Manga Store

Manga Store ร้านหนังสือการ์ตูน

In May 1921, Walter Russell—an American artist, architect, and self-taught polymath—fell into a mysterious 39-day coma-l...
07/24/2025

In May 1921, Walter Russell—an American artist, architect, and self-taught polymath—fell into a mysterious 39-day coma-like state. Upon awakening, he claimed to have tapped into “the source of all knowledge,” a divine wellspring of universal truth. In a frenzy, he recorded pages of profound revelations that would later form his monumental work *The Universal One*. His writings attempted to bridge science, philosophy, and spirituality, outlining a radically different understanding of reality. While most of the 500 scientists and intellectuals he contacted dismissed him, one stood apart: Nikola Tesla. The brilliant inventor was so moved by Russell’s insights that he advised him to lock the work away for a millennium, convinced the world was not yet ready.

Russell’s cosmology was visionary. He asserted that matter is not solid but “crystallized light”—energy compressed by thought into form. In his model, everything is made of rhythmic light patterns, spiraling through cycles of expansion and contraction, like breath or heartbeat. He proposed that consciousness, not matter, is the primary force of the universe. Death, he wrote, was merely the uncoiling of compressed light—energy returning to source—not an end, but transformation. He rejected the idea of opposites like good and evil, suggesting instead that all things seek equilibrium and unity. Time, to Russell, was not linear, but a spiral—where all moments coexist in a dynamic, living whole.

His theories, dismissed in his time as mystical nonsense, now echo through the emerging fields of quantum physics, field theory, and consciousness research. Russell believed electricity was not a mechanical force but a living spiral of energy. He saw the vacuum of space not as empty but as a vibrant sea of potential—a precursor to today’s ideas of zero-point energy. In medicine, he taught that health was a balanced rhythm and that disease resulted from a disruption in this natural flow. Though long marginalized, Walter Russell is now being re-examined as a prophet of unified science and spirit—a man whose vision may have anticipated a future still dawning.

In the year 2000, Jennifer Connelly stood at the threshold of a major career transformation. That year, her haunting por...
07/24/2025

In the year 2000, Jennifer Connelly stood at the threshold of a major career transformation. That year, her haunting portrayal of Marion Silver in Darren Aronofsky’s *Requiem for a Dream* drew critical acclaim and redefined her as a serious dramatic actress. The film, a raw and unflinching depiction of addiction, demanded an emotional intensity few roles require, and Connelly delivered a performance that was both devastating and deeply human. Her portrayal of a young woman consumed by ambition and dependency revealed a depth and vulnerability that marked a new chapter in her professional life. It was a performance that not only shocked audiences but also earned her widespread respect from critics and peers alike.

In addition to *Requiem for a Dream*, Connelly also took on the role of Lee Krasner in *Po***ck*, a biopic centered on the troubled American painter Jackson Po***ck, played by Ed Harris. As Krasner—Po***ck’s wife, muse, and fellow artist—Connelly brought a quiet strength and intelligence to the screen, embodying a woman who both loved and endured a volatile genius. Though a smaller role compared to her turn in *Requiem*, her work in *Po***ck* demonstrated her ability to bring layered sensitivity to historical figures, navigating the subtleties of partnership, sacrifice, and artistic identity with grace. The film further affirmed her commitment to complex, character-driven stories over commercial spectacle.

While 2000 highlighted her range as an actress, it also reminded audiences of the elegance and presence that had long made Jennifer Connelly a captivating screen figure. Having entered the industry as a teenager in films like *Labyrinth* (1986) and *The Rocketeer* (1991), she was no stranger to the spotlight—but it was in this era that she truly stepped into her own as an artist. The year 2000 marked the end of her ingénue phase and the beginning of a career defined by substance, emotional depth, and a bold willingness to inhabit difficult roles. It was the groundwork for her later success in films like *A Beautiful Mind* (2001), which would bring her both an Oscar and enduring acclaim.

When World War II ended in 1945, Hungarian soldier András Toma was captured by the Soviet Red Army and taken deep into t...
07/24/2025

When World War II ended in 1945, Hungarian soldier András Toma was captured by the Soviet Red Army and taken deep into the Soviet Union. Unable to speak Russian and with no one around him who understood Hungarian, he was misdiagnosed as mentally ill and committed to a psychiatric hospital. What followed was not months or even years—but over five decades of isolation and silence. Trapped in a world where language failed him, Toma became a ghost of the war, forgotten by time and unreachable by voice.

For 55 years, Toma remained in that psychiatric institution, entirely cut off from meaningful human communication. To those around him, he seemed incoherent or delusional, simply because they could not understand the language he spoke. It wasn’t until the year 2000 that a newly assigned doctor heard something familiar in his speech—words that resembled those from the Uralic language family. Realizing this might be Hungarian, the doctor contacted the Hungarian embassy. Linguists were brought in, and at last, the mystery was solved: the man they thought insane was simply speaking a forgotten language in a forgotten body.

At the age of 74, András Toma finally returned home. His family, long believing he had perished during the war, was stunned to welcome him back. Though much of his life had been lost to isolation, his story became a powerful reminder of war’s lingering cruelty and the deep human need for connection. Toma passed away in 2004, but his life remains one of the most heartbreaking and surreal tales to emerge from the ashes of the Second World War.

In 1940, as the shadow of war loomed over Europe, a quiet photograph was taken in Paris—a young Alain Delon, only five y...
07/24/2025

In 1940, as the shadow of war loomed over Europe, a quiet photograph was taken in Paris—a young Alain Delon, only five years old, sitting beside his mother Édith. The city was on the brink of German occupation, and life was growing increasingly uncertain. Yet in this rare image, there’s a moment of stillness: a mother’s steady presence amid the chaos, and a child unaware of the storm unfolding around him. For Delon, who would go on to become one of France’s most enduring screen legends, these early years were shaped as much by war as by the quiet strength of his mother, whose love offered shelter from a fractured world.

Alain’s childhood was marked by disruption—his parents separated shortly after his birth, and he was later sent to live with foster families. But Édith, a young working mother, remained a constant in his life whenever she could. Despite economic hardships and the strain of wartime France, she nurtured her son’s fiery independence and emotional intensity—traits that would later define his acting career. In interviews, Delon has spoken of her with deep admiration, crediting her resilience and tenderness for anchoring him through a turbulent youth filled with instability and rebellion.

Looking back, the 1940 photograph becomes more than just a family snapshot; it is a symbolic bridge between the vulnerable child and the magnetic figure Delon would later become in films like *Le Samouraï* and *Plein Soleil*. The boy gazing into the distance in his mother’s care would one day captivate audiences with his cool detachment and brooding intensity. Yet beneath that iconic exterior always lay the imprint of a little boy from wartime Paris—shaped by love, hardship, and the quiet heroism of a mother who never stopped believing in him.

On the night of August 17, 1960, a little-known band from Liverpool stepped onto the modest stage of the Indra Club in H...
07/24/2025

On the night of August 17, 1960, a little-known band from Liverpool stepped onto the modest stage of the Indra Club in Hamburg, Germany. Paul McCartney, John Lennon, and George Harrison were all teenagers then—full of swagger, talent, and the hunger to make their mark. Alongside drummer Pete Best, they were still finding their sound, playing gritty covers of rock and roll standards and rhythm and blues classics under the crude neon lights of Hamburg’s red-light district. The booking, arranged by their first manager Allan Williams, wasn’t glamorous—but it would become the crucible in which The Beatles were forged.

The Indra Club, located on the notorious Grosse Freiheit street, was a tough place. The boys played for hours each night to crowds more interested in drink and distraction than music. Sleeping in cramped quarters behind a cinema and living on little more than beer and sandwiches, they endured grueling schedules and rough audiences. Yet the relentless performing—sometimes for eight hours a day—pushed them to grow tighter as a group. Lennon’s edge, McCartney’s melodic instincts, and Harrison’s precision began to blend, their early sound thick with attitude and sweat. They learned not just how to play, but how to perform.

By the time they left Hamburg later that year, The Beatles had transformed. The stage had shaped their identity, hardened their resolve, and deepened their bond as friends and musicians. It wasn’t the screaming fans or stadiums yet—it was neon smoke, German beer, and six-string ambition. The raw nights at the Indra were where Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison became a band in the truest sense. That club, dark and loud, was the seedbed of a cultural revolution that would echo far beyond Hamburg.

Headaches are as old as humanity itself. Long before aspirin was synthesized in 1897, people were already desperately se...
07/24/2025

Headaches are as old as humanity itself. Long before aspirin was synthesized in 1897, people were already desperately searching for relief. A striking photo from 1890 reveals one bizarre method from the era: "vibration therapy." In this curious treatment, a patient’s metal helmet was struck with a mallet against an anvil—turning the human skull into a kind of bell, supposedly to chase the pain away. Whether the headaches actually stopped remains unclear, but something certainly must have gone silent inside.

Before such industrial-age methods, medieval remedies were equally extreme. Migraine sufferers were treated with sponges soaked in vinegar and o***m, placed on the head in hopes of dulling the pain—usually by knocking the patient into a deep, drugged sleep. The logic was simple: if you couldn’t cure the pain, you could at least make the person forget it entirely… along with everything else.

And if all else failed, there was always trepanation—the ancient practice of drilling a hole into the skull to “release evil spirits” believed to cause suffering. This procedure dates back to at least 7000 BC and was used for thousands of years across civilizations. When the pain became unbearable, it seemed the treatment was often more extreme than the illness. Today, we reach for a paracetamol. But once upon a time, fighting a headache took faith, fortitude… and perhaps, a steady hand with a hammer.

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s life was a relentless battle against adversity. Born in 1821 into a troubled household, he lost both...
07/24/2025

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s life was a relentless battle against adversity. Born in 1821 into a troubled household, he lost both parents at a young age, setting the stage for a life steeped in suffering. Early success with *Poor Folk* (1846) was soon overshadowed by his arrest for involvement with a radical intellectual circle. Sentenced to death, he faced a mock ex*****on before being spared at the last moment—a psychological scar he would carry forever. He spent years in a Siberian labor camp, surrounded by criminals and filth, which deepened his understanding of suffering, faith, and human resilience. Upon release, he was forbidden to publish or travel freely, and his health, worsened by epilepsy, remained fragile for the rest of his life.

Despite these crushing hardships, Dostoevsky produced some of the most profound literature of the 19th century. Novels like *Crime and Punishment*, *The Brothers Karamazov*, and *Notes from Underground* were born out of the tension between faith and doubt, sin and redemption, freedom and responsibility. He wrote with urgency, often under threat of debt or illness, yet his characters revealed a startling depth of psychological realism. His belief that suffering could lead to spiritual awakening shaped his worldview, even as he mourned the deaths of his children and endured a tumultuous marriage. Still, he held on to a deep, if tormented, faith in the potential of the human soul.

When Dostoevsky died in 1881, over 60,000 mourners flooded the streets of St. Petersburg to honor him—a staggering turnout that reflected the quiet revolution he had sparked in the hearts of his readers. He had lived a life marked by rejection and loss, yet he left behind a body of work that continues to challenge and comfort millions. His writing transcends its era, asking eternal questions about love, guilt, and the possibility of grace in a broken world. In the end, Dostoevsky transformed his pain into truth, becoming not just a chronicler of Russian life but one of humanity’s greatest literary voices.

In 1938, as the Great Depression continued to grip the United States, life for many families along the Kanawha River in ...
07/24/2025

In 1938, as the Great Depression continued to grip the United States, life for many families along the Kanawha River in Charleston, West Virginia, was stripped down to the essentials. Among them was a family living aboard a small wooden houseboat, their lives tethered to the rhythms of the river. Captured by photographer Marion Post Wolcott for the Farm Security Administration, the image of this floating home reveals both the hardship and the ingenuity of the era. The boat itself, rough-hewn and weathered, was not merely a shelter but a sanctuary—offering mobility, access to food, and a way to avoid the costs of land-based housing. Children sit barefoot near the edge, their gazes steady, as if already familiar with the weight of adult concerns.

For Appalachians and many others hit hardest by economic collapse, life on a riverboat was less a choice than a survival strategy. The river offered fish, transportation, and a connection to occasional work. Families like this one might have bartered with passing boats, gathered driftwood for fuel, or taken odd jobs in town. The houseboat became a vessel of resilience, its cramped quarters fostering a closeness that was both physical and emotional. Wolcott’s lens captured more than poverty—she photographed pride, self-reliance, and the subtle routines that stitched meaning into everyday survival.

What makes Wolcott’s photograph so enduring is its refusal to romanticize or pity. Instead, it presents a slice of life—one shaped by economic displacement but anchored in quiet strength. The family’s expression, their possessions, their way of life—each detail tells a story not just of struggle, but of adaptation. Through this image, the Great Depression becomes personal, rooted in the real experience of ordinary people who made do with what little they had. In the stillness of the river and the steadiness of the family, we glimpse the enduring human spirit that history books often overlook.

In 1971, inside a quiet lab at Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 29-year-old computer engineer ...
07/24/2025

In 1971, inside a quiet lab at Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 29-year-old computer engineer Ray Tomlinson was working on a government research project that would unknowingly reshape global communication. The project, ARPANET—the precursor to the internet—was designed to allow computers to communicate across long distances. But there was one major limitation: users could only send messages to others logged into the same machine. Seeking a workaround, Tomlinson experimented with a file transfer protocol and had a flash of insight—why not combine messaging with remote file delivery? To differentiate between a user and a computer destination, he chose the underused "@" symbol, a stroke of elegant simplicity that birthed the modern email address format.

Tomlinson’s first messages, sent between two side-by-side computers, were largely unremarkable test strings—he later admitted they were likely gibberish. But the system worked. Despite its revolutionary potential, his creation went unnoticed at first. His supervisor even suggested he not make a big deal of it, as it was technically outside the scope of their assigned work. Still, word of mouth spread quickly within the tech community, and soon, the email program became the most-used feature of ARPANET. What began as a simple utility to solve an internal problem quickly evolved into a foundational tool for personal and professional digital communication.

By the 1980s, email had moved beyond government labs into universities and corporate networks, and by the 1990s, it was ubiquitous. Tomlinson never patented the invention or capitalized on it commercially. He remained modest throughout his life, often brushing off praise by saying he was just trying to make something practical. Yet his innovation—anchored by a single, now-iconic symbol—quietly changed the world. Today, billions of emails fly across the globe daily, and every message still carries a trace of that original brilliance. Ray Tomlinson’s creation didn’t just launch a new technology—it sparked a transformation in the way humanity communicates, collaborates, and connects.

In 1940, amid a series of strategic training exercises conducted by the German Luftwaffe, an unusual and unexplained inc...
07/24/2025

In 1940, amid a series of strategic training exercises conducted by the German Luftwaffe, an unusual and unexplained incident occurred that continues to intrigue historians and UFO researchers alike. As part of the drills, smokescreens were deployed to simulate battlefield conditions, obscuring visibility and mimicking the chaos of real combat. It was during one of these exercises that several photographs reportedly captured a disc-shaped object cutting smoothly through the dense clouds of smoke. The object appeared to maneuver with precision and speed far beyond the capabilities of any known aircraft of the era, leaving Luftwaffe personnel both stunned and unsettled. The event was immediately classified and documented under strict wartime secrecy.

At the time, aviation technology was progressing rapidly—but still within the bounds of propeller-driven aircraft and the fledgling development of jet propulsion. The notion of a remote-controlled or autonomously guided aerial vehicle was virtually nonexistent in 1940, making the object’s controlled flight amid explosions and heavy turbulence all the more baffling. Eyewitness accounts describe how the object moved with extraordinary grace, seemingly unaffected by wind resistance or environmental instability. Official Luftwaffe reports noted the incident but refrained from offering explanations, merely categorizing it under "anomalous aerial activity." The documents remained buried in classified archives until the postwar period, when fragments of the story began to surface.

Now, with the reemergence of the original photographs and corroborating records, the incident has found renewed attention among both military scholars and UFO investigators. Some argue it could have been an advanced N**i prototype, while others believe it may be one of the earliest verifiable encounters with non-human intelligence monitoring human warfare. Experts in photographic analysis have verified the age and authenticity of the images, ruling out modern tampering. Whether the object was a long-lost wartime innovation or an early example of extraterrestrial surveillance, its appearance over a smokescreened battlefield in 1940 raises compelling questions about the presence of unknown observers in times of human conflict—long before the term “UFO” entered popular vocabulary.

After the passing of his beloved wife, Gloria, in 1994, James Stewart—America’s beloved “everyman” and one of Hollywood’...
07/24/2025

After the passing of his beloved wife, Gloria, in 1994, James Stewart—America’s beloved “everyman” and one of Hollywood’s most revered figures—faced a world that suddenly felt unfamiliar. Married for nearly 45 years, Stewart had shared a deep and steady love with Gloria, one that had carried them through fame, war, and family life with grace. When she died, the sparkle in Stewart’s eyes seemed to dim. The loss was not just personal—it was foundational. In a quiet act that spoke volumes about grief and devotion, he chose not to replace the battery in his pacemaker. It was a decision made not out of despair, but from a place of peace and longing—a quiet acknowledgment that his journey had felt complete with her at his side.

Those who knew him well understood this not as surrender, but as a final act of love and integrity. Stewart had always lived with authenticity, on and off screen, and his decision reflected that same truth. He once described Gloria as “the sunshine of my life,” and without her, life lost its color and rhythm. It wasn’t about giving up, but about honoring a bond that had defined the best chapters of his life. Even in mourning, Stewart embodied a kind of strength that came not from bravado, but from fidelity—choosing to step away from the stage of life with the same quiet dignity that had made his performances so beloved.

James Stewart passed away on July 2, 1997, at the age of 89. The man who had played heroes, poets, soldiers, and dreamers left the world not with fanfare, but with a gentle sigh. His passing felt like the closing of a chapter in American history—a farewell to a kind of decency and quiet resilience that he so perfectly embodied. Stewart’s final years, lived in solitude but not sadness, were a testament to enduring love and the graceful acceptance of life’s seasons. In choosing to let go, he gave one last performance—an unscripted act of devotion that, like the man himself, was timeless, sincere, and unforgettable.

In 2006, Turkish physiology professor Üner Tan made a discovery that challenged conventional understandings of human evo...
07/24/2025

In 2006, Turkish physiology professor Üner Tan made a discovery that challenged conventional understandings of human evolution. In a remote village in the Iskenderun province of Turkey, he encountered the Ulas family—parents and their 19 children, five of whom moved in a way that stunned researchers. Four daughters and one son walked naturally on all fours, using both hands and feet to move efficiently across the ground. This wasn’t a learned behavior or an experimental practice; it was their only means of locomotion. Despite their ability to briefly stand upright, they were unable to walk bipedally, and their verbal skills were extremely limited—speaking fewer than 100 words. Cognitive impairments and significant memory loss were also observed among the affected siblings.

As word of the discovery spread, similar cases began to emerge in parts of Brazil, Iran, and Iraq—regions marked by poverty, isolation, and a lack of access to education and healthcare. These families, often invisible to broader society, shared striking similarities with the Ulas family. Scientists began referring to the condition as **Üner Tan syndrome**: a rare neurological disorder characterized by quadrupedal locomotion, intellectual disability, and poor balance. Further studies pointed to a form of **degenerative cerebellar ataxia**, a condition that compromises motor coordination and balance—essentially erasing the body's ability to walk upright over time. It was as though, under certain environmental and genetic pressures, evolution itself had taken an unexpected step backward.

Beyond its biological implications, the story of the Ulas family raises unsettling questions about the fragility of human progress. If the achievement of upright walking—a defining trait of Homo sapiens—can be undone by extreme poverty, isolation, and neurological disorder, what does that say about the stability of our evolutionary gains? This case serves as a haunting reminder that walking upright may not only be a biological milestone but also a **social construct**, upheld by environment, care, and opportunity. It suggests that under the right conditions, or perhaps the wrong ones, the line between advancement and regression may be thinner than we imagine.

Address

Ashburn, VA

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Manga Store posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Manga Store:

Share