07/09/2025
President Marcos and His Bold Desire to Cleanse Government of Corruption, the only President in history to do such.
Corruption has long been the most malignant disease of Philippine governance. It has weakened institutions, eroded public trust, and deprived citizens of basic services that rightfully belong to them. Against this backdrop, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. has declared a bold and serious desire to cleanse the government of corruption, positioning this battle as central to his administration’s promise of unity, progress, and a renewed nation.
The President’s words go beyond rhetoric. By establishing independent commissions to probe anomalies in infrastructure projects, endorsing stricter auditing mechanisms, and supporting lifestyle checks on public officials, Marcos signals that accountability is no longer negotiable. His stance also challenges the culture of impunity that has allowed corruption to thrive within agencies like the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Bureau of Customs, and even local governments. It is a recognition that unless corruption is confronted head-on, no policy on economic growth or social development will achieve its purpose.
What makes this stand bold is the political risk it carries. Cleansing government of corruption means calling out powerful figures who once enjoyed impunity—political allies, contractors, even members of his own party. Unlike past leaders who used anti-corruption campaigns as slogans while tolerating anomalies in the shadows, Marcos appears determined to put action behind his declarations. The creation of independent bodies outside Congress’ influence, for instance, shows his willingness to bypass traditional avenues often compromised by vested interests.
Yet boldness is only the beginning. The seriousness of Marcos’ campaign will be measured by how consistently it is pursued, regardless of personalities involved. To dismantle entrenched syndicates, the President must ensure that the justice system is unshackled from political pressure and that cases are prosecuted swiftly. Moreover, reforms must not stop at exposing anomalies—they must be institutionalized to prevent their repetition.
Filipinos have heard promises before, and skepticism is understandable. But Marcos now faces a unique moment: a chance to define his presidency not just by economic gains but by moral leadership. If he succeeds, he will leave behind a legacy of restored trust in government and a renewed hope that the Philippines can indeed break free from the vicious cycle of corruption. If he fails, his bold desire risks being reduced to mere rhetoric, swallowed by the same system he vowed to change.
For now, the challenge is clear. President Marcos has taken the first decisive steps. The nation watches closely, hoping that this time, the promise to cleanse government of corruption will not only be bold and serious—but enduring and real.