Pofamon

Pofamon Look within; the right advice is here. Sound advice begins with self-awareness and inner clarity.

29/04/2026

Despite the caution fee you paid in your rented apartment, you will still repair the damages if it is beyond the fee.

People often think you only need a lawyer when something has gone wrong.But the truth is, the real value of legal guidan...
27/04/2026

People often think you only need a lawyer when something has gone wrong.

But the truth is, the real value of legal guidance is often seen before problems arise.
A simple contract properly drafted can prevent years of dispute.

Clear terms in a business relationship can save millions.
Taking a few minutes to understand your rights can change the entire outcome of a situation.

Law is not just reactive, it is preventive.

In practice, you begin to realize that many conflicts, especially in business and everyday transactions, don’t come from bad intentions. They come from assumptions, poor documentation, or lack of clarity.

That’s where lawyers come in—not just as advocates in courtrooms, but as problem-solvers, risk managers, and trusted advisors.

Whether it’s a startup trying to structure properly, a company navigating compliance, or an individual making a major decision, having the right legal input early can make all the difference.

The best legal work is sometimes the one no one ever hears about, because the problem never happened.

15/04/2026

There are people that the law will not allow them to get married to.

15/04/2026

These are invalid marriages.

14/04/2026

To get a divorce in court, you must prove one of the things listed in this video.

14/04/2026

To get a Divorce in court, you must prove one of the things listed in this video.

If you are actively serving in the military during war or stationed in military duty, orIf you are a sailor currently at...
18/02/2026

If you are actively serving in the military during war or stationed in military duty, or
If you are a sailor currently at sea, You are allowed to distribute or give away your personal property (not land) without strictly complying with the formal requirements of the Act.

Why?
Because of practicality.
A soldier in combat or a seaman at sea may not have access to lawyers, witnesses, or formal documentation. The law recognises the urgency and danger of their situation and gives them flexibility.

It applies only to movable and personal property (not land). It applies only while they are in actual service or at sea.

It preserves their pre-existing freedom to dispose of such property informally.

The law protects those who serve under dangerous circumstances.

Knowledge of the law is power, especially when it comes to property and succession rights.

If you found this insightful, kindly LIKE, COMMENT, and FOLLOW for more simplified legal breakdowns.

18/02/2026

Although the statute requires trusts concerning land to be in writing, there are some situations where a trust can arise automatically by law, and those types of trusts are still valid, even if they are not written down.

If land is transferred in a way that makes the law automatically create a trust, or makes a trust pass, end, or change because of how the law operates, then that trust will still be valid and effective.

Even if there is no written document.

And this applies “anything in this statute to the contrary notwithstanding”, meaning:

Even though earlier sections say trusts must be in writing, this rule is an exception.

So what type of trusts is this talking about?

It refers to:

Resulting trusts

Constructive trusts

Trusts arising by operation of law

These are not created because someone expressly wrote “I declare a trust.”

They arise automatically because fairness or legal principles demand it.

Simple example:

If A pays for land but the land is registered in B’s name, and there is no evidence that A intended it as a gift, the law may presume that B holds the land in trust for A.

That is a resulting trust.

Even if nothing was written down, the trust is valid because it arises by implication of law.

Why this matters

Without this clause, people could use the “must be in writing” rule to commit fraud.

For example, someone could take property in their name after another person paid for it, then argue:

“There is no written trust, so I own it completely.”

This provision prevents that injustice.

In summary:

Express trusts of land must be in writing.
Trusts that arise automatically by law do NOT need writing.
They remain valid and enforceable.

If a person who is a beneficiary of a trust (and has full ownership interest in land under that trust) dies, and that in...
17/02/2026

If a person who is a beneficiary of a trust (and has full ownership interest in land under that trust) dies, and that interest passes to their heir, then: that inherited trust property will be treated as part of the deceased’s assets.
And because it is treated as assets, the heir who inherits it can be held responsible for the deceased person’s debts — just as if the deceased had owned the land outright (legal ownership) instead of through a trust.

In other words, You cannot escape liability for debts simply because the property was held in trust instead of in your direct legal name.
The law says the heir will be liable to the same extent as if the land had legally descended to them in possession.

And the final part, “any law, custom or usage to the contrary notwithstanding” — means:
No other rule or local custom can override this.

Simple Practical Example
If Mr. A was entitled to land under a trust and owed creditors money, and he dies leaving that interest to his son, the son cannot say:
“This was only a trust interest, so I’m not responsible for my father’s debts.”
The law treats that trust interest as inheritable assets that can be used to satisfy the father’s obligations.

Any declaration or creation of a trust over:Land, Tenements and Hereditaments (interests in real property) Must be in wr...
17/02/2026

Any declaration or creation of a trust over:
Land, Tenements and Hereditaments (interests in real property) Must be in writing, and must be signed by the person legally capable of declaring the trust, OR be contained in that person’s written will.

If this is not done, the trust will be void and of no legal effect.

What Does This Mean in Practice?
If someone says:
“This land I bought is actually held in trust for my brother.”
That statement alone is not enough.
To be valid:
✔️ It must be reduced into writing,
✔️ Signed by the person declaring the trust,
OR
✔️ Clearly stated in a written will.
Without this, the alleged trust cannot be enforced in court.

Why Is Writing Required is because land transactions are serious and prone to dispute.

The law requires:
📝 Certainty
🖊️ Signature
📄 Documentary evidence
This prevents fraud, false claims, and family disputes over property.

This rule applies to express trusts over land.
Other types of trusts (like resulting or constructive trusts arising by operation of law) may not require writing, but that is a different legal principle.

Practical Example
If a father buys land and intends to hold it in trust for his daughter:
✔️ He should execute a written trust document, signed by him.
Otherwise, future disputes may render the arrangement unenforceable.

Trusts over land must be in writing and signed
or they are legally void.

In property matters, verbal arrangements are dangerous.

If this explanation clarified land and trust law:
👉 LIKE 👍
👉 COMMENT 💬
👉 FOLLOW 🔔

More simplified property and equity principles coming your way ⚖️

Do you know that Even though certain interests in land must generally be in writing,there is an exception:Leases not exc...
16/02/2026

Do you know that Even though certain interests in land must generally be in writing,

there is an exception:
Leases not exceeding three (3) years from the date they are made
are valid even if not in writing, provided that:
The rent reserved during the term amounts to at least two-thirds (2/3) of the full improved value of the property.

What Does That Mean Practically?
If a landlord grants:
A lease for 3 years or less, and
The tenant pays a rent that is at least two-thirds of the property’s full market rental value, then, the lease may be valid even if it is not formally executed as a deed.

Why This Rule Exists?
The law recognises that:
Short-term tenancies are common.
Requiring strict formal documentation for every short lease would be impractical.
But to prevent abuse, the rent must reflect a substantial portion of the property’s value.

Practical Example (Nigerian Context)
If a landlord grants a 2-year shop lease at a fair market rent:
✔️ It may not require the same formalities as a long-term lease (e.g., 10 or 25 years).
However, once the term exceeds 3 years, stricter legal requirements apply.

Short leases (3 years or less) at substantial rent are treated differently under property law.
“Notwithstanding” simply signals an exception to the general rule.

If this breakdown made property law clearer:
👉 LIKE 👍
👉 COMMENT 💬
👉 FOLLOW 🔔

More simplified land law and litigation principles coming your way ⚖️

Address

Ikoyi

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Pofamon posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share