06/08/2026
State Attorney General Nick Brown wants the conservative U.S. Supreme Court to wade into Washington’s partisan-fueled tiff on the boundaries of legislative districts.
Last Tuesday, he told the high court that it should accept a case contesting the political maps for the state Legislature, then send it back to a lower court to decide if the manner in which the lines were drawn complies with the justices recent ruling in a Louisiana case.
Brown, a Democrat, says his reason isn’t all that complicated.
The decision in Louisiana v. Callais significantly rewrote how the federal Voting Rights Act is applied in redistricting by significantly curtailing the use of race in drawing boundaries.
This transformed the legal landscape compared to early 2024 when U.S. District Court Judge Robert Lasnik approved redrawn maps for Washington legislative districts to enhance the political voice of Latino voters in the Yakima Valley. Later that year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his decision, concluding race was not the predominant factor in shaping the redrawn map.
“When we have a substantial change in the underlying case law that the original decisions were based on we think it’s important that the court follow the current standard and the current precedent,” Brown said in an interview late last week.
“We’re asking them to take the case but we’re not asking the Supreme Court to decide the case,” he said. “We have to make sure that the court here gets it right.”
State Attorney General Nick Brown says it is prudent to have the U.S. Supreme Court involved in Washington's redistricting legal battle.