https://www.facebook.com/503319772859216/

Mia Belling, New York, NY (2026)

08/27/2026

This is exactly where a little consideration for the space you're delivering into matters.

There were already several boxes grouped neatly along one side of this small entryway. Then the groceries ended up spread across most of what was left. The door still opens, but there's barely any comfortable space to stand and actually gather everything.

I'm not expecting grocery bags to be stacked like bricks. Some things obviously need to stay upright or separated.

But when you're working with an entrance this small, shouldn't the goal be to keep the next delivery reasonably compact instead of using nearly every remaining open spot?

Delivery convenience matters. So does leaving the customer enough usable space to retrieve what was delivered.

08/27/2026

I have absolutely no problem with people taking care of their yards. But a gas-powered leaf blower shortly after sunrise? Come on.

Look at the street. The sun is barely up, there's still dew across the lawns and cars, porch lights are still on, and most of the neighboring houses are still closed up for the morning.

The yard isn't the issue. The timing is.

I understand the argument for doing outdoor work early. It's cooler, some people start their day before everyone else, and nobody wants to be running lawn equipment in the worst heat of the afternoon.

But living in a neighborhood means your schedule isn't the only thing that matters when the equipment you're using can be heard beyond your own yard.

Nobody needs to wait until noon. But there's a pretty big difference between getting an early start and firing up one of the noisiest yard tools when the day has barely begun.

For me, basic neighborhood courtesy means giving the morning a little more time first.

08/26/2026

Why make passing another vehicle tighter than it needs to be?

This sedan is already in the left lane with a full-size pickup directly beside it, yet it's riding noticeably closer to the dashed divider while there's a whole lot more pavement sitting unused between the car and the left shoulder line.

That's what gets me. Nobody is asking drivers to hug the shoulder, but if you're temporarily running side-by-side with another vehicle, use the room your lane gives you. Staying between the lines shouldn't automatically make every lane position equally considerate.

Yes, the sedan is completely inside its lane. The pickup is inside its lane too. Technically, everybody has their own space.

But that's exactly why this bothers me: there was visible room to make the pass less cramped without leaving the lane at all.

Being inside the lines is the minimum. Sharing the road well sometimes means using those lines intelligently.

08/26/2026

Two full lanes of pavement, plenty of room on both outside edges, and somehow these two vehicles still ended up practically squeezing the same divider.

The pickup is completely inside the center lane. The sedan is completely inside the right lane. I can see that. But look at where BOTH vehicles are sitting compared with all that unused pavement on their opposite sides.

That’s the part I have a problem with.

Being technically inside your lane shouldn’t be the entire standard for sharing the road. When another vehicle is running directly beside you, why crowd the exact side where that vehicle already is when your own lane visibly gives you room the other direction?

And yes, lane position naturally varies. Nobody should have to constantly reposition their vehicle every time somebody pulls alongside.

But there’s a difference between demanding perfect centering and expecting a little common courtesy when two vehicles are already traveling shoulder-to-shoulder.

The lines tell you where your lane ends. They shouldn’t have to tell you where consideration begins.

08/25/2026

Watching this construction merge today had me seriously questioning what people think “taking turns” means.

There was one obvious opening in the continuing lane, and two cars from the ending lane were sitting nose-to-tail right beside it. One car merging there makes perfect sense. The second one expecting to follow straight through the same opening? That's where I have a problem.

Zipper merging only works when both lanes cooperate. One gap shouldn't suddenly become a two-for-one deal because the cars in the ending lane are packed together. 🚗

Sure, congested merges get messy, and spacing isn't always perfectly synchronized. I can understand that.

But if we're not basically going one-for-one, what exactly makes a zipper merge fair—should the second car wait for the next opening, or should continuing-lane traffic simply make room whenever multiple cars arrive together?

08/25/2026

Riding down a wide boulevard today, this immediately caught my attention from the passenger seat.

These two cars were side-by-side, both completely inside their lanes, but both riding surprisingly close to the same dashed line. Meanwhile, there was plenty of unused pavement on the opposite side of each vehicle.

That kind of crowding drives me nuts. If there's easy room to give another vehicle a little more separation, I think basic road-sharing courtesy says use it. Nobody needs to own every inch of their lane just because they technically can.

Sure, both cars are within the markings, so neither one owes the other the outside half of the lane.

But when you're traveling directly beside someone, should drivers make reasonable room when it's available, or is staying inside your own lane all the courtesy anyone should expect?

08/25/2026

Walking back through the parking lot today, this parking choice immediately got under my skin.

The work van is technically inside the painted lines, but look how tightly that huge body and mirror are sitting beside the compact car. Meanwhile, there are several open spaces farther down the exact same row.

Being inside the lines doesn't automatically make something considerate. If you're driving something this wide and there's clearly more room nearby, why squeeze it right beside another vehicle? 🙄

Yes, a standard parking space is a standard parking space, and the van does fit. I don't expect larger vehicles to park in another zip code just to make everyone comfortable.

But when roomier options are sitting right there, does fitting between the lines settle it, or should drivers of wider vehicles make a little extra effort not to crowd the car beside them?

08/25/2026

I was grabbing a quick lunch today when this little sign beside the card reader caught my attention: card payments under $10 get an extra $1 processing fee, followed by “convenience has a cost.”

That honestly rubbed me the wrong way. On a $6 or $7 purchase, another dollar isn't exactly insignificant. Paying with a card in 2026 doesn't feel like some special luxury that customers should be penalized for using.

Yes, small restaurants have processing expenses, and at least this place puts the policy where customers can see it before paying. I can respect the transparency without liking the charge.

I'd rather see card-processing costs treated as part of doing business instead of hitting the smallest purchases with a flat fee.

Is a $1 fee on card purchases under $10 reasonable cost-sharing, or should accepting cards simply be part of the restaurant's operating costs?

08/25/2026

Charging $25 just to bring a birthday cake into a restaurant is exactly the kind of fee that makes eating out feel like every little thing comes with an extra charge now. 🎂💸

I understand the restaurant side. Outside cakes mean extra plates, utensils, table cleanup, and staff handling something the restaurant didn't sell. A reasonable service charge isn't automatically ridiculous.

But $25? That's where you lose me.

A family could already be buying appetizers, dinners, drinks, and leaving a tip, then gets another $25 added because they brought a cake for someone's birthday. At some point, hospitality starts feeling more like a list of surcharges.

The sign is clear, so nobody can say the policy is hidden. I’ll give them that.

Still, if I saw this before walking in with a birthday group, I’d seriously consider celebrating somewhere else.

08/24/2026

Maybe I’m old-fashioned, but this kind of thing immediately changes the feel of a restaurant for me.

You’ve got one employee in a full button-down uniform looking polished and professional, while another person serving a table is wearing a plain red T-shirt with an apron. Same dining room, completely different presentation. 😬

At a sit-down steakhouse, I expect the staff appearance to feel somewhat consistent. Nobody needs to wear a suit, but when customers are paying for a full-service meal, having some kind of recognizable dress standard doesn’t seem unreasonable.

Sure, the shirt someone wears doesn’t determine whether they can provide great service, and plenty of customers probably wouldn’t notice.

Still, restaurants put a lot of effort into creating a certain atmosphere. If employee appearance is part of that experience, where does “casual” end and “too casual” begin?

Mia Belling

08/27/2026

08/27/2026

08/26/2026

08/26/2026

08/25/2026

08/25/2026

08/25/2026

08/25/2026

08/25/2026

08/24/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request