Tabitha Miller, CVT

02/08/2026

This is my sister Harrisburg ACO Sabrina Manalli...Making the world safer for animals...

02/07/2026

This is so sad! Rest in peace Brad Arnold! Thank you for the music! 🪽💔🪽

(I do not own rights to this music. I only am sharing it)

REMASTERED IN HD!Official Music Video for Kryptonite performed by 3 Doors Down.Follow 3 Doors DownInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/3doorsdownTwitter: htt...

01/29/2026

Yesterday, at the Cody Roberts hearing the judge did not make a formal decision. While we wait to see what will be decided,we hope that the right thing for wildlife is done. This case has serious implications for how cruelty to wildlife is treated in Wyoming. Only time will tell. All we can do is to continue to speak out for the treatment of wildlife. As of now trial is set to begin March 9th. Here's to hoping the judge makes the right decision.

01/28/2026

Today ,a Wyoming court will hear this repugnant humans motion to dismiss his felony animal cruelty charges, for the undue and cruel torture of a wolf yearling...It is my hope that Wyoming does the right thing and upholds his charges. To dismiss them, would send a dangerous message that this type of cruel behavior toward wildlife is ok! It is far from ok! Cody Roberts should pay for his actions!

01/02/2026

Good! May this P.O.S rot in hell!

UPDATE: Wyoming prosecutor says the law does not excuse cruelty.

Sublette County’s top prosecutor Clayton Melinkovich made it clear: Wyoming’s “wolf capture” rule does not give a blanket license to torture animals.

In a new court filing, prosecutors argue that while state law allows the capture or killing of predators under certain circumstances, it does not excuse malicious cruelty. Tormenting a wolf by injuring it, taping its mouth shut, parading it in a bar, and drawing out a torturous death is a separate crime.

The prosecution’s position is simple and powerful:
👉 Hunting laws do not legalize torture.

If the defense’s argument were accepted, prosecutors warn it could open the door to beating, starving, or otherwise abusing captured wildlife: an outcome the state calls “an absurdity.”

📅 Court Dates:
• Hearing: January 28
• Trial: March 9

This case matters far beyond one wolf, although we will never forget the innocent life that was cut short.
This case will help determine whether wildlife laws draw a clear line against cruelty or leave space for violence to be excused under legal loopholes.

We continue to talk about this case because precedent matters. What happens here could influence how wolves and other wildlife are treated, protected, or harmed in the future.

**Important: Please do not contact the prosecutor, the court, or anyone involved in this case. Let the legal process run its course without interference.**

You can help by spreading the word about wildlife cruelty!

01/01/2026

Welcome to 2026...Save our wolves!
(Not my music)

• My Art & Jewelry Webshop: https://jonnajintonsweden.com• Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/jonnajinton• Wallpaper collection: https://www.p...

12/29/2025

Absolutely mesmerizing birds. I love watching them in Maine.

12/27/2025

I judge everyone by how they treat animals and nature...

12/27/2025

As of 2025 wolves are still protected under the ESA in Maine. The state does not acknowledge on an official basis that wolves are in Maine,but many Mainers have seen them in the woods,and caught them on their trail cams. It is split in Maine on the subject of wolves. By this I mean,some verbalize not being fond of the idea of reintroduction,but would be ok if they naturally migrated back on their own. Mainers in large part would not harm wolves and support them being in Maine. The International Wolf Center estimates Maine has around 18,000 square miles of habitat that can sustain wolves. As well as an estimated 29,722 square miles with Vermont, New Hampshire, New York and Maine. I personally would love to see wolves naturally migrate back to the North East.

Wolves once existed throughout Maine but removal began shortly after European settlement. Currently no established wolf populations live in this state. However, due to close proximity of a viable wolf population in Canada, wolves appear to be moving into this state. In the fall of 2020, DNA tests on...

12/27/2025

12/25/2025

Those who are anti wolf love to puke out that hunters are the real conservationist. They also like to spew the rhetoric that hunters are the main source of conservation. Both completely false information. First of all, to fully be the main source of conservation funds in the US,you would have to completely ignore the roughly 95% of Americans who do not hunt.(only about 4-5% of Americans hunt)You would have to exclude every dollar spent by tax payers each year,along with all the money National parks etc pull in from nature enthusiasts, along with every other source of funding/donations that come in from non hunting society that goes for wildlife conservation .
Next, to be a conservationist, you must first have a respect for all of nature and its natural order. This includes predators,prey,insects,aquatic life,plant life etc. You need to understand the delicate balance all life has and the jobs they were put here to do.For millions of years nature balanced itself before human interference. Top predators such as bear,wolves,coyote,mountain lions etc. regulated their own populations. They do this by only allowing the alpha to mate,or eliminating some of their own young.They did not need the help of humans.
Not to mention, unlike those who hunt to feed their families, or to carry on family tradition (while loving and respecting the animals they kill) anti wolf killers are the opposite! They dont kill them to feed their families, and they sure as hell do not respect the animal they are killing. So to refer to themselves as "conservationist " is a laughing joke at best.