Georgia Law Review

Georgia Law Review Georgia Law Review is the flagship publication of the University of Georgia School of Law. Georgia Law Review’s mission addresses two principal goals.

Established in 1966, Georgia Law Review is the flagship publication of the University of Georgia School of Law. Staffed entirely by second- and third-year law students, the Law Review is Georgia Law’s only general subject-matter publication. Law Review publishes one volume–comprised of four quarterly issues–annually, and it has recently launched a Symposium issue. Dedicated to publishing quality a

nd timely legal scholarship for over forty-five years, Georgia Law Review publishes the work of renowned law professors, judges, and legal practitioners in addition to selected notes written by Georgia Law Review members. First, the Review provides the finest legal education and training. Law Review editors select, edit, and publish the works that appear within the pages of Georgia Law Review’s volumes. Through this process, Law Review editors develop and hone their research, writing, editorial, and leadership skills. More importantly, however, the Review strives to provide a forum for legal reform. In the inaugural issue of the Georgia Law Review, Dean Lindsey Cowen articulates the Review’s purpose “in seeking out the weak points in our law, in developing appropriate recommendations for change, and in advocating them persuasively in its pages.” The editors of Georgia Law Review continually seek to fulfill this mission in helping the Review serve as a platform of legal reform. Georgia Law Review is staffed by Georgia Law students and operates independently of the University of Georgia Law faculty or administration.

In his Note, Alexander F. Krupp, Georgia Law '23, advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of ...
04/26/2023

In his Note, Alexander F. Krupp, Georgia Law '23, advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of the expressive function of the law to meaningfully protect individual data privacy rights from corporate deregulators.

By Alexander F. Krupp. This Note advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of the expressive function of the law to meaningfully protect individual data privacy rights from corporate deregulators.

In his Note, Vol. 57 Executive Articles Editor Nicholas R. Lewis argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit...
04/25/2023

In his Note, Vol. 57 Executive Articles Editor Nicholas R. Lewis argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit expansive executive war power, and offers a framework to do so through existing laws or new legislation.

By Nicholas R. Lewis. This Note argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit expansive executive war power, and offers a framework to do so through existing laws or new legislation.

In his Note, Hunter Davis, Georgia Law '23, examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Com...
04/24/2023

In his Note, Hunter Davis, Georgia Law '23, examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Commissioner—and the question of which governmental entity should address the taxability of credit card rewards.

By Hunter Davis. This Note examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Commissioner—and the question of which governmental entity should address the taxability of credit card rewards.

In his Note, Kasey Clark, Georgia Law '23, explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform...
04/19/2023

In his Note, Kasey Clark, Georgia Law '23, explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and advocates for courts to dismantle the rule after years of legislative inaction.

By Kasey Clark. This Note explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and advocates for courts to dismantle the rule after years of legislative inaction.

In his Note, Vol. 57 Senior Managing Editor Logan Purvis reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectu...
04/18/2023

In his Note, Vol. 57 Senior Managing Editor Logan Purvis reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectual disability, the Supreme Court's rulings and guidance on the issue, and proposes changes to the law to remedy prejudice.

By Logan Purvis. This Note reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectual disability, the Supreme Court's rulings and guidance on the issue, and proposes changes to the law to remedy prejudice.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Zachary S. Price documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these...
04/04/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Zachary S. Price documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these varied positive laws should govern whether categorical nonenforcement violates a duty of faithful ex*****on.

By Zachary S. Price. This Article documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these varied positive laws should govern whether categorical nonenforcement violates a duty of faithful ex*****on.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Samuel D. Brunson discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their gr...
04/03/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Samuel D. Brunson discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their growth and development in relation to LLCs, and the obligations that come with their tax entity status.

By Samuel D. Brunson. This Article discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their growth and development in relation to LLCs, and the obligations that come with their tax entity status.

In his Article, Dan T. Coenen studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-leg...
03/31/2023

In his Article, Dan T. Coenen studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-legislature theory, concluding that it does not comport with a proper reading of the Constitution.

By Dan T. Coenen. This Article studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-legislature theory, concluding that it does not comport with a proper reading of the Constitution.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Maytal Gilboa argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligenc...
03/27/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Maytal Gilboa argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligence law and proposes using the loss of chance doctrine to eliminate evidentiary hurdles and incentivize the elimination of bias.

By Maytal Gilboa. This Article argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligence law and proposes using the loss of chance doctrine to eliminate evidentiary hurdles and incentivize the elimination of bias.

Thank you to Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, Monika Ehrman, Roy...
03/24/2023

Thank you to Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, Monika Ehrman, Roy Hadley, and Matthew Grocoff, who spoke at today's symposium.
An additional thank you to all who attended as well as our Executive Symposium Editors, Savannah Grant and Tripp Keeffe.

Address

Athens, GA
30602

Telephone

+17065427286

Website

https://georgia-law-review.scholasticahq.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Georgia Law Review posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category