11/08/2024
The management of Unicross are the ones causing confusion there for them.
How on earth will the school management be so emotional about who becomes the Institution's SUG President?
We have since advised the school management to abolish the use of 'student electoral board chairman' to avoid too much of interest, but should rather use some of the academic/non-academic staff for the conduct of Unicross SUG elections.
The process is very simple, b'cos they'll have to study the zoning structure, thereby making sure that if for instance the office of the SUG President has been zoned to the faculty of Engineering, then all members of the electoral committee should come from Faculties/Departments far away from Engineering and Sciences to at least help to curtail some excessiveness.
Management should also try as much as possible to distance themselves from the activities of student unionism, but rather they should play advisory roles whenever the needs arises.
The student on the other hand, are not trying at all, b'cos the don't even know how to go about all this processes, and they don't want to know.
Leader, it will shock you to know that some of them don't even know the three C's of aluta, which is even the common code that binds the students together in unionism.
The student are no longer enjoying union the way we do during our time, they keep progressing in error.
Cultism is the order of the day in Unicross unionism now, b'cos both the management and student are cultist, and they join hands together in making sure that everything about students unionism on campus, remains under their control.
The school internal security men are not left out of the whole mess, as they're the number one piloters of crimes/criminality within the school campus. Most of those harden cultist/criminals, are children of those bigwigs security officers who're even helping their children in aiding/abating crimes inside the campus.