10/07/2026
Journalist Bol Deng Kiir, recently shared his thoughts on social media, specifically on his Facebook wall, where he provided insights and categorized various South Sudanese politicians. His reflections aim to foster understanding and discussion about the political landscape in South Sudan.
“In South Sudan, the political landscape is characterized by a diverse array of politicians, each influenced by different motivations and priorities. They can be categorized as follows:
1. International Politician
These individuals actively engage in shaping public policy and governance at a national or international level. Typically, they hold official positions within the government and serve as representatives of the populace. Their primary role involves advocating for the interests of their constituents, making critical decisions that affect the lives of many, and playing a significant part in the formulation of public policies that guide the country's direction.
2. Community-Minded Politician
A community-minded politician is deeply invested in the welfare of their local area. These individuals not only participate in governance but also take an active role in the community by volunteering, supporting grassroots initiatives, and promoting social activism. Their focus extends beyond mere political gain; they strive to foster a sense of unity and progress within their community, often working tirelessly to address social issues and improve the quality of life for all residents.
3. Tribal-Minded Politician
Tribal-minded politicians predominantly prioritize the interests of their own ethnic group or tribe, often at the expense of the broader national unity. They tend to support only their tribal members, and their agendas are frequently entrenched in tribal loyalties. This approach can lead to significant corruption and fuel community conflicts, as these politicians might incite division rather than promote collaboration among different communities.
4. Hand-to-Mouth Politician
These are the extreme cases in the political realm, often characterized by a focus on personal gain over public service. Hand-to-mouth politicians may propose numerous ambitious projects, but these initiatives are typically self-serving and aimed at enriching themselves rather than benefiting the populace. Their behavior can be likened to expecting to receive a significant advantage (like carrying an elephant) while only offering minimal returns to those in need (like demanding a rabbit from impoverished citizens).
5. Current Affairs Politician
Current affairs politicians are often seen as opportunists who align themselves with wealthy patrons, supporting individuals based solely on their financial standing rather than their ethical or leadership qualities. Even those with only a modest fortune, such as one million dollars, may find themselves supported if they hold influence or power. This type of politician tends to view political alliances through the lens of financial gain, often lacking a true commitment to the values and needs of the community they serve.”
