28/07/2025
๐๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐ | Cold in the Face of Genocide: the Philippines' Response to the Israel-Palestine Conflict
๐๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ข ๐๐ข๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ข๐ฏ๐จ
As bombs fall on the land of Gaza and death tolls rise by thousands, the world watches in horror. Voices rise in aim to defend the voiceless innocent, protests erupt, and calls for a permanent ceasefire are made. Yet amid the chaos, violence, and suffering, the Philippine government remains, to a great extent, silentโabstaining from United Nations votes, avoiding firm positions, and choosing what it calls a โneutralโ stance.
But in the face of genocide, is neutrality still neutralโor is it cold indifference?
Gaza continues to bleed due to relentless airstrikes. Homes and refugee shelters are now ruins, hospitals are bombed and innocent children lie buried beneath the debris. A Global outcry erupts; some in protests, and others in silence. Among those watching from a distance is the Philippine government, whose consistent position has been to pursue a โbalanced approach.โ While Gazaโs population dwindles, the Philippine government remains firm in its calculated neutrality.
This Article takes a closer look at the Philippines' stance throughout the years on the Israel-Palestine conflict, from abstentions and neutrality to a vague diplomatic statement. This also explores the stance and opinion of some Filipino citizens, some of whom challenge the governmentโs silence, calling it a betrayal of the countryโs moral responsibility. In the face of what many international bodies and rights groups label as genocide, is neutrality still an option, or is it a quiet form of complicity?
๐ผ ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐๐๐ก ๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ฉ, ๐ผ ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐
The Israel-Palestine conflict is a long-standing and deeply rooted struggle spanning decades; a dispute shaped by land, identity, colonialism, and forced displacement. To put it briefly, the tension escalated when Palestine was divided into two states by the United Nations in 1947: one for Jews (Israel) and one for Palestinians (Arab state). While the Jewish leadership accepted the partition, Palestinians rejected it, viewing it as unjust. Violence erupted, and by 1948, following Israelโs declaration of independence, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled from their homesโmarking the Nakba, or โcatastrophe.โ It remains a historic wound and the root of Palestinian statelessness today.
As the long-standing conflict reignited on October 7, 2023, with Hamas launching an attack on southern Israel, the Israeli government responded with overwhelming military force on the Gaza Strip, triggering a humanitarian catastrophe. The United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution on the 27th of October 2023, where it called for an immediate humanitarian truce between Israel and Hamas, where it received 121 in favor, 14 against, and 44 abstentions. Among those who abstained was the Philippinesโa country that happens to be the third-largest buyer of Israeli weapons. Shortly after, a protest erupted in Metro Manila, where Filipino activists and citizens voiced their outrage at the governmentโs silence. Their message was unambiguous: the Philippine government had taken a side, and it wasnโt with the oppressed. In a time of genocide, abstention is not neutrality, it is a position.
โThe Marcos government has the blood of Palestinians on its hands. It turns a blind eye to the genocide in Gaza while continuing to buy weapons from Israel,โ said Liza Maza, secretary-general of the International League of Peoplesโ Struggle (ILPS), who spearheaded the protest. Maza added, โThe Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jrโs governmentโs deafening silence on the massacre of a population in Israel-occupied Gaza is condemnable and smacks of inhumanity.โ
On a Wednesday afternoon, a few days after the reignited conflict, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. met with Israeli Ambassador Ilan Fluss in Malacaรฑang Palace, where he thanked the Israeli government for rescuing 20 Filipinos and bringing them to safety after the Hamas attack. He assured Fluss that the Philippines will always stand with Israel against the inhuman terrorist attacks by Hamas. This, by all accounts, shows where the governmentโs loyalties lie.
๐ผ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ข๐๐ง ๐ค๐ ๐๐ค๐ง๐๐ก ๐พ๐ก๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐ฎ
A spark of hope emerged in November 2023 when the National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP)โa prominent ecumenical fellowship of Protestant and non-Roman Catholic churchesโreleased a bold statement condemning Israelโs actions in Gaza. Breaking away from the governmentโs diplomatic neutrality, the NCCP denounced the Israeli occupation as illegal and labeled its military offensive as genocidal.
In a Facebook post, the NCCP wrote: โChurches must not condone Zionist rhetoric among Christians who legitimize as a right of โThe chosen peopleโโthe illegal occupation of Palestinian properties and other violations of human life and dignity. The outdated and irresponsible claims must be rectified.โ
It was one of the clearest and most courageous statements from any major institution in the Philippines as it directly challenged a long-standing narrative of Zionism and divine entitlement. By calling out the misuse of Christian theology to justify colonialism and violence, the NCCP offered a counter-moral voiceโone rooted not in politics, but in human dignity, faith, and justice. The statement stirred discomfort among Filipino Christians and their idea of neutrality as peace. But It was a call for churches to take a standโnot just in prayer, but in protest; not just in compassion, but in confrontation.
But the NCCPโs statement did not exist in a vacuum. It landed in a country deeply influenced by digital noise, where every opinion on the conflictโwhether rooted in theology, politics, or misinformationโwas being fought out online.
Religion has played a big role in the Philippines as religious beliefs divided the Filipinos in discussions related to Israel and Palestine. Social Media has become a digital battlegroundโa space where users fiercely debate the roots of the violence: the attacks by Hamas, Israelโs military retaliation, the deaths of innocent civilians, and the history of occupation. In a crucial moment where social media is involved, disinformation and misleading narratives spread quicklyโand are often tolerated or left unchallenged.
๐ผ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ค๐ ๐๐๐๐ง๐ฉ ๐ค๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐?
After months, or even years, of silence, abstention, and diplomatic double-speak, the Philippine government seems to shift its tone. On June 12, 2025, the Philippines finally made a significant move by being one of 148 votes favoring the United Nations resolution demanding an Immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, and unhindered entry of humanitarian aid.
It was the countryโs most decisive and visible statement yet โ one that, on the surface, suggested a long-overdue recognition of the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza. The Philippines took a stand โ not too early, not too late.
It was the countryโs most decisive and visible statement yet โ one that, on the surface, suggested a long-overdue recognition of the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza. The Philippines took a stand โ not too early, not too late.
But was it a genuine moral shift โ or simply diplomatic maneuvering?
Itโs difficult to fully embrace this supposed shift after a long silence and carefully worded neutrality, especially when, just months earlier, an Israeli ambassador asserted that the โexcellent tiesโ between Israel and the Philippines remained unchanged, now stronger. In a January 2025 article by Philstar, Israeli officials reaffirmed that bilateral cooperation โ particularly in defense, labor, and trade, would proceed uninterrupted, despite Manilaโs support for UN resolutions critical of Israel.
A statement coming from Israel itself has settled a great amount of doubt on the idea that the Philippinesโ vote in June marked any real rupture โ or any real courage.
Despite the formal shift, the Philippines has not suspended arms purchases from Israel, demonstrating how military ties outlast a single diplomatic gesture. In 2024 alone, it imported over US $39 million in Israeli weaponry, including ATMOS 155 mm howitzers, despite publicly supporting ceasefire resolutions. While the Philippines has long recognized Palestinian statehood, formally since 1989 and reaffirmed as recently as June 2025, it has not issued any statement explicitly condemning Israelโs continued blockade of Gaza, actions many believe would mark genuine accountability. Because in circumstances like this, absence of these matters more than a single UN vote.
So, is this a change of heart or just a facade to escape global scrutiny? a carefully calculated move to appease growing domestic and international criticism? That question remains unanswered. But what is clear is that silence, in the face of war crimes, forced starvation, ethnic cleansing, and a mounting civilian death toll is no longer defensible.
๐ผ ๐๐๐๐ง๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐ก๐๐๐๐จ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐
As Gaza continues to bleed, the world watches โ some with outrage, others in silence. But more and more Filipinos are no longer willing to stand by. Everyone is making a noise in their own little ways. Across the country, voices rise in protest, fueled not just by politics, but by conscience, compassion, and a refusal to be complicit.
Outside the Israeli Embassy in Taguig, one protest placard captured the growing sentiment with piercing clarity: โAbstention is not neutral. It is choosing the side of the oppressor.โ
In the face of injustice, neutrality becomes a stance โ one that history does not always forgive.
The Filipino people have a long memory of their own struggle against colonialism, displacement, and state violence. Filipinos understand the struggle of Gaza โ at least in some sense and angle. That history makes the silence of the government โ or its attempt at neutralityโfeel especially hollow. From students to church leaders, from labor groups to ordinary citizens, more are calling out the paradox: that one cannot claim peace while continuing to arm the aggressor, nor call for restraint after months of calculated neutrality and polite indifference. Is it worthy to give them the benefit of the doubt after they publicly favored the immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza while also visibly showing their warm ties with Israel?
The call for justice is loud, urgent, and unwavering. It echoes from the streets of the Philippines to the ruins of Gaza. Whether the Philippine government chooses to finally answer that call โ or continue hiding behind diplomacy and economic interest โ will define not only its foreign policy, but its moral legacy for years to come.
Because in a time of genocide, silence is never neutral โ it is a decision. And even a smallest voice that dares to call for its ending can matter most.
References:
Admin. (2025, February 8). Philippines to acquire additional 12 ATMOS 155mm self-propelled howitzers from Israel. Defence Security Asia. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/philippines-to-acquire-additional-12-atmos-155mm-self-propelled-howitzers-from-israel/
Baizas, G., & Macaraeg, P. (2023, October 31). In the Philippines, religion plays big role in Israel-Hamas discussion. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/investigative/religion-big-role-israel-hamas-discussion-social-media/
Beltran, M. (2023, October 31). Philippines protesters slam govโt abstention on UNโs Israel-Gaza resolution. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/31/filipino-protesters-slam-govt-abstention-on-israel-gaza-resolution-at-un
Beltran, M., & Beltran, M. (2023, November 1). Israel-Gaza war: Philippinesโ โembarrassingโ abstention from UN resolution sparks protest near Israeli embassy. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3239850/israel-gaza-war-philippines-embar-rassing-abstention-un-resolution-sparks-protest-near-israeli
Marcos calls for adherence to INTโl humanitarian law amid Gaza crisis. (2025, May 27). Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1250903
National Council of Churches in the Philippines. (2024, October 7). Churches must not condone Zionist rhetoric that legitimizes the illegal occupation of Palestinian land and violations of human dignity [Facebook post]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/100066377144788/posts/pfbid029hAbf2wTD4HBnNeJgXDrRR7kF69mTwBYebuCksQKdvq2BeGw1jJHQeS9D6XetwSrl/
Palestinians recount painful history with war in Gaza as a reminder | AP News. (2024, May 16). AP News. https://apnews.com/article/nakba-gaza-israel-hamas-war-a58e1a4f7fd224e1adfedf0da9b3608e
Philstar Global. (2025, June 27). Philippines reiterates โbalanced approachโ to IsraelโPalestine conflict. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/06/27/2453776/philippines-reiterates-balanced-approach-israel-palestine-conflict/amp/
Presidential Communications Office. (2023, October 11). PBBM thanks Israel government for rescuing Filipinos torn between IsraelโHamas conflict | PCO. Presidential Communications Office. https://pco.gov.ph/news_releases/pbbm-thanks-israel-government-for-rescuing-filipinos-torn-between-israel-hamas-conflict/
Resources, C. F. W., & Resources, C. F. W. (2024, October 20). PH Govโt #3 buyer of Israeli arms used to fund Palestine genocide, killing women & children | CWR | Center for Womenโs Resources. CWR | Center for Womenโs Resources. https://centerforwomensresources.org/blog/2023/11/08/ph-govt-3-buyer-of-israeli-arms/
Yu, L. S. (2023, October 28). Philippines abstains from UN resolution calling for Israel-Hamas โhumanitarian truceโ. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/vote-abstain-united-nations-resolution-israel-hamas-truce/