05/20/2025
📆 ⚖️ Sixty years ago, a legal battle waged by clinicians in Connecticut changed everything.
On June 7, 1965, the Supreme Court struck down a “Little Comstock” law in Connecticut banning the provision of contraception. The case? Griswold v. Connecticut. Their reasoning? The constitution protects (married) couples' right to privacy.
For those concerned about reproductive, gender, and s*xual justice, privacy matters. █▬▬
Privacy rights would serve as a legal cornerstone in later rulings that expanded reproductive and s*xual freedom and LGBTQ rights. But those rights were never universally enjoyed or accepted by the political Right. As some Supreme Court Justices question the right to privacy articulated in Griswold, we asked five feminist scholars, judges, and lawyers to weigh in on Griswold’s legacy:
▪️ Who has and has not been afforded privacy rights? 💭
▪️ Why and how does privacy matter today? 💭
▪️ What alternate legal or policy frameworks might advance the unfinished work of gender and s*xual justice? 💭
Read Privacy Matters: The Legacy of Griswold
https://ow.ly/N7nE50VVcVB