Hittin Hard Radio

01/13/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1cK1rMkAEB/

01/12/2026

R. Kelly hit us with a surprise remix of Chris Brown's "It Depends" straight from the bing. His vocals are still on point, making folks wonder if it's AI or if he's really still got it. Even C. Breezy gave it his stamp of approval.

👇🏾📺 Check the comments for the video 📺👇🏾

01/12/2026

Atlanta and surrounding areas... I will be filming my podcast with a live audience... Come get in on the action!!!

01/12/2026

Before he takes the Super Bowl Halftime stage, Bad Bunny is going to court. The reggaeton star is facing a $16 million lawsuit over the use of voice recordings on two of his songs. The woman whose voice was used claims that she never permitted samples of her voice to be included on the songs “Solo de Mi” and “EoO”.

Billboard reports that the plaintiff is Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera. She alleges that producer Roberto Rosado solicited the recording from her when the two were students at the Interamerican University of Arecibo.

Rivera argues that she never agreed to the recording of her voice being used for commercial purposes. She also says she never signed a contract.

Rivera believes she is entitled to $16 million in publicity rights and privacy violations. This is based on a couple of facts that she points to. The first is that Bad Bunny plays the sample when he performs concerts. The second reason is that Bad Bunny has used it to sell merchandise.

The lyrics in the sample are, “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo.” Pitchfork reported that this translates to: “Damn, don’t take away my perreo!” This is reportedly a reference to a reggaeton subgenre. The outlet noted that the lyric has been heavily memed and often appears on social media.

Interestingly, Pitchfork pointed out that this is not the first time Bad Bunny has been taken to court over using unauthorized voice samples in his music. In 2023, his ex-girlfriend Carliz de la Cruz Hernández sued him for the same thing. That legal battle is still ongoing.

01/12/2026

This is the story of how one of the most beloved stores of your childhood, Toys 'R' Us, got taken down in one of the coldest corporate hits in history.
Toys “R” Us didn’t lose because people stopped buying toys.
They lost because they trusted the wrong partner.

Back in the early 2000s, Toys “R” Us made a deal with Amazon to handle its online sales. At the time, Amazon wasn’t the giant it is today — it was just the tech plug. The idea was simple: Toys “R” Us brought the brand, Amazon handled the backend. Looked like a win-win.

But behind the scenes, Amazon wasn’t just selling toys…
They were studying everything.

What parents bought.
When they bought it.
Which toys moved fast.
Which ones sat.
Who the customers really were.

Amazon later allowed other toy sellers onto the same platform, cutting into Toys “R” Us’ exclusivity while quietly stacking data.

Toys “R” Us sued Amazon — and won a $51 million settlement.

But here’s the part that hurt more than the money…

Amazon walked away with the entire playbook.
The data.
The customer behavior.
The blueprint for domination.

By the time Amazon launched its own toy operation, it was already game over. Faster shipping. Better pricing. Infinite reach.

Toys “R” Us didn’t just lose a lawsuit.
They lost the future.

01/12/2026

LIKE FOLLOW SUBSCRIBE TO US ON YouTube

Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

01/12/2026

YOU NOT GONNA BELIEVE IT TILL YOU SEE IT.... GO TO www.HITTINHARDRADIO.com RIGHTNOW, JOIN THE LIVE CHAT TALK WITH THE HOST AND GUEST