15/07/2025
💥 The PCA Ruling: West Philippine Sea Day Daw o Fiesta ng Kabobohan 😹😹😹
The Playful Cat
Tuwing July 12, ang daming nagpo-post ng "Panalo tayo sa PCA!" at tinatawag pa itong "West Philippine Sea Day.” Pero gaya ng maraming manufactured holidays, ito’y pista ng ilusyon at pagrerecycle ng kasinungalingan.
Wala ka pang masyadong sinasabi, may bumabanat na agad ng:
🤡“Eh diba may ruling na sa PCA? Talo na China!”,,,anak ng sabaw talaga😹🔥🔥
Well… huminahon muna mga ‘tol.
Time for historical receipts and actual documents, para matigil na ang “Fiesta ng Kabobohan.”
📌 FACT CHECK #1: PCA ≠ UN Court, and It Has No Jurisdiction Over Sovereignty
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not a UN court, confirmed mismo ng UN spokesman:
📌 “The PCA has nothing to do with the UN.” – Stéphane Dujarric
It ruled only on maritime entitlements under UNCLOS, not territorial sovereignty.
📌China legally opted out via UNCLOS Article 298 noong 2006 — kaya walang legal force ang ruling sa kanila.
📌 FACT CHECK #2: The Ruling Did NOT Award Territory
Wala pong sinabing "Philippines owns Scarborough Shoal" o "Spratlys belong to Manila."
Ang sinabi lang: invalid ang China’s “historic rights” claim within the Philippine EEZ.
That’s it. Walang isla ang na-award.
📜 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT DROP (Western Sources pa!)
✅🔹 British High Commission, Singapore (1971)
👉🏽 “Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency… and was returned to China after the war. We cannot find any indication of its having been acquired by any other country.”
🗞 Far Eastern Economic Review, Dec. 31, 1974
✅🔹 US State Department (Daniel Dzurek) - Chief of Spatial Geography:
👉🏽 “The 1952 Sino-Japanese Treaty includes Spratlys and Paracels in the same sentence as Taiwan and Penghu, indicating they are of equal status — meaning Chinese territory.”
📘 The Spratly Islands Dispute: Who’s on First?
✅🔹 US Diplomat Chas Freeman (WWII Expert)
👉🏽 “In 1945, China accepted Japan’s surrender of the Paracels and Spratlys and declared them part of Guangdong Province. In 1946, they established military garrisons.”
📍 Based on Cairo and Potsdam Declarations
✅🔹 French Archives (1931)
👉🏽Jules Basdevant, French jurist: Paracel Islands belong to China.
France even acknowledged China’s claim as early as 1909.
✅🔹 French Document (1970s)
👉🏽Filipino claim to the Spratlys = “historically baseless and absurd.”
✅🔹 British Legal Opinion (Eileen Denzel)
👉🏽 Spratly Islands are Chinese, based on legal and historical precedent.
🧭 MAP TIME: The "Naughty" Nine-Dash Line😹😹😹
China’s Nine-Dash Line is based on an 11-dash map from 1946 drawn after Japan surrendered its occupied territories.
Cairo (1943) and Potsdam (1945) Declarations demanded Japan return all stolen territories.
China took the Paracels, Spratlys, and Pratas — as part of that post-war transfer.
🤡 So… July 12 Is Victory Day?
Only if you celebrate illusions.
What People ThinkWhat Actually Happened
😹“Panalo ang Pilipinas!”👉🏽Wala pong na-award.
😹“UN ruled in our favor!”👉🏽PCA is not UN.
😹“Akin ang Spratlys!”👉🏽British, French & U.S. docs say otherwise.
😹“Sino nagsabing China may claim?”👉🏽Lahat ng credible Western sources, besh.🤪🤪🤪
📌 SO WHAT WAS THE RULING REALLY ABOUT?
✅ It clarified maritime entitlements under UNCLOS.
❌ It did NOT grant territory.
❌ It did NOT decide sovereignty.
❌ It is NOT UN-backed.
❌ It is NOT enforceable on China.
✅ It was paid for and lobbied by the U.S. — costing over $20 million.
🧠 The Verdict: Propaganda Pa More!
🎯 Sa mga “WPS Defenders”:
📚 Basahin n’yo muna ang ruling.
📜 Balikan n’yo ang Treaty of Paris, 1887 Sino-French Convention, at WWII treaties.
⚖️ Alamin n’yo ang UNCLOS Article 298.
🧠 At higit sa lahat — mag-isip bago mag-celebrate.
➡️ Ang "West Philippine Sea" ay isang bahagi lang ng South China Sea, partikular yung nasa northwest ng Luzon, kasama ang Reed Bank, Scarborough Shoal, at ilang bahagi ng Spratlys na pasok sa EEZ natin.
🔴 Pero yung narrative ng mga “WPS defenders” eh parang buong South China Sea na ang inaangkin daw natin — sabay sigaw ng “China ang nang-aagaw!”
Pero teka lang mga Amaw😹🤪😁
😅Sino ba talaga ang nang-aagaw?
Kung ang WPS lang ang sakop natin, ba’t gusto n’yong i-claim ang buong South China Sea?💥
🎯 Reminder lang mga Kapusa:
Ang West Philippine Sea ay nasa northwestern side lang ng Luzon — pasok sa ating EEZ + Sovereign rights not your territory, assets or wealth tulad ng gusto nyo eh wala naman tayimg titulo at resubo ng pinagsasabi nyo!😹🤪😁😅👻
Pero ang narrative ngayon, parang buong South China Sea na ang sinasaklaw ng drama ng media at keyboard patriots.
So sino ulit ang nang-aagaw? 😹
Baka tayo rin pala ang nag-aambisyong agawin ang hindi atin — tapos sinisisi ang China.
Kung sakop lang ng UNCLOS ang usapan, wag tayong sumawsaw sa usapang sovereignty sa Spratlys, Paracels, at beyond.
Huwag tayong maging propaganda pawn ng ibang bansa sa laban na hindi natin naiintindihan.
Ang July 12 ay hindi “victory day” — ito ay araw ng collective delusion.
Isang piyesta ng mga walang nagbasa ng ruling.
Isang “feel good” holiday para sa mga pa-patriot na hindi alam ang batas o kasaysayan.
Ang “West Philippine Sea Day” ay hindi victory day.
Ito ay araw ng kahihiyan para sa bansang hindi nagbabasa ng sariling kaso, at mas piniling ipagsigawan ang isang ilusyon kaysa alamin ang buong katotohanan.
🎯 Para sa mga Delusional na mga Keyboard Warriors:
Bago magpakalunod sa bandwagon ng “WPS Day,”
Basahin n'yo muna ang PCA ruling.
Balikan n’yo muna ang kasaysayan.
At higit sa lahat: Magtira kayo ng hiya.
🔚 Postscript:
This is not fake news. This is not even news. This is called: 🔍 Rewriting the broken narrative — based on facts, archives, and treaties long buried under propaganda.
📚 If truth makes you uncomfortable, that’s the point.
So debunked na false narrative — based not on memes or media soundbites, but on documents, treaties, declarations, and legal history that the mainstream refuses to touch.
The truth was always there — you just weren’t taught to look.🤗☺️😉😹🤪😁
🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽
English 101🌉
💥 The PCA Ruling: “West Philippine Sea Day” or Festival of Foolery? 😹😹😹
BâoRuìLông
Every July 12, the internet is flooded with “Panalo tayo sa PCA!” and declarations of “West Philippine Sea Day.”
But like many manufactured holidays, this is a festival of illusions, built on recycled lies and media spin.
Before you even say anything, the keyboard warriors are already yelling:
> 🤡 “But didn’t we already win against China at the PCA?”
Anak ng sabaw talaga. 😹🔥
Let’s take a deep breath, mga ‘tol.
Time for some historical receipts and actual documents, so we can finally end this Festival of Foolery.
📌 FACT CHECK #1: The PCA is not a UN court — and it had no jurisdiction over sovereignty.
🔹 The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not a UN body.
> “The PCA has nothing to do with the UN.” — UN Spokesman Stéphane Dujarric
🔹 The ruling only clarified maritime entitlements under UNCLOS — it did not and cannot decide territorial sovereignty.
🔹 China legally opted out in 2006 through UNCLOS Article 298, so the ruling has no binding effect on them.
📌 FACT CHECK #2: The PCA ruling did not award any territory.
✖️ It never said, “The Philippines owns Scarborough Shoal.”
✖️ It never declared, “The Spratlys belong to Manila.”
✔️ It only ruled that China’s “historic rights” claim within the Philippines’ EEZ was invalid.
That’s it.
No islands were awarded. No territory was granted.
📜 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT DROP (From Western Sources!)
✅ British High Commission, Singapore (1971):
📝“Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency… and was returned to China after the war. We find no indication that it was ever acquired by any other country.”
🗞 Far Eastern Economic Review, Dec. 31, 1974
✅ Daniel Dzurek, US State Dept Geographer:
📌The 1952 Sino-Japanese Treaty mentioned Spratlys and Paracels in the same sentence as Taiwan and Penghu — which are undisputed Chinese territories.
📘 The Spratly Islands Dispute: Who’s on First?
✅ Amb. Chas Freeman, US Diplomat (WWII expert):
📌In 1945, China accepted Japan’s surrender of the Spratlys and Paracels — and made them part of Guangdong Province. They even stationed troops there in 1946.
📍 Based on the Cairo & Potsdam Declarations
✅ French Jurist Jules Basdevant (1931):
> The Paracels belonged to China, and France acknowledged that as early as 1909.
✅ French Archive (1970s):
> The Filipino claim to the Spratlys was “historically baseless and absurd.”
✅ British Legal Opinion (Eileen Denzel):
📌The Spratly Islands were Chinese — based on legal precedent and historical facts.
🧭 MAP TIME: The “Naughty” Nine-Dash Line 😹
China’s Nine-Dash Line came from an 11-dash post-WWII map drawn after Japan surrendered its occupied territories.
Under the Cairo (1943) and Potsdam (1945) Declarations, Japan was ordered to return all stolen territories.
China reclaimed the Paracels, Spratlys, and Pratas as part of this post-war transfer.
🤡 So… July 12 is “Victory Day”?
Only if you’re celebrating delusions.
What People Believe What Actually Happened
😹 “We won against China!” 👉🏽 No territory was awarded.
😹 “The UN ruled in our favor!” 👉🏽 PCA is not part of the UN.
😹 “The Spratlys are ours!” 👉🏽 British, French, and US sources say otherwise.
😹 “China has no claim at all!” 👉🏽 Check your sources, besh. 🫢
📌 So what was the PCA ruling really about?
✅ It clarified maritime rights under UNCLOS.
❌ It did not grant territory.
❌ It did not decide sovereignty.
❌ It is not UN-backed.
❌ It is not enforceable on China.
✅ It was funded and lobbied by the U.S., costing over $20 million.
🧠 The Verdict: Propaganda Pa More!
🎯 Dear “WPS Defenders” —
📚 Read the actual ruling.
📜 Go back to the Treaty of Paris, 1887 Sino-French Convention, and WWII peace agreements.
⚖️ Understand UNCLOS Article 298.
🧠 And most of all — think before you celebrate.
🗺 BONUS TRUTH: What Is the Actual West Philippine Sea?
The WPS is just a portion of the South China Sea — specifically northwest of Luzon, covering Reed Bank, Scarborough Shoal, and some Spratlys within our EEZ.
🔴 But the narrative pushed by the media and woke warriors makes it look like we own the entire South China Sea.
So let’s ask the real question:
> If we only have sovereign rights over the WPS, then why are we trying to claim the entire South China Sea?
🎯 Reminder, mga Kapusa: The WPS is within our EEZ — where we have sovereign rights, not sovereignty.
It’s not “ours” like Palawan or Batanes.
We don’t own the sea. We don’t own the rocks.
We just have access to resources — not territorial title.
So who’s really doing the land grabbing?
Maybe… we’re trying to grab what isn’t ours, then crying foul when someone pushes back.
⚠️ July 12 is not “Victory Day.”
It’s a collective delusion day.
A fiesta for those who never read the ruling.
A feel-good echo chamber for people who don’t know the law or the history.
🎯 Final Message to the Keyboard Patriots:
Before you drown in the bandwagon of “WPS Day”…
📚 Read the PCA ruling.
📜 Know the historical context.
🧠 And most of all — leave some room for shame.
🔚 Postscript🤗☺️😉😹❤️
This isn’t fake news. It’s not even news.
This is what you call: 🔍 Rewriting a broken narrative — based on facts, archives, and treaties long buried under propaganda.
📚 If the truth makes you uncomfortable, that’s the point
The truth was always there.
You just weren’t taught to look. 😎
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AsWp8RoiN/?mibextid=oFDknk
On this day nine years ago, an international tribunal in The Hague delivered a landmark decision that affirmed Philippine sovereignty over the West Philippine Sea and invalidated China's claims of historic rights over most of the South China Sea.
READ MORE: https://inqnews.net/PHwinsarbitrationcase
