07/06/2026
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐น๐น๐ฒ๐โ๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ: ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐
On April 23, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) confirmed an armed encounter on April 19 at Toboso, Negros Occidental. Nineteen people were killed. The military called it a victory. The victimsโ families called it a massacre. Among the dead were Alyssa Alano, a University of the Philippines (UP) student councilor, and RJ Nichole Ledesma, a community journalist and a cultural worker. They were there to document the farmersโ struggle, yet the military insists they were rebels. When journalists, researchers, activists, and innocent individuals become casualties of a disputeโthe same script is pulledโthe victims of the gunfire are not merely civilians but turncoats to the nationโs peace.
In a span of 12 hours, Sitio Sinugmawan, Barangay Salamanca, turned into a bloodbath spotโa conflict between the AFP and the New Peopleโs Army (NPA). What could have been a data-gathering opportunity for Alano and Ledesma, who entered the scene as researchers, instead became their brutal end. They were unfortunate enough not to meet with answers but with gunshots.
โ๐๐ง ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฐ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ซ๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฎ๐บ. ๐๐ฉ, ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฌ๐ช๐ต ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ช๐ต๐ข ๐ด๐ช๐บ๐ข ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข-๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฃ๐ข๐ตโฆ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ข๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฅ. ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ง๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ.โ AFP Chief Romeo Brawner Jr.โs words were a blatant contradiction, not because his statement holds the actuality of the tragedy, but because of the uncertain, distorted truth said by a person deemed a hero. In a split second, the victims were declared traitors, even as investigations paradoxically point out that six civilians were also among those killed.
To challenge the reports of the AFP, forensic pathologist Raquel Fortun noted that not only were the returned bodies poorly handled, but her initial findings also refute the words of the military, leaving questions unanswered. A contradiction between the given proofs and statements and the findings of the autopsy and investigation. This raises a question about why the authorities tried to hide an important fact, treating each death as a measure of success.
Evidence was presented. Photographs of alleged weapons were publicized. However, the National Fact-Finding and Solidarity Mission (NFSM) asserted a high probability of the military tampering with the crime scene, revealing that the Armed Forces kept full control of the site for two full daysโfrom April 19 to April 21โgiving them a 48-hour window stage before allowing anyone to enter the scene. In a country with a documented history of planted evidence, mere statements and documentary pictures are not enoughโespecially when itโs convenient to simply falsify evidence that can support their narratives and declare anyone who opposes them a terrorist of the land.
How can one not question the validity of their claims when the military can casually frame the innocent youth by associating them with the NPA, staging guns and combat vests for a documentary and presenting themselves as saviors of the people who eliminated threats to the tranquil living of the country?
Moreso, in the depths of the AFPโs declaration are worshippers that glorify their statementโonline trolls and media users reducing the victimsโ corpses to mere โcorned beefโ jokes, dehumanizing their deaths to food as a mockery of their merciless end. A joke, despite its immoral usage, only matches how the military handles the bodies it failed to care forโleaving the bodies submerged in fishpond water for two days, rotting until their retrieval.
Every photo revealed met with funny reactionsโwith netizens terrorizing victims of the encounter and praising the forces. It was not a secret to keep. It was powerful to hold. A cycle never ending as long as the citizens lived to justify and defend the acts of the militants. What should have been concealed violence becomes a righteous exploitation in the eyes of the masses who have already deemed its enemies righteous.
The same country that trains journalists in schools and at press conferences and emphasizes rigorous research in its curriculum, now calls journalists ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ด for simply doing their job. When they channel their ideas toward the mountainside, they are boxed in as subversives and silenced as they continue holding the truth. In early years, young journalists are taught to be critical and to verify information, yet when applied to real-life scenarios, these same acts are demonized and abhorred by authorities.
While the military continues to assert the need to protect citizens, ironically, it is same force that labels these individuals as activists who turned into outright traitors when the odds are not in their favor. Accountability becomes a sacred passage that, once taken, means being guilty of the charge. And so, the easiest thing to do is to tag the victims with red.
On the other hand, the incident was only a showcase of a state failure that encompasses the humanity it aims to teachโit was not only about the lives taken, but the incident also tackles a larger dispute between the AFP and NPA, a deep-rooted dilemma that was responded to through retaliatory guns.
The existence of the rebel groups should have been a problem long solved. The said traitors were not made overnight; they were the product of marginalization and oppression by the power-tripping elites. The so-called โrebelsโ were once farmers whose land was taken away from them, laborers suffocated by heavy taxes, and civilians fighting for state policies to govern systematic problems. This was not a simple matter to solve, as it addresses the plundering of workersโ economic and civic freedoms, but it could have been deliberately addressed if only the government had chosen to listen and act, not by force.
Despite the piled-up proof that proves the innocence of the victims, arguments would still snap, questioning the existence of researchers residing on mountainsidesโa bigoted belief that anyone who partakes in mountain research is a recruited member of the NPA. Their claim was not rooted in facts but in bold assumptions that only further spread propaganda about what researchers could only becomeโto be the dogs of the government.
When cries become a plea never heard, the people turn their words into violence. The forces, calling their operations a successful abolishment of the insurgent groups, have only further proven the point of their shallow-level solutions. Their accomplished reports are not worth the celebrationโit was not a feast; it was a punishment. Glory to those who hailed as winners; blessed by the heavens are those who lost. Unfortunately, the poor will always be the defeated.
Redโtagging is not a policy. It is a cancer. It is the stateโs preferred method of silencing truth without a trial. When journalists, researchers, and students are reduced to ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ช๐ด๐ต ๐ด๐บ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ป๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด and then shot, the message is clear: Tell the truth, and you become the enemy.
In a country where lives are always at stake, the military has longed to cross the bridge as defenders of the people. And it must not stay this way. The story of success should have been ours to paint.
When life becomes a privilege to those who speak, power will always lie within the hands of the massesโeven when they are to meet with guns, even when the bullet forms its own tale. Despite the risk, freedom will always be the core of resistance. They are not merely journalists, researchers, activists, traitors, terrorists, or ๐ค๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ง๐ด; they, too, are Filipinos. To fight for freedom is to struggle against the red-tagging by the protectors of the Philippines. And to resist is to defend the rights of the history that was revised to fit the Armed Forces Patronage Story.
Written by Aziraphale
Proofread by Champignon
Cartoon by Lazi