Pawns of Life

08/11/2025

????

06/26/2025

No place for emotion

If you find yourself before a "C-o-u-r-t", maybe you are just strong willed about not being run over for something that has not brought Harm, Injury or Loss to your fellow wo/man and you make remarks that may be contrary to what the C-o-u-r-t wants to hear from you, they may well try to provoke you in some way to elicit a response. Emotion is an easy way for them to accomplish this because when you respond from a place of emotion, you lose your ability to maintain your "role" as Wo/Man and conduct the "Business" that "you" are there for. The Officer may try to claim some sort of "legal-fiction" protection but, a legal fiction can not Feel or Believe, it only consist of Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities so when you get them to Believe or Feel something at the traffic stop, they have shattered any protection they might now be claiming. Remember, this is a play and they have created a "role" for you. When "you" upset the apple cart, they don't like it They, with Post-Haste will move to recapture you back into their Jurisdiction. Please understand that the "words" that "move" C-o-u-r-t, come from the days and years before any legal dictionary or legal society. What you are being drug into is a "Theatre" where there is a "live" play being performed daily. So the words that can and will protect you do not come from this world of make-believe that you find yourself before. Want more evidence of this? Look up the "go to" dictionary for the United States Supreme C-o-u-r-t.
A sa young man, my father said to me, "son, if you can't outsmart em, outsimple em." In my quest to do just that, i discovered, that is exactly what they did to us some 230 years ago. The biggest problem i can find with this is that no one seems to believe that it's this easy, most people are just too smart for this. it took me a minute to get this to so i understand.

Good luck and

god bless

06/26/2025

So, Who is the "Judge" ?

We got it backwards in this Nation, ie Society. "They" have managed to buffalo the vast majority of us into believing that a single man or woman cloaked in power is the sole arbiter of our fate, the sole decider of right and wrong. Across the pond where we started from still tells it correctly, the black robed ones are Magistrates. The "Judges" are the members of a jury unless "you" wish to place that obligation upon a Magistrate which in some cases may be preferred. Once "you" "understand" how your local Court works and the language that "moves" a Court, your fear will go away. Once upon a time i worked with a band in a backstage position and my mentor in this phase of life said to me, "Everybody needs to know their place and more importantly, take it". i have applied that strategy across the board and it has certainly simplified things. It surly applies to the Court system as we know it. i urge every one of "you", try to find the time to go sit through some Circuit Court and if "you" are blessed with additional time to spend at Court, try some Federal Court, Wow, what a difference.
Just the ramblings of an old man trying to bring a little simplicity to your complicated world.

Good luck and
god bless

09/25/2024

Where do you get the right!

i often hear people say they have a Constitutional right to do something or a Civil right was violated in some way. They tell me that they stand in common law but, still cling to these Rights. If you truly stand in common law, you must realize that your "Rights" can't possibly come from a piece of paper. Paper Rights come from the "legal society" and at best only describe their recognition of the Rights granted to us by god. When you look up the definition of common law in let's say Blacks Law 4th, you will see that the common law is unwritten followed by how "they" choose to deal with it. Here is their definition...

Common law is a body of unwritten laws that is based on legal precedents established by courts. It is also known as case law.

It's the best they can do so why is it that we as a collective still use these "written Rights and laws" to constrict the limits that we use to conduct ourselves. As long as we limit ourselves to the Rights prescribed by this "legal society", we remain under their thumb. The Constitution is the last stand for many of us but, what if i could show you the flaws within it, what if it to were a limiting document that did no more than lead us to an end of their design leaving us under the control of our own creation.
What then?

Just a thought

god bless

03/09/2024

Words mean things

When i say that we are so sloppy with our language and that we don't know what words mean, i wish to present a situation that will demonstrate what i mean.
Let's say that CPS has taken your property (child or children) and in their inquiry, they ask your kids, does your brother/sister bother you? As kids often do, they say yea, they bother me all the time. Suddenly and seemingly from nowhere the word "mo**st" is introduced and because we are so smart, we automatically associate that word with "sexally-mo**st" and start defending that suggestion. If only we knew what that word really meant, we would see things much more clearly. Look for the word "bother" in this definition from Etymonline

mo**st (v.)
late 14c., mo**sten, "to cause trouble, grief, or vexation, disturb, harass," from Old French mo**ster "to torment, trouble, bother" (12c.) and directly from Latin mo**stare "to disturb, trouble, annoy," from mo**stus "troublesome, annoying, unmanageable," which is perhaps related to moles "mass" (see mole (n.3)) on notion of either "burden" or "barrier." Meaning "sexually assault" is attested by 1950. Related: Molested; mo**sting.

also from late 14c.
Entries linking to mo**st
mole (n.3)
"massive structure used as a breakwater," 1540s, from French môle "breakwater" (16c.), ultimately from Latin moles "mass, massive structure, barrier," perhaps from PIE root *mō- "to exert oneself" (source also of Greek molos "effort," molis "hardly, scarcely;" German mühen "to tire," müde "weary, tired;" Russian majat' "to fatigue, exhaust," maja "hard work").

mo**station (n.)
c. 1400, mo**stacioun, "action of annoying or vexing," from Old French mo**stacion "vexation, harassing," and directly from Medieval Latin mo**stationem (nominative mo**statio), noun of action from past participle stem of mo**stare (see mo**st). In Scottish law it meant "the harassing of a person in his possession or occupation of lands;" in English common law it came to mean "injury inflicted upon another."

They are not acting out of character when they say mo**st, we associated that word, not them. Just one example of how they control us with the language and how our collective ignorance serves to punish ourselves. This concept of outsimple em serves me very well, The Govern-ment is actually a corporation and "i" at least am not a member in good standing within that society (legal-society / Corporation) and if i am not a member of said society, how can i be held to the rules of said society, it's like the Boyscouts holding me because i violated some Boyscout Code. If you believe that youse are so smart that you can not only operate but, prevail in their world, you are sadly mistaken. Turn in the best legal papers the Judge has ever seen and guess what, they will just say that they do not see where you are a member of their legal society and they will not accept your paperwork, have a nice day. Now look up that word "nice" on Etymonline and youse will see how the insults and disregard for man continues.

Just a thought

god bless

03/04/2024

First one to say "no" loses

If youse are stopped by the Policy Enforcement Officers (Police) and you try all of this "i am man" b.s. As soon as you say "no" to them, you may well have your window smashed in and your body drug out the window. By saying "no", you have just brought controversy into the public where none existed before. Let's say that youse are appearing before some C-o-u-r-t to answer to some charge or summons and youse wish to "stand" as man, the black robed one may well tell youse that he/she wants the "Person" to appear and youse say "no", youse may well be on your way to a cell being held in contempt, youse can't just tell them "no".
Always a conditional yes, if he/she wants youse to appear "in person" then youse put in writing to the C-o-u-r-t that youse would be more than happy to make a special appearance just for them, which person would you like for me to appear as? (a prosecutor, a magistrate, a defendant or maybe a judge (jury member), which person shall it be?) A special appearance comes with the opportunity to present a bill for your time and trouble, they all get paid for being there, why shouldn't youse? The black robed one may respond with something like " I just want you to make a general appearance which youse must respond "in writing" that youse can only appear as man generally.The whole thing here is the conditional yes. When i was given 2 orders from the C-o-u-r-t, i returned them to the woman in the black robe with a simple notice that read,
i, Man, contract under the name P--- H------ (use your name) which is upper and lower case sensitive, and not a Title of Esquire (which was printed right after my all capital letter name) Please correct said ORDER and return for Prompt and Courteous ex*****on.

Haven't heard a word about those ORDERS in 2 years. It's all offer, counter offer and the offers "they" give youse all include "you" being "in" their Jurisdiction, like when they say
Do you have an Attorney, would you like the C-o-u-r-t to appoint you an Attorney or are you going to represent yourself?
The word should be written Re-Present as youse are "present" how does one Re-Present oneself, perhaps the C-o-u-r-t could demist rate. Once youse represent yourself, you have just brought your legal-person to life and that is what they have the power over. It's really quite simple but, dangerous at the same time. Never get upset or open your mouth at C-o-u-r-t, It's a C-o-u-r-t, a place where youse go to play games, to volley back and forth like "Hot Potato" and the first one to drop the potato (say no) loses.

They have thousands of ways to trick youse into their Jurisdiction so just keep it caveman simple and youse should fare well.

Just a thought.

god bless

03/02/2024

Who is in charge?

The Church has higher standing than the Govern-ment, in fact, the Govern-ment sees the Church as a separate Govern-ment in which it has no Jurisdiction right up until the Church (any Church) Incorporates. As soon as a Church Incorporates, it removes itself as a separate Govern-ment and places itself under the Jurisdiction of said Govern-ment. An Unincorporated Assembly holds its standing as that above any Govern-ment. When youse see a flag outside of a Church, the flag on top indicates who owns that Church and all Incorporated Churches "must" fly the United States of America flag atop their flagpole as the Govern-ment has Jurisdiction over that Church. This Incorporating of Churches started in the 60's during the Civil Rights movement as a way to keep as many under "their" control as possible. Look up when the Churches started becoming Incorporated. Want evidence of how the Govern-ment views the Church? Check out this definition of Church from Blacks Law Dictionary, a legal society dictionary.

CHURCH Definition & Legal Meaning
Definition & Citations:
In Its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate his doctrines and ordinances. A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of the same faith, and the observance of the same ritual and ceremonies. The term may denote either a society of persons who, professing Christianity, hold certain doctrines or observances which differentiate them from other like groups, and who use a common discipline, or the building in which such persons habitually assemble for public worship. Baker v. Fales, 16 Mass. 498; Tate v. Lawrence, 11 Heisk. (Tenn.) 531; In re Zinzow, 18 Misc. Rep. 053, 43 N. Y. Supp. 714; Neale v. St. Paul’s Church, 8 Gill (Md.) 116; Gaff v. Greer, 8S Ind. 122, 45 Am. Rep. 449; Josey v. Trust Co., 100 Ga. 608, 32 S. E. 628. The body of communicants gathered into church order, according to established usage in any town, parish, precinct, or religious society, established according to law, and actually connected and associated therewith for religious purposes, for the time being, is to be regarded as the church of such society, as to all questions of property depending upon that relation. Stebbins v. Jennings, 10 Pick. (Mass.) 193. A congregational church is a voluntary association of Christians united for discipline and worship, connected with, and forming a part of, some religious society, having a legal existence. Anderson v. Brock, 3 Me. 248. In English ecclesiastical law. An institution established by the law of the land in reference to religion. 3 Steph. Comm. 54. The word “church” is said to mean, in strictness, not the material fabric, but the cure of souls and the right of tithes. 1 Mod. 201.

They are playing us for fools, it's all a charade. That is why "they" were able to shut down the Churches during the Plandemic. They only have control over Commerce and the exclusion of Commerce extends down to titling and registering your property (car) and even your license to "drive". The Govern-ment can not license youse to do anything that would otherwise be unlawful. Think about that for a moment. When youse grasp this concept, think about all the ways this applies to other aspects of our lives. When youse understand that this society has conditioned us to accept what they say as the "law of the land", we lose.

Just a thought

god bless

02/06/2024

It's the little things that matter

We have become so sloppy with the language that we use, no wonder the C-o-u-r-t-s run right over us. We like to think that we are smart enough to know what someone is saying to us, we will autocorrect in our brain and assume that the one speaking to us means what we think they mean. The problem with this line of thinking is that words mean things and more often than not, it's the short words that describe position. i once heard a man at C-o-u-r-t doing his best to stand in "law" so the black robed one said "Wo Wo, sounds like we're all getting a little excited, can we find some common ground, can we all agree that we are at least in C-o-u-r-t today?" Sounded reasonable enough so this man agreed. Well, this is the black robed ones C-o-u-r-t and this man just agreed that he was "in" C-o-u-r-t today so that little 2 letter word "in" just put him "in" the Jurisdiction of said C-o-u-r-t because what you are in controls you. Are we meeting "at" the rock or "in" the rock. Coffee in a cup, the cup has Jurisdiction over the coffee. Concede to being "at" the C-o-u-r-t or "near" the C-o-u-r-t or certainly "before" the C-o-u-r-t, "you" have just maintained separation from your world and theirs. Their world uses words that sound like words "you" believe "you"know, they are not, this is a foreign language that is dangerously similar to the language we use. i once heard a black robed one say to a man several times, "I just want you to be nice, what this man was saying didn't seem angry or hostile, i was somewhat puzzled until i learned that the C-o-u-r-t-s define their words from no later than 1828, the last dictionary published before the creation of this "legal society" that we know today. When "you" define the word "nice" from it's origins, Etymonline defines it as this:
nice (adj.)
Origin and meaning of nice
late 13c., "foolish, ignorant, frivolous, senseless," from Old French nice (12c.) "careless, clumsy; weak; poor, needy; simple, stupid, silly, foolish," from Latin nescius "ignorant, unaware," literally "not-knowing," from ne- "not" (from PIE root *ne- "not") + stem of scire "to know" (see science). "The sense development has been extraordinary, even for an adj." [Weekley] — from "timid, faint-hearted" (pre-1300); to "fussy, fastidious" (late 14c.); to "dainty, delicate" (c. 1400); to "precise, careful" (1500s, preserved in such terms as a nice distinction and nice and early); to "agreeable, delightful" (1769); to "kind, thoughtful" (1830).

This is how they think of us, they speak to us in this manner believing that we are too ignorant to know any better and most of the time, they are right. If "you" manage to escape being imposed upon, as "you" are walking out of the room and the black robed one say, "Hey you, turn around here" and you do, you have just put yourself in his/her Jurisdiction and all of your efforts to this point are now worthless. The word "you" is plural so when you respond to this word at C-o-u-r-t, "you have just brought your "legal-person" to life and that is who they have Jurisdiction over. Now one is "in" C-o-u-r-t begging for mercy.
There are many pitfalls along the way so the best way i have found to get through C-o-u-r-t unscaved is to learn the words that i must use (in writing) and use no others. Only say what has already been written and presented to the C-o-u-r-t. If they try to ask questions that stray from what has been written and presented, one might just say, "i believe that the C-o-u-r-t has been properly noticed" and say no more, If they persist, just repeat your claim or requirement. You can not imagine the benefit of sitting through a few C-o-u-r-t sessions when you do not have business with the C-o-u-r-t. Your mind is free from preoccupation with some matter involving yourself. Now you can just listen to the words being spoken and soon enough, you will hear a pattern, certain words that are being used with regularity. Not being "in" this play and only being a spectator gives one a whole new perspective to what is really happening. Combine that with true definitions of the words, it becomes far easier to separate your world from theirs. They are acting in a play and just want this "legal-person" they have created from us, the "Wo/Man" to act "in" this role they have also created for us but, if we act "in" this role, we are only left holding the bag, picking up the tab for all involved. We can't fix it for the rest of the world but, we can keep it from happening to us.
Tighten up with your language, define some words, checkout some websites like:

https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/

Good luck and

god bless

Let [wo]man seek Redress

01/27/2024

No place for emotion

If you find yourself before a "C-o-u-r-t", maybe you are just strong willed about not being run over for something that has not brought Harm, Injury or Loss to your fellow wo/man and you make remarks that may be contrary to what the C-o-u-r-t wants to hear from you, they may well try to provoke you in some way to elicit a response. Emotion is an easy way for them to accomplish this because when you respond from a place of emotion, you lose your ability to maintain your "role" as Wo/Man and conduct the "Business" that "you" are there for. The Officer may try to claim some sort of "legal-fiction" protection but, a legal fiction can not Feel or Believe, it only consist of Duties, Obligations and Responsibilities so when you get them to Believe or Feel something at the traffic stop, they have shattered any protection they might now be claiming. Remember, this is a play and they have created a "role" for you. When "you" upset the apple cart, they don't like it They, with Post-Haste will move to recapture you back into their Jurisdiction. Please understand that the "words" that "move" C-o-u-r-t, come from the days and years before any legal dictionary or legal society. What you are being drug into is a "Theatre" where there is a "live" play being performed daily. So the words that can and will protect you do not come from this world of make-believe that you find yourself before.Want more evidence of this? Look up the "go to" dictionary for the United States Supreme C-o-u-r-t.
A sa young man, my father said to me, "son, if you can't outsmart em, outsimple em." In my quest to do just that, i discovered, that is exactly what they did to us some 230 years ago. The biggest problem i can find with this is that no one seems to believe that it's this easy, most people are just too smart for this. it took me a minute to get this to so i understand.

Good luck and
god bless

01/11/2024

And "Just-Us" for all
A Tale of two C-o-u-r-t-s

How many of us have found ourselves appearing before some C-o-u-r-t over a matter of insignificance offering what we believe is our "just" standing, only to find that the "C-o-u-r-t" has depth ears and seems not to favor right vs wrong. They seem to be operating under rules we have never heard of nor can make heads or tales of.
The truth is that they are operating under different rules or some Administrative Code. You believe that Right vs Wrong or Law should appear in some way in this Matter involving "you".
When it doesn't manifest we find ourselves in awe and wondering why this Wo/Man in the Black Robe is doing this. Their job is only to ensure that the "Rules of C-o-u-r-t" are followed and that is exactly what they are doing. Most C-o-u-r-t-s the majority of us ever find ourselves appearing before are not C-o-u-r-t-s of Law but instead are Administrative Code C-o-u-r-t-s. This all happens because of an oversight on our part, we are simply on the "Wrong side of the C-o-u-r-t" When you notice the C-o-u-r-t of this error and require that the Matter involving "you" be moved to a C-o-u-r-t of law, you have just effectively stopped any miscarriage of "Just-Us" that was about to be bestowed upon you. Why would they "Act" this way,Well, they are only doing what "we" (collectively) have allowed them to do and if we aren't careful, we will lose it all. You may not be able to save the world but, we can save ourselves and as many as will consider our words. The C-o-u-r-t is merely the "Enforcement" arm of this Govern,ment. and they believe that these things they offer and the way they operate is such a wonderful thing that surely you would want this. It is called "Implied Consent" and it is incumbent upon you to notice the C-o-u-r-t of your requirement of a C-o-u-r-t of law. Law is always there but, It is you that must bring it to life, lord knows they won't. They put great effort into keeping you from law and will test you before allowing Law to rear its ugly head. In law, If there is no "Plaintiff", there is no case, a pesky little detail that they don't want to be bothered with, unless you allow yourself to be "Judged" within an Administrative Venue. It really isn't that hard, you just gotta outsimple em. that means going to the root of things, i have discovered that every problem i encounter can be easily resolved by reducing it to its core 2 or 3 elements. The C-o-u-r-t-s are no different, just go back to the beginning of it all, The words that "move" the C-o-u-r-t came before any of this "legal-Society" that we know today.

Just more ramblings of a sanicle old man.

god bless

12/30/2023

Seeking whom they may devour

The vast majority of wo/man that i witness appearing before a number of C-o-u-r-t-s that i have appeared at (without having business with) seem to be of a mind that they have already been chosen for a meal, just coming to find out how they will be cooked and served with what. All this talk about the "Rule of Law", "Due Process" and the sort doesn't happen until "you" appear at a Circuit C-o-u-r-t or higher. Traffic, Misdemeanor and Family C-o-u-r-t are not C-o-u-r-t-s of Law and do not move under "Due Process", Right vs Wrong knows no place in these venues. The wo/man that "you" envision in these black robes that for some unexplained reason you believe hold some sort of "Judgement" over you as a wo/man never ceases to amaze me. They have held this position over the vast majority of us for so long that they have become lazy to some extent. These "Persons" are "word nerds" and have studied the true definitions and manipulation of these words their entire careers. As soon as we realize that the "words" that will protect us are simple, short words that were used before any "Legal Dictionary" was ever published. 5 of the strongest word one might utter (and in writing) before any C-o-u-r-t are
"Who say i do wrong?). That puts the C-o-u-r-t on notice that the Plaintiff must appear without having to actually say or write it. It also puts you on the proper side of the C-o-u-r-t which is the :Law" side and not the Administrative side from which you entered. "You" just established common law and this is now "your" C-o-u-r-t, what will you do with it? You are now one of the few that cannot be devoured unless you get sloppy and drop the ball. If you do, it's not the end of the world, you can get it back but, if you learn what words to use and just as importantly what words to avoid, like "you" , it will make your life so much easier. When the woman in a black robe threatened to have me removed through the "side door" ( the one that leads to the holding cells, i said to her "do as you wish", i knew it was an empty threat and after i uttered that, she knew that i knew at that point and the day was done. No need to get upset or angry, certainly no reason to raise your voice, in fact, the calmer you become, the more nervous they get. They prey upon our ignorance and as soon as they have "you" within their jurisdiction they will "do as they wish" and as long as "you" are ignorant, "you" will have no say in what happens, right or wrong.

Good luck and

god bless

12/12/2023

Please join forces with us. Someone needs your help.