29/03/2026
Last week, I got into a minor accident at an intersection. My car was sideswiped from behind, and my rear bumper got dislodged.
A traffic enforcer arrived and helped us move to the traffic bureau to file a report. He was surprisingly pleasant and professional. He explained everything clearly, although he mentioned that both of us might still receive traffic violations even if I was the one who got hit. He collected our driver’s licenses and vehicle documents.
At the bureau, our documents were photocopied, and we both paid ₱35 each for copies. We filled out forms, wrote our statements, and submitted everything properly.
After that, I spoke with the other driver. In my view, it was clearly his fault which of course, he didn’t agree. But we both acknowledged it was an unfortunate accident. In a traffice accident here were only two options: go through insurance or take the case to court. Going to the insurance company is the better choice but there must be an admittance of fault which he do not want.
He suggested we just forget about it and not file a report. I declined immediately because my car had significant damage.
We then spoke with the investigator. He was also calm, helpful, and surprisingly approachable. It was very different from the usual image you see on TV. He explained that he wouldn’t determine fault himself; that would be up to the court. His suggestion was simple: settle if possible, because it would be faster and less complicated. He just reminded us that there is a ₱2,500 fine for each of us due to the incident.
After some discussion, we agreed on a compromise: we would split the participation fee, and he would revise his statement and admit fault so the insurance process could proceed. The investigator asked his assistant to revise the police report.
While waiting, the investigator called me into his office. He was holding my driver’s license. He told me I was “lucky” because he could waive my fine.
At that moment, I understood what he meant. I asked if I could give something for “pang-merienda.” He smiled and said he wasn’t asking, but he wouldn’t refuse. I gave ₱500 and thanked him.
Later, the other driver told me he was also asked for something similar.
I’ve been thinking about that moment.
Technically, the investigator was helpful. He made the process easier and faster. He didn’t explicitly ask for money but I think the message was clear.
So now I’m left wondering. Was that corruption? Was it on his part or mine? Or is it simply part of the system we’ve all learned to navigate?
It’s easy to say that corruption is wrong. And I believe that. But situations like this don’t always feel black and white.
Sometimes, it feels like you’re just trying to get through a broken process. You’re not trying to cheat anyone. You’re not trying to harm anyone. You just want a solution and a quick one.
But maybe that’s exactly how these things continue. Not because people are purely bad but because small compromises feel convenient and even justified in the moment.
I don’t have a clear answer. I am probably wrong but I do know this: What feels small and harmless individually… might be part of a bigger problem collectively.