05/03/2019
(The following is an opinion on journalism contextualized by the events as presented in the documentary Joseph Pulitzer: Voice of the People)
By Mark Ladao
Push notifications. Advertisements. Subscriptions. Whenever people are online (and they always are), someone is trying to get their attention.
And the array of formats in which journalists deliver their news shows that they are fighting to do that as well.
Before Joseph Pulitzer, writing was consumed by the literate – mainly the wealthy. Journalism served that audience, while the poor and relatively uneducated were left to forage for information for themselves.
He saw this as a significant problem that needed to be addressed. And necessity is the mother of invention - or in this case, a revolution.
Pulitzer took the news world by storm and became the pioneer of modern journalism. He thought the news should serve the masses and keep the wealthy and powerful accountable. The documentary Joseph Pulitzer: Voice of the People shows his fight to change journalism as a whole.
Now, a journalist's code of ethics reflects values Pulitzer championed for most of his career, such as transparency, accuracy and objectivity, an ethos almost unchanged since Pulitzer introduced these concepts about 100 years ago.
While the principles he developed remain a key part of journalism, the field has continued to change to keep up with the rest of the world.
Today, journalists publish written articles. But they also take and edit photos and video. They tweet and livestream. Stories are told in every way in every format possible – short or long, narrative or strictly factual, read or heard or seen or some combination of all three. They can be interactive and engaging or consumed passively. They can exclude the journalist or make them the protagonist.
The boundaries of journalism are being pushed and expanded. Journalists compete with anything that requires a moment of attention, mostly the rapidly growing amount of information posted online from billions of individuals and all the different factions and groups they form with each other.
While this new wave of competition is not exactly a "problem" like Pulitzer faced, journalists today are finding it a significant challenge that needs to be addressed.
And considering what necessity can do, one can argue that journalism is in the middle of another revolution.