SAJ BLOG (2026)

08/01/2026

IS JESUS, ABRAHAM & MOSES MUSLIMS ? 🤔

Islam defines a Muslim as someone who submits to Allah through Muhammad, accepts the Qur’an, and follows Islamic law.
That definition did not exist before the 7th century.

So when Islam claims “all prophets were Muslims”—Abraham, Moses, David, even Jesus—it creates a problem:

No Qur’an before Muhammad

No Shahada before Muhammad

No Islamic law before Muhammad

No mention of Muhammad by those prophets

Abraham believed God by faith, not Islam.
Moses followed the Torah, not the Qur’an.
Jesus spoke of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, not Tawhid.

Calling all prophets “Muslims” is not history—it’s retroactive rebranding.
A theological imagination used to borrow authority from Judaism and Christianity while overriding their message.

Truth matters. History matters. Faith should not be built on confusion.

👉 Follow this page for more deep, honest discussions.

08/01/2026

IS THE QUR’AN ABOUT GOD… OR ABOUT MUHAMMAD?

A sincere reading of the Qur’an raises uncomfortable but important questions.

Many verses do not focus on moral discipline for all Muslims or universal ethics. Instead, they repeatedly appear tailored to protect, defend, elevate, or justify Muhammad personally—especially when he was questioned by his companions, his wives, or society.

🔹 Private convenience becomes revelation
Qur’an 33:53 was revealed because Muhammad was uncomfortable with guests overstaying in his house (Sahih Bukhari 4793).
Why would eternal scripture solve a dinner-party problem?

🔹 Exclusive sexual privileges
Qur’an 33:50 allows Muhammad what no other Muslim is allowed.
Aisha herself remarked: “I feel your Lord hastens to fulfill your desires” (Sahih Bukhari 4788).

🔹 God intervenes in marital disputes
Qur’an 66:1–5 rebukes Muhammad’s wives and threatens to replace them over a private domestic issue.
Why does God take sides in household conflicts?

🔹 Absolute obedience to Muhammad
Qur’an 4:65 and 33:36 make obedience to Muhammad’s personal decisions a test of faith—blurring the line between God’s will and one man’s authority.

🔹 Revelation changes customs to fit actions
Qur’an 33:37 justifies Muhammad marrying his adopted son’s ex-wife—something taboo in Arab culture—by altering divine law after the fact.

🔹 Criticism becomes a crime
Qur’an 33:57 curses those who “harm” Muhammad.
Hadith records people being killed for insulting him (Sahih Bukhari 4037).
This is unlike biblical prophets, who were criticized yet never enforced worship of themselves.

🔹 Context-driven revelations
Qur’an 16:101 admits verses were replaced based on circumstances.
If revelation shifts with situations, how eternal is it?

📌 The pattern is consistent
• Defend Muhammad
• Elevate Muhammad
• Justify Muhammad
• Silence critics of Muhammad
• Enforce obedience to Muhammad

This leads to one unavoidable question:

Is this the voice of a transcendent God revealing timeless truth—or situational revelations serving one man’s authority and desires?

Think. Question. Verify.

👉 Follow this page for more evidence-based discussions (without insults, without fear)

08/01/2026

✝️I AM DOING A PRAYER (PART 1)✝️

HALLELUYAH, AMEN!

MAY THE LORD OF THE RIGHTEOUS PEOPLE DIRECT YOUR STEPS🚶‍♂️🚶‍♀️WHEREVER GO TODAY-TODAY, INCLUDING HIM OR HER THAT IS AT HOME, IN THE OFFICE, IN BUSINESS, AND OR IN WHATEVER ACTIVITIES ARE YOUR ENDEAVOURS; LET IT OF UPLIFTMENTS, YES, AND AUGURS WELL, YES AND AMEN!

LET PEACE OF MIND AND HAPPINESS COME OUT OF IT, IN THE NAME OF JESUS, AMEN!

👉(Psalm 34:17)

👉(Psalm 97:10)

O GLORY!

08/01/2026

☪️“Why did Islam change after Muhammad got power?”☪️

Many people are unaware that Islamic theology itself acknowledges a change in message, tone, and command over time.

In Islamic jurisprudence, this is explained through Naskh (نسخ) — abrogation, where later revelations cancel earlier ones.

Mecca Phase:

While Muhammad lived in Mecca:
The Quranic tone was soft, inviting, and non-confrontational Emphasis was placed on coexistence:
“To you be your religion, and to me my religion.” (Qur’an 109:6)
No political power, no army
After 10 years, only about 150 followers

Medina Phase:

After migrating to Medina:
Muhammad gained political authority and military strength.

The Quranic tone shifted dramatically:
Commands replaced invitations

Separation from non-Muslims was enforced
Warfare and dominance were justified
Earlier peaceful verses were abrogated by later rulings
This is not speculation — it is documented in classical Islamic tafsir and fiqh.

Islamic scholars themselves admit:
The Qur’an is not arranged chronologically
Meccan verses differ sharply from Medinan verses in language, content, and intent
Many peaceful verses are considered context-bound or cancelled
Critical Question

If Allah is all-knowing and unchanging:
Why would His “style,” tone, and commands change so drastically?

Why reveal peaceful teachings only to later replace them with coercive laws?
A Dawah Reality Check

When someone quotes:
“There is no compulsion in religion…”
Ask them:
Is that a Meccan verse?
Was it later limited or overridden by Medinan commands?

Islamic sources themselves list dozens — some say hundreds — of abrogated verses.
This isn’t “Islamophobia.” This is Islamic theology, explained using Islamic sources.
Truth doesn’t fear questions.

06/01/2026

IS ISLAM TRULY A RELIGION OF PEACE? — A CRITICAL EXAMINATION

After careful study and reflection, I have come to understand the Islamic concept of “peace” as fundamentally tied to submission—the literal meaning of the word Islam. Peace, in this framework, is said to exist where submission to Islam is established.

In theory, peace exists within Dar al-Islam (the House of Islam). In practice, however, history and current events reveal repeated conflicts—even among Muslims themselves—from Afghanistan to Iraq, Yemen, Algeria, Sudan, and beyond. These internal wars challenge the idea that submission alone guarantees peace.

Peace With Non-Muslims?

Traditional Islamic jurisprudence historically divides the world into:

*Dar al-Islam (where Islam rules)
*Dar al-Harb (where Islam does not)

For those outside Islam, especially non-“People of the Book,” classical texts describe a choice: acceptance of Islam or conflict. This understanding has been used—rightly or wrongly—to justify violence in regions such as Sudan, Northern Nigeria, Chad, and under regimes like the Taliban.

Regarding Jews and Christians, Qur’an 9:29 instructs fighting “until they are subdued.” This verse has often been cited to explain the historical dhimmi system, where non-Muslims lived under Islamic rule with restricted rights. Contemporary examples are frequently discussed in relation to Saudi Arabia, parts of Egypt, Sudan, and Indonesia.

Other verses commonly referenced in these discussions include Qur’an 2:190–193 and Qur’an 9:5, which speak of fighting until opposition is removed.

Apostasy and Fear

One of the most debated texts is Qur’an 4:89, traditionally interpreted by many classical scholars to prescribe death for apostasy. If belief cannot be freely entered or freely left, critics argue that such a system produces fear rather than peace.

Contrast With the Bible

The Bible presents peace in a very different way—rooted not in coercion, but in love, conscience, and reconciliation:

> “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”
— Matthew 5:9

> “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”
— Matthew 5:4

> “If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.”
— Romans 12:18

> “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you. Not as the world gives.”
— John 14:27

Jesus never spread His message by the sword. His kingdom advanced through truth, sacrifice, and love—not force.

Final Thought

To describe Islam simply as a “religion of peace” ignores serious theological, historical, and textual challenges. When peace is defined as the entire world submitting to one belief system, critics argue it becomes—by definition—a mandate for conflict, not coexistence.

This is not a call to hate, but a call to honest discussion, critical thinking, and truth-seeking.

👉 If you value thoughtful analysis, biblical clarity, and respectful but bold conversations, don’t forget to follow this page and stay connected for more insights.

06/01/2026

😂 WHEN CLAIMS COLLIDE WITH BASIC LOGIC 😂

This picture is funny—but it also exposes a serious contradiction.

Muslims often claim that Noah (Nūḥ) was a Muslim (meaning he followed Islam as defined today).

But here’s the problem…

📖 According to the Bible, Noah was commanded by God to bring TWO OF EVERY KIND OF ANIMAL into the Ark:

“You shall bring two of every kind of living creature into the ark…”
— Genesis 6:19

That includes: 🐄 cattle
🐑 sheep
🐕 dogs
🐎 horses
🐖 PIGS

Now pause and think.

🚫 Islam declares pigs haram (forbidden)
📖 Qur’an 2:173, 5:3, 6:145

So the obvious question the meme is asking (with a facepalm 😂):

👉 If Noah was a Muslim… WHY DID HE BRING PIGS ON THE BOAT?

Some people try to escape by saying: 🗣️ “He brought animals but didn’t eat them.”

But that response misses the point.

❗ The issue is not eating pigs
❗ The issue is God commanding a prophet to preserve an animal Islam later calls impure

If pigs were truly “unclean by nature,”
➡️ Why would God preserve them?
➡️ Why create them at all?
➡️ Why save them from the Flood?

The Bible teaches something different:
“God saw all that He had made, and it was VERY GOOD.”
— Genesis 1:31

Christianity teaches: ✅ All creation is good
✅ Food laws were temporary
✅ Salvation is not about diet, but about the heart

So yes—this meme is funny 😂
But behind the humor is a real theological contradiction that deserves honest discussion.

Truth does not fear questions.
Logic does not fear memes.

✝️📖

😅

06/01/2026

DO NOT ALLOW ANYBODY TO DECEIVE YOU, SIEVE YOU AWAY THEREBY YOU WILL LOSE A RELATIONSHIP YOU HAVE HAD WITH JESUS! 😢 😭

POINT👉REMEMBER THAT THE LIVING GOD DID NOT GIVE ANY ROOM FOR IDOL WORSHIPPING, NO, NO, NO!

JESUS IS THE ONLY ONE THAT GIVES ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN, YES!

REPENT YE AND TURN TO GOD, YES!

JESUS LOVES ❤ YOU!

👉GO, BEGINNING TO THINK 🤔 DEEP ABOUT THIS TRUTH!

👉(John 14:6)

O GLORY!

05/01/2026

CAN ANY MUSLIM ANSWER THIS QUESTION ☪️

04/01/2026

☪️Spanish Priest Faces Jail for Criticizing Islam ☪️

A Spanish Catholic priest, Custodio Ballester, faces up to 3 years in prison for criticizing Islam.

Muslim groups accused him of “Islamophobia.”

Yet what did he actually say?

# “In whatever country Islam is the dominant religion, Christians suffer systematic persecution and are murdered for refusing to convert.”

This is not hate speech — it is documented reality, and it is happening right now across parts of the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia.
What makes this worse is that Ballester said this decades ago, and history has proven him right.

More than 30,000 people have signed a petition demanding his acquittal.

The Bible warned us this would happen.

📖 Jesus said:

> “If the world hates you, know that it hated Me before it hated you.”
— John 15:18

📖 Again He said:

> “They will lay their hands on you and persecute you… and some of you they will put to death. And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake.”
— Luke 21:12–17

📖 Paul the Apostle wrote:

> “Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.”
— 2 Timothy 3:12

📖 The prophets warned:

“For Zion’s sake I will not keep silent, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not remain quiet.”
— Isaiah 62:1

Silencing truth does not make it false.
Punishing a priest for stating observable facts only confirms the warning of Scripture.

📖 “The truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.”
— Isaiah 59:14

Christian persecution is real.
And speaking the truth about it should never be a crime.

✝️ Pray for Pastor Ballester. Pray for persecuted Christians. Pray for courage to speak the truth.

✝️

04/01/2026

SHARIAH FOR OTHERS, DEMOCRACY FOR THEMSELVES — ISLAM’S DAWAH HYPOCRISY EXPOSED BY ITS OWN SOURCES.

Western Dawah preachers endlessly praise Shariah Law as perfect, divine, and the ultimate solution for humanity.

So here’s a fair question 👇
If Shariah is truly superior, why don’t they live under it?

When challenged, the excuses are endless:

*Saudi Arabia? “Not real Shariah.”
*Iran? “Shia Shariah—we reject it.”
*Taliban Afghanistan? Silence.

Yet the Taliban openly claim they are applying Shariah according to the Qur’an and Sunnah.

📖 Qur’an
“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed—then it is those who are the disbelievers.”
(Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:44)

If that verse is taken literally—as Dawah preachers insist—then Afghanistan should be a magnet for them.

But no one is rushing there.

Why?

Because Shariah sounds perfect in theory, but brutal in practice.

IRREVERSIBLE PUNISHMENTS — BY HUMAN JUDGES

📖 Qur’an
“As for the thief, male and female, cut off their hands as recompense for what they committed.”
(Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:38)

📖 Hadith

“By Allah, if Fatimah the daughter of Muhammad were to steal, I would cut off her hand.”
(Sahih Bukhari 6788)

Modern justice systems allow appeals, reversals, and compensation for wrongful convictions.

Shariah does not.

Once a hand is cut—there is no appeal.
Once someone is executed—there is no correction.

Yet judgments are made by fallible humans, not angels.

STONING AND EX*****ON

📖 Hadith
“The Prophet ordered that a married adulterer be stoned to death.”
(Sahih Muslim 1691)

📖 Hadith
“Whoever changes his religion, kill him.”
(Sahih Bukhari 6922)

Ask yourself:

*What happens if witnesses lie?
*What if evidence is weak?
*What if the judge is corrupt?

There is no undo button in Shariah.

SAME-DAY BURIAL & LOST JUSTICE

📖 Hadith
“Hasten with the funeral.”
(Sahih Bukhari 1315)

This made sense in the 7th century—before refrigeration and forensic science.

But today? How many poisoning, suffocations, and domestic murders are buried before investigations even begin?

Islam preserved ritual.
Modern societies preserve evidence.

THE ULTIMATE CONTRADICTION

Even Muslim-majority nations quietly avoid full Shariah:

*Saudi Arabia adopts Western law for commerce.
*UAE builds Western-style legal zones.
*Islamic countries depend on Western science, medicine, and engineering.

Yet Dawah influencers enjoy:

*Free speech
*Democracy
*Human rights
*Welfare systems

while preaching Shariah for others.

📖 Qur’an
“Do you order righteousness of the people and forget yourselves?”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:44)

If Shariah were truly the answer, its loudest promoters would be the first to live under it.

But they don’t.

And that silence exposes the truth.

04/01/2026

🚨 WHEN “EDUCATION” BECOMES ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION 🚨

A 19-year-old Islamic teacher, Dzhamilya Timaeva, was arrested in England after allegedly using her position at Tawheed Islamic Education Centre to indoctrinate young children with extremist ideology.

According to prosecutors, she didn’t see teaching as a neutral profession — she saw it as a religious duty to spread extremist beliefs.
Police seized her phone and reportedly found ISIS propaganda videos, alongside evidence that children were being encouraged to wage jihad against non-believers.

Let this sink in.

This wasn’t happening in a war zone.
This wasn’t happening in secret camps.
This was happening in a school, to children, under the label of “education.”

Now contrast this with what the Bible teaches:

📖 “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.” — Proverbs 22:6
📖 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.” — Matthew 5:9
📖 “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck.” — Matthew 18:6

The Bible calls for peace, truth, and protection of children — not hatred, violence, or indoctrination.

The uncomfortable question remains:
👉 How many more children must be exposed to violent ideology before society speaks honestly?

Silence protects no one — especially not children.

03/01/2026

☪️ I WAS B0RN TO HATE J€WS ☪️

— And I was taught never to question it.

Via Kasim Hafeez

I wasn’t born in Iran or Syria.
I was born in England, to Pakistani Muslim parents who came seeking a better life.

We were not extremists. We wished good for everyone — except Jews.

From childhood, hatred of Jews and Israel was presented to me as righteous, moral, and religious. We were taught that Jews were occupiers, that Israel was committing genocide, and that the West was our enemy because “the Jews controlled it.”

By the 1990s, the message was clear: 👉 You are not British
👉 You are not Western
👉 You are Muslim only
👉 Loyalty to the West is betrayal

At university, hating Israel became a badge of honor. Protests were celebrated. Propaganda was praised. Soon, that wasn’t enough. I believed true jihad required violence. I planned to leave school and join a terrorist training camp in Pakistan.

Then something unexpected happened — a bookstore stopped me.

I picked up a book titled The Case for Israel by Alan Dershowitz.
The title enraged me. A Jew defending Israel? I read it to prove him wrong.

Instead, it shattered everything I thought I knew.

I learned: • Israel did NOT create the Palestinian refugee crisis
• The Jewish state was not built on Holocaust “exploitation”
• Jewish history goes back nearly 4,000 years
• There is NO genocide — the Palestinian population has doubled

Angry, I decided to see Israel myself, expecting apartheid and oppression.

What I found destroyed my hatred completely.

I saw Muslims, Christians, and Jews living together.
I saw freedom, debate, flaws — yes — but also human dignity.
I saw a country that wanted peace, not destruction.

And in that moment, my hatred died.

Too many people today are trapped in the same lies I once believed — taught by religion, professors, activists, and propaganda.

So here is my challenge: 👉 Seek the truth for yourself.
👉 Question what you were taught.
👉 Look beyond slogans and inherited hatred.

If the truth could change me — it can change anyone.

— Kasim Hafee

SAJ BLOG

08/01/2026

08/01/2026

08/01/2026

08/01/2026

06/01/2026

06/01/2026

06/01/2026

05/01/2026

04/01/2026

04/01/2026

04/01/2026

03/01/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share