Global Report

Global Report Explore the world of cinema, celebrities, and gaming with daily insights, updates, and trending stories.

Your one-stop hub for entertainment and digital culture.

In one of the boldest claims of influence yet, a Trump adviser has reportedly said that tech billionaire Larry Ellison a...
10/14/2025

In one of the boldest claims of influence yet, a Trump adviser has reportedly said that tech billionaire Larry Ellison acts as a “shadow president of the United States.” The remark paints Ellison not just as an advisor, but as someone wielding power behind the scenes.

Ellison, cofounder of Oracle, is already deeply involved in high-stakes arenas: cloud computing, AI infrastructure, and digital policy. In recent months, his name has surfaced in discussions around federal tech contracts, media mergers, and control over data infrastructure. The alleged comment suggests his reach might extend beyond business into political sway.

If true, the notion of a “shadow president” stirs debate over what real power means in modern Washington. Does Ellison pull strings subtly, or openly? Is he shaping policy or setting agendas? And what does that say about the boundaries between money, tech, and leadership?

Some see the claim as hyperbole, a dramatic way to underscore Ellison’s influence without literal truth. Others warn it signals a deeper risk: that unelected billionaires may guide national decisions without accountability.

Whatever the reality, one thing is clear: this idea has captured the public imagination. It forces us to examine who really holds power today, and how much the world is willing to let it operate in the shadows.

Gary Neville sparked fresh controversy after he admitted removing a flag from display because it was “being used in a ne...
10/14/2025

Gary Neville sparked fresh controversy after he admitted removing a flag from display because it was “being used in a negative fashion.” The former Manchester United defender and pundit made the confession on a sports talk show, sending social media into a tailspin.

Neville explained that the flag, originally intended to show support, had been co-opted by extremist voices and turned toxic. He said refusing to let it hang under those conditions was a stand against allowing symbols to be hijacked. “When something is distorted, you can no longer let it speak for you,” he remarked.

Fans reacted swiftly. Some praised Neville’s integrity, saying he chose principles over optics. Others accused him of self-censorship or overreacting. The debate grew heated on sports forums and news outlets alike.

In the world of sports, symbols carry weight. Flags, chants, and signage are never just visuals, they’re statements, endorsements, even protests. Neville’s decision reminds us that what a symbol means can depend entirely on who wields it.

Whether you agree with his choice or not, it’s clear that ideas, not just goals, are still being contested in stadiums everywhere.

In a dramatic turn of events, President Emmanuel Macron’s attempt to stabilize France’s government has ended in humiliat...
10/14/2025

In a dramatic turn of events, President Emmanuel Macron’s attempt to stabilize France’s government has ended in humiliation after Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu resigned just 27 days into his term. The abrupt exit came amid fierce backlash from all sides of the political spectrum.

Lecornu had attempted to build a coalition during a period of deep political fragmentation, only to see his newly announced cabinet spark outrage from centrist allies, the left, and even his own party ranks. Critics denounced the appointments as too connected to past administrations and incapable of inspiring confidence.

During his very short tenure, Lecornu quickly ran into roadblocks. Lawmakers threatened no-confidence votes, opposition blocs refused to cooperate, and internal divisions made consensus impossible. Facing mounting pressure, he stepped down less than a day after unveiling his government.

For Macron, this is more than a political setback , it’s a public symbol of eroding authority. Once seen as a modernizing force, he now grapples with a fragmented parliament, growing calls for new elections, and credibility under assault.

Observers say the episode shows just how fragile leadership has become in France. When even the most loyal allies can’t hold it together, it raises questions about who can.

Lecornu’s resignation doesn’t end the crisis , it deepens it. Macron now must swiftly appoint a new prime minister, rebuild alliances, and restore faith in his presidency. But after 27 days, one thing is clear: even France’s most powerful faces limits.

In a striking rebuke of presidential power, a federal judge has temporarily blocked President Trump’s attempt to deploy ...
10/13/2025

In a striking rebuke of presidential power, a federal judge has temporarily blocked President Trump’s attempt to deploy the National Guard in Portland. The judge ruled that the administration’s justification was unfounded and lacks the necessary legal basis.

Judge Karin Immergut, who was appointed by Trump himself, issued the order after hearing arguments from Oregon and city authorities. She noted that the scale and nature of reported protests did not warrant military intervention and expressed concern that the federal move bypassed constitutional limits on domestic troop use.

While Trump claimed Portland was in chaos and under siege, the court found little evidence supporting the depiction. Local and state legal teams had challenged the deployment as unconstitutional and warned it would set a dangerous precedent. With her ruling, the judge emphasized the importance of preserving local authority and civil liberties.

The decision has ignited fierce debate. Supporters of the judge’s ruling see it as a critical defense of democratic norms, that even in times of tension, the president cannot ignore limits imposed by law. Detractors accuse the court of delaying necessary action and question whether a president should be curbed in moments of crisis.

For residents of Portland, this ruling buys breathing room. It prevents troops, federal or from other states, from entering their streets without judicial approval. For the nation, it sends a potent message: checks and balances still matter.

As legal battles continue and appeals loom, one thing is clear: this moment could define how far executive authority can reach into domestic governance.

In a dramatic escalation, President Trump has moved ahead with sending 300 California National Guard soldiers to Portlan...
10/13/2025

In a dramatic escalation, President Trump has moved ahead with sending 300 California National Guard soldiers to Portland, Oregon,despite a federal judge’s restraining order blocking such deployments. His actions set off fierce backlash across the legal and political landscape.

The court had restricted the use of out-of-state guards in Portland, citing concerns over constitutional overreach and the limits of presidential authority. Undeterred, the White House described the move as necessary to protect federal property and enforce law. Trump spokeswoman called the judge’s decision an “unwarranted obstacle.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom immediately denounced the deployment, calling it unauthorized and a bold challenge to states’ rights. Oregon officials similarly warned that the move violates sovereignty and jeopardizes public safety. Legal teams in both states announced new lawsuits seeking permanent injunctions.

The situation has triggered rare unanimity among critics: from civil rights groups to conservative legal experts, many argue that this deployment shifts America toward a dangerous precedent where military force replaces democratic negotiation. Some warn it could inflame rather than quell unrest.

Even supporters of tougher policy on protests are divided, questions linger about how a president can override court orders and state objections without fundamentally reshaping the balance of power between branches of government.

As the troops mobilize, the nation is bracing for fallout. Will the courts push back harder? Will states stand firm? And most importantly, does this moment mark a turning point in how domestic dissent is handled in the U.S.?

A sudden blizzard caught trekkers and support staff by surprise on the Tibetan side of Mount Everest, trapping hundreds ...
10/13/2025

A sudden blizzard caught trekkers and support staff by surprise on the Tibetan side of Mount Everest, trapping hundreds amid howling winds, deep snow, and collapsing tents. The storm began late Friday and accelerated quickly, burying pathways and cutting off safe descent routes.

By Saturday night, rescue teams scrambled into action, battling freezing conditions and blocked passes to reach isolated camps above 16,000 feet. Many who were trapped had to dig themselves out hourly to avoid being buried. One climber later recalled, “We were clearing snow every ten minutes just to keep the tent open.”

Though some trekkers managed to descend on their own, the bulk were reached only after relentless effort. Teams used drones, horses, even locals hauling supplies upward, and set up emergency shelters as temperatures plummeted. Over several days, all those stranded were evacuated to safety, though many suffered from hypothermia and shock along the way.

The mountain’s lower slopes now lie quiet, with base camps temporarily closed. Meanwhile, survivors recounted the terror of watching snowdrifts tower over their campsite walls and seeing ropes snap in gusts stronger than anything they had trained for. Many said it was the worst weather they’d ever faced, even on Everest.

This rescue mission didn’t just test strength, it turned into an urgent race against time. It highlighted how fragile life becomes when nature asserts dominance. For those who lived through it, the mountain’s beauty now carries the memory of endurance, fear, and survival.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has publicly lashed out at Chicago’s mayor, calling him “delusional” and arguing...
10/13/2025

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has publicly lashed out at Chicago’s mayor, calling him “delusional” and arguing the city has turned into a “war zone” under his leadership. Her criticism comes as President Trump deploys 300 National Guard troops to assist federal agents amid growing tensions over immigration enforcement and local control.

Noem claimed that local leadership has allowed violence to spiral, and that federal presence is necessary to maintain order. She accused officials of obstructing federal operations, including denying agents access to essentials like restrooms, as chaos escalates across Chicago neighborhoods.

Mayor Brandon Johnson has pushed back hard. He insists the characterization is unfair, arguing these federal actions are unconstitutional and inflame the very disorder they purport to fix. He has also spoken out against what he calls overreach by the federal government into city affairs.

The deployment and public sparring reflect deeper conflicts between the Trump administration’s law-and-order agenda and local leaders’ defense of civil liberties. Many see this moment as a test of how far federal power can stretch into cities that reject its presence.

For Chicago residents already wary of militarized tactics and aggressive immigration raids, the standoff has sharpened anxieties about policing, autonomy, and who truly governs the city.

Words like “delusional” and “war zone” aren’t just rhetoric, they’re signals of a fight over narrative, authority, and political survival. As troops arrive, the battle for control over Chicago’s streets is being fought not just in neighborhoods but in headlines and public trust.

Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old climate activist from Sweden, has been deported from I*rael after her arrest during the ...
10/13/2025

Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old climate activist from Sweden, has been deported from I*rael after her arrest during the Gaza flotilla protest. She was part of an international group of activists who attempted to sail aid into Gaza, defying the blockade that has drawn global criticism.

Witnesses describe the hours before her deportation as tense. Reports from fellow detainees speak of overcrowded cells, lack of sleep, and intimidation tactics inside the detention center. Greta herself told reporters, “We stood for human rights, and for that we were treated as criminals.”

The flotilla, carrying medical supplies and symbolic aid, was intercepted by Israeli forces before reaching Gaza. Around 171 activists were arrested, with many already deported to their home countries. Human rights groups have raised alarms about the treatment of detainees, urging international observers to demand accountability for what they call “inhumane conditions.”

For Greta, this marks a new chapter in her activism. Known for challenging world leaders on climate inaction, she has now placed herself at the center of one of the most contentious human rights struggles of our time. Supporters argue that her arrest highlights how peaceful protest can still be met with heavy repression, while critics accuse her of politicizing her platform.

Whether praised or condemned, Greta’s deportation ensures her voice will echo even louder on the global stage. Her choice to risk arrest has transformed her message from environmental urgency to a broader call for justice and dignity.

In a bold move that’s already stirring debate, the U.S. Treasury has unveiled a draft design for a $1 coin honoring Amer...
10/13/2025

In a bold move that’s already stirring debate, the U.S. Treasury has unveiled a draft design for a $1 coin honoring America’s 250th anniversary, in which Donald Trump is featured on both sides. The mock-ups show his profile on the obverse, and a raised fist with the words “FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT” framed by a U.S. flag on the reverse.

The coin is meant to celebrate the nation’s semiquincentennial, but critics have quickly questioned whether featuring a living person, especially a recent president, on currency sets a dangerous precedent. Others argue it captures a moment in history, regardless of politics, and see it as a powerful symbol for his supporters.

Still, nothing is set in stone. The Treasury emphasizes the design is only a draft, and a final version may change, or be dropped entirely. Even the size, material, and circulation plan remain up for negotiation. The path forward will need to navigate both legal norms and public reaction.

For collectors and political observers alike, the proposed coin is already making waves. It blurs lines between numismatics, propaganda, and commemoration, raising tough questions about how symbols reflect power, legacy, and memory.

Whether you see this as a clever tribute or a bold stunt, one thing is clear: this coin would be far more than spare change. It would carry the weight of history and controversy in your palm.

A team of high schoolers in Texas just turned science into impact, with a tiny device that clears microplastics from wat...
10/13/2025

A team of high schoolers in Texas just turned science into impact, with a tiny device that clears microplastics from water using nothing but sound waves. Their invention recently won them a $50,000 prize, and for good reason: it tackles one of our planet’s hidden threats with elegance.

The device works by emitting specific acoustic frequencies that trap and push microplastic particles together, allowing them to be filtered more easily. In early testing, the teens showed it could remove a large share of microparticles from contaminated water samples, all with minimal power.

What started as a school science fair project turned serious fast. Teachers helped secure lab time and mentors from local universities, and before long they had refined their prototype. “We wanted to solve a problem we believe everyone will face,” one of the teens said. “Plastic pollution is invisible, but it’s everywhere.”

Now they’re presenting their device to environmental agencies, water utilities, and even companies exploring scalable versions for rivers, lakes, and wastewater systems. The $50,000 award covers new components, testing, and patenting.

This story is a powerful reminder that innovation can blossom anywhere, even among teens in Texas. With the right idea, passion, and perseverance, even small hands can make waves in the fight for cleaner water.

At the heart of growing global tensions, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has refused to wade into the Israel-football co...
10/13/2025

At the heart of growing global tensions, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has refused to wade into the Israel-football controversy, asserting that football is not equipped to settle geopolitical conflicts. He emphasized that while the world stages are shaken, football’s role should be one of unity, not division.

Infantino’s remarks came during a FIFA Council meeting in Zurich, where mounting pressure to suspend Israel from competitions has been building. Federal bodies, fans, and nations embroiled in the Gaza war have demanded a clear response. But Infantino stood firm. “FIFA cannot solve geopolitical problems,” he stated. “It can and must promote unity, educational, cultural, and humanitarian values.”

While he expressed empathy for suffering communities, Infantino argued that decisions over membership or suspension require broad consensus and cannot be made unilaterally. He also avoided placing Israel on the formal agenda during the session, signaling caution. In prior statements, he has met privately with Palestinian officials, praising their resilience but stopping short of endorsing punitive action.

Critics say FIFA’s inaction is complicit. They note past decisions, such as banning Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, as inconsistencies in how sport handles conflict. Many see Infantino’s silence as an attempt to dodge accountability while preserving football’s status quo.

Whether this stance shapes FIFA’s legacy is still uncertain. But in a world demanding moral clarity, Infantino’s choice not to take sides puts the governing body at a crossroads: can football stay neutral, or is that neutrality itself a choice?

In powerful and harrowing accounts, activists who participated in the Gaza flotilla say they were mistreated while detai...
10/13/2025

In powerful and harrowing accounts, activists who participated in the Gaza flotilla say they were mistreated while detained in Israeli prisons, and now fear for those still held. Some reported being stripped, deprived of medical care, humiliated, and psychologically pressured during their detention.

Among the returned was an American activist, David Adler, who described being zip­tied, blindfolded, and held without food or water for extended periods. “We were kidnapped, stripped, zip-tied … and sent to a prison camp,” he said, calling the experience a “five-day nightmare of serial and systematic violations.” Islamist and aid activists from Australia, South Africa, and Europe told similar stories of abuse, forced removal of hijabs, demeaning treatment, sleep deprivation, and threats involving dogs and weapons.

These allegations come amid a global outcry over Israel’s handling of the flotilla interception. The fleet of 42 vessels, carrying around 450 people, was intercepted by Israeli forces en route to Gaza under blockade. While many activists were deported, dozens remain in detention, raising fears about their treatment and basic rights.

Returned protesters are now pressing their governments and international institutions to demand accountability and transparency. Their stories have reignited scrutiny over detention practices, the rights of foreign detainees, and the conditions inside prisons where these activists are being held.

What is certain is that the world is watching closely, and those who have walked free carry the voices and fears of those still inside.

Address

New York, NY

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Global Report posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share