27/05/2026
DISTRICT # 3 FACTUAL RERUTIAL AND CONSIITUENCY ENGAGEMENT
CLARIFICATION REPORT
RESPONSE TO THE RECENT NAYMUTE LEGISLATINE PERFORMANCE SCORECARD
PREPARED BY. Concerned Citizens , Contituents Stakeherders, and Community Dwellers of electoral' Distract #3, Margibi Counts, Repubhe of Liberia.
SUBMITTED IN REFERENCE TO: The recent egislative pertormance Assessment published, by NAYMOTE- Partners For Democratic Development .
COVER STATEMEN /EXECUTE FORWARD.
This Archive is humbly submitted to NAymoTE Liberia as a Factual Counterargument or rebutte
and clarification report concerning the “No” score lines assigned under constitution/ Electorate.
outreach and legislative accentability indicators affecting District #3, Marsibi. Through Verified documentan evidence publicly accessible reports, media publications, institutional references
authentic records, and electurate documentation, this report estatlishes that Constituency visits, town hall meetings radio appearances, and
Formal Constituency
reporting activities were
indeed Conducted by the lawmaker , to the Findings presented in the published assessment.
INTRODUCTORY NOTE This corrective statement has been developed in response to the recent legislative score card and Voting bloc break monitoring report püblished by
NAYMOTE LIBERIA regarding the activities and Electoral area engagements of Hon Ellen A Attoh-wreh, Representatice of Electoral District #3, Margiti County within the published report and accompanying monitoring score card the lawmaker was assigned
"No" scorelines under the Following category .
* visited constituencies
* Conducted Town Hall meetings
* Radio program Appearances
* Presented Formal Constituenay Reports�As residents, Electorafes Stakeholders, and direct witnesses to several developmental Visitation/ Acquaintanay and Voting By accountability interactions Carried out within District #3, we evolve the Findings presented are inaccurate, incomplete, and inconsistent with publicly Veritiable evidence already available through media institutions Constituency ecords, documentary reports, public Communication, and community ducumentation. while we recognize and appreciate the important democratic accountability role played by NAYMOTE Liberia in strengthening governance and legislative oversight , we egually believe that accountability
reporting must remain Factual, balanced evidence driven, and methodogically accurate. It is against background that this clarification and rebuttal report has been developed to present authenticated counter-evidence and documentary references estallishines that the activities highlighted as “NO” within the published assesment were indeed Conducted and documented during the monitoring period under review.
REBUTTAL FRAME WORK
1. VISITED CONSTITUENCIES/VOTING BIOC FACTUAL REBUTTAL;
NAYMOTE Published fnding. The legislative Monitoring Score card reflecting a "no scoreline under constituency Visitation activities Concerning Hon. Ellen Aloh- Wreh
REBUTTAL POSITION . This finding is inconsistent with available public records and documentan evidence relating to constituency engagements and district visitation activities conducted within Electoral District #3 prior to the publication of the Scecard Several visitation constituency visitation activities,community interaction and Stakeholder engasements involving Hon. Ellen A. Attoh Wreh had already been publicly documented and Circulated through Various communication and media platforms
Authentication sources include: Community media insttutions;
Local radio stations
• Constituency engagement amouncements,
social media publications and district updates; photographic and Video documentation From communits Visits, Public Stakeholder interaction records.
Verification notice:The public may independently verify these activities through. Community media houses;
District communicatim platforms"
Public Civic engagement
pages, constituency development announcements and reports; Archived public communication materials.
The available evidence establishes that construenay Visits and direct community interaction occurred during the reporting period referenced by NAYMOTE .
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Mo11mbheC/?mibextid=wwXIfr
2. CONDUCTED TOWN HALL MEETINGS - FACTUAL REBUTTAL
NAYMOTE published Finding: The report assigned a "No" Scoreline Concerning town hall meetings and Constituency Consultation engagements!
REBUTTAL POSITUN. The conclusion that no town hall meetings or constituenay Consultation engagements occurred is contradicted by records of stakeholder Interactions, district consultations, and organezed citizens' engagement meeting held across Electoral District # 3.
several Consultative gatherings and accounfability.
Centered discussions involving constituents, community
leaders, youths grups, and stakeholders were conducted during the monitoring period.
Authentication Sources Include. Town Hall meeting notices and flyers , communihs Stakeholder engagement records,
Media announcements . and public discussions, constituency
Consultation activities, citizens interaction forums and engagement reports.
Verification Notice, These activities remain searchable and verifiable through: Local media institutions", Community radio Archives Civic organizations and
Stakeholders, public district infomation platforms,
Community engagement documentation-
The documentan evidence Therefore Contradicts The
"No" sceline reflected within the monitoring report.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CpToM4t64/?mibextid=wwXIfr
3. RADIO PROGRAM APPEARANCES- FACTUA
REBUTTAL
NAYMOTE published finding . The scorecard reflected that
no radio program appearance were cunducted by the Lamaker during the reporting period.
Rebuttal position. Contrary to the "No" rating published
Hon. Ellen A Atth- wreh participated in multiple radio appearances and public communication
engagements discussing district Concerns, governance matters, development priorities, and constituency accountability issues.
These appearancet from ex part of broader pusli engagement and information -sharing efforts directed
toward constituents and residents of District #3.
Authenticatim sources include: Archived radio Station
(Interview , public awareness bruadcasts, Community
radio discussions, media announcement and publicity
materials, Broadcast engagement documentation.
Verification Notice. Independent verification may be conducted though; Local radio institutions",
public broadcast archives, Media Communication
Platforms", Community information dissenination outlets; Archived public media Content.
The existence of there media ensagements directly
Contadicts the conclusions refected within the published monitoring scorecard.
constituency information dissemination materials.
Verification Notice: Copies of the report and associated materials remain publicly accessible and verifiable through; The office of Hon Ellen A. Wreh
Atoh-wreh Constituency stakeholdes and communities leaders public circulated district development documentation
Media and institutinal references
associated with the report.
The record established that formal constituency reporting and accountability engagements were Conducted during the monitoring period referenced within the NAYMOTE Publicatin.
METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS: The Findings reflected within the legislative monitoring report raise legitimate concerns regarding the verification process , scope of evidence gathering and methodological standard employed during the data collection exercise.
Publicly accessible constituency report , engagement documentation, media publications, and accountability records appear not to have been comprehensively reviewed prior to.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17gKVrDiyS/?mibextid=wwXIfr
4. PRESENTED FORMAL CONSTITUENCY REPORTS -
FACTUAL REBUTTAL
NAyMoTE Published finding. The report assigned a “No" Scoreline under formal constituency reportine and legislative accountability reporting.
REBUTTAL POSITION . This Finding is materiall inconsistent with the etistence, circulation, and public acessibility of the
“DISTRICT #3 LEGISLATINE AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT REPORT (OCTOBER 2023- APRIL 2025)" which was prepared and documented by the office of Hon- Ellen A. Attih-wreh.
The existence of this report directly contradicts the arsertion that no formal construency reporting or accountability documentation was presented during The monitoring period.
Authentication sources Inelude. The District 3 Legislatice and community Development Report, Stakeholder
engagement documentation
communities development and legislatice update recds,
The publicatin of the scorecard
Findings Concerning Electoral District #3 .
As a Consequence, the publication of incomplete or insufficiently verified findings risks creating misleading public perceptions
Capable of undermining Confidence in documented constituency accountability efforts and unfairly discediting publicly verifiable legislatice engagements.
CONCLUDING STATEMENT
This rebuttal is not intended to oppose democratic accountability or undermine the important role played by accountability institutions within Liberia governance process. Rather, it seeks to reinforce the principles of Factual accuraCy, balanced Verification, institufinal Fairness ,and evidence-based reporting in democratic accountability processes. we therefore respectfully Call upon NAYMOTE Liberia to review the Findings Concerning Electoral District #3, Margibi County, and to consider the attached documentary evidence, institutional references public record constituency report and authenticated,
Sources establishing that the activities scored"No" were indeed per Formed and documented during the reporting period .
Accurate and evidence-based data
Strengthens democracy accountability, transparency and public trust while incomplete or unverified assessments risk creating misleading narratives incunsistent with publicly verifiable realities on the ground.