Chasing Financial Freedom

Chasing Financial Freedom Have you ever dreamed of being able to make more money, live a better life, and have the financial f

09/09/2026

On a wholesale assignment, you at least see the fee. On a double close, you never do. That is the one that should worry you.

Here is the difference. A visible assignment fee is a number on the page. You see it; you can argue it; you can decide whether the deal still works with it. A double close hides the spread inside the purchase price. The buyer paid $130,000, and $15,000 of that was spread he never saw itemized anywhere.

Now watch what financing does to an invisible number. You put twenty percent down and finance the rest, which means you financed roughly $12,000 of that hidden spread. At 6.8 percent over thirty years, you are paying real interest, for three decades, on a markup that was never once shown to you as a line item.

At least the assignment fee gave you the choice. The double close took the choice away and put it on your amortization schedule for thirty years.

Do you actually know how your last wholesale deal was structured- an assignment you could see, or a double close you could not?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/08/2026

Fall in love with the math, not the property. The property will lie to you. The math will not.

Here is what the math says on a real deal. A first-time investor budgeted $26,000 to close. He wired over $38,000. That is twelve thousand dollars he did not plan for, showing up the week of closing because he priced only the down payment.

Your down payment is not your cash to close. Cash to close is the down payment plus lender fees, title, prepaids, and any wholesale spread baked into the price. On this deal, a chunk of what he paid was spread he never saw at the table and is now financing for thirty years.

None of that made it a bad deal or meant anyone did wrong. It meant he fell for the property before he ran the real number, and the real number is always down payment plus everything else, with reserves standing right behind it.

Before you wire, do you know your true all-in number, or just the down payment you have been picturing?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/07/2026

You brought $26,300 to close. Here is the question nobody asks until it is too late: what is left in your account the day after?

Closing drains you. That is the part first-time investors never plan for. You spend months focused on getting to the closing table, and you wire everything you have to get across it. Then you own the property, and your reserve account is scraped to the bone on day one.

Here is the line that matters. If you have less than twelve months of PITIA sitting in the bank after you close, you are one capex surprise away from a real problem. Not a vacancy. Not a market crash. Just a water heater or a roof deciding to go the same month you took possession.

The deal did not fail because it was bad. It failed because closing left you with no cushion, and the first surprise had nowhere to land.

After your last close, how many months of payments were actually left in your account, or did getting to the table take everything you had?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/05/2026

Your deal shows $198 a month in cash flow. Run it honestly, and that number is a mirage.

Here is the math most investors stop at. Rent minus PITIA. On this one, $950 rent minus a $752 payment is $198 a month, $2,376 a year. Looks like a solid little cash-flowing rental. You would sign it.

Here is the math that actually hits your account. Rent minus PITIA minus real operating reserves- the money you have to set aside because the vacancy and the repairs are coming whether you budgeted them or not. Property management alone runs 10%, $95 a month, on a sub-$100 K rental. Keep subtracting the real costs, and that $198 does not survive.

Paper cash flow is what the deal looks like. Real cash flow is what you keep. They are almost never the same number, and the gap is where investors get hurt.

Did you run your last deal on rent minus the payment, or on what actually landed in your account after real reserves were applied?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/04/2026

An investor came to me after his own bank turned him down. His Airbnb was clearing $4,200 a month, booked solid, cash flowing every single week. On paper though, his tax returns showed almost nothing, because he writes off everything he legally can, like any smart operator.

The bank looked at the paper and said no. It never really looked at the property.

We got it funded with a DSCR loan. That loan does not ask what his tax returns say. It asks one thing. Does the property's income cover the payment? For a short-term rental, the Airbnb revenue can carry the approval by itself, no W-2, no income docs.

The one thing that trips people up is how the income gets valued. Some lenders use long-term market rent, which can make a great Airbnb look underwater. The ones who do it right qualify you on what the property actually produces on nightly bookings. So you always ask up front which number they are using, before you write the offer.

If you have got a short-term rental, would you rather finance it on the property's income or your tax returns?

09/04/2026

The deal showed 9 percent cash-on-cash. He would have taken it. You probably would have too. He was going to lose $1,400 a year.

Same deal. Same numbers. The only difference was which number he read.

$102,000 wholesale purchase. Twenty percent down, DSCR loan, $26,300 to close. He ran the return the way most investors run it, income over cash invested, and got 9 percent. A number you would wire on.

Then he ran it honestly. Real reserves for the vacancy coming. The assignment fee sitting in his basis. The full cost of the loan, not just the rate. Same property, run all the way through, was not making 9 percent. It was losing $1,400 a year. A negative return wearing a 9 percent costume.

The wholesaler did nothing wrong. The fee was fair. He was simply reading the number that made the deal look good instead of the one that told the truth.

When you run a deal, are you reading the paper number that says yes, or the real number that says what you will actually keep?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/03/2026

Your down payment is not your cash to close. On this deal, the gap between the two was thousands of dollars in line items nobody warned the buyer about.

You budget the down payment because that is the number everyone talks about. Then the closing disclosure appears, and beneath the down payment is a stack of charges you did not price. Lender fees for closing, origination, and processing ran $4,491 on this deal. Title, recording, and government fees, another $1,600. A full twelve months of insurance the lender makes you prepay up front, $1,051. Property taxes owed at closing on top of that.

None of these are the down payment. All of them are due the same day, in cash, before you collect a dollar of rent.

This is why the deal that looked like it needed your down payment actually needed thousands more sitting in the account. The buyers who get surprised at the table are the ones who underwrote the down payment and forgot everything stacked underneath it.

Do you know your true cash-to-close for your next deal, or just the down payment?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/02/2026

A $102,000 rental at $950 a month sounds like a deal. Run the real numbers, and it breaks even at best, slightly negative at worst, in year one.

Here is the whole picture on this one. $102,000 purchase. A $17,000 wholesale assignment fee on top, financed right into your basis. $26,300 of your own cash in the door. And $950 a month coming back. On paper, that looks like a rental. On a real cost basis, after true reserves, it is break-even to slightly negative in year one.

That does not automatically make it a bad deal. It makes it a bad cash flow deal. It can still work if you are buying it with a rehab plan, a portfolio strategy, or a specific market thesis that you can actually name. What it cannot survive is being bought as a pure cash flow play when the cash flow is not there.

The number that matters is not the rent. It is what is left after real cost basis and reserves, and whether you had a reason to buy beyond hoping.

Did you buy your last deal on a strategy you could name, or on a rent number that looked good before the real math?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

09/01/2026

There is a line on your closing disclosure you did not budget for, and it is sitting in the buyer cash-to-close.

You show up to closing on a $26,300 out-of-pocket deal expecting your down payment and your normal fees. Then you see prepaid interest. Here is what it is. Mortgage interest is paid in arrears, meaning you pay it after you use it, so at closing the lender collects the interest for the days between your closing date and your first payment. Close with thirteen days left in the month, and that is thirteen days of interest due right now.

On this deal, that ran $18.42 a day. Thirteen days is $239; you had to bring that nobody put in your original math.

Small on its own. But run that daily number out. $18.42 a day is $6,723 in interest in year one alone, on a deal you underwrote as if the rate was just a percentage on a page. The rate is per daily meter, and it runs whether the unit is rented or not.

Did your cash to close match what you budgeted, or did the closing disclosure have lines on it you were seeing for the first time?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

08/31/2026

The deal shows $2,376 in annual cash flow. The real number is-$1,392. Same deal. The difference is whether you counted reserves.

You put $26,300 of your own cash into this one. On paper it returns $2,376 a year, which looks like a slow win. Then you subtract real reserves, the money you have to set aside for the vacancy and the repairs that are coming, and the number flips. It is not making $2,376. It is losing $1,392 a year. Real cash-on-cash, negative five percent.

So ask the question that actually matters. How many years until the cash flow pays back your $26,300 out of pocket? On this deal, never. You cannot recover your cash from cash flow that runs negative. It does not break even in year eight, year ten, or ever.

Here is the line that separates investing from hoping. If a deal takes more than eight to ten years to break even on cash flow alone, you are not investing for cash flow. You are betting on appreciation and calling it a rental.

Was your last deal cash flow, or was it an appreciation bet you had not run the break-even on yet?

More tools and straight talk at trutalk.co

Address

109 East 17th Street Suite 4456
Cheyenne, WY
82001

Telephone

+18127775850

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Chasing Financial Freedom posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category