15/07/2025
You hardly see me follow the trend, but this particular lawsuit is worth my time.
Yes!
This action alone, screams boldness!
The thing is, most Nigerian content creators “dey really over do”
Is it the pranks?
Public disrespect?
or humiliation?
Them too do Abeg 😓
Majority of the times, there are no jokes to laugh at in their supposed fun videos. So, they resort to humiliating people to make their followers laugh.
I hope this suit serves a lesson!
So the applicant is suing Peller, the popular TikTok creator, for a livestreamed “job interview” that she claims was humiliating and degrading.
What makes this even more significant is the legal basis of her claim.
SECTION 34 of the 1999 CONSTITUTION, which guarantees every Nigerian the right to dignity of the human person.
Many don’t realise that this right isn’t only about physical abuse. It also covers any treatment (online or offline) that shames, ridicules, or dehumanises a person. Dignity is not abstract. It’s personal. And once it’s violated in a way that subjects someone to public mockery or shame, the courts can step in.
From the motion filed, the applicant wants the court to declare that her rights were breached, award her ₦500 million in damages, and compel a public apology. But beyond the figures and legalese, I see something deeper. A citizen standing up and saying: what happened to me online matters in real life, and I deserve to be heard.
This raises serious questions about content creation and influencer culture. At what point does “entertainment” become cruelty? What limits should exist when the subject of a video is not just a storyline, but a real human being? And should the law step in when a person’s constitutional right is harmed in the name of going viral?
More importantly, and I think the most fascinating one, this law suit just tell everyone that Nigeria’s legal system, despite its many challenges, has the tools to address emerging harms in the digital age. Our Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 even allow individuals to bring claims against private citizens, not just government authorities, when their rights are violated.
This suit may spark debate, but it also offers a powerful civic lesson. Social media is not lawless. There are boundaries. And where rights are trampled, redress is possible.
I’ll be watching this case closely. Not just for its legal impact, but for what it teaches us about respect, responsibility, and the dignity we owe each other online and off.
So guys, Let’s go to court!
I am Your. Legal. Coach