เว็บไซต์คืออะไร?

https://www.facebook.com/109669720890539/

Monkey's Lifestyle

03/09/2025

Dear Friends,Thank you for your support & Enjoy your life by Watching: Jane, 's_Family,

02/09/2025

Dear Friends,Thank you for your support & Enjoy your life by Watching: Jane, 's_Family,

21/08/2025

Dear Friends,Thank you for your support & Enjoy your life by Watching: Jane, 's_Family,

20/08/2025

At a recent press briefing, the Thai Foreign Minister and a military representative faced questions about landmines that were reportedly laid by Cambodian troops.
The first journalist asked two things: whether international experts would be allowed to investigate the landmines, and which country was supplying them to Cambodia, how were they planted.
The Foreign Minister's answer to the first question was unclear and filled with many details that didn't directly address the point. For the second question, he handed it off to the army official, saying the military would be better suited to answer. However, the army official seemed unprepared and simply gave the question back to the Foreign Minister. This exchange left the impression that neither expert had a solid answer.
A second journalist then asked a pointed question, noting that the landmines were found in a historical minefield known as K5, and asked if they were new. The Thai official replied that they were "completely newstocked."
This response raised a logical problem. If the mines were truly brand new and laid by Cambodian troops, it would mean those troops had risked their lives by going into a dangerous, pre-existing minefield just to lay new mines. What a nonsense story! The situation appeared to be a display of Thai authorities trying to make a case to the world, but the conflicting details and unprepared answers made the event seem more like an unconvincing and even humorous performance.

03/08/2025

We call for Peace Monkey's Lifestyle

03/08/2025

listen to this Monkey's Lifestyle

02/08/2025

Dear Friends,Thank you for your support & Enjoy your life by Watching: Jane, 's_Family,

26/07/2025

Dear Friends,
Why Thai government and Thai army don't want to go ICJ, UN Security Council or seeking third party mediator? The answer is very simple because don't want the world knows what they have done to Cambodia, Mass destruction, killings, and civilian displacement etc.
They rejected ICJ, or third party mediator. They keep on insisting on bilateral talks with Cambodia. At the same time, they keeps threatening us and using all tactics to keep us on bilateral talks. We all know it has been 25 years of bilateral talks, but produced no result.
Thailand knows that they can put pressure on Camodia if we can keep on bilateral diolouge. And Cambodia also knows that such mechanism doest not work and it will cause more and become chronical issues for many generations to come.
We, Cambodia, wanted peace and lasting peace and prosperity along the approximately 800km border between the two countries. That why we wanted UN, that why we wanted ICJ, and that why we wanted third party mediator etc. Because we know that the bilateral talks or diolouge will never be able settle our difference.
The dispute between Cambodia and Thailand is like a divorced couple fighting and accusing each other, claiming their own rights etc, such thing needs a court to decide what belongs to whom, then the story comes to an end.
This case is the same, we need third party to meditate and solve problem.
As a Cambodian, I would like to appeal to the world, please help us bring this case to ICJ, that is all we wanted.