24/10/2025
The Case and Conviction: Jacob Yafai
Jacob Yafai, formerly the Deputy Secretary for Finance in Papua New Guinea (PNG), was found guilty of misappropriating large sums of public funds and abusing his office.
Specifically:
He was accused and found guilty of authorising four cheques totalling K41.8 million (Papua New Guinea Kina) paid to Paul Paraka Lawyers in 2012-2013 without proper verification.
The court also found he abused his powers as a senior public finance officer.
In August 2025, the verdict was delivered: guilty on all five counts (4 misappropriation + 1 abuse of office).
On 23 October 2025, the sentencing: 22 years in prison with hard labour, to be served at the Bomana Prison. The four misappropriation counts each carried 20 years, and the abuse of office 2 years; all concurrent.
The prosecution initially sought a 42-year term, but the court settled on 22 years, saying it was appropriate given the facts.
Papua New Guinea Today
The court, under Chief Justice Sir Gibbs Salika, stressed that the failure to verify claims and the use of the authority of office to process large payments without due diligence represented a serious breach of public trust.
Context & Details
What went wrong:
Yafai, acting as Deputy Secretary under the PNG Finance Department, signed off or caused the release of payments to Paul Paraka Lawyers, despite the claims not being verified with the Solicitor-General or properly checked.
The payments were made at the direction (or alleged direction) of then Finance Minister James Marape (who wrote a handwritten note: “Please peruse, verify and settle”). But the court found this did not absolve Yafai from his duty to verify.
The National
The timeframe: the mis-payments occurred around 2012-2013; the case took years to resolve and the court handed down guilty verdicts in August 2025, sentencing in October 2025.
Yafai did plead for leniency, citing his long public-service career and the fact that he did not personally benefit from the funds.
PNG Facts
Significance:
This is one of the most high-profile corruption/embezzlement cases in PNG’s public service sector in recent years.
The decision signals a strong stance by the judiciary on misuse of public funds. The large amount (K41.8 million) makes it an especially serious matter.
It has implications for accountability of senior public servants and for public trust in the management of state resources.
Implications & Lessons
For Governance & Public Service:
Senior public-officers must observe due diligence: verifying claims, following procurement/financial management processes, documenting decisions. Failure can lead to criminal charges.
Even when instructions come from higher-up, responsibility still lies with the official executing the process — the court in this case held Yafai accountable despite claims of ministerial direction.
Large-scale misuse of public funds undermines development, service delivery and public confidence. It has cost implications for the government and citizens.
The decision may deter others in public service from abusing office; a message that misuse will be punished.
For PNG specifically:
The case may improve the credibility of PNG’s anti-corruption efforts, at least in part.
It may spur reforms in how legal-cost claims, government payments, and oversight functions are handled.
For citizens, it may raise expectations that similar cases will be pursued and resolved, regardless of seniority.
For the individual & system:
Even with a long career, senior officials are not immune from accountability.
The sentence (22 years) is significant; though the counts run concurrently, serving such a term will obviously end or severely limit his professional future.
The case highlights the cost of inaction: the payment of K41.8 million by the state for claims that were allegedly not properly verified.
What comes next
Yafai has signalled he will appeal to the Supreme Court of PNG.
How the appeal plays out will be watched closely as it may set precedent for how similar cases are handled, sentencing standards, etc.
Additionally, this might prompt further audits of other large payments or legal-fee claims in the public service to ensure there are not similar irregularities.
The government and public service may conduct reviews of internal controls, verification processes, and accountability mechanisms to prevent recurrence.
Final Thoughts
The jailing of Jacob Yafai marks a major moment in PNG’s efforts to hold senior public officials accountable for misuse of public funds. It underscores the idea that leadership roles bring greater responsibility, and that failing to verify, control, and protect state resources is a grave matter.
For the public, it offers some hope that large-scale misappropriations will not simply go unchecked, and for the public sector, it is a reminder of the necessity of transparency, rigor and integrity in financial management.