Polimery w Medycynie / Polymers in Medicine

Strona główna
Polska
Wroclaw
Polimery w Medycynie / Polymers in Medicine

Dane kontaktowe, mapa i wskazówki, formularz kontaktowy, godziny otwarcia, usługi, oceny, zdjęcia, filmy i ogłoszenia od Polimery w Medycynie / Polymers in Medicine, Dystrybucja książek i czasopism, Marcinkowskiego 2-6, Wroclaw.

The open-access, peer-reviewed journal Polymers in Medicine publishes original papers and reviews about the application of synthetic and natural polymers or biomaterials in various fields of medicine and pharmaceutics.

12/09/2025

📢Our current CiteScore Tracker is 3.6!📢

CiteScore Tracker follows how the current year’s CiteScore is building month by month, eliminating the need to wait until mid-year to see how a journal performed in the prior year. As new citations are received each month, the metric builds up, so you can get a more up-to-date look at the performance of the journal.

08/09/2025

Antiscience is a set of attitudes and a form of anti-intellectualism that involves a rejection of science and the scientific method. People holding antiscientific views do not accept science as an objective method that can generate universal knowledge. Antiscience commonly manifests through rejection of scientific ideas such as climate change and evolution and the effectiveness of vaccination. It also includes pseudoscience, methods that claim to be scientific but reject the scientific method. Antiscience leads to belief in false conspiracy theories and alternative medicine. Lack of trust in science has been linked to the promotion of political extremism and distrust in medical treatments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiscience

05/09/2025

Altmetric in Polimery w Medycynie - Polymers in Medicine

We’ve chosen to embed Altmetric Badges on our publications to help authors track the attention their research is receiving. By tracking unique identifiers such as DOIs, Altmetric collects article-level metrics and online conversations around articles published in Polim Med. Online mentions that contain links to the abstract landing page are picked up and collated, and the result is the Altmetric Attention Score and Badge.

You will find the Altmetric Badge at the top of each article’s page. When you click on the Altmetric Badge, you will be directed to the Altmetric Details Page, which will show you every mention for your article across Twitter, blogs, mass media outlets, Facebook, and more. View this video for an overview of the Altmetric Details Page.

Why use Altmetric?
Altmetrics can be useful to researchers who are keen on (1) building their online presence, (2) demonstrating the broader impact of their work, and (3) communicating the story of their research to grant review committees and panels. To leverage this information, consider using Altmetric data to:

Identify coverage and wider dissemination of your research to use as evidence in CVs or funding applications;
View who is talking about your research, and identify potential new collaborators and build relationships with key influencers;
Monitor other research in your field and see how it has been received by a broader audience;
Manage your online reputation, and actively engage with comments and conversation about your work.

MORE INFORMATION:
https://altmetric.figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Badges_Toolkit_Details_Page_Guide/20032118?backTo=/collections/Badges_Toolkit/6036803

01/09/2025

Monthly editorial duty hour

Once a month our Managing Editor, Marek Misiak, is awaiting you at a Google Meets meeting. He will answer all your questions and clarify problematic issues.
The meeting take place on the first Thursday of each month between 9:30 and 10:30 CET. You can enter the meeting using the following URL:

meet.google.com/dqi-kzsz-fga

The only prerequisite is a Google account – without it you will not be able to log in to the meeting.

29/08/2025

The Woozle effect, also known as evidence by citation, occurs when a source is widely cited for a claim that the source does not adequately support, giving said claim undeserved credibility. If results are not replicated and no one notices that a key claim was never well-supported in its original publication, faulty assumptions may affect further research.

The Woozle effect is somewhat similar to circular reporting in journalism, where someone makes a questionable claim, and a journalist unthinkingly accepts the claim and republishes it without realizing its dubious and unreliable origins. In turn, other journalists and the public then continue to repeat and duplicate the unsupported claim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woozle_effect

25/08/2025

The politicization of science for political gain occurs when government, business, or advocacy groups use legal or economic pressure to influence the findings of scientific research or the way it is disseminated, reported or interpreted. The politicization of science may also negatively affect academic and scientific freedom, and as a result it is considered taboo to mix politics with science. Historically, groups have conducted various campaigns to promote their interests, many times in defiance of scientific consensus, and in an effort to manipulate public policy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politicization_of_science

22/08/2025

The No Nonsense Guide to Science is a 2006 book on Post-normal science (PNS). It was written by American born British historian and philosopher of science Jerome Ravetz.

What should a young person do who aspires to make the world a better place and to make their way in science? - This is how this work's ambition was summarized. Written in 2006 by one of the founding fathers of Post-normal Science - the other being Silvio Funtowicz - its 142 pages cover several themes, in part synthesizing previous works such as Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, The Merger of Knowledge with Power, and Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (with Funtowicz), and introduces the ideas of Post-normal Science. Topics include:

The problem of science being at once 'little' and big or 'mega', embedded in institutions and corporations;
The fallibility of science, against a possibly 'dogmatic' teaching of the power of science;
The democratization of science as a necessary and realistic antidote to its hubris;
The opportunity of forming extended peer communities - inclusive of whistle blowers and investigative journalists as well as academics and interested stakeholders, when science is called to answer conflicted policy questions;
The relationship between science and society.

The book makes themes that are well known to philosophers and sociologists of science accessible to a larger, less specialized audience, including young scientists.The foreword was written by biochemist Tom Blundell, who approves of Ravetz' "direct and provocative" approach to describing science, inclusive of its self-destructive tendencies as well as of its hopes and promises.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_No_Nonsense_Guide_To_Science

18/08/2025

The replication crisis, also known as the reproducibility or replicability crisis, is the growing number of published scientific results that other researchers have been unable to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is a cornerstone of the scientific method, such failures undermine the credibility of theories that build on them and can call into question substantial parts of scientific knowledge.

The replication crisis is frequently discussed in relation to psychology and medicine, wherein considerable efforts have been undertaken to reinvestigate the results of classic studies to determine whether they are reliable, and if they turn out not to be, the reasons for the failure. Data strongly indicate that other natural and social sciences are also affected.

The phrase "replication crisis" was coined in the early 2010s as part of a growing awareness of the problem. Considerations of causes and remedies have given rise to a new scientific discipline known as metascience, which uses methods of empirical research to examine empirical research practice.

Considerations about reproducibility can be placed into two categories. Reproducibility in a narrow sense refers to reexamining and validating the analysis of a given set of data. The second category, replication, involves repeating an existing experiment or study with new, independent data to verify the original conclusions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

15/08/2025

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has been referred to while doing science since at least the 17th century. Historically, it was developed through the centuries from the ancient and medieval world. The scientific method involves careful observation coupled with rigorous skepticism, because cognitive assumptions can distort the interpretation of the observation. Scientific inquiry includes creating a testable hypothesis through inductive reasoning, testing it through experiments and statistical analysis, and adjusting or discarding the hypothesis based on the results.

Although procedures vary across fields, the underlying process is often similar. In more detail: the scientific method involves making conjectures (hypothetical explanations), predicting the logical consequences of hypothesis, then carrying out experiments or empirical observations based on those predictions. A hypothesis is a conjecture based on knowledge obtained while seeking answers to the question. Hypotheses can be very specific or broad but must be falsifiable, implying that it is possible to identify a possible outcome of an experiment or observation that conflicts with predictions deduced from the hypothesis; otherwise, the hypothesis cannot be meaningfully tested.

While the scientific method is often presented as a fixed sequence of steps, it actually represents a set of general principles. Not all steps take place in every scientific inquiry (nor to the same degree), and they are not always in the same order. Numerous discoveries have not followed the textbook model of the scientific method and chance has played a role, for instance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

11/08/2025

Sexism in academia refers to the academic bias and discrimination by a particular s*x or gender in academic institutions, particularly universities, due to the ideologies, practices, and reinforcements that privilege one s*x or gender over another. Sexism in academia is not limited to but primarily affects women who are denied the professional achievements awarded to men in their respective fields such as positions, tenure and awards. Sexism in academia encompasses institutionalized and cultural s*xist ideologies; it is not limited to the admission process and the under-representation of women in the sciences but also includes the lack of women represented in college course materials and the denial of tenure, positions and awards that are generally accorded to men.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism_in_academia

Adres

Marcinkowskiego 2-6
Wroclaw
51-122

Strona Internetowa

https://www.polimery.umed.wroc.pl/

Ostrzeżenia

Bądź na bieżąco i daj nam wysłać e-mail, gdy Polimery w Medycynie / Polymers in Medicine umieści wiadomości i promocje. Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie wykorzystany do żadnego innego celu i możesz zrezygnować z subskrypcji w dowolnym momencie.

Skontaktuj Się Z Firmę

Wyślij wiadomość do Polimery w Medycynie / Polymers in Medicine:

Skróty

Chcesz aby twoja firma była na górze listy Firma Medialna w Wroclaw?

Udostępnij

Kategoria

Dystrybucja książek i czasopism