Upon Further Review

Upon Further Review Upon Further Review — because it’s never just football.

08/05/2026

What is it going to take for us to fully grasp the consequences of living in a world where we can instantly share our thoughts with millions of people?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin and Noah discuss whether human psychology has failed to keep pace with the internet. Thirty years ago, if your words sparked outrage, the reaction was usually limited to the people around you. Today, the exact same behavior can reach millions within minutes.

They explore whether our unprecedented ability to influence—and inflame—large audiences carries a level of responsibility that many of us still haven't fully recognized.

What do you think?
Has society adapted to the reality that a single post can influence millions of people? If not, what will it take for us to recognize the responsibility that comes with having a global audience at our fingertips?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/04/2026

Is it ever acceptable to lash out at someone for what you *think* they may have done?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin and Noah explore what motivates people to react with anger before all the facts are known. Is it personal insecurity? Has social media normalized snap judgments and outrage? Or is an emotional response understandable in a world where so many people feel burdened by injustice and are quick to see new situations through that lens?

What do you think?
Why do so many of us rush to judgment before all the facts are known? Is that simply human nature, or is there something about modern culture that encourages us to react first and ask questions later?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/03/2026

When a public figure finds themselves at the center of controversy, should they be more careful about what they do in public—or simply continue living their life?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin examines whether it was wise for Puka Nacua to appear publicly with someone who had recently become the subject of controversy himself, and whether the same question applies to Jaxon Dart.

He also explores whether the *reason* a person is controversial should affect how we judge the decisions they make in the public eye.

What do you think?

Should public figures consciously avoid situations that might fuel additional controversy, or should they simply live their lives without worrying about public perception? And to what extent does the nature of the controversy itself change your answer?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/02/2026

To what extent do we have to accept someone else's right to hold views that conflict with our own?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin argues that even when he doesn't believe someone's explanation for their behavior, he has to accept that they may sincerely believe it. At that point, he questions whether he's in a position to tell that person they're "wrong" for holding those views.

Noah takes a much more absolute position. He argues that if someone's beliefs don't align with reality, then the fact that they sincerely believe them doesn't make those beliefs any less wrong.

What do you think?
Should we simply accept that people see the world differently, or are there times when a person's beliefs are so detached from reality that it's fair to call them wrong—or even delusional? Where do you draw that line?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/01/2026

Should public figures stay true to their principles, or tailor what they say to what they think the internet wants to hear?
In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Noah speaks from experience about the impossible task of trying to make everyone happy — and why pursuing that goal often leads only to frustration and an unhappy existence.
He also explores the role money plays in shaping online behavior, arguing that much of what we see from high-profile individuals is influenced not simply by public opinion, but by the financial incentives tied to maintaining an audience. If those incentives didn't affect so many people's bottom lines, would we care nearly as much?
We'd love to hear your thoughts:
Should public figures prioritize authenticity, or adapt their message to what their audience wants to hear?
Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.

Follow us on:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/.../Upon-Further.../61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/01/2026

Many people seem to believe two things about public figures at the same time: that they should be authentic, and that they should avoid doing or saying things that upset people.
In this clip from Episode 1.2 of *Upon Further Review*, Noah explores whether those expectations are actually compatible. Do people really value authenticity, or do they only value it when it aligns with their own beliefs? At what point does "being yourself" become "being a disappointment" to your audience?
We'd love to hear your thoughts:
Should public figures stay true to themselves, or is part of the job adapting to what the public wants them to be?
Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.

Follow us on:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/.../Upon-Further.../61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

08/01/2026

Is it possible to respect the office of the president, even if you disagree with the politics of the person currently occupying it?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin and Noah discuss whether Jaxon Dart's explanation for introducing Donald Trump at a rally is plausible, and whether his relative youth and inexperience may have influenced his reasoning.

What do you think?
Do you believe Jaxon Dart when he says he respects the office of the presidency, regardless of who occupies it? Or do you think that's simply a politically convenient explanation?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

07/29/2026

When did we all become our own public relations departments?

It's no longer just celebrities carefully managing their public image. More and more, ordinary people curate what they say online, worried about how others will react if they step outside the expectations of their own communities.

But maybe authenticity is still the best long-term strategy. Maybe the greatest chance we have of being understood isn't by trying to please everyone—it's by being honest about who we are and what we believe.

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of Upon Further Review, Kevin and Noah discuss the pressure to manage our online personas, the cost of living inside ideological bubbles, and why authenticity requires both confidence and humility.

We'd love to hear your thoughts:
How do we stay true to ourselves without becoming unwilling to listen when we're challenged?

Or, put another way:

Be yourself. Ignore the haters. But don't mistake every disagreement for hate. Sometimes the people who challenge us are the very ones who help us grow.

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

07/28/2026

Does the fact that no criminal charges have been filed against Puka Nacua change the way we view the allegations? Should it? And what are the consequences when the public reaches conclusions before all the facts are known?

In this clip from Episode 1.2 of *Upon Further Review*, Kevin examines the public conversation surrounding the allegations involving the Rams' star receiver and asks whether too many people have already reached conclusions without actually knowing what happened.

He also explores a broader question: In an era of instant news and social media, how easily can public figures—especially those who are young and inexperienced—find themselves tried in the court of public opinion before the facts have been established?

W'd love to hear your thoughts:
How should we balance taking allegations seriously with resisting the urge to reach conclusions before the available evidence justifies them?

Full episode now available on YouTube -Podcast.



Follow us on:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Upon-Further-Review/61591525430643
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uponfurtherreview_podcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/

Address

Los Angeles, CA

Website

, ,

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Upon Further Review posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category