https://www.facebook.com/106462565472093/

Ruweng Global Media, 9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX (2025)

06/11/2025

Clarification on Historical Claims Regarding Ruweng People's Origin and Land Ownership North of Bahr el Ghazal River
By: Isaac Dau (LLB, PGDL, LLM, MA),
Monday, 2 June 2025

I am writing to bring to light certain unfounded claims and narratives that have recently surfaced regarding the origin and territorial rights of the Ruweng people, specifically surrounding the lands located north of the Bahr el Ghazal River. It is with a sense of duty and commitment to historical accuracy that I seek to address and correct these misleading assertions currently being circulated within certain circles in the Unity State.

To begin with, it has been purported by some individuals that the Ruweng people originated from the Bahr el Ghazal region. Allow me to categorically refute these claims as they are devoid of any historical basis or evidence. The lineage and heritage of the Ruweng people are rich and distinct, dating back to their settlement that occurred around the 1400s in the current Ruwengregion. Historical records and oral traditions consistently affirm that Ruweng settled in this original land called "Tiop de Loi," securing a distinctive cultural and territorial identity separate from the Bahr el Ghazal Region.

The Ruweng region was administratively transferred to the Jur River District in 1902 like any transfer to Nuba Mountains in 1905, "Pan de Gak" (Pangak/Fanjak), and into Western Nuer District in 1931. All these transfers were administrative, not the movement of people nor physical lands have been moved.
Additionally, there have been assertions regarding the ownership of specific areas namely north of Adongloj River, Diingyen (Kubri nyabol), north of Derbim comprising of Kilotelateen, Unity, Miadiing (Lalob), claiming them as part of Unity State territory. Such claims not only misrepresent historical boundaries but also serve to distort the authentic narrative of the region's past. Historically, the delineations of territories and boundaries among different ethnic communities have been shaped through centuries by patterns of migration, environmental changes, and socio-political interactions.

All areas north of Adongloj river, north of Diingyen, north of Derbim, and north of Pulledi and deeply inside Bul territories before Buong currently believed to be the border of Bul and Alor are all belongs to Ruweng region.
In exploring the broader historical context, it is pivotal to acknowledge the longstanding relationship between the Nuer and Jieng communities, recognised as brethren who historically coexisted in harmony. From residing in the central regions of Sudan, specifically in Gezira and Khartoum, these communities were subject to transformative migratory movements prompted by external pressures, such as the advance of Arab influences and the intensification of the slave trade. These interactions set off a southward migration, steering the Jieng, where the Ngok Ajuba (Ruweng) among them settled in the present-day Ruweng region in 1400s before the arrival of the Nuer from Southern Kordofan to the Liech in the 1700s.

Furthermore, understanding the environmental and political changes that influenced regional dynamics is imperative. Prior to the 1940s, documentation identified territories north of the Bahr el Ghazal River as part of the Ruweng region. However, natural disasters like flooding initiated shifts of Nuer settlements, contributing to the gradual transformation of these boundaries. When British administrators imposed road construction projects in 1945, they encountered existing Nuer communities positioned south of the Adongloj River and the south of areas that are now misinterpreted in recent claims.

At the heart of these discussions is the necessity to prioritise historical truth over conjectures shaped by personal or political agendas. Particularly concerning is the narrative that seeks to reposition historical boundary lines to the detriment of established community harmony. Assertions suggesting the accommodation of the Ruweng Alor by the Bul are notably misleading; historical accounts demonstrate the inverse, where it was the Ruweng Alor who initially accommodated the Bul, leading to the current designation of Bul Alor.
Historical records indicate that before the Ruweng people were administratively incorporated into the western Nuer District in 1931, they existed as a separate region with distinct boundaries. It is essential to note that the presence of the Ruweng people as a separate entity is well-documented in historical materials, including maps of the Nuer District from 1922 to 1930.

Based on this historical evidence, it is evident that the claim of the individual within the Unity State is without a solid foundation. The administrative boundaries of the Ruweng people were established long before their integration into the Nuer District, and any attempt to dispute these boundaries should be carefully evaluated in light of historical facts and data. See below the map of Western Nuer District of 1922-1930 and see north, the location of Ruweng region before became part of Bentiu.

As someone deeply invested in upholding historical integrity, I appeal to our people and stakeholders to exercise discernment in assessing the credibility of such claims. Our collective focus must be directed towards fostering unity and a shared understanding of our intertwined histories rather than succumbing to divisive rhetoric based on distorted narratives.
I trust this comprehensive clarification serves to illuminate the truth and encourage informed dialogue within our communities.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and for engaging with the facts substantiated by historical evidence and communal memory.

Best Regards
The author is a former SPLA veteran and currently is a legal researcher, security expert, and conflict analyst.

He can be reached at [email protected].

06/11/2025

Why is the Declaration of State of Emergency a Tool of Law and Order: A Case of Warrap State and Mayom County
By: Isaac Dau (LLB, PGDL, LLM, MA),
Monday, 10th June 2025

From the legal perspective, a state of emergency is declared due to instability beyond state control.
As it has been misunderstood, the intention is to stabilise security and restore law and order.

I write to provide a thorough and comprehensive legal analysis of the recent declaration of a state of emergency by the government of the Republic of South Sudan, specifically in Warrap State and Mayom County of Unity State, which is set to last for a period of six months.

The aim of this article is to bring to light the misunderstanding of the state of emergency declared recently. In a country or the state where insecurity is rampant, the government must intervene to restore law and order.

The declaration of a state of emergency is a significant governmental measure, implemented under exceptional circumstances to address serious threats to public order, security, or other vital national interests. In this instance, the South Sudanese government has deemed it necessary due to the alarming deterioration of security within the specified regions mentioned in the declaration.

Nature and Circumstances of the State of Emergency

The nature of a state of emergency is inherently drastic, designed to empower the authorities with exceptional powers to restore order. Such powers are typically invoked when conventional law enforcement capabilities prove insufficient to manage the threats at hand. The prevailing circumstances in Warrap State and Mayom County, characterised by escalating violence and instability, have necessitated this declaration to safeguard citizens and uphold the rule of law. The government of the Republic of South Sudan is not targeting any law abiding citizens or states with no security threats, but the state where instability prevailed.

Powers and Responsibilities

During a state of emergency, security forces are vested with enhanced powers to effectively address the crisis. These powers potentially include but are not limited to, enforcing curfews, detaining individuals without the prerequisite of a trial, regulating and restricting movement, and implementing other essential measures deemed necessary for restoring stability. While these powers are expansive, they are also subject to oversight to prevent abuse and ensure they are exercised in a manner proportionate to the severity of the crisis.

Revocation and Implications

The revocation of a state of emergency is contingent upon the stabilisation of the affected regions. The government holds the authority to lift the state of emergency once the underlying threats have been sufficiently mitigated, and public order restored. The implications of such a state of emergency are profound, as they temporarily curtail certain civil liberties and rights, balanced against the overarching need to protect the populace and maintain national security.

Role of Local Government

Local government entities play a pivotal role during a state of emergency, acting as crucial intermediaries between the central government and the affected communities. Their responsibilities include implementing directives from the national government, coordinating local security efforts, and ensuring that the community's needs and rights are adequately represented and addressed throughout the emergency period.

Legal Framework

In the context of the Republic of South Sudan, the legal framework governing the declaration and management of a state of emergency is enshrined within the nation's Constitution and supported by supplementary legal statutes. These legal instruments delineate the procedures for initiating a state of emergency, define the scope of powers granted to authorities, and establish necessary safeguards to protect individual rights amid emergency measures.

I hope this detailed analysis provides valuable insights into the legal dimensions of the state of emergency declaration in South Sudan. Should you require further insights or wish to discuss this matter in greater detail, please feel free to reach out to me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for considering this critical analysis, and I remain at your disposal for any additional assistance or information you may need.

Best Regards
The author is a former SPLA veteran and is currently a Legal Researcher, Security Expert, and Conflict Analyst.

The views expressed here are his personal thoughts and opinions and is solely responsible for any word uttered.
He can be reached at [email protected].

06/11/2025

A Robust Judiciary, Enhancing Security Sector Transformation: Addressing the Pressing Challenges of the Judiciary in Post-Conflict States, with a Focus on South Sudan
By: Isaac Dau (LLB, PGDL, LLM, MA),
Wednesday,11th June 2025

Background

I am pleased to extend or generate a discussion that would provide a platform for experts and practitioners to exchange insights and best practices in addressing the challenges faced by the judiciary in post-conflict settings, with a particular emphasis on the context of South Sudan.
The aim of this article is to bring to light the dichotomy of the significance of a strong judiciary that can enhance security sector transformation holistically. Security sector reform affects the rule of law once it's not transformed.

Therefore, in this article, it would be possible for expert and experienced legal professionals in the legal field to contribute to the study of the judiciary in post-conflict states.

The contribution would be invaluable to our dialogue, and I am confident that the participation of experts would enrich the discussion and contribute to the formulation of innovative solutions to the pressing issues at hand.

Pressing Challenges of the Judiciary in Post-Conflict States

In this article, I am writing to highlight the critical issues surrounding the judiciary in post-conflict states, with particular emphasis on the Republic of South Sudan. The title of our discussion is "A Robust Judiciary, Enhancing Security Sector Reform: Addressing the Pressing Challenges of the Judiciary in Post-Conflict States, with a Focus on South Sudan."

South Sudan, like many other post-conflict states, faces numerous challenges in establishing a functional and independent judiciary system. The aftermath of conflict often leaves justice institutions weakened, leading to a lack of public trust, accountability, and effectiveness. In this regard, the judiciary plays a pivotal role in upholding the rule of law, ensuring accountability, and promoting sustainable peace and development.

Comparing South Sudan to other post-conflict states such as Rwanda, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, we can draw valuable lessons and insights. For instance, Rwanda has made significant strides in rebuilding its judiciary by investing in capacity building, infrastructure development, and promoting transparency. The country has implemented legal reforms and transitional justice mechanisms to address the legacy of the genocide and promote reconciliation.

Similarly, Liberia and Sierra Leone have focused on strengthening the independence of the judiciary, enhancing access to justice for all citizens, and promoting the rule of law. By learning from the experiences of these countries, South Sudan can identify best practices and innovative solutions to address its unique challenges and build a robust judiciary system.

The transformation of the judiciary in post-conflict states is a complex and multifaceted process that requires sustained political will, international support, and local ownership. By addressing the pressing challenges faced by the judiciary in South Sudan and drawing on lessons from other countries, we can contribute to the enhancing of security sector reform, promote good governance, and advance the cause of peace and justice.

I hope this message finds you in good health and high spirits. As a seasoned lawyer with a deep-rooted commitment to justice and the rule of law, I am compelled to bring a matter of utmost importance to your esteemed attention: the significant challenges faced by the judiciary systems in post-conflict states, with a particular focus on the Republic of South Sudan. As we delve into this critical discourse, it is imperative to recognize the profound and far-reaching implications these challenges pose for both the legal domain and the broader socio-political landscape of these nations.

Lack of Independence

The Republic of South Sudan is not immuned from this experience or challenge, emblematic of many post-conflict states, stands at a pivotal juncture in its judicial journey. The judiciary in such environments grapples with a plethora of obstacles that severely impede its ability to function effectively and with integrity. Chief among these is the lack of independence, which continues to plague judicial systems in these fragile states. External pressures from governmental bodies, military forces, or various influential actors frequently infiltrate the justice system, thereby compromising its impartiality and undermining the independence that is fundamental to upholding the rule of law.

Inadequate Resources

Moreover, the judiciary in post-conflict states is often starved of the necessary resources to conduct its operations smoothly and efficiently. The inadequate allocation of resources results in significant delays in court proceedings, limited access to legal representation for vulnerable populations, and an overall deficiency in the efficiency and effectiveness of judicial processes. This resource scarcity not only hampers the delivery of justice but also fosters an environment where the rule of law can be easily circumvented.

Corruption and lack of Accountability

Further exacerbating the challenges is the pervasive issue of corruption within the judiciary. Corruption erodes the pillars of justice, leading to a disintegration of public trust and confidence in the legal system. In states that have endured prolonged conflict and systemic human rights violations, rebuilding this trust is of paramount importance but remains an arduous task. Transparency and accountability mechanisms must be introduced and strengthened to combat corrupt practices and restore faith in the judicial system.

Capacity building

Capacity building is another critical area that demands the government's attention. The scarcity of trained personnel, including judges, lawyers, and court staff, severely constrains the judiciary’s ability to handle complex legal cases with the requisite professionalism and expertise. This shortage of qualified personnel highlights a dire need for comprehensive training programmes aimed at enhancing the skills and knowledge of judicial actors.

Lack of Public Trust

The public's trust in the judiciary, which may have been severely dented by years of conflict and injustice, is also a significant challenge that cannot be overlooked. Restoring faith in the rule of law is essential to achieving long-term peace and stability in post-conflict states. This requires concerted efforts to engage communities, promote awareness, and demonstrate the judicial system’s renewed commitment to justice and equality for all.

Current Challenges and Impact of the Judiciary in Security Sector Transformation

In this parlance, without a functional and independent judicial system, efforts to reform and professionalize the security sector are hindered. The judiciary serves as a check on executive power, holds security apparatuses accountable for human rights abuses, and safeguards the legal framework governing security operations.

In the specific context of South Sudan, where the legacy of conflict and fragility persists, the judiciary's role in security sector reform is of paramount importance. Building a robust and impartial judiciary is essential to fostering a culture of accountability, promoting respect for the rule of law, and establishing mechanisms for redress in cases of security sector misconduct. Strengthening the judiciary's capacity to adjudicate security-related cases, investigate human rights violations, and ensure fair and transparent trials is essential for sustainable security organs and lasting peace in South Sudan.

In conclusion, addressing the current challenges faced by the judiciary and enhancing its role in security sector are indispensable steps towards achieving good governance, upholding human rights, and promoting sustainable peace in South Sudan. It is imperative that concerted efforts be made to support the judiciary in overcoming its obstacles and fulfilling its mandate as a pillar of justice in the country.
Security concerns present another formidable challenge, as judges, lawyers, and court personnel frequently face threats to their safety, which can severely inhibit their ability to perform their duties without fear of retaliation. Ensuring the protection and security of judicial actors is crucial to fostering an environment where justice can be served without fear or favour.

In conclusion, the transformation of the judiciary in post-conflict states is a complex and multifaceted process that requires sustained political will, international support, and local ownership. By addressing the pressing challenges faced by the judiciary in South Sudan and drawing on lessons from other countries, we can contribute to the empowerment of security sector reform, promote good governance, and advance the cause of peace and justice.

In light of these multifaceted challenges and their significant implications on the legal domain, it is incumbent upon us, as advocates for justice, to engage in vigorous dialogue and collaborative efforts aimed at spearheading judicial reforms in post-conflict states. Strengthening the independence of the judiciary, enhancing transparency and accountability frameworks, building robust institutional capacities, and systematically restoring public trust are critical steps that must be pursued with urgency and diligence.

I sincerely urge you, distinguished colleagues, to join me in further discussions on this vital issue. Let us pool our collective insights, experiences, and resources to explore and implement viable solutions that address the obstacles faced by the judiciary in post-conflict states such as South Sudan.
Thank you for your attention and commitment to this pressing matter. Together, let us strive to advance justice, uphold the rule of law, and contribute meaningfully to the creation of a more just, equitable, and peaceful society.

Best Regards
The author is a former SPLA veteran and is currently a Legal Researcher, Security Expert, and Conflict Analyst.

The views expressed here are his personal thoughts and opinions, and he is solely responsible for any word uttered and not the publishers of this article.
He can be reached at [email protected].

11/30/2024

Dear Ruwengians,

A Vision for Our Community's Future

As a community, our strength lies in our ability to come together, identify challenges, and seek solutions with unity and determination. The discussions on insecurity and the plight of our students abroad reflect our concerns and our commitment to creating a better future. By addressing these issues collectively, we can ensure that our community remains resilient, proactive, and hopeful.

Fostering collaboration between citizens and leaders is essential moving forward, prioritizing education, safety, and accountability as pillars of progress. Let this dialogue remind us of our responsibility to advocate for fairness and transparency. Together, we can hold leadership accountable, support one another, and work towards a community where everyone feels secure and empowered to thrive.

With persistence and unity, we will overcome these challenges and set an example of what can be achieved when people come together for a common purpose. Our community's future is bright, and it is up to us to keep that light shining.

Insecurity dominated our discussions, reflecting a widespread concern within the community. Insecurity isn't just about physical safety; it also affects mental well-being and societal cohesion. A key point raised was the need for consistent and transparent strategies from authorities to address this issue. Community-led approaches were identified as vital, as they empower individuals to take charge of our environments and foster collaboration with law enforcement. Insecurity reflects deeper systemic inefficiencies, requiring a holistic and sustainable approach rather than temporary fixes.

The government's failure to pay tuition fees for 15 students sent to India underlines the inconsistency in delivering on promises. This negligence reflects a lack of accountability and planning in government programs, leading to unnecessary hardships for students already navigating the challenges of living and studying in a foreign country. My analysis suggests that this situation goes beyond mere financial oversight; it exposes a need to prioritize education as a cornerstone for national progress. Such failures erode the confidence of citizens, especially youth, in leadership and its ability to uphold commitments.

The ripple effect of this situation is significant. For the students, unpaid fees risk academic suspension, financial stress, and emotional strain, potentially derailing their futures. This case is a cautionary tale about misplaced trust in government programs for the broader community. It is disheartening to see education as one of the most transformative tools for individual and societal growth and relegated to the background. In my analysis, this negligence undermines the essence of public service, as it contradicts the government's responsibility to nurture the potential of its citizens.

Resolving the issue requires both immediate action and long-term reforms. First, the government must clear the outstanding tuition fees and establish communication with the affected students to restore confidence. Second, reviewing the policies governing scholarships and sponsorships is essential to ensure better planning, monitoring, and ex*****on. Lastly, public advocacy plays a crucial role in holding leaders accountable. The public can demand transparency and prompt action by raising awareness and applying pressure through community forums and media platforms.

In conclusion, these issues underscore the importance of effective leadership grounded in transparency and accountability. Insecurity and educational neglect are two sides of the same coin, reflecting governance challenges. My analysis highlights that the solution lies in prioritizing people-centered policies and delivering on promises with integrity and efficiency. Leadership should not merely react to crises but anticipate and prevent them by placing education and security at the heart of national development strategies. Only then can we build a society that empowers its citizens and fosters trust in its institutions?

All in all, that is my two cents analysis. I encourage everyone to share their thoughts and contribute to this vital discussion.

Best regards,
C***r Arop Kiir

11/30/2024

Ruweng Civil Rights Organization (RCRO) Condemns the RAA SPLM Secretariat!

To: The SPLM RAA Secretariat
Cde. Jau Thonding, the SPLM
SPLM RAA Secretary,
Panrieng, RAA.

Subject: Condemnation Letter to SPLM.

Dear Cde Secretary,

Accept my partisan greetings, Cde. Jau Thonding and Cde. Thon Haar in the spirit of patriotic comradeship in the SPLM.
On behalf of the Ruweng Civil Rights Activists, leaders, intellectuals, youths, women, Paramount Chiefs, and SPLMers, I am taking this opportunity to unilaterally condemn your controversial condemnation against the patriotic Ruweng citizens who solidified their ranks and files to demand the immediate resignation of H.E.Tiop de Monyluak from the seat of the CA.

Fellow compatriots, the press statements you issued are not only infuriating and nauseating to the vast majority of the patriotic SPLM members of Ruweng, but they are also extremely divisive to the unity of the SPLM members. Your adversary's action in involving yourselves in the affairs of the Ruweng Administrative Area Executive Branch in such a highly politicized campaign by the Government of the RAA is contrary to the norms, values, principles and guidelines of the SPLM Party.

Therefore, this condemnation urges you to conform to the SPLM norms and guidelines so that you do not have to polarize and alienate the SPLM members who are severely outraged and infuriated by the failed policies and negligence of the incumbent RAA Government by H.E. Tiop.

Ruweng patriotic citizens are concerned about the already worsened, deteriorated security situation, illegal encroachment and devastating economic hardships to which H.E. Tiop de Monyluak had turned a blind eye and deafening ears.

Therefore, Ruweng concerned citizens who had written the petition have their legal consent notarized to enclose their signatures. Therefore, this concept of capitalizing on the politicized publicity of the Minister of Information, alleging the popular petition was a forgery. Those who had consented to their signatures are not complaining directly to the concerned Ruweng members who drafted the letter.

In conclusion, the SPLM Secretariat in the RAA ought to exercise maximum restraint and strictly observe the principles and guidelines of impartiality and neutrality so that the unity and harmony of the SPLM members are patriotically guaranteed.

I look forward to the RAA SPLM Secretariat reversing its dive intervention in this highly politicized publicity campaign by the H.E. Tiop de Monyluak Diran government.

Sincerely yours,
Thirik Lang Mijak,
SPLM Political Activist, former SPLM-RAL Secretary of Information & Communication
Founder of Ruweng Civil Rights Movement.

11/02/2024

The RGM team will address urgent security concerns regarding the incrimination in Panakuac Payam, situated in Aliny County within the Ruweng Administrative Area. We are confident floodwaters will recede, enabling civilians to return to Bentiu and other parts of Unity State. However, the continued presence of a militia base in Panakuac poses a significant threat to Ruweng citizens seeking access to the area. Immediate attention to this issue is necessary to ensure the safety of our community.

09/29/2024

The solution to Food Insecurity

Maize and Sorghum are the Best solutions to fight food Insecurity in the Ruweng Administrative Area (RAA).

Introduction

Improving maize and sorghum production in South Sudan's Ruweng Administrative Area is crucial for enhancing food security, boosting local livelihoods, and driving economic growth. Like many regions in South Sudan, Ruweng faces significant agricultural challenges, including erratic rainfall, poor soil fertility, limited access to quality inputs, and inadequate infrastructure. Despite these challenges, maize and Sorghum remain staple crops vital to the sustenance of the local population.

Adopting a multifaceted approach that integrates modern agricultural practices, community engagement, and strategic investments in infrastructure and capacity building can transform the agricultural landscape of Ruweng, leading to increased productivity, resilience, and sustainability in maize and sorghum farming. This paper explores the best strategies for achieving these goals, focusing on practical, context-specific solutions to drive meaningful regional change.

To improve maize and sorghum production in South Sudan's Ruweng Administrative Area, a comprehensive approach that addresses various challenges, including climate, infrastructure, agricultural practices, and socio-economic conditions, is required.

Below are the best strategies for enhancing production:
1. Improved Seed Varieties
• Drought-resistant varieties:
Given Ruweng's semi-arid climate, promoting the use of drought-resistant maize and sorghum varieties can significantly boost yields.
• Early-maturing varieties:
These reduce the risk of crop failure due to short rainy seasons or unexpected dry spells.
2. Water Management and Irrigation
• Rainwater harvesting:
Implementing water-harvesting techniques can help store water during the rainy season for use during dry spells.
• Irrigation systems:
Developing small-scale irrigation systems, such as drip or furrow irrigation, can make farming more resilient to erratic rainfall.
3. Soil Fertility Management
• Organic fertilizers:
Encouraging the use of compost and manure can improve soil fertility and structure.
• Crop rotation and intercropping:
These practices help maintain soil fertility and reduce pest and disease pressures.
4. Pest and Disease Control
• Integrated Pest Management (IPM):
Training farmers in IPM, which includes cultural, biological, and chemical controls, can reduce crop losses.
• Resistant varieties:
Using pest and disease-resistant seed varieties minimizes the impact of pests and diseases.
5. Access to Agricultural Inputs
• Seed distribution programs:
Ensuring farmers have access to high-quality seeds through subsidies or distribution programs.
• Fertilizers and pesticides:
Making fertilizers and pesticides more affordable and accessible through government support or cooperative buying schemes.
6. Capacity Building and Extension Services
• Farmer training programs:
Regular training sessions on modern farming techniques, machines (Tractors) & tools, pest control and soil management.
• Extension services:
Strengthening extension services to provide ongoing support and advice to farmers.
7. Market Access and Infrastructure Development
• Roads and transportation:
Improving roads and transport networks to help farmers access markets more easily.
• Storage facilities:
Building communal storage facilities to reduce post-harvest losses.
8. Climate-Smart Agriculture
• Agroforestry:
Integrating trees into farming systems can improve soil health, provide shade, and protect crops from wind.
• Conservation agriculture:
Practices like minimum tillage and maintaining soil cover can improve soil moisture retention and reduce erosion.
9. Access to Finance and Credit
• Microfinance and credit facilities:
Developing microfinance institutions to provide loans for purchasing inputs, investing in irrigation, or expanding farms.
• Insurance schemes:
Establishing crop insurance schemes to protect farmers against losses due to extreme weather events.
10. Community Engagement and Cooperative Formation
• Farmer cooperatives:
Encouraging the formation of cooperatives to pool resources, access larger markets, and share knowledge.
• Community seed banks:
Establishing seed banks where farmers can store and access quality seeds.
11. Research and Development
• Local research stations:
Establishing or strengthening research stations in Ruweng to develop and test crop varieties and farming practices suited to local conditions.
• Collaboration with universities:
To promote high productivity of maize and Sorghum, the Government needs to collaborate with agricultural universities for research and extension services.
12. Policy Support
• Government support programs:
Advocating for policies that provide subsidies for seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation equipment.
• Land tenure security:
Ensuring farmers have secure land rights to encourage investment in land improvement.

Implementing these strategies can significantly improve maize and sorghum production in the Ruweng Administrative Area, contributing to food security and economic development in the region.

By: Monyjok Mayak de Joli
BSc (Hon) Agriculture Science Land use and management specialist

Ruweng Global Media

06/11/2025

06/11/2025

06/11/2025

11/30/2024

11/30/2024

11/02/2024

09/29/2024

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category