Reese Gomez

Reese Gomez Please Follow my Page❤️❤️❤️

10/03/2026

During the CNN California gubernatorial debate, a clash over immigration policy produced the evening's most contentious exchange between Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton.

Moderator Jake Tapper pressed Hilton on federal immigration enforcement, asking whether—if elected governor—he would direct California law enforcement to cooperate with Trump administration mass deportations beyond individuals convicted of dangerous crimes. California’s existing sanctuary law strictly limits local cooperation with federal authorities.

Hilton avoided answering whether he would reverse the policy, framing his position instead around general law enforcement and lowering political rhetoric.

Becerra seized on the noncommittal response, zeroing in on Hilton’s background as a naturalized British immigrant who moved to the United States in 2012:

> "Steve, you're running for governor of California, and you'll enforce Trump's laws at the federal level, but you won't enforce state laws at our level. California welcomed you into California, and you welcomed ICE mercenaries into our state in return. How do you square that?"

Becerra then added the remark that quickly went viral across national feeds:

> "You seem to welcome immigrants who look like you, but deport immigrants who look like me."

Hilton condemned the comment from the podium, calling it "disgraceful" and accusing Becerra of resorting to divisive identity politics rather than answering for the state's governance.

The confrontation highlighted the central dynamic of the race: Becerra repeatedly tying his Republican opponent directly to Donald Trump’s federal agenda, while Hilton attempts to pivot focus toward state-level issues such as housing, taxation, and crime.

10/03/2026

Merrick Garland spent two years hesitating, running out the clock and hoping quiet institutionalism would placate bad-faith actors. Jack Smith’s Senate testimony shattered that timid playbook.

Facing hours of bad-faith Republican grilling—and explicit prison threats from Donald Trump—Smith didn't flinch:

* The Evidentiary Burden: Smith testified under oath that career prosecutors secured proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump committed serious crimes to overturn the 2020 election.
* Refusing to Back Down: Facing demands for his own prosecution, Smith delivered a direct rebuke to executive intimidation: *"I will not be silenced"*.
* Exposing the Smears: Congressional attempts to trap him backfired into parody, from Eric Schmitt confusing women's college basketball with an NBA franchise to Darline Graham’s attacks collapsing against her late brother’s public record.

Trump’s allies fear Jack Smith because he followed the law without fear or favor. If the Justice Department is ever to be rebuilt into a credible instrument of constitutional accountability, it needs a leader who does the work and finishes the job.

10/03/2026

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith pushed back against Republican accusations of political bias during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, offering fresh insight into the evidentiary blueprint of his 2020 election interference investigation.

Addressing sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers over investigative scrutiny placed on Senator Lindsey Graham—including subpoenas issued for congressional phone records—Smith clarified that investigators never viewed the veteran lawmaker as a criminal target. Instead, prosecutors considered him an essential evidentiary source.

“He likely would have been a witness in our case,” Smith testified.

The distinction between a target of a criminal inquiry and a potential witness carries substantial legal weight. While critics framed the subpoenas as an overreach intended to harass sitting lawmakers, Smith argued that the steps were standard investigative procedure, driven entirely by the need to document key interactions surrounding the 2020 election certification. Throughout the hearing, Smith firmly defended the integrity of his team, maintaining that decisions were governed strictly by facts and evidence rather than partisan motives.

10/03/2026

In an interview with the UK’s *Radio Times*, rock icon Rod Stewart announced a formal end to his decades-long personal friendship with Donald Trump, citing U.S. arms shipments to Israel amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

When asked about the relationship, the 80-year-old musician was direct: “No, I can’t any more. As long as he’s selling arms to the Israelis — and he still is. How’s that war ever gonna stop?”

Stewart and Trump were longtime neighbors in Palm Beach, Florida, frequently attending social gatherings together before Trump's presidency. Reflecting on that history, Stewart noted that while he had once appreciated Trump’s personality, the former president became "somebody I didn’t know" after entering politics.

Stewart widened his critique beyond Washington, calling on the United Kingdom to immediately suspend weapons sales to Israel as well. He ignited intense controversy by directly comparing the war in Gaza to the Holocaust, accusing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of pursuing "annihilation."

While Stewart has previously offered sharp public criticisms of Trump—questioning his temperament in 2016 and criticizing his 2020 withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords—his latest comments mark a permanent personal breach driven by foreign policy and the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East.

10/02/2026

During a contentious Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Darline Graham (R-S.C.) confronted former Special Counsel Jack Smith over subpoenas for telecom records linked to her late brother, Senator Lindsey Graham, accusing investigators of running an abusive "fishing expedition" to bully Donald Trump’s congressional allies.

Smith defused the attack by invoking Lindsey Graham’s own findings on the record:

* Target vs. Witness: Smith rejected claims of political targeting, stating: *"I believe your brother was a patriotic public servant. He was not a target of our investigation, and in fact, he likely would have been a witness in our case"*.
* Third-Party Subpoenas: He clarified that standard non-disclosure orders are routinely served on carriers—not out of concern that a lawmaker would alter third-party archives, but to protect the integrity and timeline of grand jury evidence.
* The Fatal Pushback: Smith reminded the panel that Lindsey Graham investigated Trump’s 2020 election fraud claims firsthand, concluded they were baseless, and said so publicly from the floor of Congress.

By grounding his answer in the late senator's own words, Smith turned an emotional ambush into a reminder that Trump's strongest detractors on the 2020 election were often his closest conservative allies.

10/02/2026

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith delivered a defiant defense of his work before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, declaring he "will not be silenced" despite threats of prosecution and imprisonment from Donald Trump.

Addressing lawmakers under oath, Smith directly confronted the White House's pressure campaign while putting the legal findings of his election interference investigation into the official record:

* Confronting Threats: Smith stated plainly: *"I will not be silenced by the continued threats of prosecution from the President or others,"* warning that the justice system faces unprecedented danger when public servants are targeted with criminal investigations for doing their jobs.
* The Evidentiary Burden: Smith reaffirmed that his team developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt"—the highest legal standard—that Trump engaged in serious crimes to overturn the 2020 election and block the peaceful transfer of power.
* Equal Justice: Rebuffing accusations of partisan bias, Smith maintained that he would bring the identical indictment today under the same facts, regardless of whether the target was a Democrat or a Republican.

While committee Republicans pressed him over the collection of congressional phone records, Smith refused to retreat, asserting that backing down from sworn duty would permanently erode the rule of law.

In a 7–0 vote, the Tullahoma City School Board drew a definitive line in Tennessee’s culture wars, banning Pride flags a...
09/28/2026

In a 7–0 vote, the Tullahoma City School Board drew a definitive line in Tennessee’s culture wars, banning Pride flags and limiting classroom displays to the U.S. and state flags under the banner of civic neutrality. The move, formalized under Policy 4.400, followed weeks of community friction triggered by an online controversy involving a high school teacher's political posts and an in-classroom Pride flag. Supported by a petition spearheaded by former Alderman Daniel Berry, proponents argued that public schools must remain focused strictly on academics rather than identity politics, insisting that national and state banners already represent all students equally. Yet the decision highlights a deepening divide over the role of public classrooms:The Case for Universal Neutrality: Advocates maintain that opening classroom walls to personal social causes inevitably invites ideological conflict, and that district-wide neutrality protects instructional focus.The Reality of Student Margins: Opponents and local faith leaders countered that a Pride flag is not partisan advocacy, but a rare signal of personal safety and acceptance in an often hostile climate for LGBTQ+ youth. Where the state legislature failed to pass a statewide restriction, local school boards are stepping into the vacuum. Tullahoma’s decision cements a growing trend across rural and suburban districts: preemptively stripping classrooms of personal expression to enforce an absolute, state-sanctioned standard of neutrality.

09/28/2026

In an on-stage conversation with presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin at Salem State University, former President Barack Obama reiterated his longstanding view that global governance would measurably improve if women held executive power worldwide. Addressing a crowd of roughly 3,600 attendees, Obama reflected on an idea he often weighed during his presidency:"If you put women in charge of every government for like, two years, and saw how things were going, I have a strong belief that things—they wouldn’t be perfect, but they’d be better." The remark echoes themes Obama previously voiced during a 2019 leadership forum in Singapore, where he argued that having women lead nations would produce widespread improvements in living standards and policy outcomes, while lamenting the resistance of entrenched, older male leaders to step aside. Throughout the discussion, Obama tied the observation to his administration's domestic record—recalling his signing of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act as his first statutory enactment in 2009 and the creation of the White House Council on Women and Girls. Closing with a self-effacing nod to former First Lady Michelle Obama, he joked that the university should aim higher for its next keynote: "You should invite Michelle. She's better than I am."

09/28/2026

House Democrats are signaling an aggressive oversight blitz targeting President Donald Trump, his family, and their private business ventures if the party reclaims the House majority in November.

Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, outlined plans to scrutinize lucrative Pentagon contracts awarded to firms tied to Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner’s foreign-backed private equity deals, and Trump-branded cryptocurrency ventures.

While the Pentagon insists defense contracts adhere to strict, independent competition rules, the White House dismissed the planned probes as purely partisan obstruction. If Democrats secure the gavel, subpoena power will shift from a theoretical threat into direct, binding scrutiny over the first family's finances.

09/28/2026

The escalating standoff between the White House and the national press corps reached a critical operational flashpoint after ABC News, acting as the designated television pool crew, refused to enter presidential events until staff provided verified proof that CNN had actually been granted access to the complex. According to reporting from The Washington Post’s Jeremy Barr, ABC crew members halted their coverage duties on site, informing White House personnel that cameras would not roll without concrete visual verification that barred outlets were physically admitted. The confrontation unfolded just hours after CNN, MS NOW, and Politico were forced to submit emergency filings to U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, reporting that their journalists were still being turned away at security gates despite a federal court order granting an immediate 14-day temporary restraining order.While administration filings claimed credentials had been restored before mid-morning, working correspondents continued to face locked gates and Secret Service denials. By withholding pool video feeds—which provide the primary broadcast footage distributed to every network in the country—ABC escalated mere rhetoric into direct institutional leverage, demanding full administrative compliance before restoring standard coverage of the presidency.

Address

39114 Letitia Drive Ollietown, MO
New York, NY
43109

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Reese Gomez posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share