06/18/2026
Confidence surveys are not perfect.
Some people may rush through them. Some people may not answer honestly. Some people may not complete them at all.
But I think we sometimes use those limitations as an excuse to avoid trying anything new.
In learning and development, we often say we want better data, better follow-up, and better insight into whether people feel prepared to apply what they learned. But when someone suggests a practical way to start collecting that signal, the first response is often why it will not work.
I get the concerns. Confidence is not competence. A self-rating does not prove someone can perform a skill. But when confidence surveys are written well, tied to specific behaviors, and connected to action planning or coaching conversations, they can become more than another survey.
They can become a starting point.
A way for learners to reflect.
A way for managers to have better development conversations.
A way for L&D teams to identify patterns where support may be needed.
The goal is not to pretend the data is perfect. The goal is to stop accepting silence as the only option.
My take is simple: do not worship the data, and do not fear the imperfections. Build the best mechanism you can, connect it to action, and keep improving it.
Because the future of learning will not belong to the people who waited for perfect data. It will belong to the people who were brave enough to create better signals where silence used to be.
Confidence surveys are not perfect, but that does not mean they are useless. In this post, I share how I used a carefully designed confidence survey inside a Supervisor eLearning program to gather better development signals, support action planning, and create a path for coaching conversations and 9...