Jennings County's Granny Punkbuster

Jennings County's Granny Punkbuster Well, bless your heart! If you like sharp talk, small-town tales and a little mischief, you’re in the right place. Stay awhile and listen, sugar!

From the sheriff’s antics to Twitchy McTweak’s pancake debates, there’s always a story. This page shuts down blatant propaganda of any kind, distraction tactics and grown adults acting like playground bullies with Wi-Fi, especially officials and their tagalongs playing word games to mislead the public. Let's have at least one place where meaningful conversation, debate and nuance has a place to su

rvive. National politics isn't welcome here. It's literally on everything, take that whining to any of them if you need to vent. Do it here, it will be deleted, even if I agree with your statement. Definitely do not tell Granny she doesn't care at the end of your pointless ranting to earn a ban, Mike Bough! Act like an adult. Pretend decorum matters. Stick to facts, skip the fallacies and leave the grade school antics at the door. If a professional peer would cringe at your behavior, don’t bring it here. This Page Blocks Bullsh*t. No Refunds. No Apologies. Again, just in case.. If you’re just here to derail, deflect or dump nonsense, take it elsewhere. Warning: Satire and parody heavy. If it makes you mad, you should probably step back and re-evaluate yourself and clean the mirror. Content on this page is for entertainment purposes only unless directly stated otherwise. No authorized use or modification of our content will ever be given. Doing so will make you liable for any legal repercussions.

Madison Runs Public Meetings. North Vernon Runs a Paid Hide-and-Seek Program.Bless their overcompensated little hearts, ...
05/29/2026

Madison Runs Public Meetings. North Vernon Runs a Paid Hide-and-Seek Program.

Bless their overcompensated little hearts, because Granny went and compared Madison’s public meeting records to North Vernon’s, and the difference is so wide you could drive a city-funded truck through it, park it beside a vague agenda item, and still have room left over for excuses.

Madison appears to understand that public meetings are supposed to be public before the vote happens, not after the bobble-heads have already nodded, motioned, seconded, and wandered back to their little tykes chairs. Madison posts agendas with materials. Actual materials. Documents. Ordinances. Resolutions. Supporting paperwork. The kind of information citizens need to understand what is being discussed, what money may be spent, what law may be changed, and what their elected officials are about to do in their name.

That is what relatively functional government looks like when it remembers the public is not an inconvenience.

Then there is North Vernon.

North Vernon too often treats an agenda like a fortune cookie. You crack it open and get one tiny sentence that could mean anything. “Surveillance cameras for code enforcement.” “Quotes for police cars.” “Stage rental request.” “Claims to be determined.” Good grief. That is not an agenda. That is a teaser trailer for people who already know the plot.

Madison hands the public a packet. North Vernon hands the public a shrug.

Madison’s system says, “Here is the agenda, here are the materials, here is what we are considering.” North Vernon’s system says, “Come to the meeting, listen carefully, hope the audio works, guess what the attachments would have said if anyone had bothered to post them online or even provide them to residents that show up, and maybe someday the minutes will appear.”

That is not transparency. That is municipal peekaboo.

And let us quit pretending this is some poor little volunteer club trying to run a city government from a folding table with one Bic pen and a prayer. North Vernon has paid officials. Paid department heads. Paid staff. Titles. Offices. Nameplates. Salaries. Public money flowing every payday like taxpayers are watering a garden and somehow still getting weeds.

According to the 2025 Certified Report of Public Employment and Compensation for North Vernon Civil City, the city reported 164 public employment compensation records. The same report lists Mayor Raymond “Missing-Minutes” Gerkin at $85,507.08 in 2025. It lists Clerk-Treasurer Charles “Minutes-R-Hard” Weber at $76,000.08, Police Chief Keith E. Messer Jr. at $80,687.20, Sewer Superintendent Russell L. Vaught at $87,759.10, and Water Superintendent William M. Spencer at $87,484.72. These are not couch-cushion salaries. These are grown-up public-payroll numbers attached to a city that still struggles to make its public meeting records look like grown-up public records.

The report also lists the mayor’s administrative assistant, Tara N. Thormin, at $47,174.15. So the public is not just paying for the mayor. The public is paying for administrative support under the mayor’s office too. That makes thin agendas, missing supporting documents, delayed minutes, sloppy archives, and the “come into the office” routine look even worse. When there is paid leadership and paid assistance, the excuse bucket starts running dry.

If the mayor is collecting $85,507.08, and the mayor’s office has an administrative assistant listed at $47,174.15, Granny has one simple question: why does the public-facing paperwork still look like somebody tried to govern with a sticky note written by Twitchy McTweek, a caffeine crash, and a shrug?

Now compare that mayoral paycheck to people tied to work where things actually break, flood, burn, back up, leak, clog, crash, get called in, or need fixed before citizens start hollering for good reason.

The police chief is listed at $80,687.20, which is $4,819.88 less than the mayor. The fire chief is listed at $63,660.30, which is $21,846.78 less than the mayor. The street commissioner is listed at $68,796.00, which is $16,711.08 less than the mayor. The assistant street commissioner is listed at $59,318.11, which is $26,188.97 less than the mayor. The parks director is listed at $53,077.10, which is $32,429.98 less than the mayor. The police administrative assistant is listed at $57,544.64, which is $27,962.44 less than the mayor.

And the mayor’s own administrative assistant is listed at $47,174.15, which is $38,332.93 less than the mayor, while from the outside it sure looks like she handles a whole lot of the heavy-lifting office grind.

So the person likely buried in the monotonous daily grind of office work, calendar work, phone work, email work, paperwork, packet work, and public-contact work makes barely over half of what the mayor does, while the mayor gets the title, the ceremony, the microphone, the photo ops, and apparently a city website that still needs citizens to squint through agenda crumbs like they are reading tea leaves at a budget séance.

Nobody is saying the assistant is the problem. From the outside looking in, assistants, clerks, and office staff may be the only reason the municipal wagon still has wheels. They are often the ones answering phones, typing minutes, chasing paperwork, managing calendars, cleaning up messes, and doing the dull grind that keeps government from collapsing into a ceremonial pile of nameplates.

The problem is leadership that gets the title, the paycheck, the photo ops, and the authority while the public still gets skinny agendas and records that look half-fed.

And let us talk about those utility salaries too, because they are not small. The sewer superintendent is listed at $87,759.10. The water superintendent is listed at $87,484.72. Both are listed higher than the mayor. Granny is not saying water and sewer work is unimportant. Quite the opposite. Water and sewer are real public services. If those systems fail, nobody cares how polished the mayor’s speech was, because they are busy wondering why the toilet sounds haunted and the faucet is auditioning for a lawsuit.

But that is exactly why the pay deserves a harder look.

North Vernon’s water superintendent is listed at $87,484.72. Madison’s 2025 Water Supervisor is listed at $73,080. That means North Vernon pays its water superintendent about $14,405 more than Madison pays its water supervisor.

North Vernon’s sewer superintendent is listed at $87,759.10. Madison’s 2025 Sewer Supervisor is listed at $72,607. That means North Vernon pays its sewer superintendent about $15,152 more than Madison pays its sewer supervisor.

So Madison is producing stronger public-facing meeting records while North Vernon is paying its water and sewer chiefs roughly twenty percent more than Madison’s comparable water and sewer supervisors.

Bless that math. It came wearing steel-toed boots.

And it is not just Madison. North Vernon’s water superintendent pay sits near the higher end of Indiana water-supervisor examples. It is below places like Carmel, Pendleton, Columbia City, Santa Claus, and Edinburgh in one comparison set, but still well above Madison. In another water-superintendent comparison, North Vernon sits right below places like Galveston and Auburn and above Bremen and Delphi. That is not a humble little small-town stipend. That is North Vernon trying to sit at the grown-up utility table while still handing the public a children’s menu of agenda details.

The sewer side is just as spicy. Madison’s sewer supervisor is listed at $72,607. Greensburg’s sewer superintendent is listed at $77,969. Cannelton’s sewer superintendent is listed at $75,000. French Lick’s sewer superintendent is listed at $61,530. North Vernon’s sewer superintendent sits at $87,759.10, only about $2,404 below Speedway’s $90,163 figure from the same comparison.

So North Vernon is not paying bargain-bin utility wages. It is paying serious money. Near-upper-end money. “You better know what you are doing and document it cleanly” money.

That means the public has every right to expect serious results: clean records, clear documentation, competent management, straight answers, and public paperwork that does not look like it was assembled by a sleep-deprived raccoon with a PDF scanner.

And if there are public concerns about family connections, hiring habits, or who got placed where, that makes transparency more important, not less. You do not answer “cousin-hiring” whispers with vague records and disappearing details. You answer them with receipts, policies, posted documents, clean minutes, and a public process that does not look like it was built to keep questions wandering in circles.

Because high pay does not automatically prove high competence. Sometimes it only proves taxpayers are buying expensive hats for heads that still cannot figure out how to post a full agenda packet.

Upload the packet. Attach the quote. Post the claim amounts. Spell the words correctly. Keep the archive clean. Put the supporting documents where the public can see them. These are not advanced acts of statesmanship. This is not diplomacy at the United Nations. This is not negotiating peace between two angry kingdoms. This is paperwork.

Boring, plain, necessary paperwork.

And somehow, North Vernon makes basic paperwork look like climbing Everest in flip-flops.

Public records are the boring machinery of government. Nobody expects a parade because someone uploaded a PDF correctly. But that is the job. Public administration means doing the boring things correctly, repeatedly, and on time. If they cannot handle the boring part, why are they being paid like they possess the governing skill to handle the big part?

Because from the outside, it sure looks like a whole lot of North Vernon leadership has mastered the fine art of sitting in official chairs while the monotonous work gets pushed downhill to assistants, clerks, and staff. The assistants likely do the typing. The assistants likely chase the paperwork. The assistants likely answer the phones, manage the calendars, prepare the packets, clean up the messes, and keep the wheels from flying off while the folks with the titles float around collecting credit like loose candy from a parade route.

And still the public gets skinny agendas, late minutes, vague descriptions, missing context, and archives with enough typos to make a spellcheck program file abuse charges.

That is not an unavoidable workload crisis. That is leadership laziness showing its house slippers.

A competent leader does not just show up after someone else did the grind and call that governance. A competent leader makes sure the public record is complete. A competent leader checks whether the agenda gives residents enough information. A competent leader asks whether documents are attached. A competent leader makes sure minutes are posted timely. A competent leader treats the public’s right to know like an obligation, not a nuisance buzzing around the conference table.

Because “we are a small city” is not an excuse when other small cities manage to post better records. “We are busy” is not an excuse when everybody else is busy too. “Come into the office” is not transparency when the same documents could be online. “To be determined” is not public finance. “Other business” is not meaningful notice. A livestream that disappears after 90 days is not a serious archive, especially when the mayor’s self-promotional radio talks disguised as public business seem to stay online forever while actual meeting records vanish into the municipal fog. And a government page riddled with sloppy spelling, missing materials, and thin records is not a professional standard. It is a digital junk drawer with taxes behind it.

Madison is not performing witchcraft. Madison is doing basic public documentation. Agenda plus materials. Meeting information plus support. Records that help citizens follow along before decisions are made.

North Vernon could do that too. It just does not want to. Add in all the red-flags over the years.....

That is where the incompetence starts looking less accidental and more cultural, possibly intentional design. When vague records keep happening, that is not one bad day. When supporting documents are not routinely attached, that is not one oversight. When old records require physical access instead of easy online posting, that is not modernization. When agendas hide the actual substance behind two-word labels, that is not efficiency Charlie! That is a government trained to do the minimum and then act offended when the public notices.

They are not underpaid volunteers. They are overcompensated public servants.

So serve.

If Madison can post agenda materials, North Vernon can post agenda materials. If Madison can attach ordinances and documents, North Vernon can attach ordinances and documents. If Madison can give the public a useful meeting record, North Vernon can stop acting like uploading a PDF requires a moon landing, three consultants, and a ceremonial blessing from the copier.

The public should not have to beg for basic information. The public should not have to decode agenda crumbs. The public should not have to sit through meetings just to learn what should have been in the packet they hide from the public. The public should not have to ask why a city with paid leadership is producing records that look like a procrastinated group project.

If a regular worker turned in this level of thin, late, sloppy, under-detailed work over and over, management would not call it “challenging but manageable.” They would call it a performance problem.

So why does government get to call it business as usual?

North Vernon officials are compensated like adults entrusted with public business, but too often the recordkeeping looks like nobody wants to do the dull part unless someone shines a porch light directly into the office window. Even that only got a couple of the more expensive claims listed while the rest are apparently to hard to add minutes and upload. That is not leadership. That is laziness wearing a lanyard.

The fix is not hard.

Post the full agenda packet. Attach the quotes. Attach the ordinances. Attach the resolutions. Attach the claims. Attach the policies. Post the minutes quickly. Keep the livestreams longer. Clean up the archive. Stop making residents come downtown for records that should already be online. Stop treating public information like office furniture. Stop acting like transparency is extra credit.

Because Madison is making North Vernon look bad without even trying.

Madison is just doing the normal work. North Vernon is the one making normal work look like a heroic burden.

That is the whole rotten pickle in the jar.

North Vernon does not need more excuses. It needs standards. It needs discipline. It needs leaders who understand that public service includes the unglamorous grind, not just the meetings, photos, titles, and checks.

If they want professional pay, they need professional output. If they want public trust, they need public records worth trusting. If they want residents to stop calling the work pathetic, then stop producing work that looks pathetic.

Until then, Granny is going to keep saying the quiet part loud enough to rattle the blinds: Madison is running a public-meeting system, and North Vernon is running a taxpayer-funded document scavenger hunt staffed by people who seem allergic to the boring work they are paid to oversee.

Bless their overpaid, underperforming, PDF-fearing hearts. How they can pretend to be so good at their job while complete failing in every aspect is beyond Granny. I guess what all the extra mental health perks they get is for, it has to take alot to keep their mental gymnastics supporting the overblown egos.

The Tale of Granny Punkbuster, the Villain Who Kept Begging Them to Defeat HerGather round, porch lovers, because today ...
05/29/2026

The Tale of Granny Punkbuster, the Villain Who Kept Begging Them to Defeat Her

Gather round, porch lovers, because today we must speak of the great villain known as Granny Punkbuster. Hide your invoices. Lock up your vague agendas. Cover the livestream button with both hands. Somewhere, in a town hall with carpet older than some ordinances, a clerk just felt a chill run down their stapler.

They say Granny is the bad guy. The troublemaker. The thorn in the soft municipal backside. The old porch goblin rattling her cane at power, paperwork, and public nonsense. They whisper it in offices where public records go to be “looked into.” They grumble it behind polished desks where accountability is treated like a contagious rash. They say she is mean, divisive, negative, dramatic, obsessed, and possibly powered by black coffee, spite, and suspiciously accurate screenshots.

But here is the part that makes the whole accusation wobble around like a folding chair at a county fair: everything Granny does is advocating for her own extinction.

Not from lawsuits, bless their poorly skilled hearts. If a lawsuit was going to take Granny down, it would first need facts, standing, damages, and somebody with better aim than “she made me look goofy by repeating what I actually did.” That is not extinction. That is just a taxpayer-funded tantrum wearing dress shoes.

No, Granny’s real extinction does not come from courtrooms. It comes from competence.

Granny dies when the agendas start saying what they actually mean.

Granny fades when meeting packets are posted before the meeting instead of hidden like state secrets under a casserole lid.

Granny disappears when minutes are uploaded without citizens having to perform a scavenger hunt through city hall, paperwork, observation, and somebody’s government-flavored attitude.

Granny vanishes when livestreams have working audio, records are easy to find, public business is explained in public, claims are itemized, contracts are attached, votes are clear, and officials stop acting shocked that the public wants to know what the public’s own government is doing with the public’s own money.

That is the wild comedy of it all. The alleged villain keeps handing them the weapon that would defeat her.

Fix your broken nonsense, and Granny loses half her material by breakfast.

Post the records, and the porch gets quieter.
Explain the spending, and the speculation dries up.
Stop hiding behind foggy language, and the foghorn stops blowing.

Run clean meetings, keep clean records, answer fair questions, and suddenly the mighty menace of Granny Punkbuster shrinks down to an old lady posting recipes, weather complaints, and occasional warnings about people who put raisins where chocolate chips belong.

Across the world, this same tale plays out in different costumes. In one town, it is a mayor who thinks transparency means smiling near a ribbon-cutting. In another, it is a council that believes “claims to be determined” counts as public information. In another, it is a school board hiding behind policy language so thick it could be poured into potholes. In another, it is a department head who treats every question like an attempted burglary.

From Indiana to Istanbul, from small-town America to marble halls overseas, governments have always had one ancient enemy: somebody asking, “Where is the receipt?”

Not a sword. Not a cannon. Not a revolution. Just the receipt.

That is what terrifies the fragile kingdoms of nonsense. Not violence. Not chaos. Not mobs with pitchforks. Just ordinary people reading documents, comparing dates, saving screenshots, asking why the numbers do not match, and refusing to clap just because someone official entered the room.

Granny is not powerful because she is mean. She is powerful because broken systems depend on people getting tired. They depend on citizens being too busy, too confused, too intimidated, or too polite to keep asking. Granny’s great sin is that she does not get bored on command. She notices the missing minutes. She notices the vague agenda. She notices the camera item with no explanation. She notices the “hefty price tag” with no itemized public road map. She notices when the story changes shape like a wet paper hat in the rain.

And then she does the one thing local power hates more than criticism.

She remembers.

That is why they call her the bad guy. Not because she is actually wrong, but because she interrupts the sweet little lullaby of “just trust us.” She kicks the rocking chair right through the nap room. She turns on the porch light and suddenly all the roaches with titles start pretending they were just passing through.

But here is the truth, carved in granite, stapled to the agenda, and highlighted in Granny’s emergency shade of red: if Granny is the villain, then the cure is simple.

Be better.

That is it. No exorcism needed. No lawsuit. No public relations fog machine. No whispered campaign about how mean the porch lady is. Just do the job in a way that does not require citizens to become amateur auditors, record clerks, budget detectives, livestream technicians, legal translators, and unpaid historians just to understand what happened last Tuesday.

Imagine the horror.

A city posts complete agendas with attachments.
A county explains contracts before voting.
A board uploads minutes on time.

A department answers questions without acting like the citizen asked for nuclear codes.

A meeting livestream works from start to finish.
Claims show who got paid, how much, and why.

Public officials stop confusing criticism with persecution.

Somewhere, Granny’s rocking chair creaks softer. Her coffee cools. Her archive folder gathers dust. The porch light dims. The empire of screenshots begins to crumble. The old watchdog looks out at a functioning government and says, “Well hell, what am I supposed to complain about now?”

That is the ending they could write anytime they want.

They could make Granny obsolete.
They could bury her under professionalism.
They could drown her in transparency.
They could smother her with competence.
They could defeat her with a working microphone and a PDF upload.

But instead, too many of them keep choosing the dumbest possible path. They hide, dodge, mumble, delay, omit, forget, spin, and then act personally wounded when the porch starts laughing. They build Granny’s throne out of their own bad habits, then complain that she is sitting on it.

That is not villainy. That is supply and demand.

If the town keeps producing nonsense, Granny will keep bottling it, labeling it, and passing it around the porch like homemade jam with a warning label.

So how can Granny be the bad guy when her whole crusade is a su***de mission against her own relevance? How can she be the monster when every demand she makes is just another way of saying, “Please become competent enough that I am no longer necessary”?

The truth is, Granny is not trying to rule the town.

She is trying to retire.

She is trying to hang up the broomstick, close the screenshot vault, and spend her remaining porch years judging tomato plants and suspicious haircuts in peace.

But until the broken nonsense gets fixed, until public business is treated like public business, until records stop playing hide-and-seek in government basements, until “trust us” is replaced with “here is the document,” Granny remains.

Not because she wants to be the villain.

Because somebody has to keep asking why the heroes keep acting so damn guilty.

If North Vernon Already Has 120 to 130 Cameras, Why Does Code Enforcement Need More?North Vernon residents should be ask...
05/26/2026

If North Vernon Already Has 120 to 130 Cameras, Why Does Code Enforcement Need More?

North Vernon residents should be asking one very simple question before code enforcement gets surveillance cameras: what exactly is not already being watched?

This is not a town with two cameras, one at City Hall and one pointed at a suspicious raccoon behind the park restroom. In a June 10, 2024 interview, Mayor Shawn Gerkin described North Vernon’s city surveillance system as a “pretty substantial” project that began in the middle of the previous year. He said the system was pushed by himself and then-Councilman Trent Wisner, and that it had three main purposes: protecting city assets, improving citizen safety, and providing entertainment livestreams for downtown events. He also estimated the city had around 120 to 130 cameras and called it a “pretty extensive project” with a “hefty price tag.”

So now, when “surveillance cameras for code enforcement” appears as an agenda item, the public deserves more than a vague line and a polite nod from the government table.

If the city already has over 100 cameras, why does code enforcement need its own? What is the specific gap? What problem exists that the current camera system cannot cover? Are these new cameras for illegal dumping? Vandalism? Employee safety? City-owned property? Or are they going to be used to watch private property and build code cases against residents?

That distinction matters.

The mayor previously said the city’s existing cameras were meant to protect public assets like the quarry project, water supply, wastewater plant, water plant, parks, restrooms, Tripton Park, the Muscatatuck Trail, and downtown events. He also said nobody would be watching them all the time and that the city was not reading license plates. Those are important claims, because they frame the system as public-property protection and safety, not nonstop monitoring.

But code enforcement is different. Code enforcement does not just deal with public parks and city buildings. It deals with private property. Tall grass. Junk vehicles. Trash complaints. Unsafe structures. Nuisance claims. Yard conditions. Porches. Alleys. Driveways. Homes.

A camera watching a park trail is one thing. A camera being used by code enforcement is another.

That is why this agenda item should come with details before anyone approves it being on an agenda. Where would these cameras be placed? Would they be fixed or mobile? Would they point only at city property? Could they capture yards, porches, vehicles, homes, or people coming and going? Would the footage be used as evidence for code violations? Who would have access to it? How long would recordings be kept? Could the public request the footage? What policy prevents misuse?

Those are not conspiracy questions. Those are basic grown-up questions for a city that already has a large surveillance system.

And let’s be honest: in a town under 7,000 people, over 100 cameras is already a lot of municipal eyeballs. That does not automatically mean every camera is bad or unnecessary. Cameras can be useful for vandalism, illegal dumping, public safety, and documenting problems on city property. But once the city already has a “pretty extensive” camera network, any request for more cameras should have to clear a higher bar.

The public should not have to guess whether code enforcement is asking for a targeted tool or trying to grow its own little surveillance kingdom with a clipboard.

If there is a specific illegal dumping site, say so. If a city-owned property is being damaged, say so. If employees are facing safety risks, say so. Put the purpose, location, cost, footage policy, and limits in the meeting packet where residents can actually see them before the meeting.

Because “surveillance cameras” is not a harmless phrase when it is tied to code enforcement. That department has enforcement power over residents. It can issue notices, warnings, fines, and orders. Adding cameras without a clear public explanation changes the relationship between the city and the people who live there.

Government should not be able to say, “Don’t worry about it,” while asking for more tools to watch people.

The mayor’s 2024 interview already gave the city’s broader explanation for its existing camera system: city assets, citizen safety, and event livestreams. Fine. But that explanation does not automatically cover code enforcement. If code enforcement now wants cameras too, it needs its own explanation.

What is not already covered by those 120 to 130 cameras?

That is the question.

Until the city answers it clearly, this does not look like transparency. It looks like surveillance creep. And in a town this size, with an already extensive camera system, residents should not let another camera request slide through like it is just another office chair purchase.

Code enforcement should enforce codes. It should not become Small Town Surveillance: Budget Edition.

Granny rates this agenda a 3/10 porch lights for public usefulness, bless its civic little heart.It is better than the p...
05/26/2026

Granny rates this agenda a 3/10 porch lights for public usefulness, bless its civic little heart.

It is better than the previous one because it at least names actual agenda topics. That much is an improvement, like finding one clean spoon in a drawer full of mystery crumbs. But it still leaves out most of the details people would need to understand what is actually being discussed, what money may be spent, and what action may be taken.

The agenda does include the date, time, location, and YouTube link. It also says this is a joint meeting of the North Vernon Board of Public Works and City Council. It names the Board of Works members and City Council members, includes roll call, and lists approval of the minutes from April 23, 2026.

It also mentions quotes for police cars, surveillance cameras for code enforcement, and stage rental requests for St. Mary’s Church from September 9–12 and North Vernon Parks for July 4. It includes movement of a light pole at 724 Woodfield Court, other business, department head updates, payroll claims listed as “No claims,” regular claims listed as “$ to be determined,” and adjournment.

Now, what is left out is where this thing starts rattling like an old screen door in a March wind. There is no agenda packet. There are no attached minutes from April 23. There are no police car quote details, which means no vendor names, no number of vehicles, no prices, no funding source, and no indication whether this is supposed to be a vote.

There are no surveillance camera details either. The agenda does not say where the cameras would go, what they would cost, who the vendor is, what the purpose is, who would have access, how long footage would be kept, or what the privacy explanation is. For something involving surveillance, that is a mighty thin bowl of soup.

The stage rental requests are also missing the particulars. There is no cost, no fee waiver information, no explanation of labor involved, no transportation details, no insurance information, and no statement about who is responsible for damages. That leaves the public guessing, which is no way to run the henhouse.

The light pole item is just as skimpy. There is no reason given for moving the light pole at 724 Woodfield Court, no cost, no explanation of who requested it, who pays for it, or whether it involves private property or utility coordination. That is the sort of thing folks ought to know before anyone starts moving public infrastructure around like furniture before company comes.

The agenda also leaves out clear action language saying whether the council is voting, discussing, approving, or just hearing updates. There are no ordinance numbers, resolution numbers, staff memos, supporting documents, or attachments. There is also no public comment section listed.

Bottom line: this agenda tells the public what broad topics exist, but not enough to understand the decisions before the meeting. It is an agenda with a pulse, sure, but it is still missing most of its organs.

Address

1600 Granny Street
North Vernon, IN
47265

Website

http://www.grannypunkbuster.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Jennings County's Granny Punkbuster posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share