What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 5pm Tuesday 9am - 5pm Wednesday 9am - 5pm Thursday 9am - 5pm Friday 9am - 5pm Saturday 12pm - 3pm

https://www.facebook.com/1885939285006292/

RTBG radio, New Orleans, LA (2026)

05/26/2026

The King of Pop vs. The Taxman: How Michael Jackson’s Children Beat a $700 Million IRS "Unprecedented" Tax Grab: The Price of a Legacy: Inside the Bitter Legal War Over Michael Jackson’s Music and Millions

RTBG RADIO EXECUTIVE REPORT: CORPORATE MANEUVERING, TRUST LAW, AND THE IRS BATTLE OVER MICHAEL JACKSON’S ESTATE

I. THE FOUNDATION OF CONTROL: CONFLICTS AND POWER DISCONNECTS

The Removal of Katherine Jackson (2009)
Following the death of Michael Jackson on June 25, 2009, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge transitioned control of the estate away from temporary administrator Katherine Jackson, permanentizing John Branca and John McClain as co-executors based on explicit legal grounds:
- Enforcement of the 2002 Will: The court was legally bound to honor Michael Jackson's valid 2002 will, which explicitly named Branca and McClain as executors and granted them broad legal powers over his assets.
- Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest: As a primary beneficiary of the estate, Katherine Jackson possessed inherent conflicts of interest regarding strict administrative and commercial decisions.
- Debt Stabilization: Facing over $400 million in immediate debt, the court ruled that transferring administrative control to designated entertainment industry professionals was essential to prevent financial collapse.

The Paperwork Trap and Vulnerability Timeline
The legal ex*****on of the estate was directly impacted by Michael Jackson’s severe, documented physical and emotional hardships:
- The 1984 Pepsi Accident: Severe second- and third-degree scalp burns resulted in permanent nerve damage, chronic migraines, and a lifetime dependency on prescription narcotics and sleep anesthetics.
- Cognitive and Emotional Isolation: Chronic pain management, combined with the profound psychological trauma and isolation following the 1993 allegations and the grueling 2005 trial, severely compromised his daily executive functioning.
- The Un-Updated Will: Due to operating in physical survival mode and shifting nomadic lifestyles across Europe and Bahrain, the 2002 will was never revised. When Jackson re-hired Branca just weeks before his death in 2009 to handle immediate foreclosure crises, he inadvertently activated the absolute powers outlined in the old paperwork.

II. THE CHRONOLOGY OF EXECUTOR MANEUVERING

The $600 Million Sony Catalog Sale
Executors John Branca and John McClain leveraged their unchecked, broad contractual discretion to execute a historic transaction with Sony Music Group, selling 50% of Jackson's publishing and master recordings catalog:
- The Family’s Opposition: Katherine Jackson fought a multi-year legal battle to block the deal, arguing that Michael had publicly condemned Sony and executive Tommy Mottola, and had explicitly stated his desire to keep his music legacy within the family in perpetuity.
- The Judicial Override: California appellate courts rejected Katherine's appeals. Legally, because Michael signed a broad-powers will that omitted specific "do not sell" restrictions, the court treated the catalog strictly as a commercial asset to maximize estate wealth, rather than a sacred heritage.

III. MODERN LEGAL LEVERAGE OF THE ADULT HEIRS

Now that Prince, Paris, and Bigi (Blanket) are adults, they derive significant legal leverage under California trust laws as primary beneficiaries of the Michael Jackson Family Trust:

- Mandatory Financial Audits: Paris Jackson secured multiple critical probate court rulings forcing the executors to disclose years of hidden financial records, allowing forensic teams to audit expenditures regarding the 2026 biopic and the Sony transaction.
- Clawbacks of Unauthorized Funds: The heirs successfully petitioned the court to force the estate to claw back $625,000 in unauthorized "bonus" payments distributed to external law firms.
- Asset Protection Blocking: Bigi Jackson filed direct legal motions to block the estate from funding Katherine Jackson's personal legal appeals against the Sony deal, successfully arguing that draining trust funds on losing battles violated fiduciary duties.
- Chronological Milestones: The trust is structured to transfer absolute, direct control over principal assets in fractional waves as the children reach key age milestones (Ages 30, 35, and 40), stripping the executors of long-term leverage.

IV. HOW THE HEIRS DEFEATED THE IRS IN U.S. TAX COURT

The IRS aggressively sought roughly $700 million in back taxes and accuracy-related fraud penalties. The estate fought the government in U.S. Tax Court and achieved a landmark defeat of federal valuation metrics.

1. Stripping "Hindsight Valuation" of Image and Likeness
- The IRS Demand: The government valued Michael Jackson's image and likeness at $161 million, factoring in post-mortem earnings like the This Is It documentary.
- The Heirs' Defense: The estate proved his value on the exact day of his death in 2009 was virtually non-existent due to zero active sponsorships, zero merchandise deals, and the lingering public damage from his criminal trials.
- The Ruling: U.S. Tax Court Judge Mark Holmes strictly rebuked the IRS, stating that taxes must look at the value at the moment of death, not future success. The judge slashed the value to $4.15 million.

2. Music Catalog Valuation Re-calculations
- The IRS Demand: Valued his Mijac Music and Sony/ATV stakes at over $321 million.
- The Heirs' Defense: Proved that these entities were heavily leveraged against crushing bank liabilities and debts.
- The Ruling: The court reduced the total valuation of the disputed assets from $482 million down to $111 million.

3. Total Eradication of Fraud Penalties
- The Ruling: The court completely wiped out nearly $200 million in accuracy and fraud penalties, ruling that the heirs and estate appraisers acted with complete legitimacy and transparency.

The Current Financial Status
Despite winning the core trial, a remaining technical dispute regarding the final accounting numbers of The Mijac Music catalog which is Michael Jackson’s personal music publishing company, which he formed in 1980 to hold the copyrights to his own songs and select pieces of music history continues to delay the official closing of the case.

Consequently:
- The Trust Lock: Because the final tax clearance is pending, the executors are legally prohibited from officially funding the primary Michael Jackson Family Trust.
- Interim Allowances: To circumvent the freeze and ensure the children are not financially exploited, the probate court approves massive, ongoing financial allowances from estate revenue directly to Prince, Paris, and Bigi while the final IRS paperwork is closed out.

If a legendary artist explicitly uses their platform to war against corporate control during their lifetime, should probate courts be legally forced to honor a corporate buyout just because of an un-updated will?

Did the estate protect Michael Jackson’s children, or did they betray his living legacy?

Copyright © 2026 RTBG Radio. All Rights Reserved.

No part of this article or publication may be reproduced, duplicated, replicated, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means—including photocopying, recording, broadcasting, or other electronic or mechanical methods—without the express prior written permission of RTBG Radio.

For permission requests or licensing inquiries, contact RTBG Radio directly. Any unauthorized use, replication, or distribution of this material constitutes a violation of copyright law and will be met with immediate legal action.

05/26/2026

A political question worth asking:

If a politician repeatedly asks for your vote, your donations, and your loyalty, but your circumstances never improve, aren't you entitled to ask whether you're being used?

A fair question:

At what point do loyal supporters stop being supporters and start asking whether they're being used?

05/26/2026

All this talk about "DEI" is a hypocrisy!

Regarding the news post about refugee admissions, reports indicate that the U.S. administration has moved to increase the refugee cap from 7,500 to 17,500, specifically allocating 10,000 of those slots for white South Africans, whom the administration characterizes as facing an "emergency refugee situation."

This policy has faced significant criticism and controversy. Critics and the South African government have rejected the administration’s claims of a "white genocide" in South Africa. President Trump has stated that the admission of this group is "justified by the grave humanitarian concerns and is otherwise in the national interest."

Furthermore, this policy change has been noted for occurring alongside the suspension or limitation of refugee resettlement programs for individuals fleeing persecution and conflict in other regions, including Afghanistan, Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The administration's policy has faced significant criticism from lawmakers and advocates who argue that the program—traditionally used to provide safety to the world's most vulnerable populations regardless of origin—is being repurposed to prioritize a single demographic, effectively leaving thousands of other vetted refugees, including allies from other nations, stranded. Because these individuals are entering through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), they must undergo established vetting procedures and security checks while still living abroad before they are granted admission. This process is distinct from asylum, where individuals are already on U.S. soil.

In response to the ongoing Ebola outbreak in parts of East and Central Africa, the U.S. government has implemented several measures as of May 2026 to mitigate the risk of the virus entering the country. On May 18, 2026, the CDC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) invoked Title 42 of the Public Health Service Act. These measures include:

* Entry Suspensions: Non-U.S. citizens and non-permanent residents who have been in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Uganda, or South Sudan within the previous 21 days are currently suspended from entering the United States.
* Designated Ports of Entry: U.S. citizens, nationals, and lawful permanent residents who have traveled through these affected regions are required to fly into specific airports—most notably Washington Dulles International Airport—where enhanced health screening and monitoring resources are concentrated.

An additional policy question remains unanswered: What specific travel, screening, and health-monitoring protocols will be used for refugees arriving from South Africa?

While there are currently no reports of Ebola transmission in South Africa, public health authorities have noted that Ebola exposure is assessed based on recent travel history and potential contact with affected individuals, not nationality. Because international travelers may transit through multiple countries before arriving in the United States, some observers are asking whether refugee arrivals will be transported on direct flights, commercial routes, or chartered aircraft, and what procedures will be used to verify that travelers have not recently been in Ebola-affected regions or had potential exposure during the previous 21 days.

Federal agencies have announced enhanced screening measures for travelers linked to affected countries, but detailed protocols for the expanded South African refugee admissions program have not yet been publicly outlined.

© 2026 RTBG Radio. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

05/24/2026

IRAN SAYS THEY DO NOT TRUST THE U.S. TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HERE'S WHY...

05/21/2026

The Taxpayers' Kick in the Face by the Republican Party:
RTBG Radio Investigative Update

This is RTBG Radio bringing you a hard-hitting look at an absolute betrayal of working-class Americans.

While everyday citizens are pulling up to gas pumps and watching hard-earned dollars drain away at nearly $5 a gallon or more, critics say loudly that allegedly corruption in Washington— Republican politicians are pulling off an unprecedented taxpayer-funded power grab. The Trump administration and the Justice Department just finalized a massive settlement, establishing a secretive $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" under the control of the Department of Justice.

This isn't just about a massive slush fund—it is about where that money is allowed to go.

During a House Rules Committee hearing, an amendment was brought to the floor specifically designed to block this multi-billion-dollar fund from ever being used to compensate convicted felons who violently assaulted law enforcement officers at the U.S. Capitol.

The result? Every single House Rules Committee Republican voted against the amendment. By killing this measure in a strict party-line vote, committee Republicans actively protected a loophole that opens the floodgates for taxpayer dollars to potentially reward rioters.

Compounding the outrage, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified before a Senate subcommittee and explicitly refused to rule out payouts for individuals who participated in the Capitol riots, stating openly that "anybody in this country can apply."

The Deep Core of the Problem: Beyond Red vs. Blue

This crisis goes far beyond standard partisan politics. This is no longer just a standard debate between Republican and Democratic voters. This points directly to what critics and political analysts describe as a profound cult-like political loyalty within the political landscape, where partisan loyalty has been weaponized to justify the unthinkable.

Allegedly, this operation represents a legislative and financial strategy that critics say is to hijack the hard-earned funds of American taxpayers. By setting up mechanisms that legally shield these massive payouts from public transparency, this fund allegedly functions as a back-channel redistribution of public wealth. The American people are being forced to bankroll the very actions that disrupted the country's democratic processes.

Dear MAGA die hard fanatics, how much was your refund check?

The Bottom Line and Call to Action:
The hypocrisy is undeniable. Working families are scraping by to afford basic necessities while Washington politicians pave the way to hand nearly $1.8 billion over to political allies and violent offenders with zero requirement for public disclosure.

Critics on both sides believe this is a direct kick in the face to every taxpayer keeping this country running. It is an insult to law enforcement and a complete misuse of public money. Every single Republican who voted to approve and protect this $1.8 billion cash pool needs to be held accountable. The message from the American people must be clear: every Republican who backed this scheme needs to be voted out of office!

© 2026 RTBG Radio. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized duplication or reproduction prohibited.

05/20/2026

RTBG Radio News Update: Federal Fund Lawsuit

Is this a slap in the face to taxpayers and to the U.S. Constitution?

The following questions are made by critics:

What the hell is this?

What about the 174 Capitol Police officers who were severely injured— one who died, the very next day, due to a stroke allegedly caused by his injuries on Jan 6?

Where is the 1.776 billion federal dollar for these officers and their family members?

Who voted to approve this alleged heist or alleged corrupt sham of an alleged heist of taxpayers' dollars?

MAGA, how can you defend this?

Where's the billions of dollars for them Capitol police and their family?

A massive $1.776 billion federal "anti-weaponization" fund is facing a major legal challenge from within the ranks of law enforcement. Two Capitol Police officers who defended the building on January 6th have filed a lawsuit to block the fund, arguing that it could inadvertently allow individuals who assaulted law enforcement to receive financial payouts.

The legal challenge has sparked intense community debate over accountability, federal spending, and the security of public institutions. While proponents of the fund argue it protects citizens from government overreach, the suing officers maintain that distributing these funds undermines the sacrifices made by law enforcement and compromises public safety standards. RTBG Radio will continue to follow this developing legal battle as it heads through the federal courts.

Credit: Image only AP

© 2026 RTBG Radio. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized duplication or reproduction prohibited.

05/19/2026

The Landry Loophole: How Louisiana's New Closed Primary "Allegedly" Rigged the Game Against Bill Cassidy

Louisiana’s traditional "jungle primary" is officially dead for federal races, and the political fallout is exactly what its architects intended. Following the state's May 16 primary elections, incumbent Republican Senator Bill Cassidy was dramatically knocked out of the running, placing third behind Trump-endorsed challengers Representative Julia Letlow and John Fleming.

Political insiders and local pundits are pulling no punches: this entire structural shift was a targeted political hit engineered by Governor Jeff Landry to deliver on a long-standing promise to the conservative establishment. Landry, a staunch and vocal ally of Donald Trump, utilized his executive power to reshape Louisiana's electoral system specifically to reward partisan loyalty and punish internal dissent.

---

> "I think the real push for this was to beat Bill Cassidy for Senate. Let’s call it like it is."
> — *Louisiana Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser*

---

Doing the Bidding: The Blueprint to Oust an Incumbent

When Senator Bill Cassidy voted to convict Donald Trump during his second impeachment trial, he instantly put a target on his back. In Louisiana’s old jungle primary system—where all candidates ran on a single ballot open to all voters—Cassidy was safe. He had a proven track record of building a broad, cross-party coalition of moderate Republicans, Independents, and crossover Democrats to clear the 50% threshold.

Enter Governor Jeff Landry. As an uncompromising MAGA surrogate, Landry prioritized dismantling the open primary system immediately upon taking office, pushing House Bill 17 through the legislature to establish closed partisan primaries. The strategic logic was calculated:

* **Shifting the Electorate:** By restricting the Republican primary strictly to registered Republicans, the new law stripped Cassidy of his moderate and Independent safety net.
* **The Two-Year Delay:** The legislature purposely timed the implementation of the closed primary to take effect right in time for the 2026 Senate race.
* **Empowering Ideological Donors:** Closing the primary narrowed the voter pool to a smaller, hyper-partisan, low-turnout crowd, allowing right-wing political action committees (PACs) to easily dominate the airwaves and split the anti-Cassidy vote between Letlow and Fleming, isolating the incumbent.

---

"A Mess Designed in a Lab": How Louisianans Feel

If the goal of Governor Landry’s new system was to create total chaos at the ballot box, it succeeded flawlessly. The May 16 elections were plagued by widespread voter confusion, technical errors, and outright anger from residents who feel completely disenfranchised.

On the eve of the election, Cassidy’s campaign issued a "Red Alert," warning that voters were actively being blocked from voting for him. Because independent or "No Party" voters had to explicitly navigate a confusing new process to request a specific party ballot, thousands arrived at the booths only to find the Senate race missing or greyed out on their screens.

Local Backlash and Voter Sentiment

Political analysts, pollsters, and voters across the state have voiced deep frustration with what is being called a deliberate attempt to suppress civic engagement:

* **Voter Disenfranchisement:** Many Independent voters reported feeling completely ripped away from the democratic process, leaving polling stations angry after realizing they were locked out of voting for an incumbent senator.
* **Widespread Confusion:** The confusion was compounded by Landry’s last-minute emergency order postponing the state's U.S. House primaries due to a Supreme Court map dispute. Voters arriving at the polls couldn't distinguish between the canceled House races and the ongoing Senate primary, leading poll workers to openly admit to locals, "Yeah, this election is all messed up."
* **Deliberate Apathy:** Louisiana political experts note that the Landry administration has effectively engineered a system designed to discourage people from participating. When the rules change abruptly, voter turnout plummets, playing directly into the hands of a rigid party establishment.

With Cassidy officially eliminated, Letlow and Fleming are headed to a June 27 runoff. But for the everyday citizens of Louisiana, the primary system overhaul has left a bitter taste, exposing how easily election laws can be rewritten simply to settle a partisan score.

---

---

© 2026 RTBG Radio: All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

05/18/2026

Is it true fiscal solidarity when a governor threatens to block hard-earned raises for state workers and firefighters just because his own ballot measures failed, while quietly allowing a legislative backdoor to secure a massive financial windfall for himself and his inner circle in 2028—or is this simply textbook political hypocrisy at the expense of Louisiana's working class?

The Price of Public Service: The Hypocrisy in the Hallways of Baton Rouge

Gov. Jeff Landry expressed frustration after all the amendments on the ballot this weekend failed, including Amendment 3, which proposed permanent raises for teachers.

According to the Governor's own statements, his frustration directly extends to those proposed government raises. After the failure of Amendment 3—which would have provided permanent funding for teacher raises—Gov. Landry declared that nobody in state government will receive a raise unless public school teachers do as well. He tied raises for himself, statewide elected officials, judges, district attorneys, and state firefighters directly to educator compensation.

Louisiana Lawmakers Consider Hefty Raises for Governor, Statewide Elected Officials in 2028

Louisiana lawmakers may significantly increase the pay of the governor and other statewide elected officials in 2028.

House Bill 1201, sponsored by Rep. John Illg, R-Harahan, would set the governor’s salary to 35% of the average base pay for Louisiana’s university system presidents in the previous fiscal year. Other statewide elected officials would earn 30% of the system leaders’ average.

If the law were enacted today, it would raise the governor’s annual salary from $130,000 to $182,088, according to a legislative fiscal analysis. Other statewide officials’ salaries would go from $115,000 to $156,075.

All statewide elected officials besides the governor would also receive a $30,000 annual housing allowance and a $12,000 annual vehicle allowance under Illg’s proposal. The governor is already given complimentary housing at the governor’s mansion and is driven around by a Louisiana State Police security detail.

The Louisiana House and Government Affairs Committee moved the bill forward Thursday. It needs a vote from the full House and Senate to become law.

Illg said salaries for statewide elected officials haven’t been raised in 20 years. Some current office holders made more money in previous government jobs at the same agencies they now lead.

Illg told the House committee he wanted to link the elected officials’ salaries to an outside metric, such as university system president pay, so pay increases were not reliant on a legislative vote in the future.

“You need to tie it to something so we never have to deal with this, again,” he said.

Behind the Curtain

In politics, public declarations often make for great theater, but a look behind the curtain usually reveals a completely different script. Recent developments in Baton Rouge have highlighted a stark contrast between political rhetoric regarding public education and the reality of proposed legislative pay hikes.

Following a weekend ballot where Louisiana voters rejected multiple constitutional amendments, Governor Jeff Landry publicly voiced his frustration over the failure of Amendment 3, which aimed to establish permanent funding for public school teacher raises. In a bold display of solidarity with educators, Governor Landry declared a firm ultimatum: nobody in state government—including himself, statewide elected officials, judges, district attorneys, and state firefighters—would see a pay increase unless Louisiana’s public school teachers received theirs first.

It is a noble stance on paper. However, the legislative gears moving simultaneously in the state capitol tell a much more lucrative story for those at the top.

While the administration laments the lack of permanent funding for the state's underpaid educators, House Bill 1201, authored by Representative John Illg (R-Harahan), is advancing through the legislature. The bill seeks to fundamentally reshape and significantly boost the compensation packages for the governor and other statewide elected officials starting in 2028.

The mechanism of HB 1201 is designed to bypass the traditional political discomfort of lawmakers voting on their own pay raises. By tying executive salaries to 35% of the average base pay of Louisiana’s university system presidents, the governor’s salary would automatically jump from $130,000 to an estimated $182,088. Other statewide officials’ salaries would climb from $115,000 to $156,075.

But the base salary increase is only part of the proposal. The bill also introduces a $30,000 annual housing allowance and a $12,000 annual vehicle allowance for statewide officials. Meanwhile, the governor already enjoys state-funded housing at the governor's mansion and a dedicated Louisiana State Police security detail for transportation.

The juxtaposition is difficult to ignore: while the frontline educators who shape Louisiana's future are left waiting for financial stability after the defeat of Amendment 3, an automated, hands-off system is being fast-tracked to ensure politicians get their payouts without ever having to answer to the voters for it again.

But the people's voice is loud and clear.

Poor little Jeff Landry. Poor little Jeff Landry doesn't know what to do.

The juxtaposition is difficult to ignore: while the frontline educators who shape Louisiana's future are left waiting for financial stability after the defeat of Amendment 3, an automated, hands-off system is being fast-tracked to ensure politicians get their payouts without ever having to answer to the voters for it again.

But the people's voice is loud and clear.

Poor little Jeff Landry. Poor little Jeff Landry doesn't know what to do.

Images credit only: WDSU

---

© 2026 RTBG Radio. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

05/17/2026

Cassidy loses GOP primary in Louisiana, as two rivals advance to a runoff

Sen. Bill Cassidy, who voted to convict President Donald Trump on impeachment charges in 2021, has lost his Republican primary in Louisiana, as two challengers who had aligned with Trump advanced to a runoff.

Rep. Julia Letlow, who had Trump’s endorsement in the race, will face state Treasurer John Fleming in a June 27 primary runoff, NBC News projects.

Cassidy’s loss further cements Trump’s grip on the GOP as the president looks to exact revenge against Republicans who have crossed him in the past. And it also means another Republican who voted to convict Trump during his 2021 impeachment will not be returning to Congress next year.

Credit: NBC News

05/16/2026

Ground Zero for Disenfranchisement: How Louisiana Just Erased 42,000 Voices

The ongoing war over the Voting Rights Act isn’t a theoretical debate taking place in a vacuum inside the marble walls of the U.S. Supreme Court. It is an active, aggressive assault on the ground, and right now, Louisiana is the battlefield.

In a staggering display of raw political maneuvering, Governor Jeff Landry and the state legislature have effectively rewritten the rules of democracy mid-game. By declaring a state of emergency to halt an ongoing U.S. House primary, the administration did the unthinkable: they tossed out more than 42,000 valid, legally cast absentee and early ballots, leaving tens of thousands of Louisiana citizens completely silenced.

When pressed on this massive act of voter erasure, Governor Landry shifted the blame entirely, stating, "It's not my fault. If anybody has a grievance, take it to the United States Supreme Court."

The "Fairness" Fallacy vs. The Blood-Bought Right to Vote:

In the wake of this chaos, a familiar talking point has emerged from vocal supporters of Governor Landry and Donald Trump. They claim that dismantling these districts and resetting the election is a step toward making voting "fair across the board." They echo House Speaker Mike Johnson’s praise of the Supreme Court for restoring a "simple but profound truth" that the Constitution protects everyone equally, arguing that maps shouldn't be drawn based on race.

But this argument demands that we completely blind ourselves to history. To claim that a "colorblind" system is inherently fair ignores a brutal reality: the only reason we need a Voting Rights Act in the first place is because the system was never fair to begin with.

History has shown us, explicitly and painfully, that the right to vote for Black Americans in the South was bought with blood. For generations, African Americans were systemically murdered, beaten, and maimed just for trying to register. Civil rights workers had their cars bombed and their homes burned to the ground by white supremacists determined to keep Black citizens completely away from the ballot box.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 wasn’t a bureaucratic favor—it was a life-saving shield forged to stop state-sanctioned terror and systemic exclusion. To look at the structural rollbacks happening in 2026 and call it "fairness" is a direct insult to the sacrifices of those who died fighting for a voice.

The Domino Effect of a Wrecked Voting Rights Act:

When the highest court in the land weakens federal protections, state politicians waste no time exploiting the gap. Following the Supreme Court's April 2026 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais—which struck down a map that had finally given Black Louisianans a second majority-minority district—state leaders rushed to use partisanship as a shield.

The Republican-led state senate just passed a brand-new congressional map that completely eliminates District 6, the majority-Black seat represented by Cleo Fields. By packing Black voters heavily into a single snaking district (District 2) that connects New Orleans and Baton Rouge, and dissolving the rest into conservative, predominantly white suburbs, the state successfully reduced minority-majority representation from two seats down to one.

Because the Supreme Court's new standard allows states to prioritize "partisan advantage" over racial equity, politicians can now structurally dilute Black voting power, pocket the seats, and simply call it "politics."

The Irreversible Human Cost of "Hitting Delete" on an Election:

Politicians like to treat an election reset as a minor bureaucratic inconvenience. The reality on the ground is far more devastating. A ballot isn't a digital rough draft; it is a citizen's vested constitutional right. By throwing 42,000 cast ballots into a legal void, the state has caused irreversible harm to its own people.

Consider the human math behind those discarded mail-in boxes:

The Stolen Final Act: Absentee voting windows open weeks in advance to accommodate the elderly, the vulnerable, and the chronically ill. In a pool of 42,000 voters, it is a statistical certainty that citizens cast their ballots in good faith and subsequently passed away before the governor’s abrupt shutdown. Because their votes were destroyed, these citizens were permanently stripped of their final civic act. They cannot "just vote again" when the election is pushed to November.

The Displaced and Deployed:

Louisiana families moving out of state for work, students relocating for the summer, and active-duty military personnel serving overseas all followed the rules to secure their votes from afar. Forcing a total timeline reset means many of these individuals will miss new deadlines, face bureaucratic nightmares trying to request a second ballot, or find themselves completely locked out of the process.

A Dangerous Precedent:

This goes far beyond standard partisan mapmaking. By utilizing an executive order to unilaterally halt an active election and throw out valid votes, the executive branch has stepped way over the line, bypassing the legislature's authority and completely ignoring the Purcell principle—a legal doctrine meant to prevent mass voter confusion close to an election.

Louisiana is showing the nation what happens when sophisticated structural barriers replace overt voter suppression. When the dust settles on this map dispute, the reality remains: 42,000 citizens did everything right, followed the law, and had their voices thrown in the trash by the very government sworn to protect them.

© 2026 RTBG Radio — All Rights Reserved.
This article and its original commentary, analysis, structure, and presentation are the intellectual property of RTBG Radio. Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution, screenshot reposting, or republication without written permission is prohibited. Excerpts may be shared only with proper credit to RTBG Radio.
RTBG Radio will continue to follow the federal lawsuits fighting to hold the state accountable. Stay tuned.

RTBG radio

05/26/2026

05/26/2026

05/26/2026

05/24/2026

05/21/2026

05/20/2026

05/19/2026

05/18/2026

05/17/2026

05/16/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	9am - 5pm
Tuesday	9am - 5pm
Wednesday	9am - 5pm
Thursday	9am - 5pm
Friday	9am - 5pm
Saturday	12pm - 3pm