JAM-Weblog

JAM-Weblog Welcome to the official JAM-Weblog page. Get Breaking News,Live Coverage, must see videos and exclusive interviews.

For adverts and more contact us +23277403533 https://www.youtube.com/.arunamohamed1201

REGIONAL POLICE COMMANDER EAST ENGAGES STAKEHOLDERS AHEAD OF NJALUAHUN PARAMOUNT CHIEFTAINCY ELECTIONSLP Media East*22nd...
22/08/2026

REGIONAL POLICE COMMANDER EAST ENGAGES STAKEHOLDERS AHEAD OF NJALUAHUN PARAMOUNT CHIEFTAINCY ELECTION

SLP Media East

*22nd August 2026*

The Regional Police Commander East, *Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) Joe Kamanda Bongay,* today joined key security and community stakeholders in a strategic security engagement ahead of the Njaluahun Paramount Chieftaincy Election, scheduled for 30th August 2026.

The engagement brought together the Njaluahun Paramount Chieftaincy election aspirants, Honourable Wuyatta Songa of Constituency 008, Section and Town Chiefs of Njaluahun Chiefdom, the Provincial Security Coordinating Committee, the Kailahun District Security Coordinating Committee, and other prominent stakeholders.
The meeting focused extensively on the need for peace, security, law and order before, during and after the Njaluahun paramount chieftaincy election.

During the well-attended engagement, stakeholders unanimously reaffirmed their commitment to ensuring that the electoral process is conducted peacefully and within the confines of the law.
In his capacity as Regional Police Commander East and a core member of the Eastern Region Provincial Security Coordinating Committee, ACP Joe Kamanda Bongay commended the people and stakeholders of Njaluahun Chiefdom for their cooperation and commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Chiefdom.
He reminded stakeholders that the Sierra Leone Police is an integral part of election management in Sierra Leone, with the specific responsibility of providing a safe and secure environment for citizens to exercise their democratic rights. He assured the gathering that the Njaluahun Paramount Chieftaincy Election would receive the necessary security attention to ensure a peaceful, orderly and incident-free electoral process.

The Regional Commander strongly condemned any form of lawlessness, intimidation, obstruction, violence or conduct capable of undermining the electoral process. He made it clear that the Police would take all necessary lawful measures to prevent disruptions and ensure that every eligible voter is able to exercise their franchise freely and peacefully within the ambit of the law.
The engagement further underscored the importance of collaboration between the Police, other security agencies, traditional authorities, political and community stakeholders, and the electorate in safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process.

The Regional Commander's firm position reflects the preparedness of the Sierra Leone Police in the Eastern Region, in collaboration with primary and secondary stakeholders, to effectively police elections and other major public events while upholding peace, security and the rule of law.

The Regional Police Commander was accompanied by the Regional Coordinator, Operational Support Division (OSD), DSP Edward Kargbo, and the newly transferred Regional Operations Officer East, Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Abdulai.

22/08/2026

Njaluahun Chiefdom Stakeholders Engagement at Segbwema, 22nd August, 2026, by the Ministry of Local Government and Community Affairs in Sierra Leone.

First game dem don begin poil tickets 🎟️ aaaaaaa UTD
22/08/2026

First game dem don begin poil tickets 🎟️ aaaaaaa UTD

22/08/2026

MAN UTD na SCAM

AN APPEAL FOR THE DETERMINATION OF TITLE OF PROPERTY IN KENEMA ENDS IN FAVOUR  OF THE RESPONDENT By Mohamed Mansaray in ...
22/08/2026

AN APPEAL FOR THE DETERMINATION OF TITLE OF PROPERTY IN KENEMA ENDS IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT

By Mohamed Mansaray in Kenema.

In the District Appeal Court Holden in Kenema between Ishmeal Mohamed Kamara an Appellant and Ibrahim Seaga Shaw a Respondent before Magistrate Wilbri Hamida. M. John Presiding as Chairman of the District Appeal Court in Kenema has ended in favour of Ibrahim Seaga Shaw the Respondent.

Bockarie. J. Adu Esq. Counsel for the Appellant and Joseph Bandabla Dauda aka JBD, Counsel for the Respondent.

The matter is an Appeal for the determination of title of the property lying situate at Dama Road in Kenema. The Appeal was made on the following grounds that the Appellant was the Defendant at the Local Court No.1 in the Nongowa Chiefdom, Kenema District. That the said Local Court No.1 in the Nongowa Chiefdom adjudicated and determined the matter in favour of Plaintiff now Respondent hearing. That the Customary Law Officer of the Local Court, Kenema District erred both in Law and fact by ignoring the evidence of the Appellant and his witnesses.

That the decision of the Customary Law Officer is against the weight of the evidence. That the Customary Law Officer of the Local Court failed to consider that the Appellant's vendor Mr. Saffa Mambu sold the Land to him and at that time was the recognised vendor for the owing family that was in charge of Land (sales) for the location of the land disputed among others. The Appellant, Ishmeal Mohamed Kamara's Counsel led Three (3) witnesses who testified under oath after which were duly cross examined by opposing Counsel. Questions were also posed to all witnesses by both assessors of the District Appeal Court, Chief Lansana and Mr. Gaimba respectively.

The Respondent established their case by leading witnesses who testified under oath and where duly crossed examined by the Appellant's Counsel. The were asked questions by both assessors supra. A date was slated for a locus in quo visit which was carried out on the 20th November, 2025. At the conclusion of same, the Registrar of the Court, Emmanuel Cooper submitted a Report of the locus in quo visit conducted by the Chairman of the said Court in the presence of the two assessors, Counsels of the Appellant and the Respondent and the parties and their representatives.

Elements of proving Title to discharge their burdens on a balance of probabilities, the Appellant must have satisfied the following by producing a legally recognised root of title, identify the boundaries of the Land, show acts of ownership and possession if paper title is disputed. Traditional and Historical evidence that is mainly used in determining title matters in the provinces as they rely heavily on Customary Law.
In conclusion, Magistrate Wilbri Hamida. M. John Presiding as Chairman of the District Appeal Court could not conclusively respond to the questions which she thought would have led her to satisfactorily respond to the probable validity of the sales.

The candour of Mammy Yonga's testimony led her to believe that it was probable that she was put in possession by the late Pa. Alhaji Shaw and the Respondent's witnesses corroborated same. "Mr. Mohamed Ngombulango seems to me as the head of the Ngombulango Land owning family would know history and details of all Land that belongs to their family"_she stated.

"A case before a court of law however can never end in a tie. 'The Law leaves no lacuna in ensuring that a decision is always achieved in that there is always a provision on the conclusion of any Legal matter."

Magistrate Hamida therefore ordered as the Appellant failed in discharging their burdens. The judgement delivered by the customary court officer of Local Court No.1 Local Court, Kenema District dated 24th February,2025 stands. That the Appellant vacates the Res and give possession of the Res to the Respondent. That the Ngombulango Land owning family gives a portion of Land with the same specifications, free from encumbrances on a main road in Kenema to the Appellant. No order as to cost.

GIVING HAS AN END DATEBy Joseph AyamgaSometimes life gives us reasons to question how much of ourselves we should contin...
21/08/2026

GIVING HAS AN END DATE

By Joseph Ayamga

Sometimes life gives us reasons to question how much of ourselves we should continue to give to others. This question does not arise because helping people is wrong. It arises because experience eventually teaches us that kindness without limits can leave the giver tired, disappointed and forgotten.

Some of us have spent years helping people grow. We have mentored them, encouraged them, defended them and pushed them beyond the limits they had placed on themselves. When opportunities did not exist, we created them. When doors were closed, we used our relationships and influence to open them. When people doubted themselves, we reminded them of their abilities. We shared our time, experience, resources and platforms because we genuinely wanted to see them succeed.

Often, we did far more than anyone knew. We made telephone calls on their behalf, recommended them for opportunities and defended their potential when others were unconvinced. We accepted inconveniences and made sacrifices because we believed their progress would be worth the effort. We were not expecting repayment. We simply believed that when people receive support, they should use it well, grow through it and remember the hands that helped them rise.

What I have found strange, however, is that some of the people we support the most are not there when we pass through difficult times. They may know what is happening. They may know the weight we are carrying and understand that we are facing one of the hardest periods of our lives. Yet, they do not call. They do not send a message. They do not even find the courage to say, “I know this is difficult, but I am thinking about you.”

This is not about demanding money, favours or a repayment of everything we have done. In many cases, all that is needed is a small sign of human concern. A message takes only a minute. A telephone call does not require wealth. Even the simple words “I am here with you” can bring comfort to someone who has spent years being strong for everybody else.

It is painful when even that little acknowledgement becomes difficult for people to offer. The same person who called you repeatedly when facing a problem may suddenly become too busy when you are the one in difficulty. The person who needed your advice, intervention or encouragement may behave as if your pain is not visible. It is at such moments that you begin to understand the difference between people who value you and those who value only what you can do for them.

This realisation can be deeply disappointing, especially when the support you gave was sincere. It can make you question your judgement and wonder whether you mistook dependence for friendship, access for loyalty or constant requests for genuine closeness. You begin to ask yourself whether the relationship would have survived if you had not been useful.

Still, the ingratitude of others should not make us ashamed of the good we have done. Helping someone remains a worthy act, even when that person later disappoints us. Our generosity speaks about our character. Their response speaks about theirs. We should not become cruel simply because some people did not understand the value of what they received.

But we must learn.

There comes a time when we have to stop pushing people who have become comfortable being carried. We must stop creating one opportunity after another for someone who has not learned responsibility, gratitude or discipline. We must recognise when mentorship has become entitlement and when support is no longer producing growth.

Giving should help people stand. It should not encourage them to remain permanently dependent on the giver. If someone always needs us to solve every problem, make every connection and remove every obstacle, then our support may no longer be helping that person mature. Sometimes the most responsible thing we can do is step back and allow people to face the consequences of their choices.

Stepping back does not always mean that we are angry. Sometimes it simply means that we have finally understood the relationship. It means accepting that we have done what we could and that the next part of the journey belongs to the person we supported. We cannot carry everyone forever. We cannot continue investing our energy in people who show no appreciation, growth or concern for our well-being.

There is also a point at which we must prioritise ourselves. For many people who are naturally generous, this feels uncomfortable. We have been taught to give, to sacrifice and to remain available. But constantly placing ourselves last is not a virtue when it damages our peace, health and ability to live fully.

Prioritising yourself does not mean becoming selfish or abandoning people who genuinely need help. It means understanding that your life also deserves care. Your strength is not unlimited. Your time is part of your life. Your peace is valuable. You are allowed to invest in people and activities that bring meaning, appreciation and goodness into your own existence.

Appreciation does not require equal repayment. Someone may never be able to return the opportunities, resources or influence we offered. That is understandable. But gratitude can be expressed through honesty, loyalty, respect and concern. A person may have little to give and still find a meaningful way to say, “I remember what you did for me.”

We must therefore pay attention not only to people’s needs but also to their character. Need can make someone appear humble for a season. Access to opportunity often reveals who the person truly is. Some people grow and become a source of strength to others. Some disappear once they obtain what they wanted. Others remain close only while there is something more to receive.

Life eventually teaches us to know when our part is finished. There is nothing wrong with saying, “I have done my best.” There is no cruelty in ending a pattern that continually drains you. Not every person must have permanent access to your time, influence and resources simply because you once helped them.

Continue to do good, but do not ignore what experience is teaching you. Support people, but allow them to take responsibility for their lives. Create opportunities, but do not make yourself the permanent foundation of another person’s progress. Love people, but do not abandon yourself in the process.

Giving has an end date. That does not mean goodness must end. It means there comes a time when help has served its purpose, responsibility must change hands and the giver must also be allowed to live.

Follow the Baobab Logic With Joseph Ayamga channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbB4C8HHFxP6ArKS492v

Dis noto beef for eat oooo my Kailahun People
21/08/2026

Dis noto beef for eat oooo my Kailahun People

Address

Kenema

Telephone

+23277403533

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when JAM-Weblog posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to JAM-Weblog:

Shortcuts

Share