Tarlac Highland Courier

Tarlac Highland Courier Fourth Estate of the Nation
Watchdog of the Government
(1)

14/06/2025

EDITORIAL
HAPPY FATHER'S DAY

Honoring the Silent Heroes: A Father's Day Reflection

Every third Sunday of June, the world pauses to celebrate one of the most quietly courageous roles in our lives—fatherhood. Father's Day is more than just a date on the calendar; it's a heartfelt tribute to the men who lift us with their strength, guide us with their wisdom, and love us in ways often unspoken.

Fathers come in many forms—biological dads, stepfathers, grandfathers, uncles, mentors, and even single mothers who wear both hats. They are our first protectors, our fiercest supporters, and the often-unseen backbone of many families. While society frequently spotlights maternal love, a father's love, though quieter, is equally deep and enduring.

This Father’s Day, let us go beyond the usual gifts and greetings. Let us take the time to truly appreciate the efforts our fathers make—the long hours at work, the sacrifices they choose silently, and the values they teach us by example.

As we celebrate, let us also remember the fathers who are no longer with us, and those who have stepped into the role of fatherhood in the lives of others. Let us honor them not just today, but every day, by embodying the virtues they have instilled—resilience, respect, and responsibility.

To all fathers: thank you for being the quiet strength behind our loudest dreams. Happy Father’s Day!

12/06/2025

127th PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENCE DAY

Philippine Independence Day is celebrated every June 12 and marks the country's declaration of independence from Spanish colonial rule in 1898.

Here’s a quick overview:

June 12 every year

🇵🇭 Historical Background

On June 12, 1898, Emilio Aguinaldo, leader of the Filipino revolutionary forces, proclaimed the Philippines' independence from Spain in Kawit, Cavite.

The Philippine flag was officially unfurled, and Lupang Hinirang (the national anthem) was played for the first time.

While Spain later ceded the Philippines to the United States via the Treaty of Paris (1898), June 12 remains symbolic of the Filipinos’ desire for self-rule.

June 12 was declared a national holiday by President Diosdado Macapagal in 1962, replacing the earlier July 4 celebration (Philippine-American Friendship Day).

🎉 Modern Celebrations

Flag-raising ceremonies, military parades, fireworks, and cultural shows across the country.

The main celebration is often held at Rizal Park in Manila, attended by the President and top officials.

Overseas Filipino communities also hold events to commemorate the occasion.

✨ Significance

It honors the struggles for freedom and the national identity of Filipinos.

A reminder of the country’s rich history, resilience, and unity.







゚

10/06/2025

EDITORIAL
5th Grounds of Impeachment
BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC TRUST

Betrayal of Public Trust in the Philippines is a serious concern that often emerges in discussions about political integrity, governance, and accountability. It is not only a legal and constitutional concept but also a moral and ethical issue that affects democratic institutions and citizen welfare.

1. Definition in Legal and Constitutional Context

In the Philippine Constitution, "betrayal of public trust" is listed as one of the grounds for impeachment of high-ranking officials, including the President, Vice President, members of the Supreme Court, and constitutional commissions (Art. XI, Sec. 2).

However, unlike "culpable violation of the Constitution" or "graft and corruption," betrayal of public trust is not precisely defined by law, making it a flexible and somewhat ambiguous charge. It generally encompasses acts that are unethical, grossly improper, or that undermine the public's confidence in government, even if not strictly illegal.

2. Examples of Betrayal of Public Trust

Corruption and Graft

Misuse of public funds (e.g., the PDAF scam or “pork barrel” scandal involving Janet Napoles and several lawmakers).

Accepting bribes or kickbacks in exchange for government contracts.

Election-related Abuse

Vote-buying or manipulating election results.

Using government resources for campaign purposes.

Negligence or Abuse of Power

Mishandling crises (e.g., slow government response to natural disasters like Typhoon Yolanda).

Police or military abuse under the guise of law enforcement (e.g., extrajudicial killings during anti-drug campaigns).

Dishonesty and Lack of Transparency

Covering up wrongdoing or withholding vital information from the public.

Falsifying official documents or credentials (e.g., academic dishonesty by public officials).

3. Consequences

Impeachment (for constitutional officers).

Public Outcry and Protests.

Loss of Public Confidence, which may affect future elections.

Legal Action in cases where betrayal overlaps with criminal offenses.

4. Prominent Cases in the Philippines

Joseph Estrada (2001) – Impeached over corruption charges, mass protests (EDSA II) forced his resignation.

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo – Faced accusations of election fraud and corruption; later detained but acquitted.

Rodrigo Duterte’s War on Drugs – Criticized by human rights groups and international bodies as a betrayal of public trust due to thousands of alleged extrajudicial killings.

Leni Robredo vs. Marcos Misinformation (2022) – Robredo’s camp cited disinformation as an orchestrated betrayal of the electorate’s right to fair election.

5. Cultural and Systemic Factors

Patronage Politics and the culture of “utang na loob” (debt of gratitude) can blur the lines between public service and personal loyalty.

Weak institutions and inconsistent rule of law.

Media suppression and misinformation, which hinder accountability.

6. Moving Forward: Addressing Betrayal of Public Trust

Strengthening transparency and accountability mechanisms.

Enforcing anti-corruption laws like the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019).

Supporting investigative journalism and civil society efforts.

Enhancing voter education and electoral reform.

10/06/2025

EDITORIAL
4th Grounds of Impeachment
GRAFT & CORRUPTION

Graft and corruption are long-standing issues in the Philippines that significantly hinder national development, good governance, and public trust. These problems manifest in various forms and across all levels of government and society.

Definition

Graft refers to the illegal use of a public official’s authority for personal gain, typically involving bribery or dishonest dealings.

Corruption encompasses a broader range of unethical or illegal behavior by officials, including embezzlement, nepotism, favoritism, and abuse of power.

Causes of Graft and Corruption

1. Weak Institutions – Lack of effective checks and balances in government agencies.

2. Poor Law Enforcement – Laws exist but are often poorly implemented or selectively enforced.

3. Low Public Sector Salaries – Encourages some officials to seek additional (often illegal) income.

4. Political Patronage – Leaders reward supporters with government positions or contracts.

5. Cultural Factors – “Utang na loob” (debt of gratitude) and family loyalty can sometimes override ethical considerations.

Forms of Corruption in the Philippines

Bribery – Payments to secure favors or expedite government services.

Embezzlement – Misappropriation of public funds (e.g., “pork barrel” scams).

Ghost Projects and Employees – Nonexistent projects or workers used to funnel funds.

Election Fraud – Vote-buying, manipulation of results, and misuse of government resources.

Red Tape – Bureaucratic delays designed to solicit bribes from citizens or businesses.

Notable Cases

Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) Scam – Involving billions of pesos in pork barrel funds allegedly funneled through fake NGOs (notably involving Janet Lim-Napoles and several senators).

Fertilizer Fund Scam – Misuse of funds intended for poor farmers.

NBN-ZTE Deal – A broadband deal with alleged overpricing and bribery.

Effects

Economic Impact – Discourages foreign investment and misallocates public funds.

Social Impact – Erodes trust in government and institutions.

Political Impact – Weakens democratic institutions and promotes inequality.

Government Efforts and Reforms

Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan – Investigate and prosecute corrupt officials.

Freedom of Information (FOI) efforts – Promoting transparency.

Anti-Red Tape Authority (ARTA) – Reducing bureaucratic inefficiency.

Citizen Engagement – NGOs, media, and citizens play a critical role in exposing corruption.

What Can Be Done

Strengthen institutions and legal frameworks.

Ensure swift and impartial prosecution of corrupt officials.

Promote transparency and accountability in government transactions.

Educate citizens on their rights and the importance of ethical governance.

Use digital tools to minimize human discretion in public service deliver.

10/06/2025

EDITORIAL
3rd Grounds For Impeachment
BRIBERY
In Philippine politics, bribery remains deeply rooted and intersects with dynastic power, patronage, and institutional weakness. Here's a focused overview:

☑️ 1. Dynastic Influence & Systemic Bribery

Roughly 70–80 % of legislators and 87 % of governors hail from political dynasties—often called "fat" or even "obese" dynasties—that use public resources to maintain power .

These dynastic networks provide fertile ground for bribery: lavish kickbacks (up to 40 %) are common in infrastructure and local budget deals, leaving scant funds for actual services .

🎯 2. Impeachment of VP Sara Duterte: Bribery Allegations

In December 2024, the first impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte cited bribery, specifically allegations involving Department of Education officials .

A fourth complaint filed in February 2025 repeated these charges and escalated them to formal Articles of Impeachment .

💸 3. Allegations in Constitutional Reform Petitions

January 2024 efforts to push agenda via a People’s Initiative (PIRMA) to amend the Constitution faced claims that petition-gatherers were bribed with ₱100 to ₱10,000 per signature .

Even senators implicated alleged district-level cash rewards to secure the required petition volumes .

🏛️ 4. Major Procurement & Budget Scandals

The Pharmally scandal involved alleged rigging in pandemic-era hospital supply contracts totaling ₱10.8 billion, with insiders accused of tailoring deals and receiving kickbacks .

Public works budgets—like the General Appropriations Act—have faced critiques of being rife with pork culture and hidden commissions up to 60% .

📈 5. International Measures & Anti-Bribery Efforts

The TRACE Bribery Risk Matrix 2024 ranked the Philippines 111th out of 194 countries, marking modest improvement, yet signaling continued risks with a score of 52/100 .

Reforms include the Government Procurement Act mandating digital bidding, FOI platforms, and e-procurement systems, intended to limit corruption opportunities .

🧭 Outlook & Conclusions

Risk Factor Description

Structural Dynasty dominance creates patronage cycles and shields illicit behavior.
Legal-Political Intersection Impeachment cases (e.g., Sara Duterte) spotlight bribery in confidential fund misuse and bureaucratic abuse.
Comparative Progress Reforms have started to show in international rankings, but enforcement remains inconsistent.

👉 Bottom line: Despite legal frameworks and recent improvements, elite-driven systems and weak accountability continue to foster bribery, especially in procurement, political defense funds, and constituency-level manipulation.

10/06/2025

EDITORIAL
2nd Grounds for Impeachment
TREASON

In the Philippines, treason is a serious crime defined under Article 114 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC). Here's a detailed overview:

Legal Definition of Treason (Philippines)

Article 114 of the Revised Penal Code states:

"Treason is committed by any person who, owing allegiance to the United States or the Philippine Islands, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort within the Philippines or elsewhere."

Key Elements of Treason

To be convicted of treason in the Philippines, two essential elements must be proven:

1. Owing allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines.

2. Either:

Levying war against the government.

Adhering to its enemies, giving them aid or comfort.

Penalties

Treason committed during wartime: The penalty is reclusion perpetua to death, and a fine not less than ₱100,000.

Treason in peacetime: The law typically doesn't apply, as treason generally assumes the presence of an enemy nation or rebellion.

Procedural Requirement

According to the 1987 Constitution (Article III, Section 18[1]), "No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."

Examples of Treason in Philippine History

1. World War II collaborators: Some Filipinos who aided the Japanese invaders were charged with treason.

2. Communist insurgency: Actions involving aiding enemies of the state (like the CPP-NPA) could theoretically fall under treason if the strict elements are met.

Treason vs. Other Crimes

Rebellion (Article 134, RPC): Involves public uprising against the government.

Sedition (Article 139): Disturbance of public peace with political motives.

Treason is graver because it involves betrayal of the nation, often during war.

10/06/2025

EDITORIAL
First Grounds of Impeachment
CULPABLE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

In the context of the Philippines, a culpable violation of the Constitution refers to a willful and intentional breach of the Constitution by a public official, particularly someone who is impeachable under the 1987 Philippine Constitution (such as the President, Vice President, Supreme Court Justices, members of Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman).

LEGAL BASIS

Under Article XI, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution:

“The President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office, on impeachment for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.”

DEFINITION & ELEMENTS

Culpable means blameworthy or involving fault. It implies that the violation is not accidental, negligent, or ignorant, but intentional and knowing.

The violation must be of a provision of the Constitution, and the offender must have been aware of its existence and deliberately violated it.

EXAMPLES

Although the Supreme Court of the Philippines has not provided a hard definition, past impeachment cases and debates have illustrated examples of acts that could be considered culpable violations:

Usurping legislative powers, such as making laws or budgets without congressional authority.

Ignoring or defying constitutional limits on presidential or judicial powers.

Non-disclosure of Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) (as in the 2012 impeachment of Chief Justice Renato Corona).

Violating the Bill of Rights, such as unlawfully detaining individuals, curtailing press freedom, or violating due process.

BURDEN OF PROOF

In an impeachment trial, the House of Representatives determines probable cause, and the Senate tries the case.

Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of all members of the Senate.

CONCLUSION

A "culpable violation of the Constitution" in the Philippines is a serious charge that involves a willful and intentional breach of constitutional duties or limits by a high public official. It is one of the grounds for impeachment and removal from office, emphasizing the need for public officials to adhere strictly to the Constitution.

Let me know if you want case examples or legal opinions on specific incidents.

10/06/2025

Here’s a concise summary of the impeachment complaints filed against Vice President Sara Duterte:

✅ Impeachment Complaints Overview
First Complaint – Filed Dec 2, 2024
Complainants: 16 civil society leaders, priests, and relatives of drug war victims
Endorsed by: Rep. Perci Cendaña (Akbayan)
Spokesperson: Former Senator Leila de Lima
Allegation: Misuse of confidential funds, betrayal of public trust
Second Complaint – Filed Dec 4, 2024
Complainants: Over 70 individuals (activists, educators, lawmakers)
Endorsed by: Reps. France Castro, Arlene Brosas, Raoul Manuel
Allegation: Corruption, red-tagging, and other misconduct
Fourth Complaint – Filed Feb 5, 2025
Complainants: 215 House members (triggered automatic impeachment)
Included: House Majority Leader Sandro Marcos
Result: VP Sara Duterte was formally impeached by the House

Next Step
The case is now with the Senate, which will act as the impeachment court

09/06/2025

Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Adolfo (Adolf) Azcuna — who helped draft Article XI of the 1987 Constitution — has strongly urged the Senate to commence the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte “forthwith” (“agad-agad”), warning that any undue delay or dismissal without trial would be a **“grave violation of the Constitution.”**

⚖️ Key Points from Azcuna’s Legal Analysis

1. **Impeachment is a constituent, not legislative, power.**
414-1He emphasized that Senate impeachment trials don’t lapse with the end of Congress, which applies mainly to legislative functions. Thus, the case should move forward into the 20th Congress if begun in the current 19th  .

2. **“Forthwith” means immediately.**
Azcuna, who authored this procedural word in the Constitution, stresses that the Senate must start “immediately and without unreasonable delay” after the House transmitted the articles .

3. **Starting the trial unlocks jurisdiction.**
He clarified that if Senate President Chiz Escudero ensures the articles are formally read and served before Congress adjourns, the Senate gains jurisdiction. From there, the trial can legitimately continue in the next session .

4. **Dismissing without trial is unconstitutional—but reversible.**
Any Senate motion to dismiss could be overturned by the Supreme Court or by the incoming 20th Congress, provided a senator who supported dismissal and stays in office moves for reconsideration.

🔍 Broader Context & Reactions

A resolution drafted by Sen. Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa seeks to dismiss the impeachment, citing inaction past the 100-day rule—but Azcuna contends that such procedural arguments misunderstand that impeachment courts are not bound by the expiration of a legislative session .
ll
Dozens of legal scholars — including faculties from UP, San Beda, Ateneo law schools — echo Azcuna’s interpretation, urging the Senate to convene **“forthwith”** .

✅ Bottom Line

Azcuna’s position is clear and backed by constitutional text:
📌 The Senate must begin the impeachment trial as soon as possible in the 19th Congress.
📌 Once formally initiated, the process can continue into the 20th Congress—even beyond June 30.
📌 Any dismissal without a hearing could be legally challenged and overturned.

His call reflects a principled defense of accountability and institutional integrity of democratic governance.

---

Address

Taguig

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Tarlac Highland Courier posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category