14/09/2025
| OPINION
Street Power Takes it All
Mass demonstrations against corrupt governments flood streets across the globe as the youth chants “Eat the Rich”. With the wealth gap widening and “nepo-babies” being exposed online, Gen-Z is expressing solidarity with worldwide movements. When people are dying from the direct consequences of corruption, civilians have every right to demand change. The testament is clear: Gen-Z protests should be taken seriously.
Just days after Nepal’s upheaval, Filipino youths gathered in front of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) in Malolos, Bulacan against anomalies in flood control projects. ABS-CBN dubbed these protests “Nepal-like”. When Philippine Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) Secretary Jonvic Remulla was asked if recent youth-led protests could escalate to the level of violence seen in Nepal, he replied, "Ah hindi! Ang mga Pilipino naman hindi ganyan. Even at our worst, hindi tayo nanununog ng [gusali].”
This statement raises a critical question: does the absence of violence diminish the legitimacy of Gen-Z-led protests in the Philippines? Absolutely not. The absence of violence in Filipino protests should not be mistaken for complacency. Just because Filipino youth are not setting buildings ablaze does not mean they are any less outraged by the government.
Secretary Remulla’s statement was met with disbelief online, with some fearing it would “embolden” the youth to take it as a challenge. These comments are implying that pride is the catalyst of activism. They overlook the fact that mere verbal provocation did not drive international Gen-Z to set buildings ablaze. If protests in the Philippines escalate, it will be because of the nation's unaddressed systemic failures, not a secretary’s statement.
Nepalese youths did not riot simply because the government banned social media. It was the result of a turbulent government threatening their freedom of speech. On September 9, Nepali Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigned after the Supreme Court and other government buildings were set on fire during protests in Nepal. According to CNN, the protests escalated the day prior, after at least 19 demonstrators were killed in a clash with the police. Over the past 16 years, Nepal had 13 government changes, inducing frustration over long-standing political instability.
Similarly, in Indonesia, ten people died and more than 3,000 people were arrested, while buildings and public facilities were set ablaze. The initial protest was conducted against the housing allowance of 50 Million rupiah to Indonesian legislative members and public dissatisfaction with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s administration. It escalated when footage emerged of a police armoured vehicle running over and killing a 21-year-old delivery worker on August 28. Indonesians in Australia, UK, and other countries echoed the demands of these protesters. These are not acts of random chaos but responses to government actions.
This pattern is global. French demonstrators expressed disagreement against new Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu during the “Block Everything” movement, demanding higher taxes for the rich and better access to basic services for the poor. It is similar to the Aragalaya Movement in Sri Lanka in 2022, which was triggered by an economic meltdown, and Bangladesh’s anti-corruption and anti-authoritarian movement led by students in 2024, which resulted in the end of Sheikh Hasina's rule.
Taking all of these protests together, it is clear that Gen-Z have deep-rooted causes for marching in the streets. They are not simply “rage-baited” into organizing. The youth are not misguided for wanting to gather and voice distaste against fascism and incompetence. This wave of anti-corruption mass demonstrations around the globe is not a trend to simply react to. It is history unfolding, as it has always done, because history is a circle and the youth is actively trying to draw the line.
Social media amplifies these movements by broadcasting stories seldom seen on traditional news, such as the women's rights protests in Afghanistan, where basic human rights are denied. While these issues are difficult to discuss amidst local struggles, the necessity of activism rings true. Social media can create an impact when it is used responsibly. After all, it is where most of political discourse arises. Secretary Remulla’s statement triggered frustration of being underestimated, but the real trigger is the lapses in the government.
Reels of protests as ABBA echoes in the background, “The winner takes it all, the loser has to fall,” may seem distant, but what we will do after watching them matters. It is up to the youths of today to decide whether they’d take their digital activism to their community or keep it within the comments section. While some protests have turned violent, the discussions should not focus on the flames, but the frustration that fueled them. It is important to remember that our democracy was built on the backs of Filipinos who assembled and marched in EDSA. The government may go offline, but they could not ignore the power of the streets.
Written by Lazarus
Cartoon by Goyo