10/01/2026
Residents fighting the Gannett Ranch annexation say they may not need to win a zoning fight or a growth debate at all. Under Idaho law, they argue, the city cannot annex the ranch in the first place, because it does not truly touch Bellevue except by a skinny “shoestring” strip the statute forbids.
Planning & Zoning meets Monday, Oct. 5. Contiguity is one of the findings the commission must make before a complete annexation application can move forward. City Council follows Oct. 13. Community Development Director Brian Parker has already invited the public to both meetings to testify.
Neighbors who want this stopped say Monday is not optional because if commissioners never hear that the connection fails Idaho Code §50-222, staff’s “it’s contiguous” opinion can walk through unchallenged, unless there is litigation.
Idaho’s annexation statute says land must be contiguous to the city. Contiguous means sharing a common border, and land is not contiguous if the only shared border is a shoestring connection.
The same chapter bars annexation when property would be tied to the city only by a highway right-of-way strip, and separately bars a connection that is only a shoestring or strip of railroad right-of-way.
In plain terms, if the ranch only “touches” Bellevue through a thin corridor, especially a road or old railroad strip, the application fails before design, density, or services are even on the table.
Parker told Brett Stevenson and others Sept. 28 that, in his opinion, the ranch is contiguous because it “shares a common border” and the code sets no minimum border length. He said “shoestring” is undefined and pointed to city-limit maps in Elizabeth, Colo., and Brady, Texas.
Stevenson answered that other states’ maps do not rewrite Idaho’s ban, that the little strip touching the Gannett Ranch parcel does not meet the statute, and that the city attorney should put that conclusion in writing. Parker disagreed that the fight matches Potvin v. Village of Chubbuck, the 1955 Idaho Supreme Court case that struck down a three-mile, five-foot corridor annexation, and again pointed residents to the Oct. 5 and Oct. 13 hearings.
County parcel data and a Gazette public records return show the large ranch parcel reaches Bellevue-coded land only through an roughly 8.34-acre connector near 39 Gannett Road.
That connector’s measured contact with clear city-owned land is about 59 feet against a former railroad corridor. The state’s Bellevue taxing-district map covers only about half of the connector and essentially none of the ranch.
Asked for an ordinance putting the connector inside the city, the clerk produced the city charter, a 1996 legislative amendment, and a 2002 boundary-clarification ordinance with an approximate map, and said Bellevue has "no further records."
Monday's Planning and Zoning hearing begins at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall or online.
https://www.5bgazette.com/neighbors-idaho-law-blocks-gannett-ranch-annexation-over-shoestring-link/article_841e7968-5ead-4d5c-abc5-95d823d075f9.html
Residents fighting the Gannett Ranch annexation say they may not need to win a zoning fight or a growth debate at all. Under Idaho law, they argue, the city cannot