05/05/2026
NewsJudge Knocks EFCC, Frees Oyo-Ita After Six-year Corruption TrialPublished May 5, 2026 at 3:20 PMBy Richard Ogunsile
Share:
Google NewsFollow Us on Google
Oyo-ItaWinifred Oyo-Ita
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, discharged and acquitted a former Head of Service of the Federation, Winifred Oyo-Ita, of money laundering charges involving ₦570 million.
Naija News reports that the judgment came six years after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) filed an 18-count charge against her and eight others over allegations bordering on fraud, kickbacks, Duty Tour Allowances, estacodes and conference fees.
Justice James Omotosho, in his ruling on separate no-case submissions filed by Oyo-Ita and her co-defendants, held that the applications had merit and that the prosecution failed to establish a case requiring the defendants to enter a defence.
The judge said the case filed by the EFCC “was built on the quicksand of speculations, suspicions and shoddy investigation.”
“I must say here that the case presented by the prosecution has no weight whatsoever,” Omotosho said.
‘EFCC Failed To Prove Predicate Offence’
Justice Omotosho held that the prosecution failed to prove the crucial elements of money laundering.
According to him, before a defendant can be called to answer a money laundering charge, the prosecution must first establish a predicate offence showing that the money in question was derived from unlawful activity.
He said, “Crucial elements of money laundering offences, which are the establishment of a predicate offence, were glaringly absent in this case presented by the prosecution.”
The judge added that the EFCC did not present evidence showing that the funds mentioned in the charge were proceeds of crime.
He said the law required proof that the money was tainted by illegality before issues of concealment, disguise or conversion could arise.
“The law is clear that to establish money laundering offences, the prosecution is expected to establish a predicate offence first before the issues of disguising, concealing the origin or conversion of properties come in,” he said.
Omotosho said the prosecution merely alleged that money was paid into the account of Frontline Ace Global Resources Limited without explaining what the payments were for or proving that they were illegal.
According to him, it was not enough for the prosecution to say that money came from the Federal Ministry of Power.
“The prosecution did not provide any shred of evidence to show that the monies are tainted with illegality,” he said.
“It is not enough to simply say that monies were paid into the accounts from the Federal Ministry of Power without an explanation of what the payments were for.
“Relying on the scanty evidence of the prosecution will be engaging in speculations. Criminal trials require credible proof and not speculations or suspicions.
“Besides, there are no complaints from the Federal Ministry of Power alleging that monies were illegally paid into the accounts of the second defendant for which the 1st defendant is a signatory to the accounts.”
The judge held that the evidence led by the prosecution did not show that the sums mentioned in counts one, two, three and four were linked to unlawful activities.
‘Oyo-Ita Not Shareholder, Director In Companies’ – Judge
The court also held that Oyo-Ita, who was the first defendant in the case, was neither a shareholder nor a director in the companies allegedly linked to her.
Justice Omotosho noted that the EFCC’s seventh and eighth prosecution witnesses, who investigated the matter, admitted under evidence that the former Head of Service was not a shareholder or director in the companies.