05/08/2026
1 month subscription also finishes within a week.
In a working society, our government would have taken it up.
But, believe me, they have given them bribe to share to remain silent while the network providers keep reaping us off.
You are forced to pay even when there’s network failures.
Just think about this.
You buy a 30-day data plan.
For weeks, the network is unstable. Calls drop. Internet speeds crawl. Entire hours go by without a usable connection. Sometimes, you can’t even access the internet despite having an active data balance.
In other words, the service provider fails to provide the quality of service necessary for you to actually use the data you paid for.
Yet the countdown never stops.
Every single day is deducted from your 30-day validity, whether the network worked or not.
Then, on the 30th day, your remaining data simply disappears.
No extension.
No compensation.
No apology.
No consideration whatsoever for the fact that the provider’s own network limitations may have prevented you from using what you purchased.
Imagine buying a 30-day gym membership, only for the gym to be closed half the time. Or paying for electricity while the power company keeps your area in blackout for days, yet still tells you your meter subscription has expired because the calendar says so.
No reasonable consumer would accept that.
Why should data be any different?
If a telecommunications company cannot consistently provide the service that enables customers to use the data they have paid for, on what moral or commercial basis should it be entitled to confiscate the unused balance when the validity period expires?
The customer fulfilled their part of the contract by paying.
Shouldn’t the provider be expected to fulfill theirs by making the service reasonably available?
Consumers are not just paying for gigabytes. They are paying for the opportunity to use those gigabytes.
When that opportunity is repeatedly denied because of network failures, and the provider still erases the unused balance at expiry, the customer bears the cost of a failure they did not cause.
That raises a fundamental question:
If the service provider prevented me from reasonably using the product I paid for, why should I be the one to lose it?
Everyone should be sharing these posts I have been making. That’s how to mount pressure and get things done. Start talking about this too.
-KAA