Standard Times Newspaper

Standard Times Newspaper For Reliable and current news update, always check on Standard Times page. W

Standard Times Newspaper was Launched on April 17, 2005
Standard Times Newspaper is an award-winning newspaper and information site providing visitors with breaking news, sports, money, life, weather, technology and travel news — all updated 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

DECEPTIVE ATTITUDE OF DRUG TRAFFICKERS BY ALIE BADARA IN BO. At one of Sierra Leone's vibrant police checkpoints, Fallah...
18/08/2026

DECEPTIVE ATTITUDE OF DRUG TRAFFICKERS
BY ALIE BADARA IN BO.
At one of Sierra Leone's vibrant police checkpoints, Fallah in the Kakua Chiefdom, Bo District drug trafficking thrives not only on violence and bribery but also on deception.

In Sierra Leone and beyond, traffickers often rely on misdirection—using human theatrics, staged misunderstandings, and calculated distractions to derail security operations.
The aim is simple: prevent thorough screening, delay intervention, and create opportunities for contraband to pass undetected.

A recent incident at the Bo–Fallah Police Checkpoint on Wednesday, 12th August 2026, at about 20:00 hours, offers a clear window into how deception is used as a strategy.

What began as a routine checkpoint process unfolded into accusations, counter-accusations, and interruptions—raising serious questions about the intentions of those involved.


The Checkpoint Duty: Routine Checks, Serious Responsibility
According to witness accounts, a three-seater van arrived at the Bo–Fallah checkpoint with passengers described as “reasonable.” At checkpoints, the responsibility of the joint security team is straightforward:
check travelers,
inspect luggage, and
ensure movement across the checkpoint occurs only after security procedures are properly followed.
This was the expectation on the night in question. The officer in charge of operations that evening was identified as Detective Police Constable 18286 Patrick Mohamed Ngobeh, described by the community as energetic and committed—especially in matters related to searching and unearthing suspicious conduct connected to drug trafficking.
The Refusal to Be Checked: A First Sign of Red Flags
As part of normal procedure, Ngobeh asked all passengers to step out for inspection before crossing the checkpoint.
He specifically directed the passengers occupying the front seat to comply.
However, the front-seat occupants allegedly refused, arguing that they were footballers, and therefore should not be subjected to checks.
On its own, such a claim might sound harmless. But at a security checkpoint, refusal to follow procedures is rarely accidental.
It becomes suspicious when a group—especially one under screening—uses identity, claims to create exemption from inspection.
That refusal reportedly became the foundation for the chaos that followed.
The Distraction Plan: Allegations, Interruptions, and Confusion
The situation escalated when, during the attempted direction of passengers for inspection, a woman—who was allegedly dressed in a manner resembling a man—became involved in a confrontation.
Eyewitnesses and accounts from the scene claimed she alleged that the inspecting officer touched her breast—either unconsciously or deliberately—and then slapped the officer.
The checkpoint was then reportedly interrupted further when the same woman reportedly grabbed a stick with nails and attempted to hit the officer but missed.
In the middle of this commotion, additional senior police personnel, including an inspector (referred to as Chief Inspector - C.I Gabba) and he was Pearce by the nail (another senior officer mentioned in accounts), were also drawn into the disturb
At the height of the allegations and the violence of the interruption, the inspection process was effectively derailed—exactly the kind of diversion traffickers often benefit from.
The Police Officer’s Response: “Calculated Ploy” to Prevent Searches
In an attempt to present the other side, the media engagement included interviewing the police officer involved.
Ngobeh reportedly denied the allegation that he touched the woman.
According to his explanation, the incident was a calculated ploy—a deliberate distraction designed to take attention away from the most important duty of the checkpoint: checking luggage thoroughly and stopping contraband movement.
He also reportedly emphasized that the Sierra Leone Police (SLP) has a system for conducting gender-appropriate searches, including female units positioned at checkpoints to handle inspections involving women
Therefore, he argued there was no need for any improper act.
Most importantly, he stated that the action appeared premeditated, suggesting traffickers may use a similar methodology across checkpoints to create confusion and prevent officers from focusing on luggage inspection.

What Matters Most: The Vehicle Went Unchecked
When misconduct erupts at a checkpoint—especially when accusations are used to shift attention—security procedures, are sometimes slowed down or halted due to concern for safety and order.
In this incident, accounts indicate that the van ended up moving without being properly inspected, which—according to the suspicion surrounding the operation—was possibly the outcome the traffickers desired.
That is how deception often works: not by overpowering security through direct confrontation but by making security busy with something else.
Formal Reporting by Both Sides
Because allegations and assault-related claims were involved, both sides reportedly made formal reports to the Bo Regional Police Division for appropriate action.
This is significant. Whether the claims are true or false, the system must investigate properly. But beyond the investigation, the strategic pattern described by Ngobeh and his supporters remains: deception and distraction can be used to sabotage checkpoint work.

Public Reaction: Confidence in Police Integrity
When the incident was discussed on a radio talk show program, public reaction was reported as overwhelmingly supportive of the police officers at the Fallah checkpoint—described as 99.9% in favor of the officers.
The public view, as stated in your account, was that officers carrying out their rightful duties should not be undermined by “games of distraction.” People also argued that the distraction approach, if allowed to succeed, risks undermining trust in the integrity of the SLP.

What This Means for Sierra Leone: Strengthening Checkpoint Discipline Against Deception
Drug traffickers use deceptive attitudes because they work. Their strategies often include:

Identity excuses (as “we are footballers” to avoid screening)
Emotional manipulation (fabricated accusations and staged outrage)
Physical interruption (assault attempts to derail routine checks)
Distraction tactics that pull officers away from luggage and documentation

For security agencies and checkpoint teams, the lesson is not only about enforcement—it is about procedure under pressure: maintaining inspection discipline, even when incidents are designed to create disorder.

The Fallah checkpoint incident is more than a clash between individuals; it is a demonstration of how trafficking networks may operate through deception.
Whether the accusations are eventually proven or dismissed through investigation, the reported refusal to comply with inspection procedures and the interruption that followed reflect tactics that traffickers often rely on: divert attention, block thorough searching, and slip contraband through the gap created by chaos.
Sierra Leone’s fight against drug trafficking requires more than bravery—it requires systems that can resist deception and remain focused on the core duty: protecting communities by stopping drugs at every point of entry and movement

JM MINING LICENSE BOMBSHELL! … 12-MONTH TIMELINE BEHIND LAPSED LICENSE OFFERBy Fadda Bakish The Government of Sierra Leo...
18/08/2026

JM MINING LICENSE BOMBSHELL!
… 12-MONTH TIMELINE BEHIND LAPSED LICENSE OFFER
By Fadda Bakish

The Government of Sierra Leone, through the Ministry of Mines and Mineral Resources and the National Minerals Agency (NMA), has launched a detailed clarification of the circumstances surrounding License Application APL-I-1172, JM Mining Kenema (SL) Limited, insisting that the company never held a Large-Scale Mining License in Sierra Leone and that no license was ever taken away from it.
According to the Government’s account, JM Mining was offered a Large-Scale Mining License on 23rd January 2025, but the offer was conditional upon the company completing mandatory legal requirements, including accepting the offer in writing and paying prescribed statutory fees.
The Government says those requirements were never fulfilled.
At the centre of the controversy is a fundamental distinction: an approval to grant a license is not the same as an issued license.
The authorities maintain that JM Mining received a conditional offer, but because it failed to meet the conditions necessary for issuance, the license was never legally granted.
The Government’s position is therefore unequivocal: there was no existing mining license to withdraw, cancel or take away. What lapsed was a conditional offer to grant a license.
According to the Ministry and NMA, the law required JM Mining to accept the license offer in writing within 30 days and pay the prescribed fees before a Large-Scale Mining License could be issued.
The total amount involved was US$1.1 million, comprising US$1 million in license fees and US$100,000 in monitoring fees.
Yet, the Government says the company failed to pay the amount despite being given substantially more time than the statutory period.
Officials further state that the NMA deliberately delayed issuing the payment demand for approximately six months, giving the company additional breathing space to secure financing.
The Government says the fees were nevertheless not paid — neither within the original statutory period, nor during the additional six-month period, nor within the further grace period requested by the company itself.
By 30th January 2026, more than a year after the original license offer, the Minister confirmed that the offer had lapsed and was rescinded.
The file was subsequently closed.
The Government’s chronology begins well before the license offer.
On 17th December 2023, JM Mining reportedly wrote to the Minister of Mines and Mineral Resources complaining that the Environment Protection Agency had halted its exploration activities.
The matter subsequently received personal attention from the Minister.
On 16th April 2024, the Minister met the company’s Chief Executive to discuss the impasse.
A month later, on 20th May 2024, the Minister formally wrote to JM Mining, undertaking to engage the Minister of Environment to help resolve the matter and allow the company to continue its activities.
The Minister also directed the National Minerals Agency to provide guidance and support to the company throughout the licensing process.
That communication was copied to the Minister of Environment, the Environment Protection Agency and the Paramount Chief of Nongowa Chiefdom.
The Government is highlighting these interventions to counter any suggestion that the State deliberately frustrated JM Mining’s investment ambitions.
Instead, officials argue, the record shows that senior government authorities actively attempted to facilitate the company’s operations and help it navigate regulatory challenges.
The application eventually proceeded through the relevant institutional process.
On 18th December 2024, the Minerals Advisory Board considered JM Mining’s application and recommended approval.
That recommendation was followed by the formal approval of the license offer on 23rd January 2025.
The Government says this sequence is important because it demonstrates that the company’s application was not rejected at the outset.
On the contrary, authorities say the company was given an opportunity to secure the Large-Scale Mining License, subject to compliance with the statutory conditions.
But the subsequent failure to make the required payments became decisive.
The Government says formal Orders to Pay were eventually issued on 24th July 2025, requiring JM Mining to pay US$1 million in license fees and US$100,000 in monitoring fees within 30 days.
That deadline expired on 23rd August 2025.
No payment was made.
On 28th October 2025, the National Revenue Authority issued a formal payment demand.
Instead of settling the outstanding amount, the company requested additional time until the end of December.
The Government says that deadline also passed without payment.
On 31st December 2025, the company’s own requested deadline expired.
Still, according to the Government, the statutory fees remained unpaid.
Then, on 29th January 2026, JM Mining reportedly requested a new Order to Pay for its license and monitoring fees.
For the Government, that request was significant because it demonstrated that the company itself recognized that the original payment requirement had not been satisfied.
The following day, 30th January 2026, the Minister confirmed that the license offer had lapsed and was rescinded.
Perhaps the most significant evidence cited by the Government is the company’s own correspondence acknowledging its outstanding obligations.
In a letter dated 31st October 2025 to the Commissioner General of the National Revenue Authority, JM Mining’s Chief Executive reportedly acknowledged that the company was overdue in paying the annual fee for the Large-Scale Mining License and the related monitoring fee.
In another letter dated 15th January 2026 to the Director of Mines, the Chief Executive reportedly acknowledged that the company was overdue in paying its license fees since 24th August 2025.
Then, on 29th January 2026, the Chief Executive reportedly requested a new Order to Pay for the license and monitoring fees.
The Government argues that these three communications provide direct evidence that the company was aware of its financial obligations and had not fulfilled them before the license offer was rescinded.
The Government has strongly rejected the argument that JM Mining was denied sufficient time to comply.
According to the authorities, the law provided 30 days for acceptance of the offer and 30 days for payment.
However, the Government says JM Mining effectively had 372 days from the date of approval and 190 days from the date of the payment orders before the matter was finally closed.
The authorities also point to the six-month period during which the NMA deliberately held back the payment demand to give the company additional time to arrange financing.
Beyond that, JM Mining itself requested an extension until the end of 2025.
The Government says that extension also expired without payment.
The Government has also rejected suggestions that the decision to rescind the offer was arbitrary.
Officials say the matter was considered by the Minerals Advisory Board before the Minister made the final decision.
The company was reportedly informed in writing about where to present its case, while the eventual decision was communicated formally and accompanied by reasons.
The authorities therefore maintain that the process followed an institutional and administrative pathway rather than being an arbitrary executive decision.
Another major issue addressed by the Government is the suggestion that its treatment of JM Mining demonstrates hostility towards foreign investors.
The Ministry and NMA strongly reject that characterization.
They point to the Minister’s personal meeting with JM Mining’s Chief Executive, his intervention with the Minister of Environment on the company’s behalf, and his directive to the NMA to provide guidance and support throughout the licensing process.
For the Government, those actions demonstrate a willingness to support serious investment while maintaining the integrity of Sierra Leone’s mining laws.
The authorities insist, however, that support for investment cannot mean exemption from statutory obligations.
The Government argues that the same requirements applied to JM Mining must apply to every applicant seeking a Large-Scale Mining License.
If one company were allowed to ignore statutory payment requirements, officials argue, it could create an unfair situation for companies that have complied with the law.
The Government has framed the dispute within a broader national principle concerning the ownership and management of Sierra Leone’s mineral resources.
According to the Ministry and NMA, the country welcomes serious investors and wants responsible investment in its minerals sector.
But such investment, the Government insists, must be accompanied by compliance with the law.
The authorities emphasize that Sierra Leone’s mineral resources belong to the people and must therefore be managed in a manner that protects national interests while maintaining a transparent and predictable regulatory environment.
The JM Mining controversy, therefore, has become more than a dispute over a single license application. It has raised questions about regulatory compliance, investor obligations, government support and the manner in which Sierra Leone manages its mineral wealth.
The Government’s central message remains that JM Mining was offered an opportunity to obtain a Large-Scale Mining License, but the opportunity was conditional and the conditions were not fulfilled.
For the Ministry and NMA, the record shows a government that intervened repeatedly to help the company, allowed additional time for financing, and ultimately acted only after the required statutory fees remained unpaid.
The Government maintains that no mining license was withdrawn because, in its account, no Large-Scale Mining License was ever issued to JM Mining in the first place.
As Sierra Leone continues to attract investment into its minerals sector, the authorities say the JM Mining case sends a wider message: investment will be welcomed, but investors must meet the obligations established by law.
The Government says it remains committed to protecting Sierra Leone’s mineral resources while ensuring that all operators are treated according to the same legal and regulatory standards.

Two Lawyers Drag To Court Over Alleged US$114,000  FraudBy Fatima Kpaka Two Barristers; Maurice Jenner Mohamed Seisay an...
18/08/2026

Two Lawyers Drag To Court Over Alleged US$114,000 Fraud
By Fatima Kpaka
Two Barristers; Maurice Jenner Mohamed Seisay and John Mans, are standing trial before Magistrate Mustapha Brima Jah of Pademba Road Court No. 1 in Freetown on allegations of conspiracy to defraud and obtaining property by false pretences.
The accused are facing two counts under Section 32(1) of the Larceny Act 1916.
According to the particulars of the offence, between November 1 and 30, 2023, at Harding Sesay and Partners Law Firm, No. 49 Dundas Street, Western Area, Freetown, the accused allegedly conspired with other persons unknown with the intent to defraud.
The second count alleges that the accused obtained three Toyota 4Runner vehicles from Bockarie Conteh, valued at US$114,000, on the representation that payment would be made within 30 working days, a representation the prosecution alleges they knew to be false.
When the charges were read and explained to the accused, no plea was taken as the matter is currently at the committal proceedings stage.
During the proceedings, State Prosecutor Yusuf Isaac Sesay, Esq., raised an objection concerning the defense’s notice of intention to cross-examine prosecution witnesses.
He argued that the defence had failed to properly comply with an earlier order of the court and the relevant provisions of the law.
Defence counsel Jessie M. Jengo, Esq., disagreed, telling the court that the defence had complied with the requirement. He said a notice of intention to cross-examine witnesses was filed on August 5, 2026, followed by another notice on August 10, 2026.
Counsel further argued that the Criminal Procedure Act No. 8 of 2024 does not prescribe a specific format for such a notice and maintained that the defence had made efforts to comply with the court's directive.
In his ruling, Magistrate Jah said he had carefully considered the submissions of both the prosecution and the defence.
The Magistrate observed that the defence application was properly filed in the court file, although he could not ascertain whether it had been served on the prosecution.
He explained that the proceedings before him constituted a preliminary investigation, or judicial investigation, which is concerned primarily with determining the sufficiency of evidence rather than establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Magistrate Jah also noted that preliminary proceedings are time-bound and, in the circumstances, exercised his discretion to dispense with the defense’s non-compliance.
He subsequently ordered the prosecution to make available, produce and tender the written statements and other relevant materials for the continuation of the committal proceedings.
The matter was adjourned to August 20, 2026, for further proceedings.

PROF. KANU SECURES FREE MEDICAL SERVICES FOR COMMUNITIES IN BOMBALI DISTRICT  Bombali philanthropist, Principal and Lect...
18/08/2026

PROF. KANU SECURES FREE MEDICAL SERVICES FOR COMMUNITIES IN BOMBALI DISTRICT



Bombali philanthropist, Principal and Lecturer at Milton Margai Technical University, Professor Philip John Kanu, on Friday, August 14th 2026, extended his humanitarian services by providing free medical services to community members in Ropolon and Mamankie villages.
Professor Kanu secured the free medical outreach in collaboration with professional experts from Smile Medical Hospital in Freetown. The services included tooth extractions, health education talks, medical examinations, and the administration of medication.
Speaking to journalists during the outreach, Professor Kanu said providing free medical services to his people was just one out of many goodies he has offered to the growth and well-being of his community.
“I feel satisfied that I have been able to provide free medical services for my people. The service is provided by Smile Medical Hospital, while I take responsibility for the drugs and other stuff, which cost over Le 150,000,” Kanu affirmed.
“I think the free medical service is a felt need for my people because I care for them,” Kanu stated.
He further explained that his motivation was mainly influenced by the love he has for his people and the sudden loss of his mother, whose illness, he said, could not be properly diagnosed.
“I could remember at one time my mother died due to a sickness that we couldn't explain... So, I always want my people to know their health status and thus prevents replica of such,” he said.
Consultant Medical Doctor at Smile Medical Hospital, Dr. Musa Rogers, confirmed that the medical team had treated more than 600 people in Ropolon and about 800 people in Mamankie.
“We're only providing the service, while the medication is being personally provided by Professor Philip John Kanu,” Dr. Rogers confirmed.
Mariama Sesay, a pregnant woman and resident of Ropolon Community, expressed her deep appreciation for the free medical services provided. She shared that the support was valuable to her and expressed gratitude to the team for making the services accessible to her and members of her community.
Chairman of the Bombali District Council, Dr. Mohamed Mark Babah Sisay, praised Professor Kanu for his philanthropic efforts and for bringing free healthcare services to the two communities.
“I am highly and deeply grateful for such a philanthropist like Professor Kanu for bringing this service to the people of Ropolon and Mamankie communities. We all know that healthcare services are very expensive, but with his kindness, he has been able to bring experts to render free services to his people. For that alone, I give my heart to him,” Chairman Sisay remarked.
The outreach is part of Professor Kanu's broader humanitarian efforts aimed at improving the welfare and health awareness of people in his community.

CRIMINAL SESSION ENDS IN BOEIGHT CONVICTS GET 80 YEARS EACH BY ALIE BADARA IN BO The Judiciary season in Sierra Leone’s ...
18/08/2026

CRIMINAL SESSION ENDS IN BO
EIGHT CONVICTS GET 80 YEARS EACH
BY ALIE BADARA IN BO

The Judiciary season in Sierra Leone’s Southern region has drawn to a close, culminating in the sentencing of eight armed robbers at the High Court in Bo.
The case, which began in the Lower court before being committed to the High Court, reached its conclusion after several appearances before Honorable Justice Francis Bangs Kamara.
All eight accused persons pleaded guilty to the charges leveled against them.
In mitigation, J.J. Harris Esq. submitted that the convicts were young men in their prime, first-time offenders who had learned their lessons and would not reoffend.
Taking these submissions into account, Justice Kamara sentenced each of the eight to 560 years imprisonment.
Under judicial calculations applied by the court, the effective minimum term for each convict is 80 years.
In his closing remarks as the criminal session ended and he prepared to proceed on vacation, the judge emphasised his determination to ensure public safety.
He stated that he wants the people of the southern region to sleep with their eyes closed rather than remain awake in fear.
Justice Kamara further declared that he would fight armed robbery by every available means to eradicate the menace or drastically reduce its prevalence in the region.
Court attendees later testified that the presence of the High Court Judge and the firm sentences handed down in recent cases have significantly improved safety and security compared with previous years.
Many credited the Judiciary with playing a crucial role in the fight against armed robbery by ensuring that justice is served and that offenders are appropriately removed from society.
Public praise was also directed at Chief Justice Komba Kamanda for his decision to deploy Justice Kamara to the southern region.
Residents of Bo District and beyond described the appointment as a wise and welcome intervention that has helped liberate communities from the threat of night-time armed thieves.
Observers further noted a positive shift in the legal landscape of the South.
The region now benefits from a more vibrant legal profession, with a greater number of lawyers available to represent clients—an improvement on earlier years when legal representation was scarce.
As the criminal session closes, the people of Bo and the wider southern region continue to express gratitude to the Chief Justice for what they regard as the selection of an effective judicial officer dedicated to their security and the rule of law.

BRAVELY WATER RAISES ALARM OVER   ALLEGED CROSS-REFILLING OF ITS DISPENSERS Kadat Food and Beverages (Kadat FnB), produc...
18/08/2026

BRAVELY WATER RAISES ALARM OVER
ALLEGED CROSS-REFILLING OF ITS DISPENSERS


Kadat Food and Beverages (Kadat FnB), producer of Bravely Water, has issued a strong warning to water-producing companies, distributors, dealers and customers against the unauthorized use, refilling and resale of water in Bravely Water-branded dispenser bottles.

Bravely Water is a locally produced purified drinking water brand in Sierra Leone, providing safe drinking water and refreshment to consumers.

The company said its attention has been drawn to reports that some customers are taking Bravely Water dispenser bottles to other water-producing companies for refilling. It further alleged that certain companies are accepting the branded bottles, refilling them with their own water and subsequently supplying or selling the filled dispensers to customers.

Kadat Food and Beverages has warned that such practices must cease with immediate effect, stressing that Bravely Water-branded dispenser bottles should not be accepted, refilled, exchanged, distributed or used for the sale of another company’s water without its authorization.

The company said the practice raises serious concerns relating to brand protection, ownership, product identification, consumer confidence, business ethics and fair competition within Sierra Leone’s growing packaged-water industry.

Branded dispenser bottles form an important part of a water company’s distribution and marketing system. Kadat Food and Beverages therefore maintains that competitors should not commercially benefit from Bravely Water-branded dispensers by filling them with products that have not been produced or supplied by the company.

The company also cautioned customers against presenting Bravely Water dispensers to rival companies for refilling. Customers are encouraged to return Bravely Water-branded dispenser bottles through the appropriate Bravely Water distribution channels.

Kadat Food and Beverages noted that the principle is comparable to practices in other industries where branded containers or cylinders are associated with particular suppliers and are generally handled within their respective distribution networks.

The company emphasized that it welcomes healthy competition in Sierra Leone’s water sector, but maintained that competition should be based on product quality, pricing, customer service, availability, distribution and innovation, rather than the unauthorized use of a competitor’s branded property.

Kadat Food and Beverages is therefore calling on all water-producing companies currently accepting or refilling Bravely Water-branded dispenser bottles to DESIST FORTHWITH unless they have received express authorization from the company.

The company is also urging the Sierra Leone Standards Bureau and other relevant regulatory authorities to take note of the reported practice and provide appropriate industry guidance on the ownership, handling, refilling and use of branded water dispensers.

Clear standards, the company believes, would help protect consumers, prevent disputes among producers and strengthen professionalism and fair competition across the industry.

Kadat Food and Beverages further warns that any company, distributor, dealer or other party found deliberately using Bravely Water-branded dispenser bottles without authorization may face appropriate legal action in accordance with applicable laws.

The company has therefore appealed to customers, distributors and water producers to respect branded business property and ensure that Bravely Water dispensers are used only for their intended purpose.

Bravely Water maintains that fair competition, respect for ownership and responsible business practices remain essential to building a credible, competitive and sustainable water industry in Sierra Leone.

Frontpage Stories
18/08/2026

Frontpage Stories

11/08/2026

Address

Freetown

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Standard Times Newspaper posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Standard Times Newspaper:

Shortcuts

Share

Category