09/08/2026
Many people mistake the difference between BRAKE FAILURE and BRAKE BREAKAGE.
The story I shared last night about déàth from an accident and how some people argued blindly thinking they are right has prompted me to address the main cause of the confusion which is the difference between brake failure and brake breakage and their legal implications under Nigerian law.
Read between the lines so you learn, unlearn and relearn to avoid making blind arguments.
👉BRAKE FAILURE is when the brakes suddenly stopped working despite proper maintenance. No warning sign was given.
Common causes are manufacturing defect, sudden brake fluid line burst or hidden defect you couldn't reasonably detect.
Section 24 of the Crimíñàl Code Act states that, "Subject to the express provisions of this Code relating to negligent acts and omissions, a person is notcrimíñàlly responsible for an act or omission which occurs independently of the exercise of his will, or foran event which occurs by accident."
It simply means that you are NOT guilty if it was not your fault and not by your choice that the accident happened. It was a genuine accident.
The big exception there is the "Subject to...negligent acts and omissions".
This exception means that if your accident happened because you were negligent, section 24 cannot save you.
Example: Brakes broke because you never serviced the car for 3 years is a negligent omission. So you CAN be charged with manslaughter if it resulted in déàth.
Brake failure resulting in déàth is a defence to avoid crimíñàl liability if you have evidence.
Evidence that can be used to prove brake failure include:
📍Receipts from mechanic/VIO showing brake pads, fluid, rotors were checked/replaced recently. 3-6 months is strong.
📍FRSC/VIO Roadworthiness Certificate that shows that the car passed inspection recently.
📍Independent mechanic report that says "Sudden master cylinder failure / burst brake line due to manufacturing defect. No signs of wear or neglect." Photos of burst hose help.
📍Witness statement such as "The driver was not speeding. He pumped brakes and swerved. No prior noise from car."
📍No record of you complaining about soft brakes, noise, or vibration before the accident.
The goal is to show the failure was sudden, hidden, and not foreseeable.
If you can prove any of these, there will be no crimíñàl charges against you, but you might face civil action for compensation to the victim's family.
👉BRAKE BREAKAGE means the brake parts physically broke due to wear, neglect, or abuse.
Common causes are brake pads worn out to metal and ignored for months, rotor cracked because it was too thin, brake was never serviced in 2+ years or you heard grinding noise but kept driving.
The legal position is that brake breakage resulting in déàth amounts to negligence and leads to the offéñce of manslaughter.
Under section 317 of Crimíñàl Code Act, "Any person who by an unlawful omission causes the déàth of another person is guilty of manslaughter".
Driving a vehicle you knew or ought to have known had faulty brakes amounts to "unlawful omission"/negligence.
When charged for manslaughter, the outcome is life imprisonment. Also, the court may still award compensation to the family of the deceased. So you can go to prison and still pay compensation.
If you are claiming the accident was a result of brake failure when it's actually brake breakage, the police and FRSC will ask, Did you service the car? When last did you service the car? Did the car make noise, vibrate, or have soft brakes before? If yes and you ignored it, it's negligence. They will carry out their inspection on the car to ascertain whether you were negligent or it was not predictable.
You will also need to prove that the vehicle was fit to be on the road using VIO and FRSC standards for roadworthiness.
In Nigeria, the question the court asks is: "Could this déàth be avoided if the driver had acted reasonably?" If yes it's manslaughter. If no, no crimíñàl liability.
👉Does having a driver's license save the driver from liability resulting from brake breakage?
The answer is "No." Having a driver’s license does NOT save you from liability if the accident was caused by brake breakage.
Under section 317 of the Crimíñàl Code, manslaughter is about negligence, and not about whether you have a license.
Having a driver's license only protects you from harm caused by brake failure. If you don't have license and you have brake failure, it's a problem for you. You will be charged for driving without a valid driver's license.
If you drive a car that has brake breakage and you don't have a driver's license, you double your offéñce.
The bottom line is that brake failure is unpredictable and doesn't come with crimíñàl liability while brake breakage is foreseeable and comes with crimíñàl liability for negligence.
Now, if you carefully read these without operating with what you have in your head, you will understand that your arguments that the pregnant woman is not liable does not fly. Those who held this argument are arguing under "brake failure" while the poster made it clear that the wife's car brake broke (brake breakage).
Law is not as easy as you think so when you learn one aspect of law from other lawyers don't apply it generally because each case has its own facts.
One word, one phrase and one evidence makes Case A different from Case B. Lawyers don't read on the surface. We read between the lines to identify the differences. If you read between the lines of that story, you will know it didn't mention "brake failure" so why use the position of the law you learnt on brake failure to provide advice on it? The fact that you were taught about brake failure blinded your eyes that you failed to pay attention to the phrase that mentioned "brake broke" in the story.
You learnt that brake failure has no crimíñàl liability. My response to the story was about "brake breakage" which is negligence and when it results in déàth, it's manslaughter and it's not negotiable.
Remember, they say people perish for lack of knowledge but now people perish for misinterpretation and misuse of knowledge.
To all those that commented that I do not know law because I addressed brake breakage which is what the story was about instead of brake failure that ran in their minds, I pardon your stupidity.
However, ignorance of the law is not an excuse.
Visit my backup page The Legal Altar for more educative posts.
© NkyLaw