Young With Solutions, 2918 Avenue I, Unit #5212, Brooklyn, NY (2026)

08/20/2026

£8,188.19 in affiliate GMV. 967 items sold. £1,165.49 in estimated commissions. And affiliates drove 95.86% of total seller GMV. 💸

One week. One affiliate system firing on all cylinders.

The number that tells the real story — shoppable video GMV up 307.35% versus the previous 7 days. Commissions up 375.89%. Items sold up 273.36%.

Everything accelerating at the same time. 🚀

The top video alone pulled in 437,200 views and generated £3,456.34 in direct revenue. One creator. One gut health video. One link in the bio that converted.

That's the affiliate effect. 🔥

No ad spend behind these numbers. Creators posting content about the product, audiences clicking through, and a TikTok Shop backend converting that trust into real transactions.

£8,161.99 of the total GMV came directly from shoppable video. Meaning the content itself was the storefront.

Most brands are still treating affiliates as a secondary channel — something to set up and forget. The ones running it as a primary growth engine are watching their GMV compound week after week without touching their ad budget.

Content that sells while you sleep. That's what a healthy affiliate program looks like. 🎯

08/19/2026

9.56 ROI. 53 orders. $1,639.50 in revenue. $171.45 spent. One week. 🔥

$3.23 cost per order on TikTok Shop. That number is almost hard to believe but there it is in the dashboard.

Look at the cost line on that chart. 👀 Flat and steady the entire week. Spend stayed consistent while orders fluctuated naturally day to day. That's a campaign running exactly the way it should — controlled spend, variable returns, overall efficiency that holds.

This is what early-stage GMV Max looks like when the setup is right. 🎯

Low spend. High ROI. Clean data coming in. The foundation is set.

Most brands see numbers like this and immediately want to 10x the budget overnight. The smarter move is to let the algorithm keep learning, tighten the product mix, and scale deliberately — so the 9.56 doesn't collapse under pressure.

$171.45 to generate $1,639.50.

The math works. Now we build on it. ⚡

08/17/2026

Follower count is not on this chart. Neither is production quality. Neither is posting frequency. 🙅

2,000 people across 16 countries were asked what actually builds creator trust. Here's what they said 👇

- Expertise — 95%. The single highest driver. People follow creators who genuinely know their subject.
- Transparency — 90%. Be open about what's paid, what's not, what works, what doesn't.
- Credibility — 82%. Consistent track record over time. Not one viral moment.
- Authenticity — 81%. Real opinions. Real experiences. Not a polished performance.
- Reliability — 74%. Show up consistently. Say what you mean. Mean what you say.
- Relatability — 62%. Lowest on the chart. Likability matters less than people think.

The brand playbook for influencer selection has been backwards for years. 🫣

Most brands chase reach, aesthetic, and relatability. The audience is actually optimizing for expertise and transparency — and they're getting better at spotting the difference between a creator who knows their craft and one who's just good at performing it.

Polish doesn't build trust. Proof does. 🎯

The creators who win long-term are the ones who teach something real, admit honest trade-offs, and show up the same way every time. That's not a content style. That's a standard.

Brands that match with those creators don't just get views. They inherit the trust those creators spent years building. 💡

08/14/2026

589 conversions. $35.30 cost per conversion. 50 campaigns. And we hit the client's ideal target CPA. ✅

That last part is the one that matters most.

Every brand has a number. The CPA where the math works, the margin holds, and scaling actually makes sense. Getting there — and staying there across 50 campaigns simultaneously — is where most agencies fall short.

We didn't just get close. We landed exactly where the client needed us to be. 🚀

462 conversions from the primary campaign at $33.49 CPA. 127 from the audience campaign at $41.91. Blended across the full account — $35.30. Right on target.

👉 Here's what 50 campaigns running at once actually means.

More data. Faster learning. Better decisions. While a single campaign is still figuring out what works, 50 campaigns are already telling you which creative, which audience, and which angle wins and which ones to cut.

That's how you hit a CPA target with precision instead of luck.

589 paying customers acquired. At exactly the cost the business needed.

That's not a good week. That's the system working. 🎯

08/13/2026

64% of people looked at AI-generated content and thought a human made it.

Let that land for a second.

100 people were shown 50 pieces of social content — half human, half AI. Then asked to guess which was which. The results are not what most people expect.

👩 Human content: 76% correctly identified as human. 24% thought it was AI.
🤖 AI content: 64% thought it was human. Only 36% correctly spotted it as AI.

The gap is closing faster than anyone predicted.

Two years ago this data would have looked completely different. AI content was stiff, generic, and easy to spot. Today nearly two thirds of people can't tell the difference when they're scrolling a feed.

This changes the conversation entirely.

The debate used to be "will audiences reject AI content?" That question is becoming irrelevant. Audiences already can't reliably identify it.

The new question is whether the content is good — not whether it was made by a human or a machine.

Quality is the only thing that matters now. Not the tool used to create it. 💯

The brands still avoiding AI over authenticity concerns are solving a problem their audience has already stopped caring about. The ones using it well are publishing more, testing faster, and compounding their content advantage every week.

The line between human and AI content just disappeared. 👀

08/11/2026

"10/10 would work with again." ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

That's the whole review in one line. But the detail behind it is what we're proud of.

Savannah worked with us from October 2025 to February 2026. Here's what she walked away with — her words, not ours.

An account manager who learned their business goals and found creators that actually fit. Patience through a complex internal approval process that required multiple leadership sign-offs. Creators who brought ideas to the table, not just deliverables. A review and approval process that was seamless. Edits turned around fast. 🎯

And at the end of it all — a deeper understanding of what content their audience actually responds to, plus a library of quality content they can keep using.

That last part matters more than most clients realize going in.

Content that outlives the contract. Audience insights that sharpen future decisions. A team that made a complicated process feel easy.

This is what a content partnership is supposed to feel like. 🤝

Not just deliverables dropped in a folder. A team that shows up, listens, adapts, and leaves you better equipped than when you started.

"Absolutely would not hesitate to work with YWS again." 🥹💙

08/07/2026

Agentic commerce was a $73 billion market in 2025. By 2030, it's projected to hit $500 billion. 🥵

That's 6.84x growth in five years. This isn't a trend. It's a structural shift in how people buy things.

Most brands have never even heard the term "agentic commerce."

👇 Here's what it means and why it matters.

Agentic commerce is when AI agents — not humans — make purchasing decisions. An AI assistant that reorders your supplements when you're running low. A shopping bot that compares prices and completes checkout without you touching a screen. Automated systems buying on behalf of real people.

The buyer isn't always a person anymore.

From $73B to $500B means the brands positioned for this shift will capture an enormous amount of that new volume. The ones still only optimizing for human browsing behavior will get filtered out before a human ever sees their product.

Your product pages, your listings, your content — they need to be readable and rankable by AI, not just by people scrolling a feed. 💯

SEO used to mean optimizing for Google. Then it meant optimizing for social algorithms. Now it means optimizing for the bots that buy.

The purchase journey is being automated. The brands that adapt early don't just survive the shift — they get swept up by it. 🤖

08/05/2026

$52,457.07 generated. $6,851.81 spent. 7.66 ROI. 560 orders. 17 days. 💸

We kept scaling GMV Max for a client on TikTok Shop — and the machine didn't flinch. 🎯

$12.24 cost per order across 560 purchases. Nearly identical efficiency to the previous period, but at almost double the spend. That's the part worth paying attention to.

Most campaigns fall apart when you scale them. Cost per order climbs. ROI drops. The numbers that looked great at $800 in spend look completely different at $6,800.

Not here. 😎

Look at that ROI line on the chart. Spend kept increasing. ROI held steady between 7 and 10 throughout the entire 17-day window. That's not luck — that's a campaign structure built to absorb budget without losing efficiency.

$6,851.81 in. $52,457.07 out. 💰

560 real customers. 560 orders processed. A fashion brand on TikTok Shop printing consistent returns week after week.

This is what happens when you stop treating paid media as an experiment and start running it like a business. ⚡

08/05/2026

DTC brands, there’s this 1 system used by:

- Comfrt
- IM8
- Bloom Nutrition
- Tarte Cosmetics
- Raw Nutrition
- Physician’s Choice

to generate $100’s of millions in GMV.

They focus on talent acquisition > customer acquisition.

a/k/a CREATOR ARMIES.

These armies generates thousands of videos per month.

These armies do the customer acquisition for the brands.

We’ve made $45M for our clients duplicating this system.

If you want it too, book a demo call, I’ll make you a personalised plan for your brand.

- Tim

08/03/2026

📊 Content budgets in 2026 are almost perfectly split. And that's the most telling data point of all.

9,210 marketers. Three almost equal camps 👇

32% are spending more on content creation.
37% are keeping it exactly the same.
31% are cutting it.

No dominant trend. No clear consensus. Just a market in the middle of deciding what content is actually worth.

👀 Here's what's really happening beneath those numbers.

Content isn't being cut across the board — it's being questioned. Every dollar now needs a reason to exist. Can this piece be redistributed? Can it be repurposed? Does it actually move a metric downstream or does it just fill a calendar slot?

The 31% cutting aren't anti-content. They're anti-waste. They got burned by producing volume with no strategy behind it and they're pulling back until someone can show them the math.

The 32% increasing have figured that math out. They know which content formats drive pipeline, which ones build retention, and which ones compound over time.

Content for content's sake is quietly disappearing. What's replacing it is content with a job — a distribution plan, a reuse strategy, and a clear link to revenue.

The question for every brand in 2026 isn't "how much should we spend on content?"

It's "can we prove what our content is worth?" The ones who can answer that are the ones still investing. 💡

Young With Solutions

08/20/2026

08/19/2026

08/17/2026

08/14/2026

08/13/2026

08/11/2026

08/07/2026

08/05/2026

08/05/2026

08/03/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request