30/08/2026
Good read today. You may read these lines and be with an intuition that modern political forces claiming a more equal society are morally better because when regular persons want more for their pursuit they start a path of problems rather than stability. But that can be misleading about what Stoic philosophers really meant. They were not against ambition. What is implicit here is the ability to always be attentive to what you can control, and always remember that excessive ambition turns easily into pernicious greed. Modern Capitalism is a force for good as long as these lessons are well learned, indeed. The alternative is an apparent virtuous quest for an equal society in an institutional apparatus that may appear magnificent, China being a good example, but in which free institutions, the separation of powers that guarantee personal freedoms, and personal ambition are all subjects of Political Parties tight control.... Within a formal communication practice with Society which is often repressive and fear mongering (hardly virtuous) Western Civilization still has its strengths to argue about what makes for good virtuous persons in Free Societies!
Thought of the day from Stoic philosopher Marcus Aurelius: "Very little indeed is necessary for living a happy life"
What the Roman emperor actually meant when he claimed happiness requires almost nothing—and why modern science keeps proving him right.