12/05/2025
FOLLOW-UP REPORT: NEW DETAILS EMERGE AFTER SPECIAL MEETING ON ANIMAL CONTROL ALLEGATIONS
A special meeting of the Lawrence County Board’s Building & Grounds Committee held this week continues to spark intense public interest as additional details, statements, and eyewitness accounts shed more light on the allegations surrounding the Lawrence County Animal Shelter and its supervisor, Animal Control Officer (ACO) Maggie Carter.
The meeting took place on Wednesday, December 3, 2025 at 5 p.m. at the Lawrence County Courthouse and drew a strong public turnout—som**hing committee chairman Tom Robinson later said the committee was “very happy” to see. Seven residents delivered testimony, with many alleging negligence, improper procedures, poor shelter conditions, and retaliation within the department. Others spoke in support of Carter. After nearly an hour of closed-door executive session, the committee announced only one personnel action: the reinstatement of former employee Megan Seitzinger, who had previously been terminated.
What has since come to light, however, paints a more complicated picture of department operations, accountability, and compliance with directives issued by county officials.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY EXPANDS: FROM SHELTER CONDITIONS TO ILLEGAL SURGERY CLAIMS
Former volunteer Angie Tracy, who said she felt appointed as spokesperson for the group opposing Carter, spoke for more than 30 minutes. Tracy described what she viewed as “a lot of negligence” inside the shelter and among some employees.
Another speaker, Alaina Hatfield, president of Claws & Paws, told the committee she learned Carter had been performing illegal cat neuter surgeries. Hatfield said when she confronted Carter, Carter replied, “well not many people know so I won’t get caught.” Hatfield stated she reported the matter to the Indiana State Board, and afterward experienced what she characterized as retaliation that prevented her rescue from pulling animals from the Lawrence County Shelter.
Several residents urged the committee to remove Carter from her position, while others defended her work. Robinson said at the time that the committee would “address all those [concerns] with our county officer.”
THE CELL PHONE INCIDENT: DIRECTIVE IGNORED, PUBLIC GASPS
One of the most striking moments of the December 3 meeting revolved around a county-issued cellphone used for Animal Control operations.
According to multiple eyewitnesses—including Lawrenceville Alderman Dwayne Volkman, who attended the meeting—Chairman Robinson stated that the committee had ordered Carter on November 12 to carry the phone on her person at all times.
When Robinson asked Carter during the public meeting where the phone was, she could not produce it.
Instead, a woman who works under Carter in some capacity raised her hand and reported that she had the phone. It was stated that:
● She lives in Bone Gap, Illinois, not Lawrence County
● She had taken the phone with her on vacation to Tennessee
● She had been keeping the phone because, she said, “Maggie isn’t comfortable talking to people.”
The room reacted with audible disbelief. Witnesses say comments like “that’s her job” spread through the crowd. Several residents said they frequently call Animal Control and receive no answer.
Volkman told Lawrence County, IL News he found it “concerning that Maggie blatantly disobeyed the board’s previous direction.” A board member instructed the woman to hand the phone back to Carter immediately and reiterated that no one else was to possess it.
QUESTIONS RAISED ABOUT USE OF COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL TRUCK
Concerns were also raised at the meeting about the use of the county-owned Animal Control truck. Dwayne Volkman stated that reports had surfaced of the truck being operated by unauthorized individuals and allegedly used for personal errands. In one instance, a witness reported seeing the truck stopped at a business that sells alcohol, where the individual driving the county vehicle purchased liquor. Board member Robinson indicated this occurred while the person was traveling between locations “presumably on county business,” but Volkman objected, saying the truck should have been returned to the shelter and any personal purchases made on personal time in a personal vehicle. Board member Jordan Feutz also reported that the truck had recently sustained cosmetic damage, yet no one could identify who was driving it when the damage occurred—raising further concerns about supervision, accountability, and chain-of-custody for county property.
ANGIE TRACY: CALLING FOR TERMINATION, INVESTIGATION, AND TRANSPARENCY
In her remarks following Wednesday’s meeting, Tracy said Carter’s failure to carry the county phone—even three full weeks after being instructed to do so—reinforced her belief that structural changes were necessary.
She said it felt “unjust” that Carter offered no response to the public during the meeting despite the breadth of concerns raised. Tracy requested:
● Termination of Maggie Carter
● A full investigation and audit of all shelter-allocated funds
● Implementation of new procedures, including defined hours and updated training requirements
● That all findings be made public
Tracy also submitted an alternative candidate for ACO, should the board decide to terminate Carter.
Tracy provided a packet of documentation to the committee—material that several board members, including Jordan Feutz, now say they are reviewing thoroughly.
Tracy advocated for the reinstatement of her sister, Megan Seitzinger. The committee granted that request after executive session. Tracy said she hopes Carter will be “just and fair” toward Megan and “do right by the animals,” given what she believes was retaliation in Megan’s initial termination.
Tracy is scheduled to appear at the next committee meeting on December 10 at 10:30 a.m. and again at the full county board meeting on December 17 at 4 p.m. She plans to ask for updates on her recommendations. According to Tracy, the board has set a February deadline for determining how it will proceed.
BOARD MEMBER STATEMENTS: TRANSPARENCY, LIMITATIONS, AND OPEN QUESTIONS
Jordan Feutz
Board member Jordan Feutz released a detailed statement emphasizing:
● He asked for the meeting to be held after working hours specifically to maximize public access
● He will not discuss executive session matters, citing legal requirements
● He intends to fully examine every allegation, including documentation submitted by Tracy
● He respects the media’s role but felt one media outlet’s report emphasized alleged activity occurring in Indiana rather than Lawrence County (possible illegal surgeries allegedly performed by Carter)
● He invites anyone with factual, evidence-supported information to contact him directly
Tom Robinson
Committee chair Tom Robinson issued a brief public comment:
“The Building & Grounds committee was very happy with the turnout at the ‘special meeting’. We had already started to address the concerns raised that evening and will continue that process.”
Jim Brewer
Board member Jim Brewer declined further comment:
“Not at this time as it is an ongoing issue. Thank you.”
ATTEMPTS TO REACH MAGGIE CARTER FOR COMMENT
Lawrence County, IL News reached out directly to ACO Maggie Carter via Facebook Messenger.
Messenger confirms the message was read, but she has not responded.
WHAT COMES NEXT
With witness testimony, board statements, the reinstatement of a former employee, and new operational concerns—including the ignored cellphone directive—Wednesday’s meeting has not settled the matter.
Instead, it has set the stage for:
● Continued investigation
● A February decision timeline
● Further public comment on December 10 and December 17
Lawrence County, IL News will continue following developments as this story evolves.