Question Antiquity

10/31/2025

Peter Thiel is seen by many as a technocrat who doesn’t trust ordinary people to run society, and has openly questioned whether democracy is compatible with the future he wants. He has invested heavily in surveillance-driven power structures — most notably Palantir, a company built on feeding government intelligence and law-enforcement systems with massive data streams. To critics, that isn’t innovation — it’s constructing a digital architecture of control, the infrastructure for a society where power flows up into the hands of a wealthy elite who believe they know better than the public.

His political actions follow the same logic. He didn’t just support candidates; he tried to engineer a new ruling class in his own ideological image, backing figures like Blake Masters and J.D. Vance who explicitly frame democracy as a problem to “fix.” Thiel didn’t hide his motivations either — he’s said straight out that expand-the-state libertarianism is a failure, that only power and technological leverage reshape society. The picture critics paint isn’t of a visionary innovator, but of a man who views nations and voters as obstacles to be bypassed.

Even his “futurist” projects get read through this lens. Seasteading looks less like utopia and more like an escape hatch for billionaires — sovereign micro-states run by technocrats, outside law and accountability. His obsession with longevity biotech scans like billionaire immortality prep, the fantasy of outliving the system rather than improving it. To people who view him harshly, Thiel isn’t pushing humanity forward — he’s building the scaffolding for a world where power, surveillance, wealth, and lifespan itself stratify society permanently, and a small circle at the top never has to answer to anyone again.

10/31/2025

Thank you for that false information ✅

10/29/2025

The world isn’t what it used to be — not even close. Families used to be the foundation of society, but now everything that once held people together is being torn apart piece by piece. Parents work themselves to exhaustion just to afford food and rent while their kids are being raised by screens, algorithms, and strangers. Dinner tables sit empty because no one has time to sit together anymore. The system was built to make sure families depend on corporations, not each other — from schools teaching obedience instead of wisdom, to a government that punishes independence while rewarding dependency. It’s like the destruction of the family unit isn’t an accident — it’s a plan.

For individuals, it’s even worse. Privacy is gone; freedom is an illusion wrapped in convenience. Every move, thought, and word is tracked, sold, or censored in the name of “safety.” The average person feels powerless, drowned in noise and false choices. People are medicated, distracted, and pacified — told what to think and how to feel by an invisible network of media, tech, and government interests working hand-in-hand. It’s not paranoia when the evidence is everywhere; it’s just easier for people to pretend everything’s fine than to face how much control they’ve already lost.

And spiritually — mentally — the damage runs deepest. People don’t believe in anything real anymore. Tradition, faith, and community have been replaced with trends, influencers, and empty slogans about “progress.” It’s all surface-level and soulless. The world has become a place where truth is mocked, morality is optional, and comfort is valued more than courage. The saddest part is that most don’t even notice. The system doesn’t need chains anymore; it just needs screens bright enough to keep people from realizing they’re already prisoners.

10/29/2025

The Trump administration enacted major changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), tightening eligibility and work requirements in what it called an effort to reduce fraud and promote self-sufficiency. One rule removed “broad-based categorical eligibility,” which had allowed states to automatically qualify low-income families already receiving other aid—potentially cutting benefits for up to 3 million people. Another enforced stricter work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, limiting aid to three months unless recipients were employed or in training programs.

Critics argued these reforms disproportionately harmed Black Americans and other people of color, who face higher unemployment rates and systemic barriers to stable work. Analyses from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that about 700,000 low-income adults would lose benefits, with Black and Latino recipients hit hardest due to racial inequities in the labor market. Yet these cuts also affected many white Americans in struggling rural areas, particularly in the South and Midwest, where SNAP participation is high and job opportunities remain limited—showing the policies’ broad socioeconomic reach.

While the administration framed the changes as restoring “integrity” to the welfare system, evidence of widespread abuse in SNAP has been minimal. Instead, the new restrictions increased food insecurity for millions of working-class Americans across racial lines, especially in regions with few employment options. The policies were race-neutral in wording but regressive in effect, deepening inequality and straining both urban Black communities and rural white populations already living near or below the poverty line.

10/28/2025

This image depicts a 17th-century English broadside titled “The Prodigious Monster; or, The Monstrous Tartar,” a sensationalized pamphlet that was part of a broader European fascination with “wonders” and “curiosities” from distant lands. These broadsides often mixed fact, rumor, and myth to entertain and astonish the public. The “Monstrous Tartar” was described as a strange, hybrid creature—half-man, half-beast—captured in Hungary during wars between European Christian forces and the Ottoman-aligned Tatars.

10/27/2025

Seth Rogen speaks openly about his Jewish identity and upbringing: he has described himself as proud to be Jewish, while also critically reflecting on the way he was taught about Jewish-history and the State of Israel growing up. He has said that he was “fed a huge amount of lies about Israel” during his childhood in Vancouver Jewish schools and camps.  He acknowledges the value Judaism has given him (for example, in confronting mortality or community rituals) but does not shy away from calling into question some of the narratives he absorbed. 

When discussing Israel specifically, Rogen has raised reservations about some of the foundational assumptions of the state. On the podcast WTF with Marc Maron, he described the idea of gathering all Jews into one state—especially one in a region he views as volatile—as something that “doesn’t make sense” to him.  He challenged the notion that Jews relocating en masse to Israel was the only or best protection strategy, arguing instead that dispersal might reduce risk and that concentrating people in one place might carry its own dangers. 

Importantly, Rogen has also said that he would not personally move to Israel. Asked if he would consider living there, he answered “no,” citing the ongoing conflicts and instability as reasons.  He clarified that some of his more provocative language came from comedic-framing and that he didn’t intend to deny Israel’s right to exist, though he stands by his broader concerns about how Jewish history and Israeli narratives are taught.

10/26/2025

The Ethiopian Bible—particularly within the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church—is one of the most expansive and ancient Biblical canons in Christianity. Preserving texts in Ge’ez, a liturgical language dating back over a thousand years, it includes books that disappeared from or were never adopted into other Christian traditions. Among these are works like 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and The Shepherd of Hermas, which provide early Jewish and Christian teachings that offer a wider view of ancient beliefs and spirituality. Rather than being “forbidden,” many of these texts simply followed a different path of tradition, and Ethiopia maintained them as part of its heritage of faith.

Ethiopia holds a unique place in Christian history. It became one of the first nations to adopt Christianity as a state religion in the 4th century, developing its theology without the same level of Roman or European influence that shaped other churches. Because of this independence, Ethiopian Christianity preserved rituals, stories, and interpretations that feel deeply rooted in antiquity—such as its reverence for the Ark of the Covenant, believed to be kept in the city of Aksum. This connection to ancient Biblical tradition gives Ethiopia an aura of sacred continuity rarely found elsewhere.

Beyond church tradition, the country’s history intertwines legend and documented heritage in ways that inspire wonder. From the epic Kebra Nagast—which traces Ethiopia’s lineage to King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba—to ancient monolithic churches carved straight from rock, Ethiopia represents a spiritual crossroads between Africa and the Near East. Its Biblical canon and religious culture are not framed as hidden or suppressed, but as a living example of how Christianity might have looked before later centuries shaped the faith into the forms most familiar today.

10/26/2025

It’s hard not to feel echoes of 1984 when looking at the world around us today. Orwell imagined a future where technology, information control, and fear kept people obedient—and now we carry tracking devices in our pockets, feed algorithms with our thoughts, and watch as truth becomes something that can be edited or deleted with a click. Like in the novel, surveillance isn’t just forced upon us; we’ve been convinced that convenience and connection are worth trading pieces of our privacy.

The manipulation of language and information is another area where fiction feels uncomfortably familiar. “Newspeak” in 1984 existed to erase nuance and block independent thought, while “doublethink” forced people to accept contradictions without question. In today’s world, political messaging, media spin, and online echo chambers flood us with simplified narratives and outrage that leave little room for complexity or genuine understanding. People become overwhelmed and, just like the characters in the story, may stop trying to sort truth from lies.

Orwell’s ultimate warning was about a society made hopeless—where resistance feels pointless and power seems unbreakable. Many people now express that same dread: that corruption is too deep, surveillance too advanced, and the public too divided to change anything. These parallels aren’t just literary coincidences—they’re signals. And while 1984 presents a grim outcome, the fact that so many recognize the similarities suggests that awareness still exists. The future only grows hopeless if people stop seeing what’s right in front of them.

10/25/2025

The government continues to tightly control the Epstein files, and their selective transparency has only amplified suspicion. Despite claiming there’s nothing left to hide, they keep large portions sealed — all while insisting the public should simply “trust” their conclusions. It gives the clear impression that powerful people are being protected from the shame and consequences that would follow full disclosure. Instead of accountability, citizens get excuses, delays, and a bureaucracy acting like it owns the truth rather than serving the people it works for.

Meanwhile, in Congress, many politicians bend over backwards to defend and prioritize Israel’s interests above the needs and concerns of their own constituents. The influence of large pro-Israel donors and lobbying groups is obvious, and some lawmakers look more eager to please their benefactors than the voters who actually elected them. Americans watch their representatives push billions in aid and unwavering support overseas while problems at home rot — and those same politicians act offended when asked who they really work for.

Taken together, these issues reveal a political class that behaves like it is untouchable. They guard secrets involving the wealthy and well-connected, and they loudly champion causes aligned with money and influence rather than the public good. The message from Washington seems clear: transparency is optional, loyalty is negotiable, and the average citizen is expected to sit quietly while the powerful take care of each other. The frustration isn’t paranoia — it’s a response to a government that too often protects everyone except the people.

10/23/2025

10/23/2025

In Christian scripture, the Synagogue of Satan represents those who pretend to serve God while acting against goodness, attacking early followers of Christ with lies, slander, and manipulation. Their behavior is defined by hypocrisy, arrogance, and hostility — creating division, discouraging the faithful, and seeking power over righteousness. Instead of guiding others toward truth, they spread deceit for personal gain, aiming to weaken the early Christian communities with fear and spiritual corruption.

Their worship is depicted as false devotion wrapped in ritual — outward holiness with a dark intent beneath it. They prioritized worldly influence, pride, and judgment over compassion, mercy, and justice. Revelation 2:9 directly condemns this behavior: “I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” These are people who lie about their own faith identity, using religion as a mask to justify harm and elevate themselves above others — a direct betrayal of God’s teachings.

Because of their destructive actions, scripture declares that they will face spiritual rejection and humiliation. Revelation 3:9 warns that they will be exposed and forced to acknowledge the truth: “They will come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you.” Their title marks them as opponents of God, defined by deceit and malice rather than devotion. The message is a warning that false faith — evil disguised as holiness — ultimately leads to being cut off from God and cast down because their hearts embraced corruption instead of truth.

10/22/2025

The United States has repeatedly supported Israel’s military operations in the Middle East, including airstrikes that have caused significant civilian casualties in Gaza and other areas. These operations are often conducted with advanced American-supplied weaponry and intelligence, enabling Israel to strike urban areas, refugee shelters, and civilian infrastructure, while minimizing risk to Israeli personnel. This shows the U.S. willingness to project power indirectly through allies, even when such operations have devastating effects on non-combatants.

In contrast, the U.S. has been extremely cautious about direct military confrontation with Russia over the war in Ukraine. Despite providing billions in aid and advanced weaponry to Ukrainian forces, America has avoided sending troops into direct combat, recognizing the immense risk of escalation against a nuclear-armed state. This stark contrast reveals a geopolitical calculation: the U.S. is willing to engage aggressively against nations or groups with limited military capabilities, but hesitates when facing a major power like Russia.

This discrepancy highlights a pattern in U.S. foreign policy: aggressive intervention on behalf of allies in regions like the Middle East versus restraint when dealing with powerful adversaries. Civilian populations in Gaza and elsewhere bear the consequences of these policies, while Russia’s military forces remain untouched by direct American strikes. The strategy underscores power asymmetries and the prioritization of risk management in U.S. military decision-making.

Follow Question Antiquity for more❕