12/05/2025
Jewish Charter School in Oklahoma Resumes the Fight to Advance the Catholic Plan for Publicly Funded Religious Indoctrination
After the U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked back on May 22, 2025, over whether an Oklahoma Catholic virtual school called St. Isidore could establish the nation’s first publicly funded religious charter school—a Jewish religious school is now advancing the very same effort to force taxpayers to fund religious teachings nationwide. The National Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School Foundation has just notified Oklahoma state education officials that it plans to apply for a statewide virtual charter high school that combines standard academic instruction with daily Jewish religious studies.
However, the Ben Gamla Charter School does not actually expect to receive state approval. Instead, it fully anticipates that Oklahoma will reject its application. The school openly acknowledges that such a denial would allow them to file a federal lawsuit with the goal of securing a favorable U.S. Supreme Court ruling—one that, unlike the previous Catholic attempt, could finally open the door for public funds to support religious charter schools in America. This new case would revisit the same issues from the St. Isidore dispute, which reached the Supreme Court but ended in a 4–4 deadlock, leaving Oklahoma’s ruling to reject religious charter schools intact.
The Supreme Court’s 4–4 tie in the St. Isidore case occurred because Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Roman Catholic, dismissed herself from the proceedings. Her recusal was due to her previous role as a faculty member at the University of Notre Dame Law School, the organization that had represented the Catholic charter school. This left the court evenly split and prevented a victory for St. Isidore.
The difference now is that the Jewish charter school is pursuing the same legal strategy but with a different legal team, meaning Justice Barrett would no longer be required to recuse herself. Her participation in this new challenge could provide the decisive vote that, for the first time in American history, opens the door for taxpayer money to directly fund the teaching of religious doctrine.
The Washington Jewish Week published the following on December 2, 2025:
• “Months after a Supreme Court deadlock blocked an attempt by a Catholic church to create the nation’s first openly religious, publicly funded charter school, a Jewish group is now advancing a similar plan—one designed to sidestep the legal obstacles that doomed the first case.” [1]
• “The National Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School Foundation has notified an Oklahoma state board that it intends to apply for a statewide virtual high school integrating Oklahoma academic standards with daily Jewish religious studies.” [1]
• “Local Jewish leaders say they were blindsided by the proposal and argue that such a school isn’t needed. But getting approval is not what the applicants are expecting.” [1]
• “Instead, the group’s legal team—led by Becket, a prominent nonprofit religious-liberty law firm—is preparing for the state board to reject the application, setting the stage for a federal lawsuit and, potentially, a precedent-setting ruling at the Supreme Court.” [1]
•, “Anticipating that the application will likely be denied, ‘we would represent Ben Gamla challenging that decision in the federal courts in Oklahoma,’ Eric Baxter, a vice president and general counsel at Becket, said in an interview.” [1]
• “Baxter said Ben Gamla expects to submit the application by the end of the year.” [1]
• “The resulting case could become the next major test of whether the Constitution permits government funding to establish religious charter schools. It would resolve a question the Supreme Court failed to decide when it deadlocked 4-4 last spring in the Catholic case, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond.” [1]
• “Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case, reportedly because of her longstanding personal and professional ties to a Notre Dame law professor who had advised the petitioner in its early stages.” [1]
• “One of the most prominent opponents of public funding for religious education is Rachel Laser, a former leader in Reform Judaism who now heads Americans United for Separation of Church and State. She argues that efforts to erode church-state separation ultimately serve to advance the domination of Christianity in government.” [1]
• “As a Jew … I feel obligated to point out that such a case would be using Jews to advance a Christian Nationalist agenda that is not ultimately in Jews’ best interest,’ Laser said.” [1]
The Ben Gamla Charter School initiative is effectively advancing the same agenda previously pursued by the Catholic Church. Where Rome’s earlier attempt failed, this Jewish charter school proposal now seeks to carry forward the Christian Nationalist and Vatican-approved strategy in Oklahoma. The endgame remains the same: to secure a Supreme Court ruling that allows government-funded religious education nationwide. Although presented as a Jewish endeavor, this “Trojan horse” is, in reality, advancing the interests of Rome.
Even more disturbing is the fact that the legal system is being gamed. The judicial system is being manipulated to achieve the outcome Rome wants. Ben Gamla Charter School admits that it does not expect its application to be approved. The group’s own legal counsel has openly stated that the real purpose is to trigger a denial, which would then pave the way for a federal lawsuit. This effort reveals a deliberate attempt to push the Supreme Court to overturn its previous ruling on taxpayer-funded religious institutions.
For decades, Catholic legal networks and Christian nationalist think tanks have advanced the argument that public funds should flow freely to religious schools. The St. Isidore case and now the Ben Gamla charter plan represent two major attempts to test and expand that principle. While the Ben Gamla initiative is Jewish in appearance, the precedent it seeks would overwhelmingly benefit Catholic and Evangelical educational systems as well, effectively establishing the Vatican’s vision of restoring religious influence in public life. Oklahoma has become a testing ground for these experiments. With its strong conservative base and history of faith-based politics, the state provides an ideal environment for pushing legal boundaries.
If the U.S. Supreme Court rules that taxpayer money can directly fund religious education, it would entangle the state with the church in ways the Constitution was designed to prevent. Such a decision would, in essence, allow the government to endorse and advance religious traditions and doctrines—using public funds. While Protestant groups—especially Evangelical Christians—have been at the forefront of efforts to unite church and state through initiatives such as school prayer, Ten Commandments displays, Bibles in public schools, and faith-based public funding, Catholic and Jewish organizations are also actively participating in this movement. When Catholics, Protestants, and Jews unite in pursuing the same church-state agenda, it is a clear indication that radical changes to our religious and political institutions are rapidly approaching.
“The Protestants of the United States will be foremost in stretching their hands across the gulf to grasp the hand of Spiritualism; they will reach over the abyss to clasp hands with the Roman power; and under the influence of this threefold union, this country will follow in the steps of Rome in trampling on the rights of conscience” (Great Controversy, p. 588).
Sources
[1] https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/jewish-group-revives-push-for-public-funding-for-religious-schools-that-stalled-at-supreme-court/