07/31/2025
Editor Rich Jackson column: Veterans tribute is not worth $250,000--just look
The sad thing about the secrecy of approving the veterans memorial is that we’ll never know what was said.
But we know some things.
This from a transcript of the open meeting.
As supervisors talked about a full board vote, some supervisors noted what had happened outside of public meetings. Supervisor Jim Evans noted he saw a rendering of the tribute, helping him to support it.
With that came the rendering attached to this column.
The rendering is a public record despite it being shared in an email to supervisors rather than during the board meeting on June 19.
Supervisor Marc Helwig, who once adamantly opposed the tribute, said the rendering changed his mind. “Especially with this picture she brought forward. And we know that’s just an idea at this point. But, with the flag, something like that.”
Next Supervisor Ron Buckholtz said, “I know it was talked a lot in the finance committee. There was talk there would be money left to do — to help out the vets that are running a raffle to get money to do whatever they want to do for the vets down there.”
Down there means the Winter area.
Next Buckholtz said, “if it don’t get approved here, then that’s saying that Winter is not gonna get a part of that money.”
Then Supervisor Stacey Hessel, the person behind the veterans tribute project, said “But keep in mind, some of the discussion was made in closed session.”
When it should not have.
Keep in mind the point of the closed meeting was for the county to enter into negotiations. But county Administrator Mike Markgren had already done the work of negotiations, so that’s a moot point.
None of the talk about how to spend up to $250,000, once negotiations were done, should have been in closed session because it had nothing to do with what’s covered by the state statute.
Twice, Hessel admonished fellow supervisors that their remarks were from the discussion was in closed session.
Legally, there’s nothing wrong with that. Closed session is only allowed in a handful of situations where the municipality needs protection from legal or financial action. It should be the anomaly, not the normality.
And yet 10 supervisors, most of them Republican or conservative in nature, have voted to spend public funds — and remove a property from the tax rolls — that didn’t have to be spent.
And on what?
Please look at the rendering attached to his column.
It’s ridiculous.
The county is going to spend a quarter million dollars for something that is little better than a billboard — and not an attractive billboard.
In an email to the Sawyer County Record, county administrator provided the rendering and promised to shepherd county meetings more closely so that violations of state law. That was after the newspaper consulted an attorney who represents the Wisconsin Newspaper Association said it seemed clear violations were made.Ultimately, the question is this: Does any supervisor have the integrity to re-open the vote so that this money is either spent more wisely or not at all?