shape what can grow.

The living community can include bacteria, fungi, worms, insects, and countless other organisms.

They decompose material, cycle nutrients, form soil structure, and interact with plants. Much of this work is invisible.

Soil forms slowly. Rock weathers, organisms contribute organic material, and climate, topography, water, and time shape layers.

Productive topsoil can be lost rapidly through erosion if land is left unprotected.

Farmers and land managers use many methods suited to particular crops and places: keeping soil covered, rotating crops, adding organic matter appropriately, reducing disturbance, managing water, or using terraces and contour practices.

No method is universal, and local knowledge matters.

Contamination can damage soil and enter food or water. Waste, oil, heavy metals, pesticides, and other chemicals require responsible handling. Students should never touch suspicious material; report it to an adult.

Healthy soil also stores carbon, though amounts and stability vary.

Protecting and rebuilding soil can support food, water, biodiversity, and climate goals together.

Soil teaches that foundations are alive. We may build above them without noticing, but their condition shapes what becomes possible. A garden fails when only the leaves receive attention and the soil is ignored.

Take a small handful of safe garden soil only with permission. Notice its color, smell, texture, and moisture, then return it. Do not treat it as dead dust. Imagine roots, water, air spaces, and organisms sharing that handful.

The Earth beneath our feet is not merely a surface to stand on. It is a patient maker of possibility.

Protecting soil means protecting the beginning of forests, farms, food, and many lives.

Soil care rewards patience. A damaged soil may not recover after one rain or one application of compost. Structure, organic matter, and living communities develop over time.

Long-term improvement is an act of faith in gradual processes.

Each protected season gives the foundation another opportunity to heal.

Buddhist Reflection
Humility is related to the earth: grounded, steady, and supportive.

Soil receives fallen material and helps transform it into new growth. It reminds us that service can be quiet and still sustain the whole community.

Today’s Reflection
What would disappear from my life if healthy soil disappeared?

Today’s Action
Compare soil beneath vegetation with bare compacted ground without disturbing either. Record differences in moisture, texture, and signs of life.

Today’s Pledge
Today I will honor soil as a living foundation and protect it from waste and erosion.

When we protect nature, we protect all beings, including ourselves.
=FRESH NEWS

Fresh News English

15/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

14/09/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request