05/26/2026
SC District 17 Sen. Everett Stubbs spoke to the News & Reporter today about his vote on possible redistricting. He supported redistricting efforts on all votes prior to today, but said he had made it clear from the beginning that if the final vote was pushed back to today, with early voting having started, he would vote "no."
"Once you have started in-person voting, you can't do that. I voted today...I couldn't look at all the other people in line and tell them their vote didn't count. I had to vote my conscience."
Stubbs said there were problems with the redistricting plan handed down to the state. He said "communities of common interest" were split up and some precincts were actually cut in half. That combined with ballots having already been cast is what led him to change his vote to "no."
"It was going to lead to lawsuits on top of lawsuits, logistical problems and it would have cost tens of millions of dollars to fix."
Stubbs said he also wasn't sure the map, as drawn, would have guaranteed seven Republican congressional members the way many think. He said experts looking into the numbers said it would likely be 6-1 or even a 5-2 split.
"I think South Carolina is going to add an additional seat in a few years and at this point, I think that is probably the proper time to look at redistricting."
He said he knows he will face criticism (he already has, he said) for his decision, but also said he isn't less conservative or less of a Republican than he was before today's vote. He noted that fellow Republicans Richard Cash and Harvey Peeler both switched their voted today for much the same reason as him.
"I don't think I'm going to question their conservative credentials...Look, if the people of District 17 ultimately look at this and decide that it makes me unworthy to represent them, that is their right, but I believe pushing the decision to today, with early voting starting made it too problematic from a logistical standpoint."
Send a message to learn more