The Neighbourhood Newspaper

The Neighbourhood Newspaper The Neighbourhood Newspaper is a colourful newspaper published by NATIVITY, a company fully register

Who We Are

The Neighbourhood Newspaper is a colourful newspaper published by NATIVITY COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LIMITED, a company fully registered in Nigeria. We are a quality, regional newspaper with credible and dependable information. Not beholden to any interest group, loyalty is to the people. Vision
To be Nigeria’s newspaper of first choice among discerning readers. Our Mission

* To provide the general public with information they need to be free and self-governing in a democratic society.

* To vigorously champion a return to fundamental principles of federalism, believing that it is the arrangement that can best advance the multifarious interests of citizens in a country of many nations and faiths such as Nigeria.

* To serve as an independent monitor of power and hold those entrusted with its exercise accountable. Our Cardinal Principles
• Freedom
• Justice
• Market Economy



Our Target Audience

• Business and political elite.
• The affluent, the educated, those in leadership positions in all spheres of life; the upwardly mobile, policy makers.
• Those in the B & A segments of the society. Our Focus

• Business and Economy
• Public Policies
• The Democratic Process and Institutions of Democracy
• Sports
• Arts, Culture & Tourism
• Fashion & Lifestyle
• World Affairs
• Education, Health, Law
• Commentaries/Literary Discourses



The Strength of THE NEIGHBOURHOOD:

The 3rd most read newspaper in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria according to a 2013 survey by major retail vendors’ association in the region, Rivers State in particular. The most regional newspaper with very strong presence in all the South South geo-political zones. The highest circulating newspaper in Port Harcourt
The first on the newsstands nationwide. An authoritative newspaper in the forefront of breaking major news and reporting well-researched exclusive stories. Parades a galaxy of brilliant and perceptive columnists daily: the best collection in the industry
Compact layout and colourful pages. Unique style of reporting and writing: elevated language, concise – yet detailed analysis, and clarity of thought. Strong subscription base in Lagos guarantees the paper on the tables of vital discerning readers. Have the most colourful, well-laid-out pagination in the Niger Delta region with outstanding high resolution photos

Website
www.theneighbourhoodonline.com

We are accessed in all nations of the world.

Israel strikes back at Britain, shuts down British consulate in Jerusalem By The Neighbourhood Newspaper “Whoever acts a...
10/09/2026

Israel strikes back at Britain, shuts down British consulate in Jerusalem

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

“Whoever acts against Israel, Israel will act against them!” — Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar

The diplomatic war between Israel and Britain has exploded into a major confrontation!

Israel has announced a series of dramatic retaliatory measures against Britain's Labour Government, including the closure of the British Consulate in Jerusalem, following new British sanctions and what Jerusalem describes as a sustained campaign of hostile anti-Israel policies.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, acting with the agreement of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, announced that Israel would no longer allow British actions against the Jewish state to go unanswered.

And the response is massive.

Israel's four major countermeasures

The British Consulate in Jerusalem will be shut down.

British representatives will be removed from the International Gaza Support Center in Kiryat G*t.

British activities training Palestinian Authority forces in Judea and Samaria will be terminated.

Twelve British elected representatives and other British nationals accused by Israel of antisemitic and anti-Israel activities will be denied entry into Israel.

"We have nothing against the British people"

Sa’ar made it clear that Israel's dispute is not with ordinary British citizens.

But he launched a blistering attack on Britain's Labour Government, accusing it of systematically taking hostile and one-sided actions against Israel.

According to Sa’ar, Britain has imposed sanctions, restricted defence cooperation and taken several diplomatic steps that Israel believes are designed to pressure Jerusalem into acting against its national and security interests.

And now, Israel says enough is enough
Jerusalem vs London: The diplomatic war escalates

The closure of the British Consulate in Jerusalem is one of the strongest signals yet that relations between the two historic allies are entering dangerous territory.

Israel insists that Jerusalem is its capital and under its sovereignty, arguing that foreign activity in the city must operate with Israel's consent.

Sa’ar accused Britain of trying to interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation and warned London that political and economic pressure would not force Israel to abandon what it considers its vital national interests.

“We did not return to our land after 2,000 years only to lose it under pressure,” Sa’ar declared.

He also delivered a warning, not just to Britain, but to other governments.

Any country that takes hostile action against Israel, he said, should expect Israel to respond.

The warning to the world

Britain may have initiated the latest confrontation, but Israel says it will not be the only country facing consequences.

Sa’ar warned that Jerusalem could take additional countermeasures against other governments that act against Israel.

The message from Netanyahu's government is unmistakable:

“Measures against Israel will not go unanswered.”

The confrontation comes amid deep disagreements over Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria, the future of a Palestinian state, arms restrictions, security cooperation and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

But this latest move has now pushed the dispute to an entirely new level.

Israel has moved from diplomatic protests to direct retaliation.

And with the British Consulate in Jerusalem now caught in the middle of the escalating crisis, one major question remains:

Will Britain respond, or will London back down?

The diplomatic battle has begun.

Netanyahu from Syria's Mt. Hermon" "We control the entire area" as Israel vows to defeat Iran By The Neighbourhood Newsp...
09/09/2026

Netanyahu from Syria's Mt. Hermon" "We control the entire area" as Israel vows to defeat Iran

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

Standing atop the strategic heights of Mt. Hermon in Syria, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, delivered a defiant message that could further raise tensions across the Middle East: Israel, he declared, now exercises an unprecedented level of military control over the surrounding region, and Tehran remains firmly in his sights.

On the eve of Rosh Hashanah, Netanyahu visited an Israeli Defense Forces, IDF, outpost overlooking Syria alongside Defence Minister Israel Katz, and the IDF Deputy Chief-of-Staff, Maj.-Gen. Tamir Yadai.

The Israeli leader was briefed on operational activities in the sector by the Head of Northern Command, Maj.-Gen. Rafi Milo, and the Commander of the 210th Division, Brig.-Gen. Yair Palai.

But it was Netanyahu's sweeping declaration from the mountain heights that is likely to attract international attention.

“Damascus is right here, Lebanon is right there, the Syrian Golan Heights are right there,” Netanyahu said.

He declared that Israel controls the area “from the Hermon Crown to the Yarmouk River, and from here to the Mediterranean Sea”, describing it as a level of control “the likes of which has never been seen before.”

A warning to Israel's enemies

Netanyahu vowed that Israel would not permit hostile forces to establish themselves along its borders.

“We will not allow any terrorist army to establish itself on our border,” he said, describing the situation as one of Israel's major achievements in the “War of Redemption.”

Then came the message directed at Iran.

From the strategic peaks of Mt. Hermon, Netanyahu said Israel still had “work to do”, identifying what he described as the central objective: "The main task is to defeat the terrorist regime in Iran."

According to Netanyahu, Israel is “very close” to achieving that objective.

He further predicted the eventual collapse of the regional alliance opposed to Israel.
“We know that the entire axis will ultimately fall. We are committed to doing this, and we will do it,” Netanyahu declared.

The big question

Netanyahu's appearance on Syrian territory, and his declaration of sweeping Israeli control, comes at a highly sensitive moment for the Middle East.

His words send a powerful signal: Israel is not merely focused on defending its borders; its leadership is openly projecting military dominance across a wider strategic theatre stretching from Syria and Lebanon to the confrontation with Iran.

As Netanyahu promises that the “entire axis” will fall, the world is left watching one crucial question:

Is Israel preparing for the final and most dangerous phase of its confrontation with Iran, or is this a declaration designed to demonstrate strength before an even bigger regional battle?

Photo credit: GPO

2027: Abiante's report card - What has the Rivers South East Senate hopeful done in the House? By The Neighbourhood News...
09/09/2026

2027: Abiante's report card - What has the Rivers South East Senate hopeful done in the House?

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

By the time Rivers South East voters are asked to choose their next Senator in 2027, the most important question may not be who speaks the loudest, but who can point to a verifiable record of legislative work.

For Hon. Awaji-Inombek Dagomie Abiante, the answer lies in his years at the National Assembly, where he has represented the Andoni–Opobo/Nkoro Federal Constituency.

Now seeking to move from the House of Representatives to the Senate, Abiante's legislative record is coming under a different microscope.

What has he sponsored?

Which ideas survived the legislative process?

What became law?

And, perhaps most importantly, what does his record tell Rivers South East about the kind of Senator he could become?

The record behind the campaign

Political campaigns are often built around promises.

Legislative records are different.

They leave paper trails.

Bills have sponsors. Motions have dates. Committee assignments are documented. Proceedings can be examined. Laws eventually carry the signatures of the National Assembly and the President.

Against that standard, Abiante's record contains several significant entries.

One of the most consequential is his long-running push for the establishment of a South-South Development Commission.

But that is only one part of the story.

From Constituency to regional development

On July 19, 2023, parliamentary records showed Abiante sponsoring several bills in the House.

Among them were proposals concerning:

- The establishment of the National Institute for Brackish Water Fisheries Research in Ngo-Andoni;

Amendment of the Sea Fisheries Act;

Repeal of the River Niger Transit Act;

Establishment of the South-South Development Commission; and

Compulsory installation of Close Circuit Television systems.

The spread of these proposals is significant.

They touched constituency development, fisheries, waterways, regional development and national security.

In other words, his legislative agenda was not confined to one narrow subject.

The Ngo-Andoni question

For Rivers South East, the proposed National Institute for Brackish Water Fisheries Research deserves particular attention.

The communities around Andoni, Opobo and Nkoro are heavily connected to waterways and aquatic economic activities.

Fisheries are therefore not an abstract policy issue.

They are connected to livelihoods.

The proposal for a federal fisheries research institute in Ngo, Andoni, represented an attempt to translate the economic realities of the constituency into federal legislation.

Whether the institute ultimately becomes operational is a separate question.

But the legislative initiative itself demonstrates an attempt to put a constituency-specific economic issue on the national legislative agenda.

The bill that survived two assemblies

Then comes perhaps the most important chapter of Abiante's legislative story.

The South-South Development Commission proposal was not a product of the 10th Assembly alone.

Abiante had pursued the idea during the 9th Assembly.

The House passed the bill in 2021, but the legislation did not complete the process because of the Senate concurrence issue.

Instead of disappearing with the dissolution of the Assembly, the proposal returned in the 10th Assembly.

The National Assembly eventually passed the bill, and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu assented to the legislation in March 2025.

That gives Abiante something considerably more substantial than a campaign claim:

a legislative initiative that survived an Assembly transition and eventually became law.

That persistence is arguably one of the strongest points in his legislative report card.

The controversial NYSC proposal

But Abiante's legislative career has not been without controversy.

In 2021, he sponsored a bill seeking to discontinue the National Youth Service Corps.

His argument centred substantially on the insecurity confronting corps members and the changing security environment in Nigeria.

The proposal generated significant debate because NYSC has traditionally been viewed as one of Nigeria's major national-integration programmes.

Whether voters agreed with the proposal or not, it demonstrated that Abiante was prepared to put forward legislation on politically sensitive national issues.

What does the record actually say?

A serious assessment must distinguish between sponsoring legislation and successfully making law.

This is where political scorecards frequently become misleading.

A lawmaker can sponsor dozens of bills.

That does not mean dozens of laws emerge from the National Assembly.

Abiante's record should therefore be divided into different categories:

Sponsored legislation: substantial evidence exists.

Legislative initiatives that progressed: several proposals received consideration in the House.

Legislation that became law: the South-South Development Commission is a particularly important example.

Implementation: this remains a separate test requiring evidence beyond the legislative record.

That distinction makes the assessment more credible.

What could Abiante bring to the senate?

The 2027 Senate contest presents a different challenge.

The Senate is not simply a larger version of the House.

Senators operate within a chamber with fewer members, powerful committees and significant influence over national legislation, oversight and federal policy.

For Rivers South East, therefore, the relevant question is not merely whether Abiante has experience.

He clearly does.

The question is how that experience would be deployed.

A serious senatorial agenda would need to address issues including:

Environment

Oil-producing communities continue to face questions around environmental degradation, remediation and sustainable development.

Infrastructure

Roads, waterways, bridges, electricity and other federal infrastructure remain central to the economic future of the district.

Blue economy

The extensive waterways of Rivers South East provide opportunities in fisheries, aquaculture, maritime transportation and other coastal economic activities.

Youth employment

The district needs economic opportunities that go beyond government employment.

Federal presence

The quality and distribution of federal institutions and projects across the district will remain an important measure of representation.

Oversight

A Senator's influence is not measured only by bills.

Oversight of ministries, departments, agencies and development interventions can determine whether federal promises become actual projects.

The real rest of the Abiante record

The strongest argument emerging from Abiante's legislative history is not that every bill he sponsored became law.

It did not.

The stronger argument is that he has demonstrated legislative persistence, constituency advocacy and the willingness to pursue regional policy at the federal level.

The South-South Development Commission provides the clearest example of persistence translating into legislation.

The Ngo-Andoni fisheries proposal demonstrates attention to the economic character of his constituency.

The NYSC proposal demonstrates willingness to engage controversial national questions.

Together, these provide voters with something more tangible than campaign slogans: a legislative trail that can be examined.

But the Senate requires more than a record

This is where the 2027 conversation becomes more interesting.

A good House record does not automatically guarantee effective Senate representation.

The Senate candidate must explain what comes next.

If Abiante wins the Rivers South East senatorial mandate, what specific legislation will he pursue?

Which federal projects will he fight for?

Which ministries and agencies will he hold accountable?

How will he strengthen the economic prospects of the district?

How will he use committee membership?

And how will constituents measure his performance four years later?

Those questions should be answered before the ballot, not after it.

The bigger 2027 question

Rivers South East is not simply choosing another politician.

It is choosing someone who will have six years to speak, legislate, negotiate, scrutinise government spending and influence federal policy from one of Nigeria's most powerful legislative chambers.

That makes the examination of every candidate's record essential.

For Abiante, the evidence points to a lawmaker who has spent years building a legislative portfolio that reaches from his immediate constituency to the wider South-South region and national policy.

But 2027 presents the ultimate test.

Can the experience accumulated in the House be converted into greater legislative influence for Rivers South East in the Senate?

That is the question the district—and ultimately the voters—must answer.

Grave warfare: How Wike turned Amaechi's matriarchal farewell into a battleground of bitterness By The Neighbourhood New...
08/09/2026

Grave warfare: How Wike turned Amaechi's matriarchal farewell into a battleground of bitterness

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

​UBIMA, RIVERS STATE — Political animosity plumbed new depths in Rivers State as the final funeral rites for late Dame Ezinne Mary Oduah Amaechi, mother of former Governor Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, transformed into an arena of desperate state-backed sabotage and partisan theatre.

​Despite calculated roadblocks, security restrictions, and rival political events intentionally engineered by Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Minister Nyesom Wike, to choke access to Ubima, the final journey of the matriarch ultimately became a massive show of national solidarity. Prominent leaders across political divides, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, defied the hostile climate to stand with the grieving family.

​The confrontation laid bare a grim escalation in Rivers politics.

While the Amaechi family prepared to lay their mother to rest, Wike, whom Amaechi famously elevated as his Chief of Staff in 2007, orchestrated competing civic and community events in neighbouring areas. Allies and local watchdogs reported strategic traffic blockades along the Isiokpo-Ubima expressway designed to frustrate dignitaries and mourners, weaponising state influence against a sacred cultural tradition.

​Rather than observing the solemnity traditionally accorded to the dead, Wike utilised the platform of his parallel gathering to launch scathing political attacks against his former benefactor. The deliberate scheduling stunned civil observers, underscoring what critics termed a profound erosion of African traditional decency in the face of unbridled political obsession.

​Yet, the desperate optics backfired. Ubima swelled with an elite bipartisan delegation, including former governors and national political figures, rendering the tactical obstructions a testament to the enduring national relevance of the former Rivers governor. As the dust settles over the Ikwerre local government area, the events of that Saturday have left an indelible stain on the conscience of the state's political class, proving that for some, even the gates of the grave offer no sanctuary from petty warfare.

Benue under fire: "No state is a no-go area" - Amnesty International tells APC, condemns blockade of Peter Obi By The Ne...
08/09/2026

Benue under fire: "No state is a no-go area" - Amnesty International tells APC, condemns blockade of Peter Obi

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

Rights group demands answers as armed youths barricade road and block NDC presidential candidate's entry into Benue

A political storm is brewing in Benue State after Amnesty International raised the alarm over the alleged blockade of opposition presidential candidate Peter Obi and his entourage.

In a strongly worded statement, Amnesty International expressed deep concern over what it described as the “reckless and unlawful use of political thugs” to prevent the presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress, NDC, Mr. Peter Obi, from entering Benue State.

The rights organisation insisted that no Nigerian requires anybody's permission, or prior notification, to visit any part of the country.

And it delivered an even stronger warning: "No State is a no-go area for any person or supporters of any political party."

According to Amnesty International, the incident reportedly occurred when heavily armed youths barricaded Gboko Road in Makurdi, creating what the organisation described as a dangerous situation for Obi and his entourage.

The organisation said the circumstances surrounding the blockade raised serious questions about political intolerance and the safety of opposition candidates.

"What happened today is dangerous"

Amnesty International described the incident as an “unprecedented and dangerous act of political hooliganism” capable of undermining Nigeria's democratic process.

The organisation said the alleged use of armed vigilante groups or political thugs to harass rival candidates was unacceptable and called for the relevant authorities to investigate the incident and ensure that anyone found responsible is held accountable.

The rights group also said the Benue State Government has questions to answer over the incident.

But beyond the events in Makurdi, Amnesty International warned that the Benue confrontation could be part of a broader and disturbing pattern.

A warning for Nigeria's democracy

According to Amnesty International, it has been documenting what it described as increasing political repression since last year.

The organisation cited alleged incidents including attempts to prevent hotels from hosting opposition political meetings; direct attacks on the political activities of rival parties; actions allegedly designed to deny political opponents a level playing field.

The warning is alarming.

Because elections are not merely about casting ballots.

A democracy also depends on whether political parties can campaign freely; travel freely; hold meetings freely; address supporters freely; and compete without intimidation or violence.

Amnesty International warned that political intolerance, incitement and other actions capable of undermining the democratic process must be addressed decisively.

"Where is the response?"

The organisation expressed concern over what it described as insufficient action by relevant authorities to prevent political repression and violence.

It also raised concerns about the alleged failure to investigate and prosecute suspected perpetrators of politically motivated intimidation and violence.

Its message was clear: political violence must not become a normal part of Nigeria's election culture.

The organisation called on political parties and candidates to make a clear commitment against violence and thuggery an integral part of their election campaigns.

The big question after Benue

The incident involving Peter Obi has now triggered a wider national conversation.

If a presidential candidate can allegedly be blocked from entering a state, what does that mean for ordinary political supporters?

If opposition meetings can allegedly be disrupted, where does political competition end—and intimidation begin?

And perhaps most importantly: Who will be held accountable when political violence occurs?

Nigeria's democracy is built on the principle that every citizen is entitled to freedom of movement and lawful political participation.

No governor owns a state.

No political party owns a state.

And no group of armed youths should determine who is permitted to enter Nigerian territory.

That is the central message Amnesty International is sending after the dramatic events in Benue.

The Benue incident may have ended, but the questions have only just begun.

As Nigeria moves deeper into another politically charged season, the country now faces a critical test:

Will political leaders condemn violence and intimidation regardless of who benefits from it—or will silence allow political thuggery to become the new weapon of election campaigns?

Should any political party or government have the power to prevent a Nigerian from entering any state in the Federation?

Tell us what you think.

Israel's election earthquake: Netanyahu under pressure as a General rises .. But who will really control Jerusalem? By T...
08/09/2026

Israel's election earthquake: Netanyahu under pressure as a General rises
.. But who will really control Jerusalem?

By The Neighbourhood Newspaper

Benjamin Netanyahu has survived political scandals, corruption allegations, wars, coalition rebellions and repeated predictions of his political death.

But the Israeli Prime Minister may now be facing one of the most dangerous political battles of his extraordinary career.

And this time, the threat is not coming from one man.

It is coming from a former army chief, a former Prime Minister, a divided right wing, and the haunting political consequences of October 7.

The battle for Israel's next Prime Minister is becoming a political earthquake.

And at the centre of it all is one question: Has the political magic of Benjamin Netanyahu finally been broken?

The General who is shaking Netanyahu

For years, Netanyahu dominated Israeli politics.

But a new challenger is rapidly changing the political equation.

Gadi Eisenkot, a former Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, has emerged as one of Netanyahu's most formidable challengers.

Recent polling has placed Eisenkot's political camp ahead of Netanyahu's Likud.

One recent poll projected:

Eisenkot's Yashar - 25 seats

Netanyahu's Likud - 21 seats

On the surface, it looks like a devastating blow to Netanyahu.

But here is where the real political drama begins.

In Israel, winning the most seats does not necessarily make you Prime Minister.

The real number is: 61.

Israel's parliament has 120 seats.

Whoever can assemble a coalition controlling at least 61 seats holds the key to power.

And that means something extraordinary could happen.

Eisenkot could win the largest party, and still fail to become Prime Minister.

Netanyahu could lose the battle for the largest party—l, and still remain Prime Minister.

Welcome to the brutal mathematics of Israeli politics.

Netanyahu's biggest enemy may not be Eisenkot

Ironically, Netanyahu's greatest danger may be coming from inside his own political camp.

For years, Netanyahu's strength was the Israeli right.

Likud.

Religious parties.

Ultra-Orthodox parties.

Nationalist parties.

The political machine was powerful.

But now, cracks are appearing.

And Netanyahu knows it.

The nightmare scenario is simple: Too many right-wing parties. Too many candidates. Too many wasted votes.

Israel has an electoral threshold of 3.25 percent.

Any party that fails to cross that line could be shut out of parliament.

Imagine thousands of right-wing voters casting their ballots, and discovering that their party has won ZERO seats.

Those wasted votes could change the entire election.

This is why Netanyahu has reportedly been pushing smaller right-wing parties to unite.

Because in this election a divided right-wing could destroy Netanyahu.

Itamar Ben-Gvir, Smotrich and the war for the right

Netanyahu's political survival depends heavily on allies.

But allies can become liabilities.

Smaller right-wing parties are fighting for their own political survival.

Some are hovering dangerously close to the electoral threshold.

Others are resisting pressure to merge.

And new political forces are emerging.

Every independent party creates another danger:

What happens if it takes votes away from Netanyahu's traditional bloc?

That question is now terrifying the Likud camp.

Because Netanyahu does not necessarily have to lose millions of votes to lose power.

He could lose power through political fragmentation.

A few percentage points here.

A small party there.

A party failing to cross the threshold.

And suddenly, the road to 61 disappear s.

October 7: The ghost following Netanyahu

There is another issue that refuses to disappear.

October 7.

The Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023, was one of the most devastating security failures in Israel's history.

For Netanyahu, the political consequences have been profound.

For decades, he carefully cultivated an image as Israel's ultimate security leader.

The message was always clear: Netanyahu means security.

But October 7 changed the conversation.

Now, his opponents are asking: If Netanyahu was Israel's ultimate protector, how did October 7 happen?

It is a question his political opponents will not allow voters to forget.

And that is precisely where Gadi Eisenkot becomes politically dangerous.

Eisenkot's secret weapon: Security without Netanyahu

Eisenkot is not entering politics as a conventional left-wing politician.

He is a former military chief.

A general.

A man with decades of national-security experience.

And that gives him a potentially powerful message: Israel can change its leader without changing its commitment to security.

That is dangerous territory for Netanyahu.

For years, Netanyahu benefited from the fear that an alternative government might be weak on security.

But Eisenkot changes the argument.

A voter can now ask: Why should I choose Netanyahu for security when another former military chief is asking for my vote?

That could become one of the defining questions of the election.

Enter Naftali Bennett: The man who could change everything

Then there is Naftali Bennett.

The former Prime Minister.

The political survivor.

The wildcard.

Bennett has already sat in the Prime Minister's office.

He understands coalition politics.

He understands the Israeli right.

And he has demonstrated that he can lead a politically diverse government.

But there is a problem.

Gadi Eisenkot is rising.

And Bennett is now facing a dangerous political question: Is he running to become Prime Minister, or positioning himself to decide who becomes Prime Minister?

This is where the election becomes truly fascinating.

Imagine this scenario:

Eisenkot wins the largest party.

Netanyahu cannot get 61 seats.

Eisenkot cannot get 61 seats.

Then the smaller parties begin negotiating.

And suddenly, Naftali Bennett becomes the compromise.

Yes.

It is entirely possible for Bennett to finish behind both Eisenkot and Netanyahu, and still find himself back in the Prime Minister's office.

The most important number in Israel is not 25.

It is not 21.

It is not even the number of votes.

The most important number is: 61.

And this is where Netanyahu remains extremely dangerous.

Benjamin Netanyahu understands coalition politics better than almost anyone in Israel.

He has spent decades negotiating political alliances.

He knows how to build governments.

He knows how to keep allies close.

And he knows that elections are not won on polling day alone.

They are also won after the votes are counted..

That could be Netanyahu's greatest weapon.

The ultra-orthodox time bomb

Another political battle is quietly developing.

Military service.

Israel has experienced prolonged military mobilisation.

Reservists have been called up.

Families have lost loved ones.

Soldiers have spent months away from their homes.

And in the middle of all this is a deeply controversial question: Should ultra-Orthodox Jews continue receiving exemptions from military service?

Netanyahu's political alliances have placed him directly in the middle of that controversy.

And some voters are asking a painful question:
Why should one Israeli fight, while another is exempted?

The issue could affect Netanyahu's support among:

Reservists.

Soldiers' families.

Secular Israelis.

Traditional right-wing voters.

Another potential crack in the political wall.

The Arab parties and the secret battle for 61

Then comes one of the most complicated questions in Israeli politics.

The Arab parties.

They could collectively control significant seats in the Knesset.

But the question is not simply how many seats they win.

The question is: Who is willing to govern with them?

For Eisenkot and the anti-Netanyahu camp, coalition mathematics becomes extremely complicated.

Some parties may refuse to join a government dependent upon Arab political parties.

Others may be willing to cooperate.

This is why every single seat matters.

One small party crossing the 3.25 percent threshold could change everything.

One small party failing could destroy an entire coalition.

One defection could produce a political earthquake.

This is why the election will be won and lost in the small parties

For possible futures for Israel

Scenario one: Netanyahu's great escape

Netanyahu succeeds in uniting the right.

His allies cross the electoral threshold.

Likud stabilises.

The religious parties remain loyal.

The opposition remains divided.

And despite losing ground in the polls Netanyahu returns as Prime Minister.

It would be one of the greatest political comebacks of his career.

Scenario two: The Eisenkot revolution

Eisenkot maintains his momentum.

The anti-Netanyahu camp consolidates.

Small opposition parties cross the threshold.

Netanyahu's right-wing allies fragment.

And the opposition reaches 61 seats.

The former military chief becomes Prime Minister.

And Israel enters a post-Netanyahu era.

Scenario three: The Bennet surprise

Neither Netanyahu nor Eisenkot can build a government.

Political negotiations begin.

Weeks of bargaining follow.

And Bennett emerges as the compromise candidate.

The man who may not win the election wins the Prime Minister's Office.

Scenario four: Political chaos

Nobody reaches 61.

Coalition negotiations collapse.

Political pressure intensifies.

Israel enters another period of instability.

And the country could face yet another political crisis.

The wildcard: War

But there is one factor no opinion poll can accurately predict.

War.

Israel remains at the centre of an extraordinarily volatile region.

The conflicts and security crises involving Gaza, Lebanon and Iran could change the political environment overnight.

A major security crisis could produce a rally-around-the-flag effect.

Netanyahu could benefit from voters seeking experienced leadership.

But there is a darker possibility.

Another major security failure could reinforce the political damage already caused by October 7.

And strengthen the argument that Israel needs new leadership.

War could save Netanyahu politically.

Or destroy him.

The real election is not left vs right

This may be the biggest misunderstanding about Israel's coming election.

The battle is no longer simply left vs right

It is increasingly becoming Netanyahu vs the post-Netanyahu Israel

Eisenkot is not traditionally associated with the left.

Bennett is certainly not a traditional left-wing politician.

Both bring strong security credentials.

Both can appeal to centre-right voters.

And both offer an alternative message:

“Israel can have security without Netanyahu.”

That may be the most dangerous political message Netanyahu has faced in years.

The verdict: Netanyahu is wounded but not dead

The polls suggest Eisenkot has momentum.

The former military chief has emerged as a powerful challenger.

Bennett remains a major wildcard.

The right is showing signs of fragmentation.

October 7 continues to cast a long shadow.

And Netanyahu's traditional image as Israel's ultimate security leader has been severely challenged.

But do not write off Benjamin Netanyahu.

Not yet.

Because elections are not won by headlines.

They are not won by one opinion poll.

And in Israel the largest party does not automatically take power.

The man who controls the coalition, controls the government.

And Netanyahu has spent decades mastering that game.

The three men to watch

Gadi Eisenkot - The momentum

The General who may represent Israel's strongest post-Netanyahu alternative.

Benjamin Netanyahu - The survivor

Under enormous pressure, but armed with decades of political experience and a powerful political machine.

Naftali Bennett - The wildcard

The former Prime Minister who could become the kingmaker, or even return to power.

The final question

Israel is approaching a moment that could redefine its political future.

For years, the question was:

“Can anyone defeat Netanyahu?”

Now, the question has changed.

“Can Netanyahu's opponents agree on who should replace him?"

Because that may be Netanyahu's greatest hope.

A divided opposition.

A fragmented alternative.

Too many Prime Ministerial ambitions.

And not enough agreement.

The general is rising.

The former Prime Minister is waiting.

The right is divided.

October 7 still hangs over the nation.

And Netanyahu, Israel's greatest political survivor, is once again fighting for his political life.

The battle for Israel has begun.

Who will control Jerusalem after the election - Netanyahu, Eisenkot or Bennett?

Is this finally the beginning of the end for Benjamin Netanyahu, or is Israel about to witness another Netanyahu political comeback?

Address

47 Ikwerre Road, Mile 1, Diobu
Portharcourt
500001

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Neighbourhood Newspaper posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Neighbourhood Newspaper:

Shortcuts

Share

Category