True love channel

13/09/2026

My landlord pursuit me because am supporting APC 🏃🤣🙆

13/09/2026

Sir more

13/09/2026

Can you marry a second wife?🤣🤣🏃🙇🙆
Who's voice is this?

13/09/2026

13/09/2026

She sw£ar say I no go ever see the color of her p@nt and this happen 🤣🤣🤣🏃 abi I never see am finish?

13/09/2026

I won relocate 🤣🏃🤣🏃

13/09/2026

TO RTD-DSP SAMPSON AGADA

Today, we celebrate not just the retirement of a distinguished police officer, but the remarkable life and service of a truly gallant, intelligent, and cheerful gentleman.

You have been a man of courage, discipline, and integrity. As an intelligent instructor in weapon handling and VIP protection, you shared your knowledge with professionalism and dedication, helping to prepare others for the responsibilities that come with protecting lives and serving the nation.

As an administrator, you demonstrated wisdom, fairness, and efficiency. You are a man who does not act on gossip or hearsay, but one who seeks the truth, listens carefully, and makes decisions based on facts and sound judgment. This quality has earned you the respect and confidence of those who have had the privilege of working with you.

Beyond your professional achievements, your greatest qualities are perhaps your warm personality, happiness, humility, and willingness to make others feel comfortable. Your presence brings positivity wherever you go, and your colleagues will surely miss your laughter, wisdom, guidance, and camaraderie.

As you bow out of active police service, may you enter this new chapter of life with great joy, good health, peace, and fulfillment. May the years ahead reward you abundantly for your sacrifices and dedicated service.

Congratulations on your retirement, Sir.
Your uniform may be retired, but your legacy of courage, wisdom, professionalism, and kindness will continue to inspire those who served alongside you.

We salute you, we celebrate you, and we wish you a truly happy and fulfilling retirement.

13/09/2026

Happy Sunday

13/09/2026

WELCOME OCHIDOMA

13/09/2026

Love is not a sufficient qualification for marriage..
It’s often necessary in modern romantic expectations, but treating it as the primary or only criterion is a relatively recent cultural shift that doesn’t hold up well against history, outcomes data, or practical reality.
What actually sustains marriages
Shared values, goals, and worldview matter more over decades than initial feelings. Couples who align on money, children, religion/philosophy, work ethic, and lifestyle have far higher odds of lasting. Passion fluctuates; compatible operating systems do not.
Character and reliability outrank chemistry. Trustworthiness, emotional regulation, conflict skills, and willingness to keep showing up under stress predict durability better than butterflies. Love does not automatically produce those.
Economic and practical partnership has always been central. Marriage has historically functioned as a household, child-rearing, and mutual-insurance arrangement. Modern data still shows financial stress and mismatched expectations about roles as major predictors of divorce.
Commitment and deliberate choice often matter more than the feeling. Many long-term marriages succeed because both people decided the relationship was worth the work, not because the feeling never dipped. The reverse—waiting for perpetual intensity—frequently fails.

Historical and cross-cultural reality
For most of human history and in many societies today,

marriages were arranged or heavily family-influenced around kinship, property, status, and alliance. Romantic love was sometimes expected to grow afterward, not required as the entry ticket. The idea that intense romantic love must precede and justify the legal/social contract is largely a product of the last couple of centuries in the West, amplified by literature, film, and individualist culture. That model produces high expectations and high divorce rates when reality fails to match the script.
Where the “love is everything” view goes wrong
It confuses a powerful emotion (or set of emotions) with a decision framework. Infatuation and early romantic love are neurologically time-limited for most people. If the only filter is “do I feel it strongly enough right now?”, people select poorly for long-term traits. Plenty of people love each other and still make terrible spouses because of incompatibility, unresolved personal issues, or inability to handle the mundane and hard parts of shared life.
That does not mean loveless arranged matches are ideal either. Forced or purely transactional unions without respect or eventual affection have their own high costs. The more useful standard is: sufficient mutual regard + demonstrated compatibility + commitment capacity + practical alignment. Love (or the capacity for it to deepen) is one input among several, not the sole qualifier.

In short: love is valuable and often desirable, but treating it as the qualification is how people end up surprised when the feeling changes and the foundation underneath was never built.